A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE RECONSTRUCTED DISTAL FEMUR AND THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLANT MATERIAL PROPERTIES ON THE TRABECULAR LOADING PATTERNS

Abstract

Introduction: Bone resorption at the bone-implant interface is still a problem, leading to pain, poor function and the possibility of bone fracture. This loss of supporting bone tissue is due to resorption and impaired bone formation. Loosening of an implant is often not clinically or radiographically apparent for 8–10 years. It would be beneficial if these potential failures could be identified early so that revision surgery can be avoided. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of implant material property changes and its influence on the trabecular loading patterns of the underlying supporting bone structure.

Methods: An intact and reconstructed 3D finite element (FE) model of a human femur was developed. The model was generated using PATRAN and CT scans. This was used to determine the stress, strain and interface sliding of a knee implant at heel-strike and stair climbing phases of gait. FE analysis of the model was performed using ABAQUS software. The materials properties of the bone were extracted from the CT data and applied using FORTRAN subroutines. Implant-bone interfaces were simulated using cementless fixation concepts. Sliding contact conditions were applied to simulate the immediate post-operative period.

Results: Three material property cases were analysed, with respect to the intact bone, at 100%, 25% and 2.5% of cobalt chrome’s (CoCr) Youngs modulus. At heel-strike, for the 100% case, higher stress was found at anterior flange while lower stress dominated around the pegs and intercondylar notch. For the 25% case, lower stresses were found in the intercondylar notch and higher stresses above the pegs. For the 2.5% case, stresses resembled that of intact bone, higher stresses were found above the pegs and lower stress in the intercondylar notch. In stair-climbing, for the 100% case, lower stresses were found around the pegs and in the intercondylar notch. For the 25% case, lower stresses were found in the intercondylar notch and higher stresses in areas above the pegs. For the 2.5% case, higher stresses were found at the distal condyles and lower stresses were observed in the intercondylar notch.

Discussion: The analysis presented changes in the trabecular loading and subsequently resulted in stress shielding. The general trend showed that the majority of stress shielding is occurring at the posterior flange and medial condyle while increased trabecular loading occurred at the anterior flange and lateral condyle regions. As the stiffness of the implant decreases from 100% to 25%, the differences in trabecular loading are extremely small. Both these implant material properties are very stiff in comparison to the underlying trabecular bone. However, as CoCr stiffness is decreased to 2.5% this yields a more homogenous stress distribution at the contact interfaces.