Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

CORROSION OF THE MORSE TAPER RESULTS IN A HIGHER RATE OF REVISION FOR A BROACH ONLY TAPERED STEM IN PRIMARY THA

The International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA), 28th Annual Congress, 2015. PART 4.



Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Corrosion of modular tapers is increasingly recognized as a source of adverse tissue reaction (ALTR) and revision surgery in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The incidence of corrosion and rate of revision for ALTR may differ among different types of implants.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine if a difference exists in rate of THA revision for corrosion and ALTR with tapered broach only stems compared to ream-broach femoral stems.

METHODS

We reviewed the results of 3741 primary THA performed over a 5 year period at our institution using 2 different implants by the same manufacturer, a tapered proximally coated cementless titanium stem inserted via a broach only technique (Group A) and dual tapered proximally coated cementless titanium stem inserted via a ream and broach technique (Group B).

RESULTS

Of 1567 THA in group A, 964 were combined with a chrome cobalt metal head, while 603 were ceramic. Of 2174 THA in group B, 1302 were metal and 872 were ceramic. Head sizes used were similar between groups. The same polyethylene was used in all THA. At a minimum follow-up of 2 years and average follow-up of 5 years, the overall revision rate for all causes was 3.1% in group A and 1.4% in group B. There were 29 revisions for ALTR due to corrosion of the morse taper junction in group A (3.4%) and 0 in group B. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated no relationship between revision for corrosion/ALTR and age, gender, stem size, stem offset and head size. A significant relationship was identified between revision and head length, with an increased rate of revision among longer head lengths. There were no revisions for corrosion, ALTR or unexplained pain among patients receiving ceramic heads in either group.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant difference in the rate of revision for corrosion and adverse tissue reaction encountered with the use of stem A when compared to stem B. The stem geometry, taper geometry and exact metallurgy of these femoral components likely influences the incidence and severity of taper corrosion, however, more research is required to identify the exact contributions of these factors.


*Email: