Abstract
In fractures electrical currents generated by piezoelectric and junctional diode effects initiate and augment healing. Conductive fixators may interfere with these currents causing delayed/nonunion which can be avoided by non conductive fixators, facilitating osteosynthesis. Null hypothesis of no difference and two tailed alternate hypothesis of any could be better was used. Impugn change in Electrical properties for demarcating union rate.
Patients of Gustillo's grade I and II tibia fractures were randomised in conductive and non conductive fixator groups in a blinded manner. Electrical and clinico-radiological properties were compared every two weeks for 20 weeks, recoding magnitude and significant difference. Capacitance(p=0.03), Impedance(p=0.002), Inductance(p=0.01) and Reactance(p=0.02) are the electrical parameters which not only demarcated union rate but orchestrated diagnosis of fracture healing. In Non-conducting group, after removal of fixator at week 10, Local Tenderness was consistently absent, Rust Score was higher at week 18 and 20(p=0.01), absence of abnormal mobility was 58% higher and 100% at week 12(p < 0.05), Presence of weight bearing was higher from week 16(OR=15, p=0.03), presence of transmitted movement was 2.4 times higher at week 10(95% CI=0.17–34.93, p=0.52) and was 100% at week 14.
Fractures heal at a faster rate if fixed by insulated non-conducting external fixators. Electrical parameters can be used to demarcate and monitor fracture healing.
