Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 50 of 54
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 4 | Pages 419 - 420
1 Apr 2017
Costa ML Griffin XL Parsons N Dritsaki M Perry D


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 6 | Pages 522 - 524
1 Jun 2024
Kennedy JW Jones JD Meek RMD


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 6 | Pages 372 - 374
8 Jun 2023
Makaram NS Lamb SE Simpson AHRW

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(6):372–374.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 13, Issue 12 | Pages 790 - 792
17 Dec 2024
Mangwani J Brockett C Pegg E

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(12):790–792.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1235 - 1238
1 Dec 2023
Kader DF Jones S Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 6 | Pages 516 - 521
1 Jun 2024
Al-Hourani K Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 6 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Dec 2022
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 311 - 312
5 May 2023
Xu C Liu Y

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):311–312.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 2 | Pages 111 - 113
1 Feb 2024
Howard A Thomas GER Perry DC


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 10 | Pages 654 - 656
16 Oct 2023
Makaram NS Simpson AHRW

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(10):654–656.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1199 - 1202
1 Nov 2024
Watts AC Tennent TD Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1036 - 1038
1 Oct 2024
Tennent TD Watts AC Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 8 | Pages 494 - 496
9 Aug 2023
Clement ND Simpson AHRW

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(8):494–496.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1033 - 1035
1 Oct 2024
Clement ND Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 7 | Pages 642 - 645
1 Jul 2024
Harris IA Sidhu VS MacDessi SJ Solomon M Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 1 | Pages 5 - 8
1 Jan 2023
Im G

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(1):5–8.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 9 | Pages 879 - 883
1 Sep 2024
Kayani B Staats K Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 4 | Pages 210 - 213
1 Apr 2022
Fontalis A Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 1 | Pages 29 - 31
20 Jan 2022
Ma M Tan Z Li W Zhang H Liu Y Yue C


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 1 | Pages 26 - 28
20 Jan 2022
Ma M Tan Z Li W Zhang H Liu Y Yue C


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1443 - 1444
1 Nov 2013
Griffin XL Parsons N Carey Smith R Stengel D Costa ML

The importance for observing the intention-to-treat approach in clinical studies is explained. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1443–4


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 2 | Pages 134 - 136
1 Feb 2021
Im G

The high prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), as well as the current lack of disease-modifying drugs for OA, has provided a rationale for regenerative medicine as a possible treatment modality for OA treatment. In this editorial, the current status of regenerative medicine in OA including stem cells, exosomes, and genes is summarized along with the author’s perspectives. Despite a tremendous interest, so far there is very little evidence proving the efficacy of this modality for clinical application. As symptomatic relief is not sufficient to justify the high cost associated with regenerative medicine, definitive structural improvement that would last for years or decades and obviate or delay the need for joint arthroplasty is essential for regenerative medicine to retain a place among OA treatment methods.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):134–136.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2021
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 12 | Pages 870 - 872
21 Dec 2020
Tsang SJ Simpson AHRW


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 10 | Pages 729 - 730
1 Oct 2020
Clarke SA


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 6 | Pages 658 - 660
1 Jun 2020
Judge A Metcalfe D Whitehouse MR Parsons N Costa M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1179 - 1183
1 Oct 2019
Parsons N Carey-Smith R Dritsaki M Griffin X Metcalfe D Perry D Stengel D Costa M


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 10 | Pages 469 - 471
1 Oct 2019
Evans CH


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1033 - 1034
1 Sep 2019
Rodeo S Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 12 | Pages 604 - 607
1 Dec 2019
Konan S Abdel MP Haddad FS

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1466 - 1468
1 Dec 2019
Ramasamy A Humphrey J Robinson AHN


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 8 | Pages 508 - 510
1 Aug 2018
Horriat S Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 5 | Pages 325 - 326
1 May 2018
Clement ND Deehan DJ


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 10 | Pages 520 - 522
1 Oct 2016
Simpson AHRW Murray IR Duckworth AD


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 12 | Pages 665 - 666
1 Dec 2017
Hamilton DF Giesinger JM Giesinger K


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 150
1 Feb 2017
Costa ML Tutton E Achten J Grant R Slowther AM

Traditionally, informed consent for clinical research involves the patient reading an approved Participant Information Sheet, considering the information presented and having as much time as they need to discuss the study information with their friends and relatives, their clinical care and the research teams. This system works well in the ‘planned’ or ‘elective’ setting. But what happens if the patient requires urgent treatment for an injury or emergency?

This article reviews the legal framework which governs informed consent in the emergency setting, discusses how the approach taken may vary according to the details of the emergency and the treatment required, and reports on the patients’ view of providing consent following a serious injury. We then provide some practical tips for managing the process of informed consent in the context of injuries and emergencies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:147–150.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 4 | Pages 194 - 195
1 Apr 2017
Simpson AHRW Howie CR Norrie J



Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 3 | Pages 92 - 94
1 Mar 2016
Murray IR LaPrade RF


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Jan 2017
Roberts LC Dowd JO Hlavsova A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1425 - 1426
1 Nov 2016
Reed M Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 151
1 Feb 2016
Haddad FS McLawhorn AS

Health economic evaluations potentially provide valuable information to clinicians, health care administrators, and policy makers regarding the financial implications of decisions about the care of patients. The highest quality research should be used to inform decisions that have direct impact on the access to care and the outcome of treatment. However, economic analyses are often complex and use research methods which are relatively unfamiliar to clinicians. Furthermore, health economic data have substantial national, regional, and institutional variability, which can limit the external validity of the results of a study. Therefore, minimum guidelines that aim to standardise the quality and transparency of reporting health economic research have been developed, and instruments are available to assist in the assessment of its quality and the interpretation of results.

The purpose of this editorial is to discuss the principal types of health economic studies, to review the most common instruments for judging the quality of these studies and to describe current reporting guidelines. Recommendations for the submission of these types of studies to The Bone & Joint Journal are provided.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:147–51.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 145 - 146
1 Feb 2016
Haddad FS Zagra L


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 4, Issue 12 | Pages 195 - 197
1 Dec 2015
Simpson AHRW Dave J Ghert M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1575 - 1577
1 Dec 2014
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The extent and depth of routine health care data are growing at an ever-increasing rate, forming huge repositories of information. These repositories can answer a vast array of questions. However, an understanding of the purpose of the dataset used and the quality of the data collected are paramount to determine the reliability of the result obtained.

This Editorial describes the importance of adherence to sound methodological principles in the reporting and publication of research using ‘big’ data, with a suggested reporting framework for future Bone & Joint Journal submissions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1575–7.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 7 | Pages 866 - 867
1 Jul 2013
Parsons N Carey Smith R Griffin XL Stengel D Costa ML


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 6 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2013
Ollivere BJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 5 | Pages 567 - 568
1 May 2014
K. Graham H Narayanan UG


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 3
1 Jan 2013
Costa ML Stengel D Griffin XL Carey Smith R Parsons N


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 2 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Apr 2014
Mauffrey C