Surgical training has been greatly affected by the challenges of reduced training opportunities, shortened working hours, and financial pressures. There is an increased need for the use of training system in developing psychomotor skills of the surgical trainee for fracture fixation. The training system was developed to simulate dynamic hip screw fixation. 12 orthopaedic senior house officers performed dynamic hip screw fixation before and after the training on training system. The results were assessed based on the scoring system that included the amount of time taken, accuracy of guide wire placement and the number of exposures requested to complete the procedure. The result shows a significant improvement in amount of time taken, accuracy of fixation and the number of exposures after the training on simulator system. This was statistically significant using paired student t-test (p-value <0.05). Computer navigated training system appears to be a good training tool for young orthopaedic trainees The system has the potential to be used in various other orthopaedic procedures for learning of technical skills aimed at ensuring a smooth escalation in task complexity leading to the better performance of procedures in the operating theatre.
This paper reports the cost of outpatient venous
thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following 388 injuries of the lower
limb requiring immobilisation in our institution, from a total of
7408 new patients presenting between May and November 2011. Prophylaxis
was by either self-administered subcutaneous dalteparin (n = 128)
or oral dabigatran (n = 260). The mean duration of prophylaxis per
patient was 46 days (6 to 168). The total cost (pay and non-pay)
for prophylaxis with dalteparin was £107.54 and with dabigatran
was £143.99. However, five patients in the dalteparin group required
nurse administration (£23 per home visit), increasing the cost of
dalteparin to £1142.54 per patient. The annual cost of VTE prophylaxis
in a busy trauma clinic treating 12 700 new patients (2010/11), would
be
£92 526.33 in the context of an income for trauma of £1.82 million,
which represents 5.3% of the outpatient tariff. Outpatient prophylaxis in a busy trauma clinic is achievable
and affordable in the context of the clinical and financial risks
involved. Cite this article:
A recent meta-analysis for total knee replacement (TKR) undertaken with navigation demonstrated improved accuracy of implant positioning but did not have sufficient evidence on functional outcomes. This meta-analysis evaluates the functional outcomes for TKR with and without navigation. We present a randomized prospective and comparative studies on functional outcomes of TKR with and without navigation were identified. The selected articles were tested for publication bias and heterogeneity. Studies presenting the functional outcomes in terms of knee society score, oxford knee score and HSS scores were included in the study. The data was then aggregated by random-effects modelling after which estimated weighted mean differences for individual functional scores were calculated. Sixty two studies were identified and reviewed independently by two researchers; ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, resulting in 976 cases for the meta-analysis (490 with navigation and 486 without). The mean age of both groups was similar (68 and 69). Results of a meta-analysis are best demonstrated by funnel graphs, forest plot, P values, and confidence intervals. In summary, the weighted mean of difference of KSS score is −0.288, with a p value of 0.867. Moreover, the standard means of difference of Oxford knee score was 0.133, with a P value of 0.257. The HSS scores resulted in a SMD of −0.099 and a ‘p’ value of 0.686. Finally, the range of motion weighted means of difference was 1.428, and a ‘p’ value of 0.228. This meta-analysis demonstrated that there is no statistical advantage to the use of navigation for TKR in terms of functional outcome; the increased positional accuracy does not impart an improved outcome as has been proposed. This is probably due to the tolerances available in the implant positioning. This meta-analysis is providing the early outcomes &
highlighting the necessity of long term studies.
In the studies using SF36, the mean Physical Component Summary (PCS) for the amputation group was 39.76 +/−7.06 and mean Mental Component Summary (MCS) was 52.05+/−3.39. The mean PCS for the reconstruction group was 38.5+/−0.78 and the mean MCS was 50.76 +/− 3.09. The mean physical SIP score for amputation was 13.033 with SEM of 3.048, and the psychological SIP score was 15.953 with SEM of 1.153. The mean Physical SIP for reconstruction was 10.686 with SEM of 1.034 and the psychological SIP was 10.754 with SEM of 0.647. The Unpaired t test was used to compare the outcomes of amputation and reconstruction, studies using SF36 and SIP scores were compared independently. Our results show that physical morbidity in both groups is not significantly influenced by the modality of surgical intervention, but there is a statistically significant difference noted in psychological morbidity, the group with reconstruction being better. These results were consistent in studies using either of the two generic scales namely, SF36 or SIP scores.
Introduction: Surgical training is being greatly affected by the challenges of reduced training opportunities, shortened working hours, and financial pressures. There is thus an increased need for training systems to aid development of psychomotor skills of the surgical trainee. Furthermore, simulation environments can provide a friendlier and less hazardous environment for learning surgical skills. Such simulations may be used to augment training in the operating room (OR) so that trainees acquire key skills in a non-threatening and unhurried environment. Trajectory planning and implementation forms a substantial part of current and future orthopaedic practice. This type of surgery is governed by a basic orthopaedic principle where the placement of a surgical tool at a specific site within a region via a trajectory that is planned from X-ray based 2D images and is governed by 3D anatomical constraints. The accuracy and safety of procedures utilising the basic orthopaedic principle depends on the surgeon’s judgement, experience, ability to integrate images, utilisation of intra-operative X-ray, knowledge of anatomical-biomechanical constraints and eye hand dexterity. With the decrease in training opportunities in OR for the surgical trainee, these skills are developing at a much later stage in training. Several studies have shown a reduction in the number of operations undertaken and a reduction in the level of competence achieved by surgical trainees.
The study is divided into two parts. The initial part of the study involves the use of the conventional CAOSS to train the orthopaedic trainees with no prior exposure of distal locking of femoral nails and the dynamic hip screw. The second part of the study involves the use of modified CAOSS to assess whether the initial training has helped in developing mental navigation skills of using a 2-D image and navigating the drill bit in 3-D space. The scoring system is based on a combination of parameters which include the time taken for centring of the interlocking screw, total exposures taken and the improvement in the position of the tip of the drill bit with each exposure.
The Phantom based Computer assisted orthopaedic surgical system (CAOSS) has been developed collaboratively by the University of Hull and the Hull Royal Infirmary, to assist in operations like dynamic hip screw fixation. Here we present summary of our system. CAOSS comprises a personal computer based computer system, a frame grabber with video feed from a C-arm image intensifier, an optical tracking system and a radiolucent registration phantom which consists of an H arrangement of 21 metal balls. The phantom is held in position by the optically tracked end-effector. Knowing the optical position of the phantom, a registration algorithm calculates the position of C-arm in coordinate space of the optical tracking system. Computer based planning uses an anteroposterior (AP) and lateral image of the fracture. Marks are placed on the 2D projections of femoral shaft, neck and head on the computer screen, which are then used to create 3D surgical plan. The computer then plans a trajectory for the guide wire of DHS. The depth of the drill hole is also calculated. The trajectory is then shown on both AP and lateral images on the screen. CAOSS meets all the requisite of electrical and electromagnetic radiation standards for medical equipment. There has been extensive validation using software simulation, performance evaluation of system components, extensive laboratory trials on plastic bones. The positional accuracy was shown to be within 0.7mm and angular accuracy to be within 0.2°. The system was also validated using Coordinate Measurement Machine. Our system has the unique feature of the registration phantom which provides accurate registration of the fluoroscopic image.
Though the perceived advantages of computer assisted orthopaedic systems (CAOS) have been claimed incessantly over the years, these systems are far from commonplace in most orthopaedic theatres. Here, we present a summary of those very reasons. Health Technology Assessment report elicited no proof of clinical benefits of the Robodoc over conventional procedures. Mazoochian et al were unable to confirm the same accuracy of implant position while using the Caspar. Honl et al found a higher revision and dislocation rate accompanied with longer surgery durations when robotic assisted technology was used. Shortcomings identified in the CT-based navigation systems included an additional CT scan, which represents extra costs for the acquisition as well as additional radiation to the patient. Sistan et al claims that image-free navigational systems in knee arthroplasty do not provide a more reliable means for rotational alignment as compared to traditional techniques. Computer assisted pedicle screw insertion in the spine has also not demonstrated any significant clinical advantages. To date, long term results of computer-guided or robot-assisted implantation of endoprosthetic devices are still lacking. With the unproven long-term clinical and functional results of patients who had computer aided surgery and given the multi-factorial complexities of patient outcome, it is difficult to claim via small scale short term studies that these systems present a significant benefit to the patient or the healthcare providers. Potential benefits of long-term outcome, better implant survival and functional improvement require further investigation and until that information is available this technology must be further developed before its widespread usage can be justified.