PAPER 113: GENDER SPECIFIC TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT OUTCOMES: AN ANALYSIS USING PROSPECTIVELY COLLECTED CLINICAL PATIENT DATA

Abstract

Purpose: Gender specific total knee replacement design has been a recently debated controversial topic. The purpose of this study was to investigate the survivor-ship and clinical outcomes of a large primary total knee arthroplasty cohort, specifically assessing any differences between gender groups.

Method: A consecutive cohort of 3817 patients with osteoarthritis, having undergone 5289 primary total knee replacements (3100-female, 2179-male) with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were evaluated. All surgeries were performed at the same institution by one of four surgeons. Pre-operative scores, latest scores, and change in clinical outcome scores (KSCRS, SF12, WOMAC) were compared and tested for significance using the students t-test. Kaplan Meier (K-M) survivor-ship was determined and tested for significance and categorical variables were compared using chi-squared.

Results: Men were significantly taller and heavier than women, while women had significantly higher BMI’s (p< 0.0001). While men had higher raw scores preoperatively, women demonstrated statistically greater improvement (p< 0.019) in all WOMAC domains including pain (29.87 vs. 27.30), joint stiffness (26.78 vs. 24.26), function (27.21 vs. 23.09) and total scores (28.34 vs. 25.09) There were no gender differences in improvements of the SF12 scores. Men demonstrated statistically greater improvement (p< 0.0001) in Knee Society function (22.10 vs. 18.63) and total scores (70.01 vs. 65.42), but not the Knee Society knee score (47.83 vs. 46.64, p=0.084). K-M cumulative survivorship at 10 years was 87.4±.01 for females and 82.9±.014 for males. K-M survivorship distribution was found to be significantly different between gender groups (p< 0.013, Mantel-Cox, Breslow, Tarone-Ware). Revision rates were 10.2% for males and 8.3% for females which was found to be significant by crosstabs with chi-squared (p=0.006).

Conclusion: In this cohort of patients undergoing total knee replacements, women demonstrated statistically greater implant survivorship, statistically greater improvement in WOMAC scores and less improvement in KSCR scores, leading one to question the hypothesis of an inferior clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty that is gender based.