The Pivot-shift test is a clinical test for knee instability for patinets with Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), however the test has low inter-observer reliability. Dynamic radiostereometry (dRSA) imaging is a highly precise method for objective evaluation of joint kinematics. The purpose of the study was to quantify precise knee kinematics during Pivot-shift test by use of the non-invasive dynamic RSA imaging. Eight human donor legs with hemipelvis were evaluated. Ligament lesion intervention of the ACL was performed during arthroscopy and anterolateral ligament (ALL) section was performed as a capsular incision. Pivot-shift test examination was recorded with dRSA on ligament intact knees, ACL-deficient knees and ACL+ALL-deficient knees. A Pivot-shift pattern was identifyable after ligament lesion as a change in tibial posterior drawer velocity from 7.8 mm/s in ligament intact knees, to 30.4 mm/s after ACL lesion, to 35.1 mm/s after combined ACL-ALL lesion. The anterior-posterior drawer excursion increased from 2.8 mm in ligament intact knees, to 7.2 mm after ACL lesion, to 7.6 mm after combined lesion. Furthermore a change in tibial rotation was found, with increasing external rotation at the end of the pivot-shift motion going from intact to ACL+ALL-deficient knees. This experimental study demonstrates the feasibility of RSA to objectively quantify the kinematic instability patterns of the knee during the Pivot-shift test. The dynamic parameters found through RSA displayed the kinematic changes from ACL to combined ACL-ALL ligament lesion

Summary Statement. In young, active patients cementless THR demonstrates excellent prosthetic stability by RSA and outstanding clinical outcomes at 5 years using a tapered titanium femoral stem, crosslinked polyethylene liners and either titanium or tantalum shells. Introduction. Early femoral implant stability is essential to long-term success in total hip replacement. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) provides precise measurements of micromotion of the stem relative to the femur that are otherwise not detectable by routine radiographs. This study characterised micromotion of a tapered, cementless femoral stem and tantalum porous-coated vs. titanium acetabular shells in combination with highly cross-linked UHMWPE or conventional polyethylene liners using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for 5 years following THR. Patients and Methods. This IRB-approved, prospective, double randomised, blinded study, involved 46 patients receiving a primary THR by a single surgeon. Each patient was randomised to receive a titanium (23) (Trilogy, Zimmer) or tantalum (23) (Modular Tantalum shell, Zimmer) uncemented hemispheric shell and either a highly-crosslinked or conventional polyethylene liner. Tantalum RSA markers were implanted in each patient. All patients had a Dorr A or B femoral canal and received a cementless, porous-coated titanium tapered stem (M/L Taper, Zimmer). All final femoral broaches were stable to rotational and longitudinal stress. RSA examinations, Harris Hip, UCLA, WOMAC, SF-12 scores were obtained at 10 days, 6 months, and annually through 5 years. Results. All patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement in Harris Hip, WOMAC, and SF-12 PCS scores post-operatively. Evaluation of polyethylene wear demonstrated that median penetration measurements were significantly greater in the conventional compared to the HXPLE liner cohorts at 1 year through 5 years follow-up (p<0.003). At 5 years, conventional liners showed 0.38 ± 0.05mm vertical wear whereas HXLPE liners showed 0.08 ± 0.02mm (p<0.003). Evaluation of the femoral stems demonstrated that the rate of subsidence was highest in the first 6 months (0.09mm/yr), with no other detectable motion through 5 years. Two outlying patients had significantly higher stem subsidence values at 6 months (0.7 mm and 1.0mm). One stem stabilised without further subsidence after 6 months (0.7mm), and the other stem stabilised at 1 year (1.5mm). Neither patient has clinical evidence of loosening. Evaluation of acetabular shells demonstrated less median vertical translation in tantalum than titanium shells at each time-point except at 3-years follow-up, however due to large standard errors, there was no significant difference between the two designs (p>0.05). These large standard errors were predominantly caused by two outliers, neither of which had clinical evidence of loosening. Discussion/Conclusion. In this RSA study of young THR patients, cementless tapered femoral stems, highly crosslinked polyethylene liners, and tantalum or titanium acetabular shells all demonstrated excellent performance through 5 years follow-up. Highly crosslinked polyethylene liners demonstrated significantly less wear than conventional liners. The femoral stem showed excellent stability through 5 years, with no clinical or radiologic episodes of failure. The small amount of micromotion seen is less than that previously reported for similar tapered, cementless stems and approaches the accuracy of RSA (0.05mm). Both acetabular shells demonstrated excellent stability with minimal micromotion at 5 years without significant differences in migration. All patients demonstrated significant clinical improvement in pain and function and additional RSA evaluation of these patients is planned

Introduction. Primary mechanical stability is important with uncemented THR because early migration is reduced, leading to more rapid osseointegration between the implant and bone. Such primary mechanical stability is provided by the design features of the device. The aim of this study was to compare the migration patterns of two uncemented hip stems, the Furlong Active and the Furlong HAC stem; the study was designed as a randomised control trial. The implants were the Furlong HAC, which is an established implant with good long term results, and the Furlong Active, which is a modified version of the Furlong HAC designed to minimise stress concentrations between the implant and bone, and thus to improve fixation. Materials and methods. The migration of 43 uncemented femoral components for total hip replacement was measured in a randomised control trial using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) over two years. Twenty-three Furlong HAC and twenty Furlong Active stems were implanted into 43 patients. RSA examinations were carried out post-operatively, and at six months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively. The patients stood in-front of a purpose made calibration frame which contained accurately positioned radio-opaque markers. From the obtained images, the 3-D positions of the prosthesis and the host bone were reconstructed. Geometrical algorithms were used to identify the components of the implant. These algorithms allowed the femoral component to be studied without the need to attach markers to the prosthesis. The migration was calculated relative to the femoral coordinate system representing the anterior-posterior (A-P), medial-lateral (M-L) and proximal-distal (P-D) directions respectively. Distal migration was termed subsidence. Results. Both stems subsided significantly during the first six months following surgery but almost all stems did not progressively subside thereafter. The Furlong Active stem experienced approximately three times the amount of subsidence of the Furlong HAC stem; this difference was significant (p = 0.02). There was one subsidence outlier (four standard deviations from the mean) for the Furlong Active stem between one and two years post-operatively. Both the stems migrated laterally and rotated into valgus. Lateral migration was greater for the Furlong Active stem; at 12 and 24 months there was a significant migration of the Furlong Active head laterally of 0.51 mm (p = 0.012) and 0.58 mm (p = 0.013) respectively. There was no significant difference in clinical scores between the implants at any RSA examination post-operatively. Discussion. The initial fixation of the Furlong Active stem was not as good as the established stem making it less likely to integrate effectively with the bone. In this study, the theoretical design of a hip replacement to minimise the stress concentration between the implant and bone and thus improve fixation actually resulted in worse implant fixation. Stems designed theoretically to improve fixation may not achieve this. Therefore we recommend that new devices should be tested using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis. Acknowledgments This work was funded by the Furlong Charitable Research Foundation

Whether it is best to retain the posterior cruciate ligament in the degenerated knee, i.e. using a cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee prosthesis (TKP), or to use a more constraint posterior-stabilized (PS) TKP is of debate. There are limited studies comparing the effect of both methods on implant fixation and clinical outcome, leaving it up to the surgeon to base this decision on anything but conclusive evidence. We assessed the effect of two different philosophies in knee arthroplasty on clinical outcome and tibial component migration measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), by directly comparing the CR and PS version of an otherwise similarly designed cemented TKP. Sixty patients were randomized and received a Triathlon TKP (Stryker, NJ, USA) of either CR (n=30) or PS (n=30) design. RSA measurements (primary outcome) and clinical scores including the Knee Society Score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were evaluated at baseline, at three months postoperatively and at one, two, five and seven years. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse the repeated measurements. Both groups showed a similar implant migration pattern, with a maximum total point motion at seven years follow-up of around 0.8 mm of migration (mean difference between groups 95% CI −0.11 to 0.15mm, p=0.842). Two components (one of each group) were considered to have an increased risk of aseptic loosening. Both groups improved equally after surgery on the KSS and KOOS scores and no differences were seen during the seven years of follow-up. No differences in implant migration nor clinical results were seen seven years after cruciate-retaining compared to posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses

Summary. Five year migration results of 49 large-head metal-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasties show good implant stability and no association between implant migration and metal-ions levels, stem and cup position, or femoral bone mineral density. Introduction. The failure mechanism of metal-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty has been related to metal wear-debris and pseudotumor, but it is unknown whether implant fixation is affected by metal wear-debris. Patients and Methods. In July-August 2012 41 patients (10 women) at a mean age of 47 (23–63) years with a total of 49 MoM hip arthroplasties (ReCap Shell/M2a-Magnum head/Bi-Metric stem; Biomet Inc.) participated in a 5–7 year follow-up with blood tests (chrome and cobalt serum ions), questionnaires (Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS), measurement of cup and stem position and periprosthetic BMD. Further the patients had been followed with stereo-radiographs post-operative and at 1, 2 and 5 years for analysis of implant migration (Model-Based RSA 3.32). Results. 4 patients (6 hips) had elevated metal-ion levels (>7ug/l). The mean cup inclination was 45°(sd 6), the mean cup anteversion was 17°(sd7), and the mean stem anteversion was 19°(sd7). The difference between genders was statistically insignificant (p>0.09). At 5 years follow-up total translation (TT) for the stems (n=39 hips) was a mean 0.79mm (sd 0.53) and total rotation (TR) was a mean 1.99° (sd 1.53). Between 1–2 years there was no significant difference in mean TT (p=0.49)for the stems and between 2–5 years TT was mean 0.13 mm (sd 0.35) which was significant (p=0.03) but clinically very small and within the precision limits of the method. We found no significant migration along the 3 separate axes. There was no significant association between stem migration and metal ion levels >7ug/l (p=0.55), female gender (p=0.86), stem anteversion > 25° (p=0.29), T-scores < −1 (p=0.23), total OHS < 40 (p=0.19) or total HHS < 90 (p=0.68). Between 1–5 years there was no significant change in neither subsidence (p=0.14) nor in version (p=0.91) of the stems. At 5 years TT for the cups (n=36) was mean 1.21 mm (sd 0.74) and TR was mean 2.63° (sd 1.71). Between 1–2 years cup migration along the z-axis was mean 0.29 (sd 0.73) (p=0.03), which was also within precision limits of the method. There was a positive association between total OHS below 40 (n=4) and cup migration (p=0.04), but no association between cup migration and metal ion levels >7ug/l (p=0.80), female gender (p=0.74), cup inclination > 50° (p=0.93), cup anteversion > 25° (p=0.88) or HHS < 90 (p=0.93). Proximal cup migration at 5 years was mean 0.46 mm (sd 0.47), which was similar to the cup migration at 1 year (p=0.91) and 2 years (p=0.80) follow-up. No patients were revised before the final 5–7 year follow-up. Patient satisfaction was high (94%). Conclusion. All cups and stems were well-fixed between 1–5 years. We found no statistical significant correlation between implant migration and other factors that have been associated with failure of MoM hip arthroplasty such as elevated metal ion levels, component position, and female gender. Cup migration was higher in patients with a total OHS below 40. In conclusion, metal wear-debris does not seem to influence fixation of hip components in large-head MoM articulations at mid-term follow-up

We studied the knees of 11 volunteers using RSA during a step-up exercise requiring extension while weight-bearing from 50° to 0°. The findings on weight-bearing flexion with and without external rotation of the tibia based on MRI were confirmed

Summary Statement. We analysed impaction bone grafting used together with cemented or uncemented fixation in acetabular revision surgery. The overall risk for re-revision did not differ between the cemented and uncemented group. However, aseptic loosening was more common in the cemented group. Background. Several surgical techniques address bone defects in cup revision surgery. Bone impaction grafting, introduced more than thirty years ago, is a biologically and mechanically appealing method. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bone impaction grafting when used with uncemented and cemented fixation in cup revision surgery. Uncemented cups resting on more than 50% host bone were used as controls. Patient and Methods. Cup fixation was studied in ninety hips (eighty-two patients), revised due to loosening between 1993 and 1997. There were fifty-three isolated cup and thirty-seven total revisions. Patients were followed for thirteen years using conventional radiography, radiostereometry (RSA), Harris Hip score and a pain questionnaire. Peroperatively the surgeon assessed the acetabular bone bed vitality. In hips where the cup was judged to rest on > 50% vital bone (group I, n=43), an uncemented cup was used. If the cup was resting on ≤ 50% living bone, uncemented (group IIa, n=21,) or cemented (group IIb, n=26) technique was chosen, according to the surgeon's preference. The mean age of patients at index revision was 61±12 years, 56% were females. The most common index diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis (n=45) followed by rheumatoid arthritis (n=10). Results. At thirteen years, acetabular component failure had necessitated a second revision in 6/7/8 hips in Groups I/IIa/IIb respectively. These re-revisions were performed 1–10 (mean 7.1) years after index revision. Moreover four cup / liner revisions were performed in hips with femoral loosening, not allowing further RSA measurements. These twenty-five hips were followed until re-revision. Deceased patients (n=21) and patients with deteriorating medical condition, not able to attend the follow-up (n=7), were censored in the survival statistics. Aseptic loosening was the most common reason of re-revision. However, in the uncemented groups (I/IIa), four cups were re-revised due to liner wear, osteolysis or instability. In the total study population, and up to two years, the median proximal migration was lowest in Group I followed by Group IIa and Group IIb (p≤0,006). At thirteen years the mean proximal migration was highest in Group IIb 1.29 mm (SD 1.23) followed by Group I 0.30 mm (SD 0.40) and Group IIa 0.22 mm (SD 0.22), p = 0.05. In cases subsequently re-revised because of loosening or with radiographically loose cups at the last follow-up, a higher proximal migration was observed compared to the non-revised and radiographically well-fixed group (up to seven years: p < 0.001; thirteen years: p=0.04). Discussion/Conclusion. We found an increased risk for rerevision in cases with less than 50% host bone-implant contact. These cups showed high early proximal migration, measured by RSA, indicating poor initial fixation. Rate of re-revision due to any reason did not differ between cemented and uncemented cups. The cemented group (IIb) had a higher risk of being re-revised due to aseptic loosening. Poor bone stock, use of small bone chips, inferior impaction technique, and no or restricted contact with living bone are probable reasons for failures when extensive bone grafting is needed

Dual mobility hip arthroplasty utilizes a freely rotating polyethylene liner to protect against dislocation. As liner motion has not been confirmed in vivo, we investigated the liner kinematics in vivo using dynamic radiostereometry. 16 patients with Anatomical Dual Mobility acetabular components were included. Markers were implanted in the liners using a drill guide. Static RSA recordings and patient reported outcome measures were obtained at post-op and 1-year follow-up. Dynamic RSA recordings were obtained at 1-year follow-up during a passive hip movement: abduction/external rotation, adduction/internal rotation (modified FABER-FADIR), to end-range and at 45° hip flexion. Liner- and neck movements were described as anteversion, inclination and rotation. Liner movement during modified FABER-FADIR was detected in 12 of 16 patients. Median (range) absolute liner movements were: anteversion 10° (5–20), inclination 6° (2–12), and rotation 11° (5–48) relative to the cup. Median absolute changes in the resulting liner/neck angle (small articulation) was 28° (12–46) and liner/cup angle (larger articulation) was 6° (4–21). Static RSA showed changes in median (range) liner anteversion from 7° (-12–23) postoperatively to 10° (-3–16) at 1-year follow-up and inclination from 42 (35–66) postoperatively to 59 (46–80) at 1-year follow-up. Liner/neck contact was associated with high initial liner anteversion (p=0.01). The polyethylene liner moves over time. One year after surgery the liner can move with or without liner/neck contact. The majority of movement is in the smaller articulation between head and liner

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and Reverse Total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are two of the most performed shoulder operations today. Traditionally postoperative rehabilitation included a period of immobilisation, protecting the joint and allowing time for soft tissue healing. This immobilisation period may significantly impact a patient's quality of life (Qol)and ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's). This period of immobilisation could be safely avoided, accelerating return to function and improving postoperative QoL. This systematic review examines the safety of early mobilisation compared to immobilisation after shoulder arthroplasty focusing on outcomes at one year. Methods. A systematic review was performed as per the PRISMA guidelines. Results on functional outcome and shoulder range of motion were retrieved. Six studies were eligible for inclusion, resulting in 719 patients, with arthroplasty performed on 762 shoulders, with information on mobilisation protocols on 736 shoulders (96.6%) and 717 patients (99.7%). The patient cohort comprised 250 males (34.9%) and 467 females (65.1%). Of the patients that successfully completed follow-up, 81.5% underwent RSA (n = 600), and 18.4% underwent TSA (n = 136). Overall, 262 (35.6%) patients underwent early postoperative mobilisation, and 474 shoulders were (64.4%) immobilised for a length of time. Immobilised patients were divided into three subgroups based on the period of immobilisation: three, four, or six weeks. There were 201 shoulders (27.3%) immobilised for three weeks, 77 (10.5%) for four weeks and 196 (26.6%) for six weeks. Five of the six manuscripts found no difference between clinical outcomes at one year when comparing early active motion versus immobilisation after RSA or TSA. Early mobilisation is a safe postoperative rehabilitation pathway following both TSA and RSA. This may lead to an accelerated return to function and improved quality of life in the postoperative period

Introduction and Objective. In recent years, along with the extending longevity of patients and the increase in their functional demands, the number of annually performed RSA and the incidence of complications are also increasing. When a complication occurs, the patient often needs multiple surgeries to restore the function of the upper limb. Revision implants are directly responsible for the critical reduction of the bone stock, especially in the shoulder. The purpose of this paper is to report the use of allograft bone to restore the bone stock of the glenoid in the treatment of an aseptic glenoid component loosening after a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Materials and Methods. An 86-years-old man came to our attention for aseptic glenoid component loosening after RSA. Plain radiographs showed a complete dislocation of the glenoid component with 2 broken screws in the neck of glenoid. CT scans confirmed the severe reduction of the glenoid bone stock and critical bone resorption and were used for the preoperative planning. To our opinion, given the critical bone defect, the only viable option was revision surgery with restoration of bone stock. We planned to use a bone graft harvested from distal bone bank femur as component augmentation. During the revision procedure the baseplate with a long central peg was implanted “on table” on the allograft and an appropriate osteotomy was made to customize the allograft on the glenoid defect according to the CT-based preoperative planning. The Bio-component was implanted with stable screws fixation on residual scapula. We decided not to replace the humeral component since it was stable and showed no signs of mobilization. Results. The new bio-implant was stable, and the patient gained a complete functional recovery of the shoulder. The scheduled radiological assessments up to 12 months showed no signs of bone resorption or mobilization of the glenoid component. Conclusions. The use of bone allograft in revision surgery after a RSA is a versatile and effective technique to treat severe glenoid bone loss and to improve the global stability of the implant. Furthermore, it represents a viable alternative to autologous graft since it requires shorter operative times and reduces graft site complications. There are very few data available regarding the use of allografts and, although the first studies are encouraging, further investigation is needed to determine the biological capabilities of the transplant and its validity in complex revisions after RSA

Introduction and Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CT-based pre-operative planning, integrated with intra-operative navigation could improve glenoid baseplate fixation and positioning by increasing screw length, reducing number of screws required to obtain fixation and increasing the use of augmented baseplate to gain the desired positioning. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) successfully restores shoulder function in different conditions. Glenoid baseplate fixation and positioning seem to be the most important factors influencing RSA survival. When scapular anatomy is distorted (primitive or secondary), optimal baseplate positioning and secure screw purchase can be challenging. Materials and Methods. Twenty patients who underwent navigated RSA (oct 2018 and feb 2019) were compared retrospectively with twenty patients operated on with a conventional technique. All the procedures were performed by the same surgeon, using the same implant in cases of eccentric osteoarthritis or complete cuff tear. Exclusion criteria were: other diagnosis as proximal humeral fractures, post-traumatic OA previously treated operatively with hardware retention, revision shoulder arthroplasty. Results. The NAV procedure required mean 11 (range 7–16) minutes more to performed than the conventional procedure. Mean screw length was significantly longer in the navigation group (35.5+4.4 mm vs 29.9+3.6 mm; p . .001). Significant higher rate of optimal fixation using 2 screws only (17 vs 3 cases, p . .019) and higher rate of augmented baseplate usage (13 vs 4 cases, p . .009) was also present in the navigation group. Signficant difference there is all in function outcomes, DASH score is 15.7 vs 29.4 and constant scale 78.1 vs 69.8. Conclusions. The glenoid component positioning in RSA is crucial to prevent failure, loosening and biomechanical mismatch, coverage by the baseplate of the glenoid surface, version, inclination and offset are all essential for implant survival. This study showed how useful 3D CT-based planning helps in identifying the best position of the metaglena and the usefulness of receiving directly in the operation theater real-time feedback on the change in position. This study shows promising results, suggesting that improved baseplate and screw positioning and fixation is possible when computer-assisted implantation is used in RSA comparing to a conventional procedure

Abstract. Background. The influence of diagnosis on outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is not completely understood. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of different pathologies. Methods. A total of 78 RSAs were performed for the following diagnoses: (1) rotator cuff tear arthropathy(RCA), (2) massive cuff tear(MCT) with osteoarthritis(OA), (3) MCT without OA, (4) arthritis, (5) acute proximal humerus fracture. Mean follow up 36 months (upto 5 years) Range of motion, Oxford Shoulder Score were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively. Results. Mean OSS was 30. The RCA, MCT-with-OA, MCT-without-OA, and arthritis groups all exhibited significant improvements in all outcome scores and in all planes of motion. After adjustment for age and compared with RCA, those with OA had significantly better abduction (P < .05), and those with fractures had significantly worse patient satisfaction (P < .05). Among male patients, those with MCTs without OA had significantly worse satisfaction (P < .05). Conclusion. RSA reliably provides improvement regardless of preoperative diagnosis. Although subtle differences exist between male and female patients, improvements in clinical outcome scores were apparent after RSA

Physiological kinematics is very difficult to restore after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A new model of medial stabilized (MS) TKA prosthesis has a high spherical congruence of the internal compartment, which guarantees anteroposterior (AP) stability associated with a flat surface of the insert in the lateral compartment, that allows a greater AP translation of the external condyle during knee flexion. The aim of our study is to evaluate, by dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA), the knee in vivo kinematics after the implantation of a MS prosthesis during sit to stand and lunge movements. To describe the in vivo kinematics of the knee after MS Fixed Bearing TKA (GMK Sphere (TM) Medacta International AG, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) using Model Based dynamic RSA. A cohort of 18 patients (72.1 ± 7.4 years old) was evaluated by dynamic RSA 9 months after TKA. The kinematic evaluation was carried out using the dynamic RSA tool (BI-STAND DRX 2), developed at our Institute, during the execution of sit to stand and lunge movements. The kinematic data were processed using the Grood and Suntay decomposition and the Low Point method. The patients performed two motor tasks: a sit-to-stand and a lunge. Data were related to the flexion angle versus internal-external, varus-valgus rotations and antero-posterior translations of the femur with respect to the tibia. During the sit to stand, the kinematic analysis showed the presence of a medial pivot, with a significantly greater (p=0.0216) anterior translation of the lateral condyle (3.9 ± 0.8 mm) than the medial one (1.6 ± 0.8 mm) associated with a femoral internal rotation (4.5 ± 0.9 deg). During the lunge, in the flexion phase, the lateral condyle showed a larger posterior translation than the medial one (6.2 ± 0.8 mm vs 5.3 ± 0.8 mm) associated with a femoral external rotation (3.1 ± 0.9 deg). In the extension phase, there is a larger anterior translation of the lateral condyle than the medial one (5.8 ± 0.8 mm vs 4.6 ± 0.8 mm) associated with femoral internal rotation (6.2 ± 0.9 deg). Analysing individual kinematics, we also found a negative correlation between clinical scores and VV laxity during sit to stand (R= −0.61) and that the higher femoral extra-rotation, the poorer clinical scores (R= 0.65). The finding of outliers in the VV and IE rotations analysis highlights the importance of a correct soft tissue balancing in order to allow the prosthetic design to manifest its innovative features

Introduction. The increased prevalence of osteoporosis in the patient population undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) results in significantly increased complication rates. Mainly demographic and clinical predictors are currently taken into the preoperative assessment for risk stratification without quantification of preoperative computed tomography (CT) data (e.g. bone density). It was hypothesized that preoperative CT bone density measures would provide objective quantification with subsequent classification of the patients’ humeral bone quality. Methods. Thirteen bone density parameters from 345 preoperative CT scans of a clinical RSA cohort represented the data set in this study. The data set was divided into testing (30%) and training data (70%), latter included an 8-fold cross validation. Variable selection was performed by choosing the variables with the highest descriptive value for each correlation clustered variables. Machine learning models were used to improve the clustering (Hierarchical Ward) and classification (Support Vector Machine (SVM)) of bone densities at risk for complications and were compared to a conventional statistical model (Logistic Regression (LR)). Results. Clustering partitioned this cohort (training data set) into a high bone density subgroup consisting of 96 patients and a low bone density subgroup consisting of 146 patients. The optimal number of clusters (n = 2) was determined based on optimization metrics. Discrimination of the cross validated classification model showed comparable performance for the training (accuracy=91.2%; AUC=0.967) and testing data (accuracy=90.5 %; AUC=0.958) while outperforming the conventional statistical model (Logistic Regression (LR)). Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) were created for each patient to explain how the predicted output was achieved. Conclusion. The trained and tested model provides preoperative information for surgeons treating patients with potentially poor bone quality. The use of machine learning and patient-specific calibration showed that multiple 3D bone density scores improved accuracy for objective preoperative bone quality assessment

Objectives. Lengthening osteotomies of the calcaneus in children are in general grafted with bone from the iliac crest. Artificial bone grafts have been introduced, however, their structural and clinical durability has not been documented. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a very accurate and precise method for measurements of rigid body movements including the evaluation of joint implant and fracture stability, however, RSA has not previously been used in clinical studies of calcaneal osteotomies. We assessed the precision of RSA as a measurement tool in a lateral calcaneal lengthening osteotomy (LCLO). Methods. LCLO was performed in six fixed adult cadaver feet. Tantalum markers were inserted on each side of the osteotomy and in the cuboideum. Lengthening was done with a plexiglas wedge. A total of 24 radiological double examinations were obtained. Two feet were excluded due to loose and poorly dispersed markers. Precision was assessed as systematic bias and 95% repeatability limits. Results. Systematic bias was generally below 0.10 mm for translations. Precision of migration measurements was below 0.2 mm for translations in the osteotomy. Conclusion. RSA is a precise tool for the evaluation of stability in LCLO. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4:78–83

Summary. Application of RSA in supine and standing positions allows pelvic fracture stability to be measured more accurately than current techniques. RSA may enable a better understanding of these injuries. Introduction. The in vivo stability of the pelvic ring after fracture stabilisation remains unknown. Plain radiographs have a low accuracy in diagnosing loss of fracture reduction over time. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is an accurate imaging measurement method that has previously been applied to measure the healing of other fractures. This pilot study investigated the potential application of RSA in supine and standing positions to measure pelvic fracture stability over time and under weightbearing load. Methods. Five patients with a similar type C pelvic ring disruption who were all operated on using the same surgical technique and had RSA markers inserted at the time of surgery. All five patients had a unilateral comminuted sacral fracture lateral to the sacral foramina treated with posterior plating and pubic rami fractures stabilised by external fixation for six weeks. All patients were mobilised partial weight bearing after regaining leg control. RSA examinations at 2, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks included three radiographic pairs taken in supine, standing and supine positions at each time point. Two additional RSA examinations were performed the day prior and post pin removal at 6 weeks. Results. All patients ambulated before the 2 week follow-up and progressed uneventfully. At latest follow-up, there were no complications. Minimal displacements (translations less than 0.3mm and rotations less than 0.5°) were recorded between the supine exams pre and post standing at 2 weeks. Hence, the supine examination was found to be a reliable position to measure the migration of the ilium over time. No loss of reduction was identifiable on plain radiographs over time. At 52 weeks, in contrast to plain radiographic results, RSA measurements revealed that one patient had a fracture migration greater than 4mm. Such large displacements could result in sacral nerve root transection, leading to devastating consequences, such as incontinence, for patients whose sacral fractures are through or medial to the sacral foramina. In one patient, the migration recorded for the apparent uninjured posterior complex side exceeded the migration of the injured side suggesting an unrecognised bilateral injury. Comparative RSA examinations pre and post external fixator removal demonstrated that in three patients the injured hemipelvis migrated greater than 2mm after the removal of the external fixator, which may be indicative that the fixator was removed prematurely. Discussion and Conclusion. The application of RSA allows accurate measurement of pelvic fracture stability which is difficult, if not impossible, to identify and quantify with any other imaging techniques. Hence, RSA has the capacity to enable a better understanding of pelvic ring injuries and optimise their treatment

Summary. In this study we validate that weight-bearing images are needed for accurate polyethylene liner wear measurement in total knee prostheses by measuring the difference in minimum joint space width between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing RSA views. Introduction. Recent studies show that Model-based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis is superior to the conventional in vivo measurements of polyethylene liner wear in total knee prostheses. Although it is generally postulated that weight-bearing (standing) views are required to detect liner wear, most RSA images are acquired in non-weight-bearing (supine) view for practical reasons. Therefore, it would be of interest to know if supine views would be sufficient for measuring TKA liner wear, defined as a change in minimum joint space width (mJSW). As a difference in mJSW between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing RSA images has never been validated, the aim of this study is to compare the outcome of in vivo measurements of mJSW in total knee prosthesis when conducted with weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing RSA views. Method. We selected the first 16 patients with a Triathlon total knee prosthesis from a clinical study for which subsequently a weight-bearing eand a non-weight-bearing RSA image pair were acquired at one year follow up. For both images the mJSW and the corresponding contact point locations in terms of mediolateral (ML) and anterioposterior (AP) coordinates were measured. In addition, the ML stability was scored to assess knee laxity. The size of the mJSW difference between non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing views was determined and a regression analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of knee laxity to this difference, while correcting for differences between the contact point locations. Results. On average, the measured mJSW was 0.22 mm larger in the non-weight-bearing views (T-test, p < 0.05). The standard deviation of the difference was 0.22 mm. The regression analysis showed that a difference in the ML position of the contact location was an important covariate (beta = 0.255±0.054, Wald 95% CI). 13 patients had a high ML stability (< 5 deg) and three had a medium stability (5–10 deg). The regression analysis showed that on average patients with medium ML stability had a 0.17 mm larger difference in mJSW than patients with a high ML stability. Conclusion. The study shows that the mJSW is larger in non-weight-bearing views. The differences found are clinically relevant, as wear rates in practice are as small as 0.1 mm per year. Hereby it is validated that weight-bearing RSA images are more capable of detecting the mJSW in total knee prostheses. The size of the difference in mJSW between the views seems to be in relation with the knee laxity

The Adora RSA (NRT, Denmark) is a new stereo X-ray system custom built for Radeostereometry. Images are acquired using CXDI50C digital detectors (Canon, Netherlands). Analysis software was written locally to detect both Tantalum markers and the spherical head of the hip implant, and for RSA reconstruction and kinematic analysis. To assess geometric reproducibility, a planar grid phantom was constructed with 1400 2mm markers in a grid pattern over a 350 by 430 mm glass plate. Additionally 25 tantalum markers of each diameter 1.0, 0.8 and 0.5 mm were added within a 120mm square of the grid. The phantom was imaged repeatedly with translation and rotation over the detector. For small phantom movements of up to 10mm over the detector, very small measurement errors were observed of median 2 microns, maximum 6 microns. For larger movements, the errors increased to median 5 microns and maximum 50 microns. Errors also increased with decreasing exposure. For RSA validation, an acetabular PE cup was cemented to a Sawbone pelvis. Tantalum markers were inserted into the pelvis (10), cement (4), and cup (10). A 28mm metal head was fixed to the cup. The phantom was imaged repeatedly without movement, then moved in translation (up to 100 mm) and rotation (all axes, up to 45 degrees), and with full X-ray repositioning. Precision errors were calculated on the assumption of no relative movement between components. Results are given for repositioning movement categorised as none, small (less than 25mm or 15 degrees), medium (less than 50mm or 30 degrees), and large. For the head, the mean total point motion error was 4, 10, 14 and 24 micrometers. Mean error of segment fitting was less than 60 microns with no markers rejected from the composite segment of 24 markers. Cup migration total translation error was 10, 16, 24, and 35 micrometers with rotation errors less than 0.05 degrees. Observed RSA errors were small, increasing with phantom movement. This is consistent with the geometric uniformity tests. X-ray exposure and tissue thickness were also identified as factors in precision. We conclude this system has excellent precision for Radiostereometry

Summary. Comparison of accuracy and precision in measuring wear using 4 commonly used uncemented cup designs shows small differences in mean and data scatter for marker and model-based RSA. Introduction. The disadvantage with conventional RSA is that implant has to be supplied with tantalum markers, which may be difficult to visualise. This problem can be resolved with model-based RSA, but it is uncertain if this method has the same precision as marker-based RSA to measure wear. We compared these methods and studied different prosthesis geometries represented by four different uncemented cup designs (Trilogy, TMT-Trabecular Metal, Zimmer, Warsaw, USA, Ringloc, Biomet, Inc., Warsaw, Indiana, and ABG, Howmedica International, Staines, UK). Patients and Methods. Stereoradiographs of 75 patients (19 Trilogy, 17 TMT, 20 Ringloc, 19 ABG) were exposed postoperatively (2 examinations) and after 2 years. The patients were selected from prospective clinical studies. During operation tantalum markers had been inserted into the liner in all cases. The measurements and analysis of all radiographs were performed with UmRSA Digital Measure and UmRSA Analysis 6.0. We used the differences between the postoperative double-examinations to compute the precision for the two methods and for the different implant designs. The proximal and the total (vectorial sum of medial/lateral, proximal/distal and anterior posterior) femoral head penetration up to 2 years were compared. Results. The mean differences and the standard deviation of mean obtained from calculations between the double examinations in the total material did not differ between the 2 methods for any of the designs studied. The mean values and SD for marker and model-based RSA were −0, 00 mm ± 0.09 mm and 0.02 mm ± 0.08 mm, respectively (p>0.05). The comparison between Classical marker-based RSA and Model-based RSA in measuring wear up to 2 years did not showed any statistically significant differences for the Trilogy, TMT and ABG cups (p>0.05). However the mean difference of the postoperative double examinations were slightly higher for the Ringloc design (p=0, 02) and the data scatter (SD) at 2 years was higher (p=0,004) with use of model-based RSA. Conclusions. We found small differences between marker and model-based RSA for measurements of proximal and total wear (penetration). In 3 of the 4 cup designs studied the data scatter was about equal for the 2 methods. In the 4. th. design (Ringloc) the data scatter was higher when model-based RSA was used

Summary. Despite high revision rates, the mean two year migration of the ASR. TM. cup is within an acceptable threshold. Slightly higher migration rates found for the M2a- Magnum™ Porous Coated Acetabular Component but longer follow up is needed to establish if this implant is at risk. Introduction. RSA can detect the migration of an implant, and continuous migration is a predictor for failure (1). The ASR. TM. resurfacing implant was withdrawn from the marked due to excessive failure rate but showed initial femoral component stability. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial implant stability for the ASR cup as a possible explanation for the high revision rate, and to compare it to another metal on metal (MoM) cup. Patients and Methods. 36 patients with primary osteoarthritis from a RCT received either an ASR. TM. (n=19) or an M2a-Magnum Cup. TM. (n=17) without markers. Ten 0.8mm tantalum markers were injected in the periacetabular bone. Using a UmRSA® 43Calibration Cage™ (RSA Biomedical, Sweden), supine RSA images were obtained within 3 days of surgery, at 8 w, 6 m, 1 and 2 years. A model based RSA system using an EGS Hemi-sphere model (Medis specials, Leiden) calculated migration. For the 2 year analysis 16 and 15 sets of images were available. ANOVA with repeated measurements analysed movement over time for each type of implant as well as difference between implants. Results. Mean translations in the medial –lateral (X), proximal-distal (Y) and anterior-posterior (Z) direction are depicted. Initial movement was noted, especially for the M2a-Magnum cup, where the 2 year mean (sd) X translation was −0.307 (0.53)mm (p = 0.01), Y translation was 0.282 (0.36)mm (p < 0.001) and Z translation was −0.343 (0.63)mm p = (0.03). After 2 years the ASR cup displayed a mean X translation of −0.115 (0.60) mm (p = 0.82), Y translation of 0.075 (0.14)mm (p = 0.01) and Z translation of 0.438 (0.88)mm (p = 0.04). The implants had a similar pattern for X and Y with slightly more movement for M2a-Magnum in the X translations (p < 0.01) On the Z axis the implants displayed movement in opposite directions (p=<0.001). At two years 4 ASR and 5 M2aMagnum displayed movement above 1 mm in one axis . Discussion/Conclusion. The early migration of both cups were low. The ASR implant is slightly higher than a competing implant with better survival rates on the Z axis, but low at particularly the Y axis, where the mean 0.075 mm is well below the limit of 0.2mm recently suggested as an acceptable threshold. The M2a-Magnum cup has migration rates just above that, but longer clinical follow up is needed to establish if this cup has greater risk of revision. We will continue to monitor our patients to establish if the individual patient with excess migration is at risk. Continuous migration is not likely to explain failure of neither the cup nor the femoral side of the ASR hip