Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective blinded randomized control trial was to compare the stem migration of two cemented stem designs using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). This was essentially a safety study in which our hypothesis was that the newer design (CPCS, Smith and Nephew Inc) would demonstrate similar micro-motion to the well-established Exeter (Stryker) design.
Method: Thirty patients were consented and enrolled into a blinded RCT in which 15 patients received a dedicated RSA CPCS stem and 15 patients received a RSA Exeter stem. Both stems are collarless tapered polished cemented stems, the only difference being a slight lateral to medial taper with the CPCS design. Outcome measures were compared (Hip Society Score, WOMAC, SF-12). RSA analysis was conducted immediately postoperatively, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.
Results: No difference was found in any of the outcome measures pre-operatively or postoperatively. At 2 years, stem subsidence for the CPCS stem was approximately half that seen for the Exeter stem (0.565±0.189mm and 0.981±0.209mm respectively, p< 0.0001). In contrast, posterior (internal) rotation of the CPCS was approximately twice that of the Exeter stem (1.496±1.215° and 0.716±0.818° respectively, p=0.221). Other migration patterns were no different between stems.
Conclusion: As expected with this stem design, both stems showed some axial and rotational migration within the cement mantle. The subtle differences in design may explain the differences in migration patterns. Our data suggests that the newer CPCS design should perform well over the long-term.
Correspondence should be addressed to: COA, 4150 Ste. Catherine St. West Suite 360, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada. Email: meetings@canorth.org
