Abstract
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures is associated with well known complications including wound dehiscence and infection, construct failure and symptomatic metalwork. A technique of intramedullary fibular nailing has been developed that requires only minimal incisions, is biomechanically stronger than ORIF and has low-profile hardware. We hypothesized that fibular nailing would result in a rate of reduction and union comparable to ORIF, with a reduced rate of wound and hardware problems.
100 patients over the age of 65 years with unstable ankle fractures requiring fixation were randomised to undergo fibular nailing or ORIF. Outcome measures assessed over the 12 postoperative months were wound complications, accuracy of reduction, Olerud and Molander score (OMS), and total cost of treatment.
The mean age was 74 years (range 65–93) and 75 patients were women, all had some form of comorbidity. Significantly fewer wound infections occurred in the fibular nail group (p=0.002). Eight patients (16%) in the ORIF group developed lateral-sided wound infections, two of these developed a wound dehiscence requiring further surgical intervention. No infections or wound problems occurred in the fibular nail group and at 1 year patients were significantly happier with the condition of their scar (p=0.02), and had slightly better OMS scores (p=ns). The overall cost of treatment in the fibular nail group was less despite the higher initial cost of the implant.
The fibular nail allows accurate reduction and secure fixation of ankle fractures with a significantly reduced rate of soft-tissue complications when compared with ORIF.
