header advert
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIII | Pages 217 - 217
1 May 2012
Hogg M Molnar R Shidiak L Gillies M
Full Access

A finite element study was carried out to compare the performance of a three-hole locking plate with angled screws to the ‘gold-standard’ four-hole hip plate. Two cases of the three-hole hip plate were examined; (a) three screws and (b) two screws (most proximal and most distal).

A 3D model of the proximal femur was constructed from CT scans. A 3D CAD model of the four-hole hip plate was also created. The three-hole hip plate was then created from the four-hole implant in a way that it was possible to switch between all three models by activating/deactivating sections and/or switching material properties. A single common finite element model was generated, and a static analysis of each model variation was then performed in two steps using ABAQUS/standard. In the first, screws were pre-tensioned up to 150N. In the second, loads corresponding to stair climbing were applied.

Forces in the screws, permitted to change in the second step, were examined and compared. Maximum principal stresses in the bone were also examined, with a focus on the stresses in the bone at the end of the plate in each model. The highest tensile force was in the proximal screw of the three-hole plate with three screws, followed by the most distal screw in the standard four-hole plate. This suggests that the risk of screw pull-out is highest at the proximal screw of the three-hole hip plate with three screws.

A comparison of the forces in the distal screws for all cases shows that the highest tensile force was in the four-hole plate, followed by the three-hole plate with two screws. The lowest was the three-hole plate with three screws, which was in compression at full load. The maximum tensile stresses in the bone at the end of the plate were greatest for the standard four-hole hip plate, followed by the three-hole plate with two screws and then the three-hole plate with three screws. This indicates that the risk of bone fracture at the end of the plate is lowest for the three-hole hip plate with three screws.

The risk of bone fracture is significantly lower for the three-hole hip plate, with either two or three screws, compared to the ‘gold-standard’ four-hole hip plate. This is partially offset by a small increase in the risk of screw pull out (in the proximal rather than the distal screw).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIII | Pages 136 - 136
1 May 2012
Gillies M Hogg M Dabirrahmani D Donohoo S Walter W
Full Access

Squeaking ceramics bearing surfaces have been recently recognised as a problem in total hip arthroplasty. The position of the acetabular cup has been alluded to as a potential cause of the squeaking, along with particular combinations of primary stems and acetabular cups. This study has used the finite element method to investigate the propensity of a new large diameter preassembled ceramic acetabular cup to squeaking due to malpositioning.

A verified three-dimensional FE model of a cadaveric human pelvis was developed which had been CT scanned, and the geometry reconstructed; this was to be used to determine the behaviour of large diameter acetabular cup system with a thin delta ceramic liner in the acetabulum. The model was generated using ABAQUS CAE pre-processing software. The bone model incorporated both the geometry and the materials properties of the bone throughout based on the CT scan. Finite element analysis and bone material assignment was performed using ABAQUS software and a FORTRAN user subroutine. The loading applied simulated edge loading for rising from a chair, heel-strike, toe off and stumbling.

All results of the analysis were used to determine if the liner separated from the shell and if the liner was toggling out of the shell. The results were also examined to see if there was a propensity for the liner to demobilise and vibrate causing a squeaking sound under the prescribed loading regime.

This study indicates that there is a reduction in contact area between the ceramic liner and titanium shell if a patient happens to trip or stumble. However, since the contact between the liner and the shell is not completely lost the propensity for it to squeak is highly unlikely.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIII | Pages 63 - 63
1 May 2012
Dabirrahmani D Hogg M Gillies R Kohan L
Full Access

The Birmingham Hip Mid Head Resection (BMHR) was designed to accommodate patients with lower quality bone in the proximal half of the femoral head. It is a relatively new conservative hip implant with promising early results. Finite element modelling may provide an insight into mid-term results.

A cadaveric femur was CT scanned and 3D geometry of the intact femur constructed. The correctly sized BMHR implants (with and without visual stop) were positioned and these verified by a surgeon; hence constructing the post-operative models. Walking loads were applied and contact surfaces defined.

Stress analyses were performed using the finite element method and contact examined. Also, a strain-adaptive bone remodelling analysis was run using 45% gait hip loading data. Virtual DEXA images were computed and were analysed in seven regions of the bone surrounding the implants.

The BMHR was found to be mechanically stable with all surfaces indicating micromotion less than the critical 150 microns. Stress distribution was similar to the intact femur, with the exception of the head-neck region where some stress/strain shielding occurs. This is mirrored in the bone remodelling results, which show some bone resorption in this region. The visual stop, which is designed to ensure that the stem is not overdriven during implantation, did not affect the stress/strain results; only on a very local scale.

There is minimal data available in the literature regarding conservative hip implants and no data regarding the BMHR. This study is the first to look at the mechanical response of the bone to this implant.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 298 - 298
1 May 2010
Gillies M Kohan L Hogg M Appleyard R
Full Access

Introduction: High ion release along with bone resorption at the bone/implant interface is still a problem, leading to pain, poor function and the possibility of bone fracture. Treatment of a loose implant is not easy and can lead to less than satisfactory revision surgery. The reason for ion release, loosening or periprosthetic fracture of an implant is multifactorial. One factor for ion release that has been reported is inclination angle. Another can be the version angle of the implant and subjecting it to an abnormal loading environment. Few studies have been reported in the literature on hip resurfacing performance based on implant orientation. More studies are required into investigating the use of this predictive technique in orthopaedics to investigate the bearing behaviour and potential ion release due to implant surgical positioning. In this study we modeled a number of different version angles and investigated the contact area, stress and wear characteristics using the finite element method.

Methods: CT scans were used to reconstruct the part of the femur and pelvic geometry. A 3D finite element mesh was created using PATRAN (MSC Software, Santa Ana, CA). The femur loading was taken at peak load position of the gait cycle. The loading was applied to the femur and pelvis was fixed. Material properties were applied using the Hounsfield units from the CT file. Two models were generated, a preoperative and a postoperative state model. The post operative model was reconstructed using the Birmingham Hip Replacement (BHR) system (Smith & Nephew Inc, Memphis, TN). The BHR acetabular cup was oriented at different anteversion angles (5°, 30° & 45° to the saggital plane) to investigate the contact mechanics between the head and cup. Serum ion levels were taken from 12 patients and the change in ion levels over the first 12 month period were analysed statistical to investigate the correlation with anteversion angle. Radiographs from the same patients were analysed to determine the cup anteversion angle using image analysis and edge matching techniques.

Results: The contact areas increased with increasing anteversion angle, 137.3, 165.3 and 169.9mm2 respectively. As a consequence, the contact pressure decreased. The change in ion levels for the patients over the first 12 month period correlated significantly (p< .05) with the anteversion angle using Pearson’s r test.

Discussion: Statistical analysis showed a good Pearson’s correlation of anteversion angle to a change in serum ion levels, 0.867 and 0.734 with p values of 0.001and 0.012 respectively. Acetabular version angle appears to be, at the least, important in determining serum metal ion levels and in evaluating causes of metallosis, the influence of anteversion angle needs to be considered when using metal on metal bearing technology when placing the cup in the acetabulum.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 185 - 185
1 Mar 2010
Dabirrahmani D Hogg M Gillies M
Full Access

Geometric and material changes in the femoral neck following hip resurfacing have been linked to femoral neck fractures.

This study developed a unique method to determine the level of influence of the implant stem on the structural changes in the femoral neck following surgery.

A 3D femur model was generated using CT-images. The finite-element model was meshed using 10-noded tetrahedral elements. An ASR hip-resurfacing component (Depuy International, Leeds) was implanted into the femur in load sensitive position. A strain-adaptive bone-remodelling algorithm was used to determine the bone-remodelling behaviour of the femur over a minimum of 2-year period.

Following the analysis, the material properties and stresses in the neck region were mapped onto a cubic mesh, which simulated a CT stack. Moments of inertia, bending moments and shear was calculated for each slice along the neck of femur. These were compared to the pre-operative model.

Bone mineral density changes in the neck region were observed following implantation due to the changes in moments of inertia, bending moments and shear loading.

A method to determine the effect of implantation on the geometric and densitychanges in the femoral neck following resurfacing was developed. This methodology has shown that implant stem geometry affects the load transfer to the femur and the adaptive behaviour of the femoral neck. This will influence the structural integrity of the femoral neck and the long-term clinical outcome of the hip resurfacing component.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 209 - 209
1 Mar 2010
Gillies M Hogg M Dabirrahmani D Becker S Appleyard R
Full Access

A recurrent fracture rate after vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty is as high as 20%. Biomechanically, it has not been proven that refracture rate is due to the cement stiffness alone. This finite-element study investigated effects of cement-stiffness, bone-quality, cement-volume and height-restoration in treatment of vertebral compression fractures using balloon kyphoplasty.

A finite-element model of the lumbar spine was generated from CT-scans. The model comprised of two functional spinal-units, consisting of L2-L4 vertebral bodies, intervertebral-discs, and spinal ligaments. Cement volumes modelled were in the order of 15% and 30% of total vertebral body (VB) volume. Spinal fracture was modelled as being reduced and height of VB was restored. Kyphoplasty was performed. Three different bone qualities were modelled: healthy, osteopenic, osteoporotic. A compressive load was applied to the proximal endplate of L2. An anterior shift of the centre-of-gravity of upper body was simulated by increasing the moment arm of the applied load.

All results of the analysis were compared back to an intact spinal model of the same region under the same loading regime. All parameters affected the mechanical behaviour of the spine model, although changing the bone quality from normal to osteoporotic resulted in the least change. The cement stiffness was initially modelled with an elastic modulus between 0.5GPa and 2GPa. The results showed small differences relative to intact case in the lower modulus cement. A much higher cement stiffness of 8GPa resulted in larger changes in the stresses. The most significant parameter in this study was found to be the changed load path as a result of partial height restoration. This induced a moment in the construct and increased the stresses and strains in the anterior compartments of each vertebra as well as marked in the adjacent (upper and lower) vertebrae. The factor of safety calculation showed the centre of the L3 vertebra to be the most failure prone in all cases, with the osteoporotic bone models showing higher fracture tendencies.

This study indicates that healthier bone has a better chance of survival. Cement properties with lower cement elastic moduli induce stresses/strains which are more similar to the intact model. The best way to reduce the likelihood of failure is to restore the vertebral height.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 16 - 16
1 Mar 2009
Gillies R Hogg M Kohan L
Full Access

Introduction: Cemented hip resurfacing component orientation may, in part, be associated with femoral neck fracture. Orientation offset may be introduced due to the cement setting prior to achieving a completely seated component. Varus/valgus orientation error may occur due to surgical error or poor instrumentation design. We modeled a number of different orientations and investigated bone mineral density change using the finite element method.

Methods: CT scans were used to reconstruct the femoral geometry and create a finite element model. The boundary conditions applied were hip muscle forces at the 45% position of the gait cycle. Two models were created, a preoperative (reference) and a postoperative (reconstructed) model. The post operative model was reconstructed using the Birmingham Hip Replacement (BHR). Implant offsets and varus/valgus orientations were analysed. The bone mineral density (BMD) changes at nine positions along the superior and inferior aspects of the alignment stem were analyzed.

Results: Results suggest bone loss decreases with increasing offset distances. Femoral offset distance is defined as the perpendicular distance from the center line of the femoral shaft to the center of the femoral head. Greater femoral stem offsets increases the abductor moment arm and this decreases the abductor force need for walking as well as the overall articulating reactive force at the articulating surface. As the BHR orientation deviates away from the an extreme valgus to a more varus position, the volume of bone that will decrease in BMD increases.

Discussion: There is minimal difference between the 1mm and 3mm offsets and their respective bone remodeling volumes. The 5mm offset has a larger bone volume where the BMD will increase; this is due to the larger moment applied to the proximal femur and is not an advisable surgical position as there may be a large density gradient at the mouth of the resurfacing component and could predispose the femoral neck to fracture. There is also not a lot of difference in bone remodeling volume between the extreme valgus, 5° and 10° cases. However, the extreme valgus case does present a “notching” risk. The objective of this study was to implement a consistent theoretical adaptive bone remodelling rule that may, in part, give an understanding as to how a femoral resurfacing component’s orientation would influence and simulate BMD changes in the proximal femur.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 30 - 30
1 Mar 2009
Gillies R Hogg M Donohoo S Schmidt W Racanelli J
Full Access

Introduction: Bone resorption at the bone-implant interface is still a problem, leading to pain, poor function and the possibility of bone fracture. This loss of supporting bone tissue is due to resorption and impaired bone formation. Loosening of an implant is often not clinically or radiographically apparent for 8–10 years. It would be beneficial if these potential failures could be identified early so that revision surgery can be avoided. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of implant material property changes and its influence on the trabecular loading patterns of the underlying supporting bone structure.

Methods: An intact and reconstructed 3D finite element (FE) model of a human femur was developed. The model was generated using PATRAN and CT scans. This was used to determine the stress, strain and interface sliding of a knee implant at heel-strike and stair climbing phases of gait. FE analysis of the model was performed using ABAQUS software. The materials properties of the bone were extracted from the CT data and applied using FORTRAN subroutines. Implant-bone interfaces were simulated using cementless fixation concepts. Sliding contact conditions were applied to simulate the immediate post-operative period.

Results: Three material property cases were analysed, with respect to the intact bone, at 100%, 25% and 2.5% of cobalt chrome’s (CoCr) Youngs modulus. At heel-strike, for the 100% case, higher stress was found at anterior flange while lower stress dominated around the pegs and intercondylar notch. For the 25% case, lower stresses were found in the intercondylar notch and higher stresses above the pegs. For the 2.5% case, stresses resembled that of intact bone, higher stresses were found above the pegs and lower stress in the intercondylar notch. In stair-climbing, for the 100% case, lower stresses were found around the pegs and in the intercondylar notch. For the 25% case, lower stresses were found in the intercondylar notch and higher stresses in areas above the pegs. For the 2.5% case, higher stresses were found at the distal condyles and lower stresses were observed in the intercondylar notch.

Discussion: The analysis presented changes in the trabecular loading and subsequently resulted in stress shielding. The general trend showed that the majority of stress shielding is occurring at the posterior flange and medial condyle while increased trabecular loading occurred at the anterior flange and lateral condyle regions. As the stiffness of the implant decreases from 100% to 25%, the differences in trabecular loading are extremely small. Both these implant material properties are very stiff in comparison to the underlying trabecular bone. However, as CoCr stiffness is decreased to 2.5% this yields a more homogenous stress distribution at the contact interfaces.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 16 - 16
1 Mar 2009
Gillies R Hogg M Donohoo S Kohan L
Full Access

Introduction: The process of impacting cemented hip resurfacing components may, in part, be associated with femoral neck fracture. The impaction process may introduce fractures due to the impact shock wave passing through the bone during the setting of the implant and achieving a completely seated position. The aim of this study was to measure the impaction loads during hip resurfacing surgery and correlate the measured loads to theoretical calculations.

Methods: Following ethical approval 3 patients have been enrolled out of 24 patients in a pilot study. A surgical mallet was manufactured and instrumented with a calibrated impact load cell. During the impaction procedure the impact loads are recorded to a laptop using Labview software. An Excel spreadsheet has been written using the finite difference method to calculate the impact loads based on a mass (hammer, impactor and implant) and spring system (compression only) defining each part of the surgical instrumentation used to impact the resurfacing component onto the femoral head.

Results: Clinically, upto 19 impacts are used to seat the resurfacing implant onto the femoral head. Loads upto 24kN were recorded. The finite difference model was calibrated to the clinical measurements. The Pearson’s R correlation coefficient for the net force on the mallet was 0.91 and for the impulse was 0.98

Discussion: This study has investigated the clinical impaction loads imparted onto an implant during resurfacing surgery and developed a finite difference model of the process. The finite difference approach can be used to better understand the loads applied to not only the implant, but the underlying bone. This may, in part, give the surgeon a better understanding as to whether the bone has been predisposed to fracture following the high impact loads and thereby affecting the long-term integrity of the joint replacement.