Femoral neck fractures are the second cause of hospitalization in elderly patients. Nowadays it is still not clear whether surgical treatment may provide better clinical outcome than conservative treatment in patients affected by mental disorders, such as senile dementia. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess mortality and clinical and functional outcome after hemi arthroplasty operation following intracapsular neck fractures in patients with senile dementia. Between 2008 and 2014, 819 patients were treated at our Orthopaedic Institute for neck fracture of the femur (mean age: 83.8 years old). Eighty-four of these showed clear signs of cognitive impairment at time of admission in the Emergency Department. Mental state of patients was assessed in all cases, as routine, at the Emergency Room with the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (Sh-MMT) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Patients were divided in two groups depending whether they were surgically treated with hemiarthroplasty (Group B, 46 patients; 35 females, 11 males; mean age: 88.5 y.o.) or conservatively treated (Group C, 38 patients; 28 females, 10 males; mean age: 79.5 y.o.). These two groups were compared with a matched case-control group of patients surgically treated with no mental disorders (Group A, 40 patients; 34 females, 6 males; mean age: 81.5 y.o.). Incidence of mortality, systemic or local complications and functional clinical outcomes were evaluated with the ADL score and the Barthel index. Mortality rate was 35% (14 patients) for Group A, 50% (21 patients) for Group B and 95% (22 patients) for Group C. Paired t-test, with significance rate set at 0.05, showed significant higher mortality rate in Group A compared to both Group B (p:0.02) and Group C (p:0.001), and also between Group B and Group C (p:0.01). Three orthopaedic complications were found in Group B (two cases of infection and one dislocation of the prosthesis) while none in Group A (p<0.001). There have been 14 overall general complication in Group A (33%), 16 in group B (38%) and 15 in Group C (65%), with significant higher rate in Group B vs. Group A (p:0.02) and in group C vs. Group B (p: 0.001). Activity daily living scale and Barthel Index results showed higher results in Group B than Group C both in terms of recovery of walking ability and daily living (hairdressing, wearing clothes, eating). For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Aims. The new COVID-19 variant was reported by the authorities of the UK to the World Health Organization (WHO) on 14 December 2020. We aim to describe the clinical characteristics and nosocomial infection rates in major trauma and orthopaedic patients comparing the first and second wave of COVID-19 infection. Methods. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected trauma database was reviewed at a level 1 major trauma centre from 1 December 2020 to 18 February 2021 looking at demographics, clinical characteristics, and nosocomial infections and compared to our previously published first wave data (26 January 2020 to 14 April 2020). Results. From 1 December 2020 to 18 February 2021, 522 major trauma patients were identified with a mean age of 54.6 years, and 53.4% (n = 279) were male. Common admissions were falls (318; 60.9%) and road traffic accidents (RTAs; 71 (13.6%); 262 of these patients (50.2%) had surgery. In all, 75 patients (14.4%) tested positive for COVID-19, of which 51 (68%) were nosocomial. Surgery on COVID-19 patients increased to 46 (61.3%) in the second wave compared to 13 (33.3%) in the first wave (p = 0.005). ICU admissions of patients with COVID-19 infection increased from two (5.1%) to 16 (20.5%), respectively (p = 0.024). Second wave mortality was 6.1% (n = 32) compared to first wave of 4.7% (n = 31). Cardiovascular (CV) disease (35.9%; n = 14); p = 0.027) and dementia (17.9%; n = 7); p = 0.030) were less in second wave than the first. Overall, 13 patients (25.5%) were Black, Asian and Minority ethnic (BAME), and five (9.8%) had a BMI > 30 kg/m. 2. The mean time from admission to diagnosis of COVID-19 was 13.9 days (3 to 44). Overall, 12/75 (16%) of all COVID-19 patients died. Conclusion. During the second wave, COVID-19 infected three-times more patients. There were double the number of operative cases, and quadruple the cases of ICU admissions. The patients were younger with less dementia and CV disease with lower mortality. Concomitant COVID-19 and the necessity of major trauma surgery showed 13% mortality in the second wave compared with 15.4% in the first wave. In contrast to the literature, we showed a high percentage of nosocomial infection, normal BMI, and limited BAME infections. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):661–670

Abstract. Background. Dislocation of a hip hemiarthroplasty is a devastating complication with a high mortality rate in elderly patients. Previous studies have suggested a higher dislocation rate in patients with neuromuscular conditions. In this study, we have reviewed our larger cohort of patients to identify whether there is any association between neuromuscular disorders and prosthetic dislocation in patients treated with hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. Patients and Methods. Our study is a retrospective analysis of data collected over 34 years for patients with intracapsular neck of femur fracture who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty. The study population is composed of four groups: patients with no neuromuscular disorders, patients with Parkinson's disease, patients with previous stroke, and patients with dementia. Results. A total of 3827 patients were treated with hip hemiarthroplasty. For the 3371 patients with no neuromuscular condition (Group I) the dislocation rate was 1.1%. 219 patients had Parkinsonism (Group II) with a dislocation rate of 3.2%, 104 patients had a previous stroke with weakness on the fracture side with a dislocation rate of 1.0% (Group III), and 984 patients had severe dementia with a dislocation rate of 1.8% (Group IV). The increased dislocation rate for those with Parkinson's disease was statistically significant (p=0.02) while none of the other neuromuscular conditions were statistically significant. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates an increased risk of dislocation after hemiarthroplasty for patients with Parkinson's disease in comparison to other groups. No increase was apparent for those with dementia or weakness from a previous stroke

Aims. The first death in the UK caused by COVID-19 occurred on 5 March 2020. We aim to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of major trauma and orthopaedic patients admitted in the early COVID-19 era. Methods. A prospective trauma registry was reviewed at a Level 1 Major Trauma Centre. We divided patients into Group A, 40 days prior to 5 March 2020, and into Group B, 40 days after. Results. A total of 657 consecutive trauma and orthopaedic patients were identified with a mean age of 55 years (8 to 98; standard deviation (SD) 22.52) and 393 (59.8%) were males. In all, 344 (approximately 50%) of admissions were major trauma. Group A had 421 patients, decreasing to 236 patients in Group B (36%). Mechanism of injury (MOI) was commonly a fall in 351 (52.4%) patients, but road traffic accidents (RTAs) increased from 56 (13.3%) in group A to 51 (21.6%) in group B (p = 0.030). ICU admissions decreased from 26 (6.2%) in group A to 5 (2.1%) in group B. Overall, 39 patients tested positive for COVID-19 with mean age of 73 years (28 to 98; SD 17.99) and 22 (56.4%) males. Common symptoms were dyspnoea, dry cough, and pyrexia. Of these patients, 27 (69.2%) were nosocomial infections and two (5.1%) of these patients required intensive care unit (ICU) admission with 8/39 mortality (20.5%). Of the patients who died, 50% were older and had underlying comorbidities (hypertension and cardiovascular disease, dementia, arthritis). Conclusion. Trauma admissions decreased in the lockdown phase with an increased incidence of RTAs. Nosocomial infection was common in 27 (69.2%) of those with COVID-19. Symptoms and comorbidities were consistent with previous reports with noted inclusion of dementia and arthritis. The mortality rate of trauma and COVID-19 was 20.5%, mainly in octogenarians, and COVID-19 surgical mortality was 15.4%. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:330–338

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are devastating complications. Our knowledge on hip fractureassociated hemiarthroplasty PJI (HHA-PJI) is limited compared to elective arthroplasty. The goal of this study was to describe the epidemiology, risk factors, management, and outcomes for HHA-PJI. A population-based (465,000) multicentre retrospective analysis of HHAs between 2006-2018 was conducted. PJI was defined by international consensus and treatment success as no return to theatre and survival to 90 days after the initial surgical management of the infection. Univariate, survival and competing risk regression analyses were performed. 1852 HHAs were identified (74% female; age:84±7yrs;90-day-mortality:16.7%). Forty-three (2.3%) patients developed PJI [77±10yrs; 56% female; 90-day-mortality: 20.9%, Hazard-Ratio 1.6 95%CI 1.1-2.3,p=0.023]. The incidence of HHA-PJI was 0.77/100,000/year and 193/100,000/year for HHA. The median time to PJI was 26 (IQR 20-97) days with 53% polymicrobial growth and 41% multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO). Competing risk regression identified younger age [Sub-Hazard-Ratio(SHR) 0.86, 95%CI 0.8-0.92,p<0.001], chronic kidney disease (SHR 3.41 95%CI 1.36-8.56, p=0.01), body mass index>35 (SHR 6.81, 95%CI 2.25-20.65, p<0.001), urinary tract infection (SHR 1.89, 95%CI 1.02-3.5, p=0.04) and dementia (SHR 9.4, 95%CI 2.89-30.58,p<0.001) as significant risk factors for developing HHA-PJI. When infection treatment was successful (n=15, 38%), median survival was 1632 days (IQR 829-2084), as opposed to 215 days (IQR 20-1245) in those who failed, with a 90-day mortality of 30%(n=12). There was no significant difference in success among debridement, excision arthroplasty or revision arthroplasty. HHA PJI is uncommon but highly lethal. All currently identified predictors are non-modifiable. Due to the common polymicrobial and MDRO infections our standard antibiotic prophylaxis may not be adequate HHA-PJI is a different disease compared to elective PJI with distinct epidemiology, pathogens, risk factors and outcomes, which require targeted research specific to this unique population

Currently 180 days is the target maximum wait time set by all Canadian provinces for elective joint replacement surgery. In Nova Scotia however, only 34% of Total Knee Arthroplasties (TKA) and 51% of Total Hip Arthroplasties (THA) met this benchmark in 2017. Surgery performed later in the natural history of disease is shown to have significant impact on pain, function and Health related Quality of Life at the time of surgery and potentially affect post-operative outcomes. The aim of this study is to describe the association between wait time and acute hospital Length of Stay (LOS) during elective hip and knee arthroplasty in province of Nova Scotia. Secondarily we aim to describe risk factors associated with variations in LOS. Data from Patient Access Registry Nova Scotia (PAR-NS) was linked to the hospital Discharge Access Database (DAD) for primary hip and knee arthroplasty spanning 2009 to 2017. There were 23,727 DAD observations and 21,329 PARNS observations identified. Observations were excluded based on missing variables, missing linkages, revision status and emergency cases. Percentage difference in LOS, risk factors and outcomes were analyzed using Poisson regression for those waiting more than 180 days compared to those waiting equal or less than 180 days. For primary TKA, 11,833 observations were identified with mean age of 66 years, mean wait time of 348 days and mean LOS of 3.6 days. After adjusting for controls, patients waiting more than 180 days for elective TKA have a 2.5% longer acute care LOS (p < 0.028). Risk factors identified for prolonged LOS are advanced age, female gender, higher surgical priority indicator, required blood transfusion, dementia, peptic ulcer disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, malignancy, ischemic heart disease and diabetes. Factors associated with decreased LOS are surgical year, use of local anesthetic, peripheral location of hospital and admission to hospital from home. For primary THA, 6626 observations were identified with mean age of 66 years, mean wait time of 267 days and mean LOS of 4 days. Patients waiting more than 180 days for THA did not show a statistically significant association with LOS. Risk factors and protective factors are the same with exception of CVD and use of local anesthetic. Our findings suggest a positive and statistically significant association for patients waiting more than 180 days for TKA and longer acute care LOS. Longer LOS may be due to deteriorating health status while placed on a surgical waitlist and may represent a delayed and indirect cost to the patient and the healthcare system. Ultimately with projected increase in demand for elective joint replacement surgeries, our findings are aimed to inform physicians and policy makers in management of surgical waitlist efficiency and cost effectiveness. For any reader inquiries, please contact . shahriar-s@hotmail.com

We have conducted a case-control study over a period of ten years comparing both deep infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and colonised cases with a control group. Risk factors associated with deep infection were vascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, admission to a high-dependency or an intensive-care unit and open wounds. Those for colonisation were institutional care, vascular diseases and dementia. Older age was a risk factor for any MRSA infection. The length of hospital stay was dramatically increased by deep infection. These risk factors are useful in identifying higher-risk patients who may be more susceptible to MRSA infection. A strategy of early identification and isolation may help to control its spread in trauma units

To progress to a same day surgery program for arthroplasty, it is important that we examine and resolve the issues of why patients stay in the hospital. The number one reason is fear and anxiety of the unknown and of surgical pain. The need for hospital stay is also related to risk arising from comorbidities and medical complications. Patients also need an extended stay to manage the side effects of our treatment, including after effects of narcotics and anaesthesia, blood loss, and surgical trauma. The process begins pre-operatively with an appropriate orthopaedic assessment of the patient and determination of the need for surgery. The orthopaedic team must motivate the patient, and ensure that the expectations of the patient, family and surgeon are aligned. In conjunction with our affiliated hospitalist group that performs almost all pre-admission testing, we have established guidelines for patient selection for outpatient arthroplasty. The outpatient surgical candidate must have failed conservative measures, must have appropriate insurance coverage, and must be functionally independent. Previous or ongoing comorbidities that cannot be optimised for safe outpatient care may include: congestive heart failure, or valve disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or home use of supplemental oxygen; untreated obstructive sleep apnea with a BMI >40 kg/m2; hemodialysis or severely elevated serum creatinine; anemia with hemoglobin <13.0 g/dl; cerebrovascular accident or history of delirium or dementia; and solid organ transplant. Pre-arthroplasty rehabilitation prepares the patient for peri-operative protocols. Patients meet with a physical therapist and are provided with extensive educational materials before surgery to learn the exercises they will need for functional recovery. Enhancement of our peri-operative pain management protocols has resulted in accelerated rehabilitation. The operative intervention must be smooth and efficient, but not hurried. Less invasive approaches and techniques have been shown to decrease pain, reduce length of stay, and improve outcomes, especially in the short term. Between June 2013 and December 2015, 1957 primary knee arthroplasty procedures (1010 total, 947 partial) were performed by the author and his 3 associates at an outpatient surgery center. Seven percent of patients required an overnight stay, with a majority for reasons of convenience related to travel distance or later operative time. Importantly, no one has required overnight stay for pain management. Outpatient arthroplasty is safe, it's better for us and our patients, and it is here now. In an outpatient environment the surgeon actually spends more time with the patients and family in a friendly environment. Patients feel safe and well cared for, and are highly satisfied with their arthroplasty experience

The first case was that of an 89-year-old woman with advanced dementia. After falling onto the left hip, she was admitted to the emergency room. Standard x-rays revealed an unstable intertrochanteric fracture. Closed reduction and internal fixation was performed using the long PFNA with a 105-mm helical blade, the second patient treated with this implant in our series. The operation was performed by an attending surgeon who was experienced with treatment of trochanteric fractures with intramedullary devices. Six weeks later the patient presented again with severe pain after she had fallen onto her left hip for a second time. Follow-up x-rays showed a perforation of the helical blade through the cortex of the femoral head after a shortening of the femoral neck by 2 cm. CCD angle was still 129 degrees, and there were no radiological signs of rotational displacement. The acetabular cartilage appeared intact. At her second operation, a replacement of the blade was performed using a shorter 95-mm implant. Postoperatively the patient was again mobilized under full weight bearing, and at 12 weeks follow-up, we found cut through again, we replaced hip with biopolar hemiarthroplasty

In Alberta there are over 2,700 hip fractures per year costing the health system over $24 million in acute care costs alone. 50% of hip fracture patients have had a prior fragility fracture as a result of underlying osteoporosis (OP) that has never been assessed or appropriately treated. The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) in Alberta aims to improve appropriate osteoporosis care, highlight and address gaps within seniors care through OP management, and provide a geriatric syndrome triage service. The FLS has developed a linkage with the Emergency Department (ED) geriatric team whereby hip fracture patients are identified in ED using a screening tool for geriatric syndromes prior to their surgery, allowing the FLS to follow through on comorbidities likely contributing to falls. An inpatient orthopaedic unit with a dedicated Registered Nurse (RN) and a Care of the Elderly Physician see and assess hip fracture patients after surgery for appropriate osteoporosis management and treatment. Screening tools have been developed to quickly detect underlying dementia and to quantify frailty to determine life expectancy and appropriate osteoporosis therapy. Patients are also referred to Geriatric Assessment Units and fall prevention programs. Patients are then contacted in the community at 3, 6,9,12 months by the FLS RN to follow up on osteoporosis therapy, and arrange other needed tests (i.e. bone mineral density, vitamin D) as needed. Information is sent to their family physician with all results. Prior to the patient's discharge from the FLS at one year, a final hand-over letter from the program will be provided outlining the plan of care for the patient. The FLS launched in June 2015 at the Misericordia hospital in Edmonton, Alberta (with plans to expand provincially). Currently 3 out of 4 hip fracture patients per week are being identified in the ED. Ninety-eight hip fracture patients have been identified post-surgery, with 71 patients eligible for enrollment in the program (five deceased patients). Sixty-six (50%) of those enrolled were discharged on osteoporosis medication compared to 8% prior to the program initiation. Seventeen (26%) of those were new medication starts. Of those not started, 7(11%) was patient choice. 11(31%) will be reassessed at 3 months for appropriate therapy. Nineteen (27%) of patients were referred to other inpatient or outpatient programs (i.e. falls, memory). Three month follow up calls have begun with patients for further data collection and a full 1 year qualitative and quantitative evaluation will be done. The implementation of an FLS with dedicated personnel to proactively manage and treat patients with appropriate investigations and interventions can close the care gap that exists in OP care. It also addresses gaps in senior care and provides appropriate referral to community geriatric programs, to improve quality of life and prevent future fractures

Treatment of trochanteric fractures is associated a high complication rate. This prospective multicenter study evaluates the new Zimmer Cephalomedullary Nail (CMN). Patients over 50 years sustaining a pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric femoral fracture were prospectively enrolled and patients with multiple injuries, pathological fractures or severe dementia were excluded. 101 patients (70% female, 30% male) from 5 different hospitals were prospectively recruited between January 2011 and August 2012. Mean age was 78 (51–98) years and mean Charlson Score was 2.6 (1–6). 65% of the trochanteric fractures were unstable, 35% were stable. There were 4 (5%) minor (3 superficial infections and 1 pain over distal locking screw) and 3 (4%) major (2 lag screw cut out, 1 nail breakage) complications Fracture healing was completed in 27 of 31 patients (87%) after 12 month (3 month: 14/42 (33%); 6 month: 27/39(69%)). The Barthel Index (85, SD 19) and EQ-5-D (0.61, SD 0.30) values reached prefracture level after 6 month. The study population and fracture type were comparable to other studies and complication and early union rates were also comparable. Technical complications were low and early functional results encouraging. Final results of this trial at one year follow up are awaited

Hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral fixation are common procedures performed in trauma units, but there is very little information regarding post-operative pain experience. Pain control is a keystone in the successful management of hip fractures. A sound strategy of pain management is easier to implement in patients where pain levels can be predicted, allowing for an effective balanced analgesic regime. Analysis was performed on patients presenting with a hip fracture in two hospitals. Patients with a diagnosis of dementia were excluded. Post-operative pain scores were taken from patient observation charts using a verbal analogue scale. Post-operative opiate consumption was calculated from inpatient drug charts. 357 patients were included, 205 patients underwent a cemented hemiarthroplasty (HG) and 152 had fixation with a dynamic hip screw (DG). No significant difference was found in the length of hospital stay. HG patients recorded a mean morphine requirement of 20.2mg compared with 40.3mg for the DG group. Although the early pain score difference was significant (p=0.009), after 4 days, the scores were equivalent. This may support the notion of non-surgical factors determining the total length of hospital stay. The reason for the elevated pain scores and higher morphine requirement in the DHS group remains unclear. One theory is the fracture site still exists, and it is possible that pre-existing hip arthritis may continue to be symptomatic. It is important to recognise the difference in pain experienced between the groups and analgesia should be tailored towards the individual, allowing for improved peri-operative surgical care and patient experience

To progress to a same day surgery program for arthroplasty, it is important that we examine and resolve the issues of why patients stay in the hospital. The number one reason is fear and anxiety for the unknown and for surgical pain. The need for hospital stay is also related to risk arising from comorbidities and medical complications. Patients also need an extended stay to manage the side effects of our treatment, including after-effects of narcotics and anesthesia, blood loss, and surgical trauma. The process begins pre-operatively with an appropriate orthopaedic assessment of the patient and determination of the need for surgery. The orthopaedic team must motivate the patient, and ensure that the expectations of the patient, family and surgeon are aligned. In conjunction with our affiliated hospitalist group that performs almost all pre-admission testing, we have established guidelines for patient selection for outpatient arthroplasty. The outpatient surgical candidate must have failed conservative measures, must have appropriate insurance coverage, and must be functionally independent. Previous or ongoing comorbidities that contraindicate the outpatient setting include: cardiac – prior revascularization, congestive heart failure, or valve disease; pulmonary – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or home use of supplemental oxygen; untreated obstructive sleep apnea – BMI >40 kg/m2; renal disease – hemodialysis or severely elevated serum creatinine; gastrointestinal – history or post-operative ileus or chronic hepatic disease; genitourinary – history of urinary retention or severe benign prostatic hyperplasia; hematologic – chronic Coumadin use, coagulopathy, anemia with hemoglobin <13.0 g/dl, or thrombophilia; neurological – history of cerebrovascular accident or history of delirium or dementia; solid organ transplant. Pre-arthroplasty rehabilitation prepares the patient for peri-operative protocols. Patients meet with a physical therapist and are provided with extensive educational materials before surgery to learn the exercises they will need for functional recovery. Enhancement of our peri-operative pain management protocols has resulted in accelerated rehabilitation. The operative intervention must be smooth and efficient, but not hurried. Less invasive approaches and techniques have been shown to decrease pain, reduce length of stay, and improve outcomes, especially in the short term. In 2014, 385 primary partial knee arthroplasty procedures (7 patellofemoral replacement, 13 lateral, and 365 medial) were performed by the author and his 3 associates at an outpatient surgery center. Of those, 348 (95%) went home the same day while 17 (5%) required an overnight stay, with 11 for convenience related to travel distance or later operative time and 6 for medical issues. Outpatient arthroplasty is safe, it's better for us and our patients, and it is here now. In an outpatient environment the surgeon actually spends more time with the patients and family in a friendly environment. Patients feel safe and well cared for, and are highly satisfied with their arthroplasty experience

Purpose. The mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty was designed to increase the contact area with the polyethylene bearing, through the functional range of motion, and subsequently decrease the wear rate previously seen in fixed-bearing implants. In the literature there is no clear clinical advantage between the different designs in the short to mid-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to compare the results between a cruciate retaining mobile-bearing design (SAL II, Sulzer) and two cruciate retaining fixed-bearing designs (AMK, Depuy, and the Genesis II, Smith and Nephew). Method. Ninety patients were randomised to receive either the mobile-bearing or one of the two fixed-bearing designs between 2000 and 2002. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the WOMAC and the SF-12, both of which are validated scores. One patient was withdrawn due to dementia before three months and eleven patients died. Two patients were revised due to infection (both had received the SAL II). One patient was revised for aseptic loosening and one patient was revised for pain (both had received the Genesis II). Of the 74 patients (77 knees) that remain, they were last seen on average 6.4 years (2–10) after their surgery. Their average age at the surgery was 69.2 years (52–81). Results. There was no statistically significant difference between the change scores (postoperative score minus preoperative score) for each of the outcome measures between the mobile-bearing and the two fixed-bearing designs. Conclusion. In conclusion, after mid-term follow-up there is no clinical difference between a cruciate retaining mobile-bearing design and two cruciate retaining fixed-bearing designs

Displaced fractures of the neck of femur are routinely treated in the elderly by either cemented hemiarthoplasty, in the fit, or uncemented hemiarthroplasty, in the less fit. In Scotland the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines are followed to identify which patients should have a cemented prosthesis. This is based on cardiovascular status, and the age and fragility of the patient. An uncemented prosthesis should be a final operation. A peri-prosthetic fracture is considered a failure of treatment as the patient then has to undergo an operation with a far greater surgical insult. We looked at all neck of femur fractures over a period of Jan 2007 to June 2010. The number of the peri-prosthetic fractures for uncemented hip hemiarthroplasties was established and a case note review was carried out. There was 1397 neck of femur fractures. 546 hemiarthroplasties were carried out, of which 183 were cemented, and 363 uncemented. 14 patients (4% of uncemented hemiarthoplasties) had peri-prosthetic fractures. The case notes of these patients were analysed. We found there was a common link of significant cardiovascular risk, lack of falls assessment (only 14% of patients had a completed falls assessment and 35% sustained their fracture during an admission to hospital) and confusion (43% had a degree of dementia that caused significant confusion). Cemented implants should be considered in those who have failed falls assessment, or are confused; even if the cardiovascular risk is significant. This decision should be made in conjunction with a senior anaesthetist. This is being implemented in our unit and a prospective audit is being carried out over the same time period (July 2010 to Dec 2013) to assess the benefit

Introduction. Although the majority of adult distal humeral fractures are successfully treated with ORIF, the management in frail patients, often elderly with multiple co-morbidities and osteoporotic bone, remains controversial. Elbow replacement is frequently recommended if stable internal fixation cannot be achieved, especially in low, displaced, comminuted fractures. The “bag-of-bones” method ie early movement with fragments accepted in their displaced position, is rarely considered as there has been little in the literature since 10 successful cases were reported by Brown & Morgan in 1971 (JBJS 53-B(3):425–428). We present the experience of three units in which conservative management has been actively adopted in selected cases. Methods. 44 distal humeral fractures were initially treated conservatively - 2004–2010. Mean age 73.9 yrs (40–91) and 34 F: 10 M. Clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of 2 years (1–6). Results. There were 18 AO Type A, 7 B and 19 C fractures. The range of elbow movement was extension/flexion 38/124, and pronation/supination 75/76 at their last follow-up. Using the Oxford elbow score (0 = worst/4 best result), the mean pain score was 2.44 (range 1–4), 2.26 (0–4) for function, and 2.04 (0–4) for psycho-social, although several patients had early dementia. Only 5 subsequently underwent replacement out of 44 patients whose residual symptoms have not been sufficient to require surgery. Discussion. We believe that there is a role for initial conservative treatment in selected higher-risk patients, as initial early mobilisation within the limits of discomfort can give good functional results. There is a significant complication rate after fixation or replacement in elderly, frail patients, which includes infection, stiffness and loosening. Unnecessary operations can be avoided in the majority of cases, with replacement of a virgin joint at a later date only if required

Epidemiologic studies project an increase of hip fractures worldwide. They are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly and represent an increasing burden on a country's health service. The aim of the study was to evaluate the mortality of hip fractures admitted to a regional hospital in Australia and calculate the relative risk ratio of morbidity variables on mortality. This retrospective review included all patients admitted from 2003 to 2008 to a regional Queensland hospital with a hip fracture. The relative risk ratio for the probability of death was calculated for the following variables: previous mobility (independent, home with help, nursing home), type of treatment (hemiarthroplasty, ORIF, DHS/Nail, total hip arthroplasty, conservative), ASA, comorbidities (dementia, hypertension, cardiac, respiratory, renal, previous hip fractures, diabetes), pre-operative haemoglobin, BUN ratio, length of stay, operative time, anaesthetic time and type (general, spinal) and, gender. A total of 211 patients (136 female, 75 male) with an average age of 79.1 years were admitted. Seventy-six patients died during the specified interval. The average 30 day mortality was 6.2% and the average time of survival was 318 days. The relative risk of death was above one for the following variables: female gender 1,16; nursing home 1,11; more than 1 comorbidity 1,38; more than 4 comorbidities 1,78; dementia 1,12; diabetes 1,3; hypertension 1,35, previous fractures 1,43; ASA 4 1,5; operating time more than 120 minutes 7,4; length of stay more than 20 days 2,16, BUN ratio>0.1 1,38 and BUN ration<0.04 1,78. This retrospective project identified a number of variables influencing mortality of hip fractures. These results demonstrate that the relative risk substantially increases with length of surgical time, length of hospital stay in excess of 20 days and more than four associated comorbidities

In the revision situation, there are times where larger heads are just not enough to obtain and maintain stability. The two most relevant times that this is the case is in patients with very lax tissues, or in patients with insufficient or absent soft tissues, especially abductor mechanisms. In addition, in cases where a revision is being performed for dislocation and components looked well-positioned, constrained liners have been extremely beneficial in our hands. Constrained acetabular liners have been available for close to two decades. Two basic types of liners are available. The type first developed by Joint Medical Products was the SROM constrained liner which captured the femoral head with a locking ring in the polyethylene. These liners may have better results with larger head sizes because the hip can be taken through a larger range of motion (with larger head sizes) before the locking ring is stressed. The second type of constraining liner was developed by Osteonics (Stryker). It consisted of a tripolar replacement which is constrained by a locking ring in the outer polyethylene of the device. Indications for constrained liners include patients undergoing primary arthroplasty who are low demand and have dementia or hip muscle weakness or spasticity. Indications for constrained liners in the revision situation include cases with previously failed operations for instability, elderly low demand patients with instability, cases with poor or absent hip musculature, and cases with well positioned acetabular and femoral components and with hip instability. In this last scenario we cement the liners into fixed shells. Our results at average 10-year follow-up in 101 hips, demonstrate a 6% failure of the device. Four hips were revised for acetabular loosening and four hips for femoral loosening. One additional hip was revised for acetabular osteolysis. Considering the difficulty of the cases we consider these results to be quite encouraging. At average 3.9 year follow-up of 31 cases where the liner was cemented into the secure shell only one case failed by dislodgement of the liner and one case by fracture of the locking mechanism. Our experience has led to the following technical recommendation: (1) if cementing the component score the liner and make sure it is contained within the shell (2) avoid inserting the liner into a grossly malpositioned shell (3) avoid positioning the elevated rim of the liner into a position where impingement might occur and (4) avoid placing the shell and constrained liner in cases with massive acetabular allografts unless additional fixation, i.e. cages, are utilized. Especially in the elderly, these liners are our components of choice for many pre-operative and intra-operative cases of instability

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of cemented TKR using either oxidized zirconium (oxinium) or cobalt chrome (CoCr) femoral components in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKR. Patients involved in the study received one of each prosthesis, thereby acting as their own control. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the clinical and radiographic outcome between the two prosthetic materials. Forty consecutive patients who were undergoing bilateral Genesis ll TKR consented to participate in the study. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at five days, six weeks and one, two and five years, postoperatively. The outcome measures included the KOOS, Knee Society Score, BOA Patient Satisfaction Scale, and radiographs at six weeks and one, two and five years. In two patients polyethlylene exchange was performed at 56 months from surgery during patellofemoral resurfacing. The four retrieved polyethylene liners were studied for wear with the aid of a stereo zoom microscope and an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Both the patients and the all examiners were blinded as to the prosthesis type throughout the study. Forty patients (80 knees) were included in the study. At five years, three patients were deceased and two had developed senile dementia. No patients were lost to follow up. At five years from surgery the CoCr knee was preferred by 41% of patients compared to 13% who preferred the Oxinium knee (p=0.009). There was no significant difference in range of motion between the two prosthesis at five days, six weeks or one, two and five years. There were also no significant differences between the two prostheses in any of the other variables assessed. The four retrieved polyethylene inserts showed similar patterns of wear in terms of both wear types and patterns under examination with both the stereo zoom and scanning electron microscope with no clear differences between CoCr and Oxinium bearing against the polyethlylene. There was no difference in the grade or incidence of radiographic lucencies between the two prosthesis at five years. At five years after surgery the only significant difference between the Genesis II Oxinium prosthesis and the CoCr prosthesis was a subjective preference for the CoCr prosthesis by a higher proportion of patients. There were no unexpected complications associated with the use the Oxinium femoral implants. In the four retrieved polyethylene liners, no significant differences were identified between the two prosthesis materials in terms of detectable wear type and patterns. Continued follow up of this cohort is planned to establish whether Oxinium femoral implants have an improved survivorship compared to CoCr femoral component in total knee replacement to warrant the additional cost

Aims

Elective surgery has been severely curtailed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is little evidence to guide surgeons in assessing what processes should be put in place to restart elective surgery safely in a time of endemic COVID-19 in the community.