Pressure ulcers are a common occurrence in individuals with spinal cord injuries, and are attributed to prolonged sitting and limited mobility. This therefore creates the need to better understand soft tissue composition, in the attempt to prevent and treat pressure ulcers. In this study, novel approaches to imaging the soft tissue of the buttocks were investigated in the loaded and unloaded position using ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-six able-bodied participants (n=26, 13 males and 13 females) were recruited for this study and 1 male with a spinal cord injury. Two visits using US were required, as well as one MRI visit to evaluate soft tissue thickness and composition. US Imaging for the loaded conditions was performed using an innovative chair which allowed image acquisition in the seated upright position and MRI was done in the lateral decubitus position and loading was applied to the buttocks using a newly developed MRI compatible loader. The unloaded condition was a lateral decubitus position. Soft tissue was measured between the peak of the ischial tuberosity (IT) and the proximal femur and skin. Tissue thickness reliability for US was excellent, ICC=0.934–0.981 with no significant differences between the scan days. US and MRI measures of tissue thickness were significantly correlated (r=0.68–0.91). US underestimated unloaded tissue thicknesses with a mean bias of 0.39 – 0.56 for total tissue and muscle + tendon thickness. When the buttocks were loaded, total tissue thickness was reduced by 64.2±9.1%. US assessment of soft tissue thicknesses was reliable in both positions. The unloaded measurements using US were validated with MRI with acceptable limits of agreement, albeit tended to underestimate tissue thickness. Tissue thickness, but not fatty infiltration of muscle played a role in how the soft tissue of the buttocks responded to loading

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) now become popular operative procedures. It is not easy to understand geometric information of pelvis and femur in the restricted operative fields during MIS-THA. Recently, THA in supine position comes into the limelight again to place acetabular cups in an optimum position because we can minimise the intra-operative pelvic motion during THA in supine position. To verify the usefulness of supine position, we measured the angels of acetabular trial cups intra-operatively using the CT-based navigation system. The trial cup positions were placed according to a conventional acetabular cup alignment guide. We compared the angles of acetabular trial cups between supine and lateral positions through the same MIS antero-lateral (AL) surgical approach. Thirty eight hips underwent THA in lateral position (the AL group; average age: 63.9 years old, female: 29 cases, 33 hips, male: 5 cases, 5 hips) and 40 hips underwent THA in supine position (the AL Supine group; average age: 62.2 years old, female 40 cases, 40 hips) were subjected in this study. The single surgeon (the first author) performed all surgeries. We used the Roettinger's modified Watson-Jones approach in both groups. The pelvic registration for navigation was carried out using the CT-fluoro matching procedure with VectorVision Hip (BrainLAB, Germany). After acetabular reaming, the acetabular trial cups were placed into the reamed acetabulum to be at 45 degrees of operative inclination (OI) and at 20 degrees of operative anteversion (OA) using a conventional acetabular cup alignment guide. These angles of the trial cups were measured intra-operatively using the CT-based navigation system, VectorVision Hip. After removing the acetabular trial cup, the acetabular cups were placed using the navigation system. Trilogy cups (Zimmer, USA) and AMS HA shells (JMM, Japan) were used in this study. The average angles of OI were 45.7 degrees (SD 5.5 degrees) in the AL group and 46.3 degrees (SD 4.6 degrees) in the AL Supine group. The average angles of OA were 30.0 degrees (SD 13.5 degrees) in the AL group and 23.5 degrees (SD 8.2 degrees) in the AL Supine group. The hip numbers whose errors were less than 10 degrees were 13 hips in the AL group and 26 hips in the AL Supine group, respectively. There was significant difference in hip numbers whose errors of angles were less than 10 degrees between the AL and Supine groups. The hip numbers whose errors were less than 5 degrees were 7 hips in the AL group and only 6 hips in the AL Supine group, respectively. There was no significant difference in hip numbers whose errors of angles were less than 5 degrees between the AL and Supine groups. The error values of OI were less than 10 degrees except one hip in both groups. However, the error values of 25 hips in the AL group were more than 10 degrees. In lateral position, the pelvis easily rotated when the affected lower extremity was extended, externally rotated, and adducted during the femoral preparation in the AL group, which resulted in malalignment of acetabular OA. In contrast, most hips could be set with the error values less than 10 degrees in the AL Supine position because the pelvis could be stabilised on the operative table. In addition, landmarks, such as bilateral antero-superior iliac spines and the symphysis pubis, were palpable in supine position. However, the hips with error values less than 5 degrees were only 6 out of 40 hips even though in supine position. Using MIS techniques, we can provide more stable hip joint just after surgery since the muscles surrounding hip joints can be preserved. We have to place acetabular cups in an optimum position to achieve wide range of hip motion to prevent dislocation and to provide limitation-free daily activities for patients. These data suggests that we should use more accurate guide systems for acetabular cup replacement such as navigation systems, patient specific templates, and patient specific mechanical instruments to place acetabular cups in an optimum position

Introduction. The position and orientation of the lower extremities are fundamental for planning and follow-up imaging after arthroplasty and lower extremity osteotomy. But no studies have reported the reproducibility of measurements over time in the same patient, and experience shows variability of the results depending on the protocols for patient positioning. This study explores the reproducibility of measurements in the lower extremity with the patients in “comfortable standing position” by the EOS® imaging system. Materials and Methods. Two whole-body acquisitions were performed in each of 40 patients who were evaluated for a spine pathology. The average interval between acquisitions was 15 months (4–35 months). Patients did not have severe spine pathology and did not undergo any surgery between acquisitions. The “comfortable standing position” is achieved without imposing on the patient any specific position of the lower limbs and pelvis. All the measurements were performed and compared in both 2- and 3-dimensional images. Distances between the centers of the femoral heads and between the centers of the knees and ankles were measured from the front. The profile is shown by the flexion angle between the axis of the femur (center of the femoral head and the top of the line Blumensaat) and the axis of the tibia. Results. The average radiation dose was 0.80 mGy (0.5–1.11). For the first acquisition, the mean distance between the femoral heads was 17.9 cm (15.8–20.2), the mean distance between the middle of the knee joints was 16.7 cm (11.2–23.1) and the mean distance between the medial malleoli was 13.1 cm (0 to 18). For the second acquisition, the mean distance between the femoral heads was 17.9 cm (14.9–21.5), the mean distance between the middle of the knee joints was 16.9 cm (11.4–23.1) and the mean distance between the medial malleoli was 13.6 cm (0–19.4). For all comparisons no significant difference was demonstrated in related samples by Wilcoxon rank test and paired Student t test. Discussion. Two- and 3-dimensional data are not affected by repeated acquisitions several to many months apart in “comfortable standing position.” This work shows the reproducibility of measurements of the lower extremity in the “comfortable standing position” by the EOS® imaging system. Additional research should be considered for combined measures in the face-profile position of each patient

Nearly one quarter of ankle fractures have a recognized syndesmosis injury. An intact syndesmosis ligament complex stabilizes the distal tibio-fibular joint while allowing small, physiologic amounts of relative motion. When injured, malreduction of the syndesmosis has been found to be the most important independent factor that contributes to inferior functional outcomes. Despite this, significant variability in surgical treatment remains. This may be due to a poor understanding of normal dynamic syndesmosis motion and the resultant impact of static and dynamic fixation on post-injury syndesmosis kinematics. As the syndesmosis is a dynamic structure, conventional CT static images do not provide a complete picture of syndesmosis position, giving potentially misleading results. Dynamic CT technology has the ability to image joints in real time, as they are moved through a range-of-motion (ROM). The aim of this study was to determine if syndesmosis position changes significantly throughout ankle range of motion, thus warranting further investigation with dynamic CT. This is an a priori planned subgroup analysis of a larger multicentre randomized clinical trial, in which patients with AO-OTA 44-C injuries were randomized to either Tightrope or screw fixation. Bilateral ankle CT scans were performed at 1 year post-injury, while patients moved from maximal dorsiflexion (DF) to maximal plantar flexion (PF). In the uninjured ankles, three measurements were taken at one cm proximal to the ankle joint line in maximal DF and maximal PF: Anterior (ASD), middle (MSD), and posterior (PSD) syndesmosis distance, in order to determine normal syndesmosis position. Paired samples t-tests compared measurements taken at maximal DF and maximal PF. Twelve patients (eight male, six female) were included, with a mean age of 44 years (±13years). The mean maximal DF achieved was 1-degree (± 7-degrees), whereas the mean maximal PF was 47-degrees (± 8-degrees). The ASD in DF was 3.0mm (± 1.1mm) versus 1.9mm (± 0.8mm) in PF (p<0.01). The MSD in DF was 3.3mm (±1.1mm) versus 2.3mm (±0.9mm) in PF (p<0.01). The PSD in DF was 5.3mm (±1.5mm) versus 4.6mm (±1.9mm) in PF (p<0.01). These values are consistent with the range of normal parameters previously reported in the literature, however this is the first study to report the ankle position at which these measurements are acquired and that there is a significant change in syndesmosis measurements based on ankle position. Normal syndesmosis position changes in uninjured ankles significantly throughout range of motion. This motion may contribute to the variation in normal anatomy previously reported and controversies surrounding quantifying anatomic reduction after injury, as the ankle position is not routinely standardized, but rather static measurements are taken at patient-selected ankle positions. Dynamic CT is a promising modality to quantify normal ankle kinematics, in order to better understand normal syndesmosis motion. This information will help optimize assessment of reduction methods and potentially improve patient outcomes. Future directions include side-to-side comparison using dynamic CT analysis in healthy volunteers

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment for end-stage glenohumeral arthritis. The use of high modulus uncemented stems causes stress shielding and induces bone resorption of up to 63% of patients following TSA. Shorter length stems with smaller overall dimensions have been studied to reduce stress shielding, however the effect of humeral short stem varus-valgus positioning on bone stress is not known. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of humeral short stem varus-valgus angulation on bone stresses after TSA. Three dimensional models of eight male cadaveric humeri (mean±SD age:68±6 years) were created from computed tomography data using MIMICS (Materialise, Belgium). Separate cortical and trabecular bone sections were created, and the resulting bone models were virtually reconstructed three times by an orthopaedic surgeon using an optimally sized short stem humeral implant (Exactech Preserve) that was placed directly in the center of the humeral canal (STD), as well as rotated varus (VAR) or valgus (VAL) until it was contacting the cortex. Bone was meshed using a custom technique which produced identical bone meshes permitting the direct element-to-element comparison of bone stress. Cortical bone was assigned an elastic modulus of 20 GPa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3. Trabecular bone was assigned varying stiffness based on CT attenuation. A joint reaction force was then applied to the intact and reconstructed humeri representing 45˚ and 75˚ of abduction. Changes in bone stress, as well as the expected bone response based on change in strain energy density was then compared between the intact and reconstructed states for all implant positions. Both varus and valgus positioning of the humeral stem altered both the cortical and trabecular bone stresses from the intact states. Valgus positioning had the greatest negative effect in the lateral quadrant for both cortical and trabecular bone, producing greater stress shielding than both the standard and varus positioned implant. Overall, the varus and standard positions produced values that most closely mimicked the intact state. Surprisingly, valgus positioning produced large amounts of stress shielding in the lateral cortex at both 45˚ and 75˚ of abduction but resulted in a slight decrease in stress shielding in the medial quadrant directly beneath the humeral resection plane. This might have been a result of direct contact between the distal end of the implant and the medial cortex under loading which permitted load transfer, and therefore load-reduction of the lateral cortex during abduction. Conversely, when the implant was placed in the varus angulation, noticeable departures in stress shielding and changes in bones stress were not observed when compared to the optimal STD position. Interestingly, for the varus positioned implant, the deflection of the humerus under load eliminated the distal stem-cortex contact, hence preventing distal load transfer thus precluding the transfer of load

Proper positioning of the acetabular cup deters dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is therefore a key focus for orthopedic surgeons. The concept of a safe zone for acetabular component placement was first characterized by Lewinnek et al. and furthered by Callanan et al. The safe zone concept remains widely utilized and accepted in contemporary THA practice; however, components positioned in this safe zone still dislocate. This study sought to characterize current mass trends in cup position identified across a large study sample of THA procedures completed by multiple surgeons. This retrospective, observational study reviewed acetabular cup position in 1,236 patients who underwent THA using computer-assisted navigation (CAS) between July 2015 and November 2017. Outcomes included acetabular cup position (inclination and anteversion) measurements derived from the surgical navigation device and surgical approach. The overall mean cup position of all recorded cases was 21.8° (±7.7°, 95% CI = 6.7°, 36.9°) of anteversion and 40.9° (±6.5°, 95% CI = 28.1°, 53.7°) of inclination (Table 1). For both anteversion and inclination, 65.5% (809/1236) of acetabular cup components were within the Lewinnek safe zone and 58.4% (722/1236) were within the Callanan safe zone. Acetabular cups were placed a mean of 6.8° of anteversion (posterior/lateral approach: 7.0°, anterior approach: 5.6°) higher than the Lewinnek and Callanan safe zones whereas inclination was positioned 0.9° higher than the reported Lewinnek safe zone and 3.4° higher than the Callanan safe zone (Figure 1,2). Our data shows that while the majority of acetabular cups were placed within the traditional safe zones, the mean anteversion orientation is considerably higher than those suggested by the Lewinnek and Callanan safe zones. The implications of this observation warrant further investigation. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Most of studies on Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) are focused on acetabular cup orientation. Even though the literature suggests that femoral anteversion and combined anteversion have a clinical impact on THA stability, there are not many reports on these parameters. Combined anteversion can be considered morphologically as the addition of anatomical acetabular and femoral anteversions (Anatomical Combined Anatomical Anteversion ACA). It is also possible to evaluate the Combined Functional Anteversion (CFA) generated by the relative functional position of femoral and acetabular implants while standing. This preliminary study is focused on the comparison of the anatomical and functional data in asymptomatic THA patients. Material and methods. 50 asymptomatic unilateral THA patients (21 short stems and 29 standard stems) have been enrolled. All patients underwent an EOS low dose evaluation in standing position. SterEOS software was used for the 3D measurements of cup and femur orientation. Cup anatomical anteversion (CAA) was computed as the cup anteversion in axial plane perpendicular to the Anterior Pelvic Plane. Femoral anatomical anteversion (FAA) was computed as the angle between the femoral neck axis and the posterior femoral condyles in a plane perpendicular to femoral mechanical axis. Functional anteversions for the cup (CFA) and femur (FFA) were measured in the horizontal axial patient plane in standing position. Both anatomical and functional cumulative anteversions were calculated as a sum. All 3D measures were evaluated and compared for the repeatability and reproducibility. Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney U-test considering the non-normal distribution of data and the short number of patients (<30 for each group). Results. Functional cumulative anteversion was significantly higher than anatomical cumulative anteversion for all groups (p<0.05). No significant difference could be noted between the cases according to the use of short or standard stems. Conclusion. This study shows the difference of functional implant orientation as compared to the anatomical measurements. This preliminary study has limitations. First the limited sample of patients. Then this series only includes asymptomatic subjects. Nevertheless, this work focused on the feasibility of the measurements shows the potential interest of a functional analysis of cumulated anteversion. Standing position influences the relative position of THA implants according to the frontal and sagittal orientation of the pelvis. The relevance of these functional measurements in instability cases must be demonstrated, especially in patients with anterior subluxation in standing position which is potentially associated with pelvic adaptative extension. Further studies are needed for the feasibility of measurements on EOS images in sitting position and their analysis in case of instability. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

In the polytrauma patient, intraoperative patient positioning is one factor thought to influence pulmonary complications associated with intramedullary (IM) nailing of the femur. With regards to lateral femoral nailing, it is currently unknown as to whether the position of the injured lung contributes to changes in pulmonary function. It has been proposed that, similar to prone positioning in the ICU for acute respiratory distress syndrome management, having the injured lung in a dependent position during lateral femoral nailing would prevent barotrauma from hyperinflation and promote gas exchange in the non-dependent healthy lung. This study aims to assess the association between the position of the injured lung during lateral femoral nailing and pulmonary complications as determined by ICU LOS. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single level 1 trauma centre. All patients treated with IM nailing for femur fracture between 2006 and 2014 were screened for inclusion. Only patients who 1) underwent lateral femoral nailing and 2) had a significant chest injury, defined by chest Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of three or greater, were included. Patients with bilateral femur fractures or symmetric bilateral thoracic injuries were excluded. Intraoperative position of the lung injury was described depending on whether the injured lung was down, or in the dependent position, during lateral femoral nailing, versus the healthy lung down. The primary outcome was ICU LOS in all study patients. Secondary analysis was performed on the subgroup of patients who were admitted to ICU prior to femoral nailing. Data analysis assessing for differences in ICU LOS between groups was performed through Wilcoxan testing. One hundred and thirteen femur fractures were included in the study. During lateral femoral nailing, 53 patients had the injured lung down and 60 patients had the healthy lung down. No differences between age, ICU admission rate, injury severity score, chest AIS or head AIS were detected between the groups. There were no detectable differences in the rate of ICU admission between patients with the injured lung down (47.2%) and patients with the healthy lung down (46.7%) (P=0.96). We were unable to detect a difference in average ICU LOS between patients who had the injured lung down (4.9 days, 95% CI 2.8 – 7) compared to patients with the healthy lung down (6 days, 95% CI 3.7 – 8.4) during lateral femoral nailing (P=0.73). When looking only at patients who were admitted to ICU prior to femoral nailing, the LOS was 10.3 days (95% CI 7 – 13.7) in injured lung down patients compared to 12.9 days (9.2 – 16.6) in healthy lung down patients (P= 0.25). In patients with chest AIS greater than three, the position of the injured lung during lateral femoral IM nailing does not appear to affect ICU LOS

Purpose. In vivo comparative gap measurements were performed in 3 different patella positions (reduced, subluxated and everted) using offset-type-force-controlled-spreader-system. Methods. Prospectively, 50 knees were operated by TKA using a navigation-assisted gap balancing technique. The offset-type-force-controlled-spreader-system was used for gap measurements. This commercially-available instrument allows controllable tension in patella reduced position. The mediolateral gaps of knee extension (0°) and flexion (90°) angle were recorded in 3 different patella positions; reduced, subluxated and everted. Any gap differences of more than 3 mm were considered as a meaningful difference. Correlation between the difference with the demographic data, preoperative radiologic alignment and intraoperative data was analyzed. For statistical analysis, ANOVA and Pearson correlation test were used. Results. The gaps in patella eversion demonstrated smaller gaps both in knee extension and flexion position compared to the gaps of patella reduction position. The amount of decreased gaps was more definite in knee flexion position. Statistically significant difference were observed for the lateral gap of patella eversion compared to gap of patella reduction in knee flexion position (p<0.05). There were notable cases of variability in knee flexion position. Significant portion 12 (24%) knees of patella subluxation and 33 (66%) knees of patella evertion demonstrated either increased or decreased gaps in knee flexion position compared from the gaps of patella reduction position. Conclusion. The gaps in patella eversion demonstrated smaller gaps both in knee extension and flexion position compared to the gaps of patella reduction position. The amount of decreased gaps was more definite in knee flexion position. Therefore, the intraoperative patellar positioning has influence on the measurement of the joint gap. Keeping the patella in reduced position is important during gap balancing

INTRODUCTION. Thorough understanding and feedback of the post-operative implant position relative to the pre-operative anatomy is missing in today's clinical practice. However, three dimensional insights in the local under or oversizing of the implant can provide important feedback to the surgeon. For the knee for instance, to identify a shift in the sagittal joint line that potentially links to mid-flexion instability or to identify zones at risk for soft tissue impingement. Despite a proven inferior outcome, clinical post-operative implant evaluation remains primarily based on bi-planar, static 2D x-rays rather than 3D imaging. Along with the cost, a possible reason is the increased radiation dose and/or metal artifact scatter in computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These detrimental effects are now avoided by using recently released x-ray processing software. This technique uses standard-of-care post-operative x-rays in combination with a pre-operative CT and 3D file of the implant to determine the implant position relative to the pre-operative situation. The accuracy of this new technique is evaluated in this paper using patient cases. Therefore, the obtained implant position is benchmarked against post-operative CT scans. MATERIALS & METHODS. Retrospectively, 19 patients were selected who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received pre- and post-operative CT of their diseased knee. The CT scans were performed with a pixel size of 0.39 mm and slice spacing of 0.60 mm (Somatom, Siemens, München, Germany). All patients underwent TKA surgery using the same bi-cruciate substituting total knee (Journey II, Smith&Nephew, Memphis, USA). Following surgery, standard bi-planar standing x-rays of the operated knee was additionally performed as standard of care. To evaluate the implant position relative to the pre-operative situation, the 3D implants are first positioned on the post-operative CT slices. Using Mimics (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium), the pre-operative bone was subsequently automatically matched onto the post-operative scan to identify the implant location relative to the reconstructed pre-operative bone. This has been independently repeated by three observers to assess the inter-observer variability. Second, the post-operative bi-planar x-rays are combined with the reconstructed pre-operative bone and 3D file of the implant. This combination is performed using the 2D-to-3D conversion integrated in the recently launched X-ray module of Mimics. This module uses a contour based registration method to determine the implant and bone position using the post-operative x-rays. For both reconstruction methods, the implant position has been evaluated in six degrees of freedom using an automated Matlab routine; resulting in three translations and three rotations. RESULTS. From the evaluated implant positions, the root mean square error was derived between subsequent measurements. For the CT reconstruction based inter-observer evaluation, the median RMS error for all degrees of freedom is below 1 mm and 1 degree for both the femoral and tibial implant. Comparing the reconstructed CT implant position with the 2D-to-3D reconstruction, the median RMS difference between the implant positions remains below 1 mm and 1 degree except for the distraction/compression component and the internal/external rotation of the component. DISCUSSION. On average, the RMS difference between the 2D-to-3D conversion and the reconstructed post-operative CT exceeds the inter-observer RMS difference obtained using reconstructed post-operative CT. The differences are in line with previous cadaveric studies using the same reconstruction technique. The largest differences are seen for the femoral and tibial internal/external rotation. However, the obtained values are still within reasonable limits according to a recent review by De Valk et al., who reported an inter-observer variation of 3° for the femur and 2° for the tibia. In addition, the 2D-to-3D conversion displays a larger difference for the distraction/compression component. Since a true, golden standard measurement is lacking in our tests, it is not clear whether this error is attributed to the CT imaging or the 2D-to-3D conversion. Given the low inter-observer variation for this degree of freedom, it is hypothesized that this discrepancy is linked to the finite slice spacing for the CT scans. Apart from the obtained accuracy, the use of the 2D-to-3D module has the advantage of significantly reducing the radiation dose with approx. a factor 20. In addition, the imaging procedure needs no more than the standard imaging required by clinical practice

Background. Supine positioning during direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (DAA THA) facilitates use of fluoroscopy, which has been shown to improve acetabular component positioning on plane radiograph. This study aims to compare 2- dimensional intraoperative radiographic measurements of acetabular component position with RadLink to postoperative 3- dimensional SterEOS measurements. Methods. Intraoperative fluoroscopy and RadLink (El Segundo, CA) were used to measure acetabular cup position intraoperatively in 48 patients undergoing DAA THA. Cup position was measured on 6-week postoperative standing EOS images using 3D SterEOS software and compared to RadLink findings using Student's t-test. Safe-zone outliers were identified. We evaluated for measurement difference of > +/− 5 degrees. Results. RadLink acetabular cup abduction measurement (mean 43.0°) was not significantly different than 3D SterEOS in the anatomic plane (mean 42.6°, p = 0.50) or in the functional plane (mean 42.7°, p = 0.61) (Fig. 1–2). RadLink acetabular cup anteversion measurement (mean 17.9°) was significantly different than 3D SterEOS in both the anatomic plane (mean 20.6°, p = 0.022) and the functional plane (mean 21.2°, p = 0.002) (Fig. 3–4). RadLink identified two cups outside of the safe-zone. However, SterEOS identified 12 (anatomic plane) and 10 (functional plane) outside of the safe-zone (Fig. 5–7). In the functional plane, 58% of anteversion and 92% of abduction RadLink measurements were within +/− 5° of 3D SterEOS. Conclusion. Intraoperative fluoroscopic RadLink acetabular anteversion measurements are significantly different than 3D SterEOS measurements, while abduction measurements are similar. Significantly more acetabular cups are placed outside of the safe- zone when evaluated with 3D SterEOS versus RadLink

The lower limbs of vehicle occupants are vulnerable to severe injuries during under vehicle explosions. Understanding the injury mechanism and causality of injury severity could aid in developing better protection. Therefore, we tested three different knee positions in standing occupants (standing, knee in hyper-extension, knee flexed at 20˚) of a simulated under‐vehicle explosion using cadaveric limbs in a traumatic blast injury simulator; the hypothesis was that occupant posture would affect injury severity. Skeletal injuries were minimal in the cadaveric limbs with the knees flexed at 20˚. Severe, impairing injuries were observed in the foot of standing and hyper‐extended specimens. Strain gauge measurements taken from the lateral calcaneus in the standing and hyper-extended positions were more than double the strain found in specimens with the knee flexed position. The results in this study demonstrate that a vehicle occupant whose posture incorporates knee flexion at the time of an under‐vehicle explosion is likely to reduce the severity of lower limb injuries, when compared to a knee extended position

Introduction. Hip resurfacing arthoplasty (HRA) is an alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA), which has increased in the last years, especially in young patients. A suitable positioning of the resurfacing head is important, mainly because it is strongly related with the neck fracture. The goal of this work was to evaluate the influence of the resurfacing head positioning in the load distribution along the femurs’ structures. Materials and methods. Using 3D scan technology, the exterior geometry of a composite femur, used to create the FE models, was obtained. Three resurfacing models were used in three different positions in the frontal plane. A model with a positive offset of +5mm (Resurfacing #1), in neutral position (Resurfacing #2), and with a negative offset of −5mm (Resurfacing #3) was developed. A Birmingham® Hip Resurfacing prosthesis was chosen according to the femurs’ head. It was positioned in the femur and acetabulum by an experimented surgeon. The metal on metal contact pair was implemented. Models were aligned with 7° and 9°, considering the position of the anatomical femurs in sagittal and frontal planes. Models were constrained on the wing of the ilium and ischial tuberosity, allowing only vertical and rotational movements on the iliac side. Femurs were constrained on its distal side, allowing only rotational movements. Results. The most important strains in four different aspects, anterior, posterior, medial and anterior were analyzed. The highest differences occurred on the medial alignment of femurs. Comparing models Resurfacing #1 and Resurfacing #2, the highest displacement increase (11%) comparatively at the neutral position was observed. Besides, comparing models Resurfacing #2 and Resurfacing #3, displacement decrease of 13% (resurfacing #3) in the same region was observed. Thus, one can conclude that: a positive offset increases the strains on the femurs neck; a negative offset decreases the strains on the same region. According to these results, one can state that the risk of neck fracture in resurfacing implants slightly increases as the resurfacing head is positioned with a positive offset. Beyond that region, differences are not relevant

Soft tissue balance is important for good clinical outcome and good stability after TKA. Ligament balancer is one of the devices to measure the soft tissue balance. The objective of this study is to clarify the effect of the difference in the rotational position of the TKA balancer on medial and lateral soft tissue balance. Materials and Methods. This study included with 50 knees of the 43 patients (6 males, 37 females) who had undergone TKA with ADLER GENUS system from March 2015 to January 2017. The mean age was 71.1±8.1 years. All patients were diagnosed with medial osteoarthritis of the knee. All implants was cruciate substituted type (CS type) and mobile bearing insert. We developed a new ligament balancer that could be fixed to the tibia with keel and insert trial could be rotated on the paddle. We measured the medial and lateral soft tissue balance during TKA with the new balancer. The A-P position of the balancer was fixed on tibia in parallel with the Akagi line (A-P axis 0 group) and 20 degrees internal rotation (IR group) and 20 degrees external rotation (ER group). Soft tissue balance was measured in extension and 90 degrees of knee flexion on each rotational position. Results. The mean angle of valgus and varus in IR group, 0 group and ER group were 4.6±2.2 degrees varus, 1.9±1.6 degrees varus and 0.4±2.4 degrees varus respectively in extension, and 5.5±3.0 degrees varus, 2.1±2.2 degrees varus and 0.7±3.2 degrees varus respectively in 90 degrees of knee flexion. There were significant differences between three groups in extension (p<0.0001) and flexion (p<0.0001). In other words, when the balancer was fixed on tibia with internal rotation against the Akagi line, the soft tissue balance indicated medial tightness. Conversely, when the balancer was fixed on tibia with external rotation against the Akagi line, the soft tissue balance showed lateral tightness. The insert trial significantly rotated to opposite side against the position of balancer fixed. Discussion. Ligament balancer is used to be inserted between femur and tibia. If balancer is not fixed on tibia, it may rotated and translated during measurement. That movement made impossible to measure the correct soft tissue balance. We created a new balancer that could be fixed to the tibia with keel and the insert trial could be rotated on the paddle. Furthermore, it is possible to measure the soft tissue balance after installation of the femoral trial. As a result, it is possible to check the real soft tissue balance after implantation. In conclusion, direction of A-P axis of the ligament balancer is important to measure the correct soft tissue balance in TKA. This result means that the implantation on excessive rotation of the tibial component affects on the medial and lateral soft tissue balance in fixed type TKA. In mobile type TKA, it is possible to substitute if it is within the possible range of rotation by rotational mobile insert

Introduction. Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty helps acetabular preparation and implantation with the assistance of a robotic arm. A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system is also helpful for acetabular preparation and implantation, however, there is no report to compare these methods. The purpose of this study is to compare the acetabular cup position between the assistance of the robotic arm and the CT-based navigation system in total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. Methods. We studied 31 hips of 28 patients who underwent the robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty (MAKO group) between August 2018 and March 2019 and 119 hips of 112 patients who received THA under CT-based navigation (CT-navi group) between September 2015 and November 2018. The preoperative diagnosis of all patients was osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. They received the same cementless cup (Trident, Stryker). Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty were performed by four surgeons while THA under CT-based navigation were performed by single senior surgeon. Target angle was 40 degree of radiological cup inclination (RI) and 15 degree of radiological cup anteversion (RA) in all patients. Propensity score matching was used to match the patients by gender, age, weight, height, BMI, and surgical approach in the two groups and 30 patients in each group were included in this study. Postoperative cup position was assessed using postoperative anterior-posterior pelvic radiograph by the Lewinnek's methods. The differences between target and postoperative cup position were investigated. Results. The acetabular cup position of all cases in both Mako and CT-navi group within Lewinnek's safe zone (RI: 40±10 degree; RA: 15±10 degree) in group were within this zone. Three was no significant difference of RI between Mako and CT-navi group (40.0 ± 2.1 degree vs 39.7± 3.6 degree). RA was 15.0 ± 1.2 degree and 17.0 ± 1.9 degree in MAKO group and in CT-navi group, respectively, with significant difference (p<0.001). The differences of RA between target and postoperative angle were smaller in MAKO group than CT-navi group (0.60± 1.05 degree vs 2.34± 1.40 degree, p<0.001). The difference or RI in MAKO group was smaller than in CT-navi, however, there was no significance between them (1.67± 1.27 degree vs 2.39± 2.68 degree, p=0.197). Conclusions. Both the assistance of the robotic arm and the CT-based navigation system were helpful to achieve the acetabular cup implantation, however, MAKO system achieved more accurate acetabular cup implantation than CT-based navigation system in total hip arthroplasty for the patients with OA secondary to DDH. Longer follow-up is necessary to investigate the clinical outcome

Introduction. While THA is associated with positive results and long-term improvement in patient quality of life, outcomes are nonetheless associated with adverse events and post-procedural deficits related to discrepancies in leg length (LLD), offset and cup placement. Post-THA errors in these parameters are associated with gait alteration, low back pain and patient dissatisfaction. Such discrepancies often necessitate revision and increasingly lead to medical malpractice litigation. Maintaining accuracy in post-surgical leg length, offset and cup placement during THA is difficult and subject to error. The sensitivity of these factors is highlighted in studies that have shown that a change of as little as 5 degrees of flexion or abduction can induce alterations in leg length of up to several millimeters. Similarly, positioning of implants can alter global and femoral offset, affecting abductor strength, range of motion and overall physical function. Compounding the biochemical issues associated with inaccurate leg length are the costs associated with these deficits. Traditional freehand techniques of managing intra-operative parameters rely on surgeon experience and tissue tensioning to manually place components accurately. These methods, however, are only able to assess leg length and are subject to inaccuracies associated with patient movement or orientation changes during surgery. Mechanical methods of minimizing post-surgical discrepancies have been developed, such as outrigger or caliper devices, although these methods also address leg length only and provide poor feedback regarding offset and center of rotation, therefore providing insufficient data to accurately achieve appropriate post-surgical leg length. Computer-assisted navigation methods provide more data regarding leg length, offset and center of rotation, but are limited by their cumbersome nature and the large capital costs associated with the systems. The Intellijoint HIP. ®. surgical smart tool (Intellijoint Surgical, Inc., Waterloo, ON) is an intra-operative guidance tool that provides surgeons with real time data on leg length, offset and center of rotation, thereby allowing for confident selection of the correct implant in order to ensure appropriate post-surgical biomechanics. The early clinical results from an initial cohort of patients indicate that Intellijoint HIP. ®. is safe and effective. No adverse events were reported in the initial cohort, and the smart tool was able to measure surgical parameters to within 1mm when compared to radiographic measurements. With training cases removed, 100% of cases had a post-procedure leg length discrepancy of less than 5mm. This paper describes the indications, procedural technique and early clinical results of the Intellijoint HIP. ®. smart tool, which offers a safe, accurate and easy-to-use option for hip surgeons to manage leg length, offset and cup position intra-operatively

Introduction. Pelvic tilt can vary over time due to aging and the possible appearance of sagittal spine disorders. Cup position in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be influenced due to these changes. We assessed the evolution of pelvic tilt and cup position after THA and the possible appearance of complications for a minimum follow-up of ten years. Materials and methods. 343 patients received a cementless THA between 2006 and 2009. All were diagnosed with primary osteoarthritis and their mean age was 63.3 years (range, 56 to 80). 168 were women and 175 men. 250 had no significant lumbar pathology, 76 had significant lumbar pathology and 16 had lumbar fusion. Radiological analysis included sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP), acetabular abduction (AA) and anteversion cup (AV) angles. Measurements were done pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, and at five and ten years post-operatively. Three measurements were recorded and the mean obtained at all intervals. All radiographs were evaluated by the same author, who was not involved in the surgery. Results. There were nine dislocations: six were solved with closed reduction, and three required cup revision. All the mean angles changed over time; the SFP angle from 59.2º to 60º (p=0.249), the AA angle from 44.5º to 46.8º (p=0.218), and the AV angle from 14.7º to 16.2º (p=0.002). The SFP angle was lower in older patients at all intervals (p<0.001). The SFP angle changed from 63.8 to 60.4º in women and from 59.4º to 59.3º in men, from 58.6º to 59.6º (p=0.012). The SFP angle changed from 62.7º to 60.9º in patients without lumbar pathology, from 58.6º to 57.4º in patients with lumbar pathology, and from 57.0º to 56.4º in patients with a lumbar fusion (p=0.919). The SFP cup angle was higher in patients without lumbar pathology than in the other groups (p<0.001), however, it changed more than in patients with lumbar pathology or fusion at ten years after THA (p=0.04). Conclusions. Posterior pelvic tilt changed with aging, influencing the cup position in patients after a THA. Changes due to lumbar pathology could influence the appearance of complications at mid and long-term

Introduction. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) provides great value in ensuring accurate, reliable and reproducible total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes [1,2]. Depending on surgeon preferences or patient factors (e.g. BMI, ligament condition, and individual joint anatomy), resection planning (guided adjustment of cutting blocks) is performed with different knee flexion, abduction/adduction (ABD/ADD) and internal/external (I/E) rotation angles, potentially leading to measurement errors in the planned resections due to a modified tracker/localizer spatial relationship. This study assessed the variation in the intraoperative measurement of the planned resection due to leg manipulation during TKA, and identified the leg position variables (flexion, ABD/ADD, and I/E rotation) contributing to the variability. Materials and Methods. Computer-assisted TKA (ExactechGPS®, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR) was performed on a neutral whole leg assembly (MITA knee insert and trainer leg, Medial Models, Bristol, UK) by a board-certified orthopaedic surgeon (BH) at his preferred leg flexion, ABD/ADD, and I/E rotation angles. A cutting block was adjusted and fixed to the tibia, targeting the resection parameters listed in Table 1A. An instrumented resection checker was then attached to the cutting block to measure the planned resection at the same leg position (baseline). Next, the surgeon moved the leg to 9 sampled positions, representing typical leg position/orientation associated with different steps during TKA [Table 1B]. The planned resection was tracked by the CAOS system at each leg position. Tibial resection parameters at each sampled position were compared to the baseline. Regression was performed to identify the variables (flexion, ABD/ADD, I/E rotation) that significantly contribute to the measured variation (p<0.05). Results. The resection parameters at the baseline leg position are presented (see Table 1A). Clinically negligible variations were found across the 9 positions [Table 1B], with mean errors ≤0.1mm in resection depths and ≤0.2° in alignment parameters. For this particular system analyzed, leg flexion strongly correlated with the measurement errors in medial resection depths (p≤0.01, R2=0.76), lateral resection depth (p=0.01, R2=0.61) and posterior slope (p<0.01, R2=0.92) [Fig. 1]. The system tended to measure less in resection depths and posterior slope with an increased leg flexion [Fig. 1]. No other statistical significance was found (N.S.). Discussion. The results here showed that ExactechGPS can provide robust measurements of the planned resection parameters during TKA, independent of the ABD/ADD and I/E rotation of the knee. Although for the system studied, measurement errors strongly correlated with leg flexion, the magnitude of the errors was clinically negligible (within ±0.5 mm/° at a confidence level of 95%) [Table 1B]. Although CAOS systems have been evaluated for accuracy in the spatial distance measurement and clinical alignment outcomes [2,3], the measurement accuracy of planned resection parameters due to change of leg position remains unknown, even though it directly impacts the final resection. This study provided an improved understanding of clinical variability on the measurement of planned TKA resection when using a CAOS system

Purpose. The measurement of radial head translation about the capitellum (in percent): the radio-capitellum ratio (RCR) has proven to have excellent inter- and intra-observer reliabilities when measuring the RCR on a lateral radiological view of elbows at 90° of flexion and in the neutral position of the forearm. However, in the clinical setting, radiographs may be taken with the elbow in different positions. However, the purpose was to validate the RCR measurement method on elbows in different positions in flexion-extension and in different positions of the forearm in pronation-supination. Method. Fifty-one healthy volunteers were recruited to evaluate the RCR in different elbow positions. Lateral elbow radiographs were taken with the elbow in different magnitude of ROM: maximal extension, maximal flexion, elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral, elbow at 90° and forearm in supination and elbow at 90° and forearm in pronation. The measurements of the RCR were done using the software SliceOmatic. ANOVA and paired T-test were used to assess the difference of the RCR depending on the position of the elbow and of the forearm. Pearson coefficients were calculated to obtain the correlation between the RCR in each different position. Results. The mean RCR for each position were the following: elbow in maximal extension: −2%±7%, elbow in maximal flexion: −5%±9%, elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral: −2%±5%, elbow at 90° and forearm in supination: 1%±6% and elbow at 90° and forearm in pronation: 1%±5%. According to the Anova results, a significant difference exists between the RCR in different elbow positions (p=0.01) and in the different forearm positions (p<0.001). Paired T-test confirmed a significant difference between maximal elbow flexion and elbow flexion at 90° (p=0.003), as well as for maximal elbow extension and maximal elbow flexion (p=0.034). According to the Pearson coefficient, significant correlations exist between: elbow flexion at 90° and in maximal flexion (r=0.19, p=0.050); the forearm in neutral and in supination (r=0.34, p<0.001); the forearm in neutral and in pronation (r=0.42, p<0.001). Conclusion. The RCR method is dependent on elbow (flexion-extension) and forearm (pronation-supination) positions. At both maximal elbow positions in flexion and extension, the measurements of the RCR have a higher standard deviation. In order to decrease its variability, we recommend as a convention measuring the RCR on lateral radiographs with the elbow at 90° and the forearm in neutral position. However, 95% of the values of RCR (except in maximal flexion which is unusual in trauma) are included in the normal range of RCR from −5% to 13%. Thus a value outside this range in any elbow positions (except maximal flexion) or any forearm positions must raise doubt on elbow alignment. Then, with a capitellum of 25 mm of diameter, the translation of the radial head must be less than 1 mm posterior and less than 3 mm anterior from the center of the capitellum

There has been a lot of focus on the value of anatomic tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction, and the relative merits of single and double bundle grafts. Multiple cadaveric and animal studies have compared the effects of tunnel placement and graft type on knee biomechanics. 45 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included into our study. Femoral tunnel position was analysed by two independent doctors using the radiographic quadrant method as described by Bernard et al., and the mean values calculated. Forty-one of these patients completed a KOOS questionnaire. The mean ratio ‘a’ was 26.57% and mean ratio ‘b’ was 30.04% as compared to 24.8% (+/− 2.2%) and 28.5% (+/− 2.5%) respectively quoted by Bernard et.al, as the ideal tunnel position. Only twenty-three of these femoral tunnels were in the anatomic range. Analysis of forty-one KOOS surveys (23 anatomic, 18 non-anatomic) revealed no significant difference in total score or subscales between the anatomic and non-anatomic groups (p= >0.05). Our study suggests that the ideal tunnel position, as described by Bernard et.al. may not be ideal and fixed