Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 35
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 311 - 312
5 May 2023
Xu C Liu Y

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):311–312.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 5 | Pages 467 - 470
1 May 2023
McBryde CW Prakash R Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 2 | Pages 189 - 192
1 Feb 2022
Scott CEH Clement ND Davis ET Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1326 - 1327
1 Aug 2021
Craven J Haddad FS Perry DC


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1431 - 1434
1 Nov 2020
Trompeter AJ Furness H Kanakaris NK Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1111 - 1112
14 Sep 2020
Perry DC Costa M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1109 - 1110
14 Sep 2020
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 6 Supple A | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jun 2020
Springer BD Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 12 | Pages 604 - 607
1 Dec 2019
Konan S Abdel MP Haddad FS

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1466 - 1468
1 Dec 2019
Ramasamy A Humphrey J Robinson AHN


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 4 | Pages 1 - 3
1 Aug 2019
Buckley R


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 2 | Pages 121 - 123
1 Feb 2019
Robinson AHN Johnson-Lynn SE Humphrey JA Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2019
Clauss M Breusch SJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1407 - 1408
1 Nov 2018
Simpson AHRW Frost H Norrie J


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 8 | Pages 508 - 510
1 Aug 2018
Horriat S Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 3 | Pages 269 - 270
1 Mar 2018
Rowan FE Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 4 | Pages 417 - 418
1 Apr 2017
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 3 | Pages 289 - 290
1 Mar 2017
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1427 - 1430
1 Nov 2016
Powell JM Rai A Foy M Casey A Dabke H Gibson A Hutton M

Many hospitals do not have a structured process of consent, the attainment of which can often be rather ‘last-minute’ and somewhat chaotic. This is a surprising state of affairs as spinal surgery is a high-risk surgical specialty with potential for expensive litigation claims. More recently, the Montgomery ruling by the United Kingdom Supreme Court has placed the subject of informed consent into the spotlight.

There is a paucity of practical guidance on how a consent process can be achieved in a busy clinical setting. The British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS) has convened a working party to address this need. To our knowledge this is the first example of a national professional body, representing a single surgical specialty, taking such a fundamental initiative.

In a hard-pressed clinical environment, the ability to achieve admission reliably on the day of surgery, in patients at ease with their situation and with little likelihood of late cancellation, will be of great benefit. It will reduce litigation and improve the patient experience.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1427–30.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1011 - 1013
1 Aug 2016
Masters JPM Nanchahal J Costa ML