Abstract
Background
A stem sitting proud (SP) or that above the final rasp position remains in some patients who undergo hip replacement using proximally coated tapered wedge stems. Surgeons may face challenges providing the best fit due to unpredictable stem seating. Zimmer Inc. introduced a new rasp to solve this issue but the clinical results of this rasp have not yet been published. Therefore, we aimed to address the following: 1) What is SP incidence using a proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stem? 2) Does the new rasp system improve seating height? 3) What are the risk factors of SP?
Methods
We performed a retrospective study with 338 hips, in which Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem (BPS) was used in 181 and M/L Taper stem was used in 157 hips (82 hips before and 75 hips after the new rasp). A positive stem SP was defined as a stem proud height of >2 mm. We analyzed and compared SP incidence in two stems and in M/L Taper stems before and after the new rasp use.
Results
Statistical differences were found across mean age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and Dorr type between the Tri-Lock BPS and M/L Taper stem groups (P < 0.05); however, no significant difference was found within the M/L Taper groups before and after the 0-mm Rasp use. The sitting proud incidence of the stem was 13% (23/181 hips) with a mean height of 3.0 mm (range: 2.1–4.3 mm) in Tri-Lock BPS and was 15% (12/82 hips) in M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm Rasp use with a mean height of 2.8 mm (range: 2.1–4.0 mm). After the 0-mm Rasp use, only 4% (3/75 hips) showed stem sitting proud with a mean height of 2.2 mm (range: 2.1–2.5 mm). There was no significant difference in the sitting proud incidence between the Tri-Lock BPS and M/L Taper stem groups; however, the sitting proud incidence with M/L Taper stem substantially decreased after the 0-mm Rasp use (P = 0.024). According to the results of the univariate analysis, stem sitting proud was significantly higher at high offset (19%) than at standard offset (8%) in the Tri-Lock BPS system (P < 0.043). In the M/L Taper stem, however, there were no significant differences across all variables, including stem offset, between the stem sitting proud and non-proud groups (Tables 3 and 4). Regarding preoperative diagnosis, the sitting proud incidence was lower in fragility fractures in patients aged ≥50 years (0/18 hips) than in other diagnoses (12/64 hips) using M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm Rasp use, but this result was not statistically significant. When multiple logistic regression analysis was performed, the significant risk factor for stem sitting proud was use of the high offset option in Tri-Lock BPS (P = 0.048; OR = 2.474; 95% CI, 1.009–6.063). There was no substantial difference in the sitting proud incidence between the case groups, each consisting of 30 cases. Regarding femoral head offset, short offset was more frequently used in the stem proud group (13% in Tri-Lock BPS and 58% in M/L Taper stem) than in the non-proud group (4% in Tri-Lock BPS and 21% in M/L Taper stem), and there was a significant difference in M/L Taper stem (P = 0.013). The mean postoperative LLD was 3.0 ± 2.9 mm in Tri-Lock BPS, 3.6 ± 3.2 mm in M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm Rasp use, and 2.7 ± 2.3 mm in M/L Taper stem after the 0-mm Rasp use. There was no significant difference in the mean postoperative LLD between the stem proud and non-proud groups regardless of stem type. At a minimum 6-month follow-up, there was no measurable stem subsidence across all cases.
Conclusions
The proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stems are associated with potential problems related to stem sitting proud. The newly developed 0-mm Rasp of M/L Taper stem showed significant improvement in initial seating height compared with the conventional rasp system without postoperative stem subsidence. The use of high offset Tri-Lock BPS stem was the only risk factor for stem proud, but its clinical significance remains unknown. Therefore, large-scale multicenter studies should be conducted to determine relevant risk factors for sitting proud of these stems using a conventional rasp system.
For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
