Abstract
Purpose
The pros and cons of general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty has been a long debated topic. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical times, blood loss and transfusion requirements between anesthetic types in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty.
Method
A consecutive series of 1600 THA procedures with complete preoperative and postoperative data were evaluated. Twenty eight percent of procedures were performed with a general anesthetic (GA), 67% with a spinal anesthetic (SP) and 5% with a combination of the two. Outcomes were compared and tested for significance using the Independent Samples Kruskal Wallis or Pearson Chi-Square analysis.
Results
Comparing GA and SP respectively, there was a statistically significant difference in patient age between the groups (age 63.73 14.5 vs 66.6 12.8, p<0.05), but not in ASA scores and distribution, or preoperative hemoglobin levels (131.74 32.5 vs 133.21 28.9). There was a statistically significant difference in length of time proceeding surgical procedure favoring Generals (SP: 35 mins (10 72) vs GA: 30 mins (8 65), p<0.05), however overall time in room was longer in Generals (GA: 132.83 29.0 vs SP: 127.15 22.5). There was a statistically significant difference in discharge hemoglobin favoring Spinals (SP: 97.9 14.2 vs GA: 94.9 16.4, p<0.05), lower transfusion rates (SP: 8.4% vs GA: 14.0%, p<0.05) and shorter length of stay (SP: 4.9 days vs GA: 5.3 days, p<0.05). The patients receiving a combination of anesthetic had a significantly greater length of time prior to proceeding the surgical procedure (43 mins (20 145)) and overall time in room (142.85 27.2) compared to both GA and SP, however were similar in all other outcomes.
Conclusion
In this consecutive series of patients undergoing general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia and a combination for total hip arthroplasty, the general anesthesia cohort demonstrated advantages in statistically significantly shorter time proceeding the surgical procedure, however the overall procedure time was significantly longer. The spinal group had less blood loss and lower transfusion rates and the combination group had statistically longer procedure times compared to both GA and SP.
