A META ANALYSIS OF AMPUTATION VERSUS LIMB SALVAGE IN A MANGLED LOWER LIMB

Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the quality of life in post traumatic amputees in comparison with a limb salvage group, using peer-reviewed studies in these areas.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for studies on lower limb amputation and limb reconstruction following trauma. A manual review of the literature and abstracts was also conducted. Only studies having more than 24 months of follow up, and those using generic scales using physical and psychological parameters (SIP or SF36), were included. Two reviewers performed the search, inclusion, and data extraction independently.

Results: 214 studies were identified after extensive searching, Eleven studies fulfilled all the inclusion criteria, reviewing the outcomes of 1874 patients including 899 cases of amputation and 975 cases of reconstruction. Outcome assessments were based on two generic scales of measurement for quality of life, namely SIP or SF 36.

In the studies using SF36, the mean Physical Component Summary (PCS) for the amputation group was 39.76 +/−7.06 and mean Mental Component Summary (MCS) was 52.05+/−3.39. The mean PCS for the reconstruction group was 38.5+/−0.78 and the mean MCS was 50.76 +/− 3.09. The mean physical SIP score for amputation was 13.033 with SEM of 3.048, and the psychological SIP score was 15.953 with SEM of 1.153. The mean Physical SIP for reconstruction was 10.686 with SEM of 1.034 and the psychological SIP was 10.754 with SEM of 0.647. The Unpaired t test was used to compare the outcomes of amputation and reconstruction, studies using SF36 and SIP scores were compared independently. Our results show that physical morbidity in both groups is not significantly influenced by the modality of surgical intervention, but there is a statistically significant difference noted in psychological morbidity, the group with reconstruction being better. These results were consistent in studies using either of the two generic scales namely, SF36 or SIP scores.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that limb reconstruction in lower limb trauma yields better psychological outcomes without significant difference in physical morbidity compared to amputation.