Objective

While the short-stem design is not a new concept, interest has risen with increasing utilization of less invasive techniques. Especially, short stems are easier to insert through the direct anterior approach. In the radiographic evaluation of patients who underwent primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a TaperLoc Microplasty femoral component (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA), cortical hypertrophy was occasionally detected on three-month postoperative radiographs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic changes associated with cortical hypertrophy of the femur three months postoperatively.

INTRODUCTION

Recently, short shaped stem becomes popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Advantages of the short stem are preserving femoral bone stock, thought to be less thigh pain, suitable for minimally invasive THA. However, bony reaction around the short stem has not been well known. The purpose of this study was to compare the two years difference of radiographic change around the standard tapered round stem with the shorter tapered round stem.

Femoral impaction grafting with cancellous bone and cement is an important technique in reconstituting deficient bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. We report the medium to long term results of 75 consecutive patients using a collarless, polished, tapered femoral stem with an average age of 68 (±11.4) years and a mean follow up of 10.5 (±2.4) years (range 6.3 to 14.1 years).

The median Endoklinik pre-operative bone defect score was 3 (IQR: 2–3) with a median subsidence at 1 year of 2mm (IQR: 1–3mm). At the most recent follow-up (mean 10.5±2.4 years), the median Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 80.6 (IQR: 67.6–88.9) and median subsidence 2mm (IQR: 1–4mm). Ten-year survivorship with any further femoral operation as an endpoint was 92%. Four prostheses required further revision.

Subsidence of the Exeter stem continued, albeit at a slower rate after the first year and was related to the Endoklinik pre-operative bone loss (p=0.037). The degree of subsidence at 1 year was a strong predictor of long term subsidence (p<0.001). Neither subsidence nor bone stock were related to long term outcome (HHS). There was a correlation between previous revision surgery and a poor Harris Hip Score (p=0.028) and those who had undergone previous revision surgery for infection had a higher risk of complications (p=0.048).

The good long term results of this technique commend its use in revision hip arthroplasty for patients with poor femoral bone stock.

INTRODUCTION

Corrosion of modular tapers is increasingly recognized as a source of adverse tissue reaction (ALTR) and revision surgery in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The incidence of corrosion and rate of revision for ALTR may differ among different types of implants.

We have prospectively followed up 191 consecutive primary total hip replacements utilising a collarless polished tapered (CPT) femoral stem, implanted in 175 patients between November 1992 and November 1995.

At a mean follow-up of 15.9 years (range 14 – 17.5) 86 patients (95 hips) were still alive (25 men and 61 women) and available for routine follow up. Clinical outcome was determined from a combination of the Harris (HHS) and Oxford (OHS) hip scores. Radiological assessment was with antero-posterior radiographs of both hips and a lateral radiograph of the operated hip. The radiographs were evaluated using well-recognised assessment techniques.

There was no loss to follow up, with clinical data available on all 95 hips. Five patients were too frail to undergo radiographic assessment, therefore radiological assessment was performed on 90 hips (95%). At the latest follow-up, the mean HHS was 78 (range 28 – 100) and the mean OHS was 36 (range 15 – 48). Stems subsided within the cement mantle, with a mean total subsidence of 2.1mm (range 0.4 – 24). Higher grades of heterotopic bone formation were significantly associated with males (p<0.001) and hypertrophic osteoarthritis (p<0.001). Acetabular wear was associated with increased weight (p<0.001) and male sex (p=0.005). Amongst the cohort, only 1 stem (1.1%) has been revised due to aseptic loosening. This patient required reaming of their canal prior to implantation, as a result of a previous femoral osteotomy. The rate of stem revision for any cause was 7.4% (7 stems), of which 4.2% (4 stems) resulted from infection following revision of the acetabular component. Twenty patients (21.1%) required some sort of revision procedure; all except 3 of these resulted from failure of the acetabular component. Cemented cups had a significantly lower revision burden (2.7%) than Harris Galante uncemented components (21.8%) (p<0.001).

The CPT stem continues to provide excellent radiological and clinical outcomes at 15 years following implantation. Its results are consistent with other polished tapered stem designs. Cup failure remains a problem and is related in part to inadequate bearings and biological abnormalities.

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the short stem has become popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The advantages of the short stem are that it preserves femoral bone stock, possibly results in less thigh pain, and is suitable for minimally invasive THA. However, because of the short stem, malposition may happen during surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the stem alignment, which was measured by CT, between the standard tapered round stem and the shorter tapered round stem.

Introduction

The French paradox regarding cemented femoral components has not been resolved, so we compared the mechanical behavior of a French stem, the CMK stem (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA), with a collarless, polished, tapered stem (CPT, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) using an original biomechanical instrument.

Introduction

In cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), proper cement mantle thickness in the femoral canal is still controversial subject. It is widely accepted that the cement mantle around a femoral stem should be at least 2 mm in thickness. But articles from France reported good long-term result with thin cement mantle. It is so called “The French paradox”. We have already reported that the greater compressive force at the cement-bone interface was seen in collarless polished tapered (CPT, Zimmer, USA) stem with thick cement mantle than that with thin cement mantle. However, the stem with thick cement mantle subsided more than with thin mantle. It may have a possibility to cause an early mechanical failure of cemented THA. We compared to stem and cement subsidence in various cement mantles using tantalum ball into cement in this study.

We report the outcome at a minimum of 10 years follow-up for 80 polished tapered stems performed in 53 patients less than 35-years-old with a high risk profile for aseptic loosening. Forty-six prosthesis were inserted for inflammatory hip arthritis and 34 for avascular necrosis. The mean age at surgery was 28 years in the inflammatory arthritis (17–35) and 27 years in the avascular necrosis (15–35) patients. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 years in the inflammatory arthritis group and 14 years in the avascular necrosis group respectively, survivorship of the 80 stems with revision of the femoral component for any reason as an endpoint was 100 % (95 % CI). Re-operation was because of failure of four metal-backed cups, 3 all polyethylene cups and one cementless cup. None of the stems were radiographically loose. All but two femoral components subsided within the cement mantle to a mean of 1.2 mm (0 tot 2.5) at final follow-up. Periarticular osteolysis was noted in 4 femurs in zone 7. This finding was associated with polyethylene wear and was only seen in those hips that needed revision for a metal backed cup loosening. Our findings show that the polished tapered stem has excellent medium-term results when implanted in young patients with high risk factors for aseptic loosening.

The goals of revision total hip on the femoral side are to achieve long term stable fixation, improve quality of life and minimise complications such as intra-operative fracture or dislocation. Ideally these stems will preserve or restore bone stock. Modular titanium stems were first introduced in North America around 2000. They gained popularity as an option for treating Paprosky 3B and 4 defects.

Several studies at our institution have compared modular titanium stems with monoblock cobalt chromium stems. The main outcomes of interest were quality of life. We also looked at complications such as intra-operative fracture and post-operative dislocation. We also compared these 2 stems with respect to restoration or preservation of bone stock. In 2 studies we showed that modular titanium stems gave superior functional outcomes as well as decreased complications compared to a match cohort of monoblock cobalt chromium stems.

As mentioned, one of the initial reasons for introduction of these stems was to address larger femoral defects where failure rates with monoblock cobalt chromium stems were unacceptably high. We followed a group of 65 patients at 5–10 years post revision with a modular fluted titanium stem. Excellent fixation was obtained with no cases of aseptic loosening. However, there were 5 cases of fracture of the modular junction.

Due to concerns of fracture of the modular junction, more recently, at our institution, we have switched to almost 100% monoblock fluted titanium stems. We recently reviewed our first 100 cases of femoral revision with a monoblock stem. Excellent fixation was achieved with no cases of aseptic loosening. Quality of life outcomes were similar to our previous reported series on modular tapered titanium stems.

Both monoblock and modular fluted titanium stems can give excellent fixation and excellent functional outcomes. This leaves a choice for the surgeon. For the low volume revision surgeon modular tapered stems are probably the right choice.

Higher volume surgeons or surgeons very comfortable with performing femoral revision may want to consider monoblock stems. If one is making the switch it would be easiest to start with a simple case. Such a case would be one that can be done with a endofemoral approach. In this approach the greater trochanter is available as the key landmark for reaming. After the surgeon is comfortable with this stem more complex cases can easily be handled with the monoblock stem.

In summary, both modular and monoblock titanium stems are excellent options for femoral revision. As one becomes more familiar with the monoblock stem it can easily become your workhorse for femoral revision. At our institution we introduced a monoblock titanium stem in 2011. It started out at 50% of cases and now it is virtually used in almost 100% of revision cases.

Background

Modular component options can assist the surgeon in addressing complex femoral reconstructions in total hip arthroplasty (THA) by allowing for customization of version control and proximal to distal sizing. Tapered stem fixation has a proven excellent track record in revision THA. Early reports by Cherubino et al. (Surg Technol Int 2010) 65 revision THA with an average follow up of 109 months (range, 76–131) demonstrate satisfactory integration in 100% of cases. Rodriguez et al.(J Arthroplasty 2009) report 96% survival in 102 revision THA at nearly 4 years average follow up. We review the early clinical results of a modular tapered femoral revision system.

The goals of revision total hip on the femoral side are to achieve long term stable fixation, improve quality of life and minimise complications such as intra-operative fracture or dislocation. Ideally these stems will preserve or restore bone stock. Modular titanium stems were first introduced in North America around 2000. They gained popularity as an option for treating Paprosky 3B and 4 defects.

Several studies at our institution have compared the modular titanium stems with monoblock cobalt chromium stems. The main outcomes of interest were quality of life. We also looked at complications such as intra-operative fracture and post-operative dislocation. We also compared these 2 stems with respect to restoration or preservation of bone stock. In 2 studies we showed that modular titanium stems gave superior functional outcomes as well as decreased complications compared to a match cohort of monoblock cobalt chromium stems.

As mentioned one of the initial reasons for introduction of these stems was to address larger femoral defects where failure rates with monoblock cobalt chromium stems were unacceptably high. We followed a group of 65 patients at 5–10 years post-revision with a modular fluted titanium stem. Excellent fixation was obtained with no cases of aseptic loosening. However, there were 5 cases of fracture of the modular junction.

Due to concerns of fracture of the modular junction more recently at our institution we have switched to almost 100% monoblock fluted titanium stems. We recently reviewed our first 100 cases of femoral revision with monoblock stem. Excellent fixation was achieved with no cases of aseptic loosening. Quality of life outcomes were similar to our previous reported series on modular tapered titanium stems.

Both monoblock and modular fluted titanium stems can give excellent fixation and excellent functional outcomes. This leaves a choice for the surgeon. For the low volume revision surgeon modular tapered stems are probably the right choice.

Higher volume surgeons or surgeons very comfortable with performing femoral revision may want to consider monoblock stems. If one is making the switch it would be easiest to start with a simple case. Such a case would be one that can be done with an endofemoral approach. In this the greater trochanter is available as the key landmark for reaming. After the surgeon is comfortable with this stem more complex cases can easily be handled with the monoblock stem.

In summary, both modular and monoblock titanium stems are excellent options for femoral revision. As one becomes more familiar with the monoblock stem it can easily become your workhorse for femoral revision. At our institution we introduced a monoblock titanium stem in 2011. It started out at 50% of cases and now it is virtually used in almost 100% of revision cases.

Background

Recently the taper wedged stems (TWS) are used widely in Japan because of good bone fixation and ease of the procedure. However, it is unclear how TWS get initial fixation in Japanese, especially dysplasia hip or elderly patients who had stovepipe canal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate initial bone fixation of the TWS in Japanese using computed tomography and to estimate biological bone fixation of the TWS using the Tomosynthesis.

Introduction

Cementless tapered wedge stems have shown excellent results over the last decade. Distal potting with inadequate proximal fit, as well as failure to achieve biologic fixation has led to thigh pain, loosening and implant failure. To support a variety of patient morphologies a novel tapered wedge stem was designed with reduced distal morphology, maximizing the proximal contact of the grit blasted surface. The objective of the study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of this stem design.

Background

A stem sitting proud (SP) or that above the final rasp position remains in some patients who undergo hip replacement using proximally coated tapered wedge stems. Surgeons may face challenges providing the best fit due to unpredictable stem seating. Zimmer Inc. introduced a new rasp to solve this issue but the clinical results of this rasp have not yet been published. Therefore, we aimed to address the following: 1) What is SP incidence using a proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stem? 2) Does the new rasp system improve seating height? 3) What are the risk factors of SP?

Introduction

Dysplastic hip has not only deficiency of acetabulum but also femoral deformity. Therefore, selection of stem is important in cementless THA for dysplasia. Especially using of short stem should be challenge for deformed femur. We studied clinical performance and radiological findings after THA with triple tapered short stem (Optimys hip) for dysplastic hip.

Cementless stem fixation is a widely used method of stem revision in North America and elsewhere in the world. There is abundant literature in its support. Most of the reports from 1985 to 2005 related to proximally or extensively porocoated designs, the former falling into disfavor with time because of unpredictable outcomes. With few exceptions (eg S-ROM) the modularity of these designs was limited to the head/neck junction. But this generation of designs was associated with some issues such as insertional fractures, limited control of anteversion (and risk of dislocation), limited applicability in the setting of severe bone loss (Paprosky Type 4 osteolysis or Vancouver Type B3 periprosthetic fracture), as well as ongoing concern relating to severe proximal stress shielding.

In the past decade we have seen the mounting use of a new design concept: tapered fluted titanium stems (TFTS), which incorporate the advantages of titanium (for less flexural rigidity), conical taper (for vertical taper-lock stability), longitudinal ribs and flutes (for rotational stability), and surface preparation which attracts bone on growth for long term fixation.

Four consecutive reports from our center have documented the superiority of the TFTS in our hands, with encouraging outcomes even when dealing with severe bone loss or periprosthetic fractures. There is an increasing body of other literature which reports a similar experience. Furthermore, with increasing experience and confidence in this design, we now use a monoblock or non-modular design in greater than 95% of cases in which a TFTS is indicated at our center. This circumvents the potential drawbacks of stem modularity, including taper corrosion and taper junction fracture.

Introduction

Although total hip replacement (THR) has been described as the operation of the century, there is still room for improvement. There is therefore continued effort for advanced implants and bearing surfaces, moreover so, for the younger patient with a longer life expectancy and increased needs.

Introduction

Bi-Metric® cementless primary stem is tapered, rounded conical shaped and coated with plasma spray porous to one-third from the proximal. Fixation is achieved by a press-fit insertion in the Metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. From 1986 until now, nearly 700 Bi-Metric® stems have been implanted at our hospital. The purpose of this study was to present the clinical and radiological findings including a survival analysis of a consecutive Bi-Metric® stems series followed for over 10 years.

INTRODUCTION

Immediate post-operative stability of a cementless hip design is one of the key factors for osseointegration and therefore long-term success [1]. This study compared the initial stability of a novel, shortened, hip stem to a predicate standard tapered wedge stem design with good, long-term, clinical history. The novel stem is a shortened, flat tapered wedge stem design with a shape that was based on a bone morphology study of 556 CT scans to better fit a wide array of bone types [2].