This prospective Randomised Controlled Trial compared two surgical approaches with respect to accuracy of guidewire and tibial nail position. Sixty-seven patients with tibial fractures were randomised to semi-extended (SE) or standard (S) approaches of nail insertion. Fluoroscopy was performed at guidewire insertion and final nail position. The SE approach is more proximal with the guidewire inserted posterior to the patella, theoretically allowing a better angle for more accurate nail placement. Measurements were taken in the Anteroposterior and lateral planes of both the nail and guidewire to determine deviation from the optimal angle of insertion (relative to the long axes of the tibial shaft). Thirty-nine and twenty-eight patients were treated with semiextended and standard approaches respectively. The semiextended approach resulted in improved nail placement to statistical significance in both planes, with mean deviation from the optimal angle of insertion as below:. Guidewire AP 3.2° (SE) versus 4° (S) Lateral 27.1° (SE) versus 30.2° (S). Nail AP 2.4° (SE) versus 4.2° (S) Lateral 17.9° (SE) versus 21.8° (S). Poor positioning of the guidewire leads to excessive anterior placement of the nail by eccentric reaming. Anterior positioning of the guidewire and nail in the lateral plane was assessed. This was expressed as a percentage from the anterior cortex of the tibia. Guidewire: Lateral 9.7% (SE) versus 9.3% (S). Nail: Lateral 23.4% (SE) 19.3% (S) (p 0.043). Semiextended nailing allows a better angle for guidewire placement and a more optimal final nail position. This facilitates accurate nail placement particularly in difficult proximal third fractures

The longitudinal midline and medial-parapatellar incision are commonly used in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Medial-parapatellar incision n offers a smaller wound, avoids creation of thin skin flaps and easier exposure in obese patients. This incision creates a lateral skin flap which may be subject to poor blood supply and delayed wound healing. We undertook a Randomised Controlled Trial (n=20) comparing midline and medial-parapatellar incisions. Cutaneous blood-flow was measured using a Doppler Imager. Interstitial fluid measurements for lactate, pyruvate, lactate/pyruvate ratio and glucose were obtained from subcutaneous microdialysis catheters. Wound cosmesis was graded and skin sensation tested. Immediately post-op there was no significant difference in subcutaneous blood flow, but by day 3 patients with medial-parapatellar incisions showed greater bloodflow than midline incisions, particularly on the medial side (387 vs 278units p=0.148). At both day 1 and 3 post-op the lateral flap of the medial parapatellar incision showed decreased blood flow compared to the medial side, though these failed to reach significance. In contrast the midline incision showed no discernable difference in blood flow between the medial and lateral flaps. Concentrations of subcutaneous glucose increased from 4 hours post-op in the midline group, returning to baseline by 24hours. In contrast, the parapatellar group remained at base line throughout. Lactate concentrations increased over time in both groups peaking at 12hours post-op. No difference was noted between incision types with regard to wound cosmesis. We conclude that the use of a medial-parapatellar incision results in only minimal biochemical changes, which are unlikely to alter wound healing. Medial-parapatellar incision is therefore a safe alternative to a midline incision and can be utilised in appropriate complex cases to aid surgical exposure

There is a paucity of published literature regarding the long-term outcomes of the modern generations of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Between 1999 and 2001, we recruited 63 patients into a randomised controlled trial of arthrodesis vs TJA. The 2 year results were published in 2005.

At a mean follow-up 15.2 years (range 13.2–17.2), all patients from the original trial were contacted. Data were collected in the form of visual analogue score for pain (VAS), visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) as well as information on any revision procedures.

Data were available from all surviving patients (66 toes 53 patients). There was no difference in pain scores between the arthrodesis group and arthroplasty group 7.4 ± 15.7 vs 15.7 ± 19.7 (p=0.06). There was also no difference in the VAS FA scores as a whole 88.9 ± 12.9 vs 86.1 ± 17.1 (p = 0.47), or when divided into its 3 components (pain, function and other complaints). There was however a significant difference with regards to patient satisfaction with the arthrodesis group outperforming the TJA group: 95.5 ± 10.4 vs 83.6 ± 20.9 (p<0.01). There was a significantly higher rate of revision surgery in the TJA group when compared to the arthrodesis group (p= 0.009).

At 15 years the patients that underwent arthrodesis were more satisfied and had a greater survivorship compared to TJA, however there was no difference in outcome with regards to pain or function between the two groups. Based on the results of this study arthrodesis remains the ‘gold standard’ due to excellent pain relief, high function and low risk of revision surgery.

Introduction

The peri-operative analgesic management of patients having either Total Knee Replacement (TKR) or Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is an area that continues to have prominence, driven in part by the desire to reduce hospital stay, while maintaining high patient satisfaction. This is particularly relevant in the current climate of healthcare cost savings. We evaluated the role of “top up” intra-articular local anaesthetic injection after identifying that an appreciable number of patients in the unit suffered “breakthrough pain” on the first post-op day, when the effects of local analgesia are wearing off.

The best surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis remains uncertain. Recently radiofrequency microtenotomy (RFMT) has been proposed as a suitable surgical treatment. We aim to compare open release with RFMT and present the results of our randomised controlled trial.

Patients with symptoms of tennis elbow for at least 6 months who had failed to respond to conservative management were included in the trial. They were randomised to open release or RFMT. Outcome measures included grip strength, pain and DASH scores.

41 patients were randomised, 23 to RFMT and 18 to open release, 2 patients withdrew from the study. Our results show that both treatments give a significant benefit at all time points for DASH and pain scores, but only open release gives a significant improvement in grip strength. Comparing the two treatments the only significant difference is the open group have better pain scores at 6 weeks, but this is not seen at later follow up.

In conclusion both groups have shown benefit from the treatments, but one is not shown to be clearly superior.

There is limited long term evidence to support instrumented fusion as an adjunct to decompression for foraminal stenosis in the presence of single level degenerative disc disease.

We report the long term outcome of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Forty-four patients with single-level disc disease were randomly assigned to three groups (spinal decompression (Group 1), decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion (Group 2), or decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion plus transforaminal interbody fusion (Group 3). Spinal disability (Dallas, Roland Morris, and Lower Back Outcome Score [LBOS]), and quality of life (EuroQol (EQ) and short form (SF-) 36 questionnaires) were assessed before and at after surgery by independent researchers.

At mean of 15 years follow up 33 (75%) patients were available for assessment. All groups observed a significant improvement in the EQ-5D at final follow up. Group 1 demonstrated significantly better functional outcome at final follow up according to the Dallas, Roland Morris, LBOS, and EQ-5D (3L and VAS) scores when compared to the other two groups (p<0.01). The SF-36 score demonstrated that group 1 had significantly better generic health scores compared to groups 2 and 3. Regression analysis was used to adjust for the differences in general health between the groups and demonstrated no significant difference between the groups in the spine specific scores: Dallas (p>0.15), Roland Morris (p>0.37), or the LBOS (p>0.32).

Fusion in combination with decompression for the treatment of foraminal stenosis and single level degenerative disc disease offers no long term functional benefit over decompression in isolation.

This ongoing prospective RCT compares two surgical approaches with respect to accuracy of guidewire and tibial nail position.

29 patients with tibial fractures were randomised to semi-extended (SE) or standard (S) approaches of tibial nail insertion. Fluoroscopy obtained guidewire and final nail position. The SE approach is more proximal with the guidewire inserted posterior to the patella, theoretically allowing more accurate wire and nail placement.

Measurements were taken in both planes of the nail and guidewire to determine deviation from optimum angle of insertion (relative to the long axes of the tibial shaft).

14 and 15 patients were treated with semi-extended and standard approaches respectively.

The semi-extended approach results in better guidewire and nail placement in both planes with mean deviation from the optimal angle of insertion as below:

Guidewire AP 4.5° (SE) versus 4.04° (S) Lateral 24.59° (SE) versus 33.36° (S)

Nail AP 3.21° (SE) versus 3.68° (S) Lateral 17.73° (SE) versus 24.04° (S)

Anterior knee pain may be due to excessive anterior placement of the nail. We assessed anterior placement of the guidewire and nail in the lateral plane. This was expressed as a percentage from the anterior cortex of the tibia. Mean results are below:

Guidewire 9.7% (SE) versus 9.3% (S)

Nail 19.5% (SE) versus 16.3% (S)

Semi-extended nailing may allow for better guidewire position and as such nail placement. This may reduce anterior knee pain.

The aims of this study were to undertake a prospective randomised trial to compare functional outcome, and range of motion after treatment of medial collateral ligament injuries by either early unprotected mobilisation or mobilisation with a hinged brace.

Patients were randomised into either unprotected mobilisation or mobilisation with a hinged brace. Assessments occurred at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Outcome measures included validated questionnaires (International Knee Documentation Committee and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores), range of motion measurements and strength testing.

Eighty six patients (mean age 30.4) were recruited. There were 53 men and 33 women. The mode of injury was sport in 56 patients (65%) with football, rugby and skiing being the most common types of sport involved.

The mean time to return to full weight bearing was 3 weeks in both groups. The mean time to return to work was 4.6 weeks in the braced group and 4.1 weeks in the non-braced group (p=0.79).

Return to running was at a mean of 14.3 weeks in the braced group and 12.8 weeks in the non-braced group (p=0.64). Return to full sport was 22 weeks in the braced group and 22.1 weeks in the non-braced group (p=0.99). There was no significant difference in range of movement or pain scores between the two groups at 2,6,12 and 24 weeks.

The use of a hinged knee brace does not influence recovery after a medial collateral injury.

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures is associated with well known complications including wound dehiscence and infection, construct failure and symptomatic metalwork. A technique of intramedullary fibular nailing has been developed that requires only minimal incisions, is biomechanically stronger than ORIF and has low-profile hardware. We hypothesized that fibular nailing would result in a rate of reduction and union comparable to ORIF, with a reduced rate of wound and hardware problems.

100 patients over the age of 65 years with unstable ankle fractures requiring fixation were randomised to undergo fibular nailing or ORIF. Outcome measures assessed over the 12 postoperative months were wound complications, accuracy of reduction, Olerud and Molander score (OMS), and total cost of treatment.

The mean age was 74 years (range 65–93) and 75 patients were women, all had some form of comorbidity. Significantly fewer wound infections occurred in the fibular nail group (p=0.002). Eight patients (16%) in the ORIF group developed lateral-sided wound infections, two of these developed a wound dehiscence requiring further surgical intervention. No infections or wound problems occurred in the fibular nail group and at 1 year patients were significantly happier with the condition of their scar (p=0.02), and had slightly better OMS scores (p=ns). The overall cost of treatment in the fibular nail group was less despite the higher initial cost of the implant.

The fibular nail allows accurate reduction and secure fixation of ankle fractures with a significantly reduced rate of soft-tissue complications when compared with ORIF.

In fractures electrical currents generated by piezoelectric and junctional diode effects initiate and augment healing. Conductive fixators may interfere with these currents causing delayed/nonunion which can be avoided by non conductive fixators, facilitating osteosynthesis. Null hypothesis of no difference and two tailed alternate hypothesis of any could be better was used. Impugn change in Electrical properties for demarcating union rate.

Patients of Gustillo's grade I and II tibia fractures were randomised in conductive and non conductive fixator groups in a blinded manner. Electrical and clinico-radiological properties were compared every two weeks for 20 weeks, recoding magnitude and significant difference. Capacitance(p=0.03), Impedance(p=0.002), Inductance(p=0.01) and Reactance(p=0.02) are the electrical parameters which not only demarcated union rate but orchestrated diagnosis of fracture healing. In Non-conducting group, after removal of fixator at week 10, Local Tenderness was consistently absent, Rust Score was higher at week 18 and 20(p=0.01), absence of abnormal mobility was 58% higher and 100% at week 12(p < 0.05), Presence of weight bearing was higher from week 16(OR=15, p=0.03), presence of transmitted movement was 2.4 times higher at week 10(95% CI=0.17–34.93, p=0.52) and was 100% at week 14.

Fractures heal at a faster rate if fixed by insulated non-conducting external fixators. Electrical parameters can be used to demarcate and monitor fracture healing.

We have previously reported that fibular nailing in the elderly is associated with a significantly reduced complication rate and greater cost-effectiveness when compared to ORIF. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of fibular nailing to ORIF in patients under the age of 65.

100 patients aged 18 to 64 were randomly allocated between groups. Outcomes assessed over two years post-operatively included: development of wound complications or radiographic arthritis, the accuracy of reduction and patient satisfaction. The mean age was 44, 25% of patients were smokers and 35% had some form of comorbidity of whom three were diabetic. 27 injuries occurred after sport and two after assault the remainder occurred after a simple fall from a standing height.

Superficial wound infections occurred in two patients in each group. Six patients requested removal of the nail, and six patients requested plate and screw removal. Patient reported outcome scores were comparable for the two groups. Two failures of fixation occurred in the fibular nail group; one in a patient with neuropathy. One failure of fixation occurred in the ORIF group. All other patients went on to an anatomical union without complication. Patient satisfaction with the surgical scar was higher after fibular nailing (visual analogue scale mean 0.75, range 0–5) than for ORIF (mean 1.5, range 0–7).

The fibular nail allows accurate reduction and secure fixation of ankle fractures with comparable radiographic and patient-reported outcomes to ORIF at two years and a greater patient satisfaction with the appearance of the surgical scars.

The cement used for hemiarthroplasties by the authors and many other surgeons in the UK is Palacos® (containing 0.5g Gentamicin). Similar cement, Copal® (containing 1g Gentamicin and 1g Clindamycin) has been used in revision arthroplasties. We aim to investigate the effect on SSI rates of doubling the gentamicin dose and adding a second antibiotic (clindamycin) to the bone cement in hip hemiarthroplasty.

We randomised 848 consecutive patients undergoing cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured NOF into two groups: Group I, 464 patients, received standard cement (Palacos®) and Group II, 384 patients, received high dose, double antibiotic-impregnated cement (Copal®). We calculated the SSI rate for each group at 30 days post-surgery. The patients, reviewers and statistician were blinded as to treatment group.

The demographics and co-morbid conditions were statistically similar between the groups. The combined superficial and deep SSI rates were 5 % (20/394) and 1.7% (6/344) for groups I and II respectively (p=0.01). Group I had a deep infection rate 3.3 %(13/394) compared to 1.16% (4/344) in group II (p=0.082). Group I had a superficial infection rate 1.7 % (7/394) compared to 0.58% (2/344) in group II (p=0.1861). 33(4%) patients were lost to follow up, and 77 (9%) patients were deceased at the 30 day end point.

Using high dose double antibiotic-impregnated cement rather than standard low dose antibiotic-impregnated cement significantly reduced the SSI rate (1.7% vs 5%; p=0.01) after hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur in this prospective randomised controlled trial.

Background

Approximately half of all hip fractures are displaced intracapsular fractures. The standard treatment for these fractures is either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. The recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on hip fracture management recommends the use of ‘proven’ cemented stem arthroplasty with an Orthopaedic Device Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating of at least 3B (97% survival at three years). The Thompsons prosthesis is currently lacking an ODEP rating despite over 50 years of clinical use, likely due to the paucity of implant survival data. Nationally, adherence to these guidelines is varied as there is debate as to which prosthesis optimises patient outcomes.