Abstract
We have previously reported that fibular nailing in the elderly is associated with a significantly reduced complication rate and greater cost-effectiveness when compared to ORIF. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of fibular nailing to ORIF in patients under the age of 65.
100 patients aged 18 to 64 were randomly allocated between groups. Outcomes assessed over two years post-operatively included: development of wound complications or radiographic arthritis, the accuracy of reduction and patient satisfaction. The mean age was 44, 25% of patients were smokers and 35% had some form of comorbidity of whom three were diabetic. 27 injuries occurred after sport and two after assault the remainder occurred after a simple fall from a standing height.
Superficial wound infections occurred in two patients in each group. Six patients requested removal of the nail, and six patients requested plate and screw removal. Patient reported outcome scores were comparable for the two groups. Two failures of fixation occurred in the fibular nail group; one in a patient with neuropathy. One failure of fixation occurred in the ORIF group. All other patients went on to an anatomical union without complication. Patient satisfaction with the surgical scar was higher after fibular nailing (visual analogue scale mean 0.75, range 0–5) than for ORIF (mean 1.5, range 0–7).
The fibular nail allows accurate reduction and secure fixation of ankle fractures with comparable radiographic and patient-reported outcomes to ORIF at two years and a greater patient satisfaction with the appearance of the surgical scars.
