Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 7 - 7
3 Mar 2023
Hughes I May J Carpenter C
Full Access

Introduction. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is a rare condition characterised by bony pain and swelling which may be initially mistaken for bacterial osteomyelitis. The episodic course of the disease may confound the diagnosis and potentially be mistaken for a partial response to antimicrobial therapy. It is an orphan disease and consequently results in many unclear aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow up for patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate a national tertiary centre's experience with the clinical condition and present one of the largest cohorts to date, emphasizing the vast array of clinical spectrum, course and response to treatment. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated all children identified with CRMO from the period 2000–2022 within Wales. Demographic data and clinical parameters were selectively identified through the utilisation of a national clinical platform (Welsh Clinical Portal). The diagnosis was based on clinical findings, radiological images, histopathological and microbiological studies. Results. A total of 21 patients were identified as suitable for inclusion. The mean age of diagnosis was 9.4 ±2 years. The age range of children being diagnosed was 6–14 years. Of the 21 patients, only 2 reported feeling unwell prior to their first presentation with generalized coryzal illness reported. The most common presenting site for CRMO was knee (33%) followed by back pain (28%). 19% of the included cases at initial presentation had localised warmth and had nocturnal pain. 4 of the patients went on to have dermatological conditions of which psoriasis was the most common (14%). Bilateral symptoms developed in 38% of the included patients. Biochemical investigations revealed only 19% of patients had a raised C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate whilst 9/21 patients went on to have a bone biopsy to aid diagnosis. 100% of patients had MRI whilst whole body MRI was utilised in 8/21 patients. NSAID's were utilised for 81%, Pamidronate for 33% and methotrexate for 14%. Biologics were utilised for a further 24% of the total population in failed medical therapy. Surgical intervention was utilised for a single individual in this cohort of patients in the form of posterior spinal stabilisation. The most common referring speciality for these patients was Rheumatology (71%) followed by Orthopaedics (33%). Discussion. CRMO represents a challenging diagnosis to make with such varied clinical and biochemical presentations for this condition. The absence of diagnostic Radiological features on X-ray could argue over early MRI imaging. The utilisation of whole body-MRI can now identify multifocal disease burden which may facilitate a timely diagnosis and ensure that effective medical treatment is started promptly without delay. This study is the largest cohort of CRMO patients conducted in this country. Future work will serve to build upon a framework and national referral pathway so that these patients can be seen by the appropriate specialist in a timely manner


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 132 - 132
1 Jan 2016
Watts A Williams B Krishnan J Wilson C
Full Access

Background. Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common debilitating condition, treated across multiple health disciplines including Orthopaedics, Physiotherapy, and Rheumatology. There is little consistency in diagnostic criteria with ‘Shoulder impingement syndrome’ being used for a broad spectrum of complex pathologies. We assessed patterns in diagnostic procedures for SIS across multiple disciplines. Methods. This is a systematic review of electronic databases MEDLINE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL five years of publications, January 2009 - January 2014. Search terms for SIS included subacromial impingement syndrome, subacromial bursitis. Searches were delimited to articles written in English. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, data was then extracted by one reviewer and twenty percent of the extraction was independently assessed by the co-reviewer. Studies included were intervention studies examining individuals diagnosed with SIS and we were interested in the process and method used for the diagnosis. Results. The search strategy yielded 3339 articles of which 1931 were duplicates. A further 1260 were excluded based on relevance obtained from title/abstract. A total of 148 articles were identified investigating SIS across thirty different journals internationally. Fourteen different health disciplines have investigated twenty-five different surgical and conservative treatments. Studies document their diagnostic approach, reporting on duration of symptoms, medical history, physical examination tests and radiological investigations. Duration of symptoms for inclusion ranged from a minimum of 2 weeks to 18 months where the median duration of symptoms is 3 months observed in 46 percent of the studies. Commonly used physical tests were Neer's test, Hawkins-Kennedy test, Jobe and Yocum, and a further eight tests identified. Neer's test or Hawkins-Kennedy tests were individually used in 72 percent of studies. Thirty of the studies used more than one and up to six physical tests per study to determine the presence of impingement. Radiological investigations were reported in twenty-eight studies, sixteen of these required more than one radiological investigation to confirm the diagnosis of SIS. Comparisons between disciplines identify important differences in diagnostic criteria used by different health professionals. Conclusions. This study highlights the variety of diagnostic methods which are currently used between health disciplines and will be a useful comparative tool for clinicians. Diagnostic transparency is pertinent for shoulder impingement syndrome to ensure all disciplines are treating the same pathology and importantly to contribute to our understanding of the common pathology


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 176 - 176
1 Sep 2012
Silverwood R Lawton R Barnett K Finlayson D
Full Access

Background. BOA Guidelines recommend clinical and radiological follow-up after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at 1 and 5 years, and every 5 years thereafter to detect asymptomatic failure and allow early intervention. As revision surgery in asymptomatic patients is rare the need for routine follow-up in well-functioning individuals has recently been questioned. To evaluate the role of routine follow-up out-patient appointments (OPA) in identifying failing implants the modes of presentation for patients undergoing revision THA were reviewed. Methods. 176 patients who received 183 revision THAs (2003–2010) were identified from an arthroplasty database. 124 patients who received 131 first time revision THAs after primary cemented total hip arthroplasty met inclusion criteria. Retrospective notes review was performed to investigate symptoms at failure and mode of presentation. Results. Most patients were seen as referrals from other specialities. Only 25% were detected via routine follow-up OPAs. The mode of initial presentation was GP 60%, routine orthopaedic OPA 25%, A&E 9%, hospital inpatient 4%, rheumatology 2%. No patients were asymptomatic. Predominant symptoms were pain 99%, impaired mobility 80%, limp 44%, stiffness 25%, night pain 22%, systemic symptoms 8%. Estimated minimum cost of routine OPA was £35. For the 377 primary THRs performed in 2009 the saving at one year with discharge after 3months would be £13149. Assuming mean 15 year survival £52780 would be saved over the cohort lifespan. Conclusions. Following uncomplicated primary cemented THA with our combination of polished tapered stem and flanged cup failure is unlikely to occur without symptoms. Symptomatic patients present mainly via their GP and other specialities and are mostly seen as new or re-referrals rather than being detected via routine OPAs. With appropriate advice, discharge after the earliest clinic when the patient has returned to full normal activities is potentially safe and could lead to significant savings


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 9 | Pages 605 - 611
28 Sep 2020
McKean D Chung SL Fairhead R Bannister O Magliano M Papanikitas J Wong N Hughes R

Aims

To describe the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes related to COVID-19 infection following corticosteroid injections (CSI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. To describe the incidence of positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, positive SARS-COV2 IgG antibody testing or positive imaging findings following CSI at our institution during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was undertaken of consecutive patients who had CSI in our local hospitals between 1 February and 30June 2020. Electronic patient medical records (EPR) and radiology information system (RIS) database were reviewed. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, SARS-COV2 IgG antibody testing, radiological investigations, patient management, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Lung findings were categorized according to the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) guidelines. Reference was made to the incidence of lab-confirmed COVID-19 cases in our region.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 8 | Pages 474 - 480
10 Aug 2020
Price A Shearman AD Hamilton TW Alvand A Kendrick B

Introduction

The aim of this study is to report the 30 day COVID-19 related morbidity and mortality of patients assessed as SARS-CoV-2 negative who underwent emergency or urgent orthopaedic surgery in the NHS during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method

A retrospective, single centre, observational cohort study of all patients undergoing surgery between 17 March 2020 and 3May 2020 was performed. Outcomes were stratified by British Orthopaedic Association COVID-19 Patient Risk Assessment Tool. Patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive at the time of surgery were excluded.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 3, Issue 5 | Pages 169 - 174
1 May 2014
Rangan A Jefferson L Baker P Cook L

The aim of this study was to review the role of clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery. A total of two electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from inception to September 2013 with no language restrictions. Articles related to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), research networks and orthopaedic research, were identified and reviewed. The usefulness of trainee-led research collaborations is reported and our knowledge of current clinical trial infrastructure further supplements the review. Searching yielded 818 titles and abstracts, of which 12 were suitable for this review. Results are summarised and presented narratively under the following headings: 1) identifying clinically relevant research questions; 2) education and training; 3) conduct of multicentre RCTs and 4) dissemination and adoption of trial results. This review confirms growing international awareness of the important role research networks play in supporting trials in orthopaedic surgery. Multidisciplinary collaboration and adequate investment in trial infrastructure are crucial for successful delivery of RCTs.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:169–74.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 3 | Pages 414 - 419
1 Mar 2014
Kodumuri P Ollivere B Holley J Moran CG

We evaluated the top 13 journals in trauma and orthopaedics by impact factor and looked at the longer-term effect regarding citations of their papers.

All 4951 papers published in these journals during 2007 and 2008 were reviewed and categorised by their type, subspecialty and super-specialty. All citations indexed through Google Scholar were reviewed to establish the rate of citation per paper at two, four and five years post-publication. The top five journals published a total of 1986 papers. Only three (0.15%) were on operative orthopaedic surgery and none were on trauma. Most (n = 1084, 54.5%) were about experimental basic science. Surgical papers had a lower rate of citation (2.18) at two years than basic science or clinical medical papers (4.68). However, by four years the rates were similar (26.57 for surgery, 30.35 for basic science/medical), which suggests that there is a considerable time lag before clinical surgical research has an impact.

We conclude that high impact journals do not address clinical research in surgery and when they do, there is a delay before such papers are cited. We suggest that a rate of citation at five years post-publication might be a more appropriate indicator of importance for papers in our specialty.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:414–19.