Introduction. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is a rare condition characterised by bony pain and swelling which may be initially mistaken for bacterial osteomyelitis. The episodic course of the disease may confound the diagnosis and potentially be mistaken for a partial response to antimicrobial therapy. It is an orphan disease and consequently results in many unclear aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow up for patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate a national tertiary centre's experience with the clinical condition and present one of the largest cohorts to date, emphasizing the vast array of clinical spectrum, course and response to treatment. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated all children identified with CRMO from the period 2000–2022 within Wales. Demographic data and clinical parameters were selectively identified through the utilisation of a national clinical platform (Welsh Clinical Portal). The diagnosis was based on clinical findings, radiological images, histopathological and microbiological studies. Results. A total of 21 patients were identified as suitable for inclusion. The mean age of diagnosis was 9.4 ±2 years. The age range of children being diagnosed was 6–14 years. Of the 21 patients, only 2 reported feeling unwell prior to their first presentation with generalized coryzal illness reported. The most common presenting site for CRMO was knee (33%) followed by back pain (28%). 19% of the included cases at initial presentation had localised warmth and had nocturnal pain. 4 of the patients went on to have dermatological conditions of which psoriasis was the most common (14%). Bilateral symptoms developed in 38% of the included patients. Biochemical investigations revealed only 19% of patients had a raised C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate whilst 9/21 patients went on to have a bone biopsy to aid diagnosis. 100% of patients had MRI whilst whole body MRI was utilised in 8/21 patients. NSAID's were utilised for 81%, Pamidronate for 33% and methotrexate for 14%. Biologics were utilised for a further 24% of the total population in failed medical therapy. Surgical intervention was utilised for a single individual in this cohort of patients in the form of posterior spinal stabilisation. The most common referring speciality for these patients was
Background. Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common debilitating condition, treated across multiple health disciplines including Orthopaedics, Physiotherapy, and
Background. BOA Guidelines recommend clinical and radiological follow-up after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at 1 and 5 years, and every 5 years thereafter to detect asymptomatic failure and allow early intervention. As revision surgery in asymptomatic patients is rare the need for routine follow-up in well-functioning individuals has recently been questioned. To evaluate the role of routine follow-up out-patient appointments (OPA) in identifying failing implants the modes of presentation for patients undergoing revision THA were reviewed. Methods. 176 patients who received 183 revision THAs (2003–2010) were identified from an arthroplasty database. 124 patients who received 131 first time revision THAs after primary cemented total hip arthroplasty met inclusion criteria. Retrospective notes review was performed to investigate symptoms at failure and mode of presentation. Results. Most patients were seen as referrals from other specialities. Only 25% were detected via routine follow-up OPAs. The mode of initial presentation was GP 60%, routine orthopaedic OPA 25%, A&E 9%, hospital inpatient 4%,
To describe the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes related to COVID-19 infection following corticosteroid injections (CSI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. To describe the incidence of positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, positive SARS-COV2 IgG antibody testing or positive imaging findings following CSI at our institution during the COVID-19 pandemic. A retrospective observational study was undertaken of consecutive patients who had CSI in our local hospitals between 1 February and 30June 2020. Electronic patient medical records (EPR) and radiology information system (RIS) database were reviewed. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, SARS-COV2 IgG antibody testing, radiological investigations, patient management, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Lung findings were categorized according to the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) guidelines. Reference was made to the incidence of lab-confirmed COVID-19 cases in our region.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study is to report the 30 day COVID-19 related morbidity and mortality of patients assessed as SARS-CoV-2 negative who underwent emergency or urgent orthopaedic surgery in the NHS during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. A retrospective, single centre, observational cohort study of all patients undergoing surgery between 17 March 2020 and 3May 2020 was performed. Outcomes were stratified by British Orthopaedic Association COVID-19 Patient Risk Assessment Tool. Patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive at the time of surgery were excluded.Introduction
Method
We evaluated the top 13 journals in trauma and
orthopaedics by impact factor and looked at the longer-term effect regarding
citations of their papers. All 4951 papers published in these journals during 2007 and 2008
were reviewed and categorised by their type, subspecialty and super-specialty.
All citations indexed through Google Scholar were reviewed to establish
the rate of citation per paper at two, four and five years post-publication.
The top five journals published a total of 1986 papers. Only three
(0.15%) were on operative orthopaedic surgery and none were on trauma.
Most (n = 1084, 54.5%) were about experimental basic science. Surgical
papers had a lower rate of citation (2.18) at two years than basic science
or clinical medical papers (4.68). However, by four years the rates
were similar (26.57 for surgery, 30.35 for basic science/medical),
which suggests that there is a considerable time lag before clinical
surgical research has an impact. We conclude that high impact journals do not address clinical
research in surgery and when they do, there is a delay before such
papers are cited. We suggest that a rate of citation at five years
post-publication might be a more appropriate indicator of importance
for papers in our specialty. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to review the role
of clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery. A total of two
electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from inception
to September 2013 with no language restrictions. Articles related
to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), research networks and orthopaedic
research, were identified and reviewed. The usefulness of trainee-led
research collaborations is reported and our knowledge of current
clinical trial infrastructure further supplements the review. Searching
yielded 818 titles and abstracts, of which 12 were suitable for
this review. Results are summarised and presented narratively under
the following headings: 1) identifying clinically relevant research
questions; 2) education and training; 3) conduct of multicentre
RCTs and 4) dissemination and adoption of trial results. This review
confirms growing international awareness of the important role research
networks play in supporting trials in orthopaedic surgery. Multidisciplinary
collaboration and adequate investment in trial infrastructure are crucial
for successful delivery of RCTs. Cite this article: