Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?

Nick D. Clement; Fares S. Haddad

doi:10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0876

Current issue

Editorial

Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?

Nick D. Clement
Fares S. Haddad

Download PDF

Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?

Clement ND, Haddad FS. Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?. Bone Joint J. 2024;106-B(10):1033-1035. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0876

Clement, Nick D., and Fares S. Haddad. “Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?.” The Bone & Joint Journal, vol. 106-B, no. 10, 2024, pp. 1033-1035., https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0876

Clement, N. D., & Haddad, F. S. (2024). Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?. The Bone & Joint Journal, 106-B(10), 1033-1035. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0876

Clement, N. D. and Haddad, F. S. (2024) “Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?.” The Bone & Joint Journal, 106-B(10), pp. 1033-1035. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0876

Clement, Nick D., and Fares S. Haddad. “Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?.” The Bone & Joint Journal 106-B, no. 10 (2024): 1033-1035. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0876

Clement ND, Haddad FS. Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?. Bone Joint J. 2024 Oct 1;106-B(10):1033-1035. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0876

Copy to clipboard

Mendeley

BibTeX

EndNote

RIS