Objectives. Enhanced micromotions between the implant and surrounding bone can impair osseointegration, resulting in fibrous encapsulation and aseptic loosening of the implant. Since the effect of micromotions on human bone cells is sparsely investigated, an in vitro system, which allows application of micromotions on bone cells and subsequent investigation of bone cell activity, was developed. Methods. Micromotions ranging from 25 µm to 100 µm were applied as sine or triangle signal with 1 Hz frequency to human osteoblasts seeded on collagen scaffolds. Micromotions were applied for six hours per day over three days. During the micromotions, a static pressure of 527 Pa was exerted on the cells by Ti6Al4V cylinders. Osteoblasts loaded with Ti6Al4V cylinders and unloaded osteoblasts without micromotions served as controls. Subsequently, cell viability, expression of the osteogenic markers collagen type I, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin, as well as gene expression of osteoprotegerin, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand, matrix metalloproteinase-1, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, were investigated. Results. Live and dead cell numbers were higher after 25 µm sine and 50 µm triangle micromotions compared with loaded controls. Collagen type I synthesis was downregulated in respective samples. The metabolic activity and osteocalcin expression level were higher in samples treated with 25 µm micromotions compared with the loaded controls. Furthermore, static loading and micromotions decreased the osteoprotegerin/receptor activator of NF-κB ligand ratio. Conclusion. Our system enables investigation of the behaviour of bone cells at the bone-implant interface under shear stress induced by micromotions. We could demonstrate that micromotions applied under static pressure conditions have a significant impact on the activity of osteoblasts seeded on collagen scaffolds. In future studies, higher mechanical stress will be applied and different implant surface structures will be considered. Cite this article: J. Ziebart, S. Fan, C. Schulze, P. W. Kämmerer, R. Bader, A. Jonitz-Heincke. Effects of interfacial micromotions on vitality and differentiation of human osteoblasts. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:187–195. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.72.BJR-2017-0228.R1

Aims. The study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to static interlocking. Methods. Patients were treated in a single level I trauma centre over a 2.5-year period. Group allocation was not randomized; both the micromotion nail and standard-of-care static locking nails (control group) were commercially available and selected at the discretion of the treating surgeons. Injury risk levels were quantified using the Nonunion Risk Determination (NURD) score. Radiological healing was assessed until 24 weeks or clinical union. Low-dose CT scans were acquired at 12 weeks and virtual mechanical testing was performed to objectively assess structural bone healing. Results. A total of 37 micromotion patients and 46 control patients were evaluated. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, the proportion of open fractures, or NURD score. There were no nonunions (0%) in the micromotion group versus five (11%) in the control group. The proportion of fractures united was significantly higher in the micromotion group compared to control at 12 weeks (54% vs 30% united; p = 0.043), 18 weeks (81% vs 59%; p = 0.034), and 24 weeks (97% vs 74%; p = 0.005). Structural bone healing scores as assessed by CT scans tended to be higher with micromotion compared to control and this difference reached significance in patients who had biological comorbidities such as smoking. Conclusion. In this pilot study, micromotion fixation was associated with improved healing compared to standard tibial nailing. Further prospective clinical studies will be needed to assess the strength and generalizability of any potential benefits of micromotion fixation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):825–833

Aims. To fully verify the reliability and reproducibility of an experimental method in generating standardized micromotion for the rat femur fracture model. Methods. A modularized experimental device has been developed that allows rat models to be used instead of large animal models, with the aim of reducing systematic errors and time and money constraints on grouping. The bench test was used to determine the difference between the measured and set values of the micromotion produced by this device under different simulated loading weights. The displacement of the fixator under different loading conditions was measured by compression tests, which was used to simulate the unexpected micromotion caused by the rat’s ambulation. In vivo preliminary experiments with a small sample size were used to test the feasibility and effectiveness of the whole experimental scheme and surgical scheme. Results. The bench test showed that a weight loading < 500 g did not affect the operation of experimental device. The compression test demonstrated that the stiffness of the device was sufficient to keep the uncontrollable motion between fracture ends, resulting from the rat’s daily activities, within 1% strain. In vivo results on 15 rats prove that the device works reliably, without overburdening the experimental animals, and provides standardized micromotion reproductively at the fracture site according to the set parameters. Conclusion. Our device was able to investigate the effect of micromotion parameters on fracture healing by generating standardized micromotion to small animal models. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(11):714–722

Abstract. Introduction. In cementless UKR, early post-operative tibial fractures are 7x more common in very small tibias. A smaller keel has been shown to reduce this fracture risk, but its effect on fixation is unassessed. This mechanical study assesses the effect of keel interference and size on sagittal micromotion of the tibial component in physiological loading positions. Method. A high-resolution Digital Image Correlation setup was developed and validated to an accuracy of 50 micrometres. Variants of tibial components were 3D-printed: standard, no-interference, no-keel, and a new small keel. Components were implanted into bone-analogue foam which was machined to a CT-reconstructed small tibia, using surgical technique. Tibias were loaded to 200N in physiological loading positions: 8mm (step-up) and 15mm (lunge) posterior to midpoint, and micromotion was assessed. Results. In all tests, anterior lift-off was the largest micromotion observed. In ‘step-up’, a standard keel moved more than the no-interference and no-keel variants (340μm-vs-63μm-vs-30μm, p=0.002). In ‘lunge’ loading, the no-interference and no-keel variants moved more than the standard (826μm-vs-1003μm-vs-521μm, p=0.039). The small keel experienced less micromotion in ‘step-up’ (245μm-vs-340μm p=0.233, overall p=0.009) and ‘lunge’ (378μm-vs-521μm p=0.265, overall p=0.006) than the standard keel. Conclusion. The keel protects against large tibial micromotion during lunge movement. Counterintuitively, interference increases micromotion during step-up movement, likely due to implant pivoting around the bone-keel interface. Results suggest patients should be advised against lunge movements early post-operatively. The new smaller keel fixes similarly or better than the standard keel, making it viable for replacing the standard keel to potentially reduce fracture risk

Patients receiving reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) often have osseous erosions because of glenohumeral arthritis, leading to increased surgical complexity. Glenoid implant fixation is a primary predictor of the success of RTSA and affects micromotion at the bone-implant interface. Augmented implants which incorporate specific geometry to address superior erosion are currently available, but the clinical outcomes of these implants are still considered short-term. The objective of this study was to investigate micromotion at the glenoid-baseplate interface for a standard, 3 mm and 6 mm lateralized baseplates, half-wedge, and full-wedge baseplates. It was hypothesized that the mechanism of load distribution from the baseplate to the glenoid will differ between implants, and these varying mechanisms will affect overall baseplate micromotion. Clinical CT scans of seven shoulders (mean age 69 years, 10°-19° glenoid inclinations) that were classified as having E2-type glenoid erosions were used to generate 3D scapula models using MIMICS image processing software (Materialise, Belgium) with a 0.75 mm mesh size. Each scapula was then repeatedly virtually reconstructed with the five implant types (standard,3mm,6mm lateralized, and half/full wedge; Fig.1) positioned in neutral version and inclination with full backside contact. The reconstructed scapulae were then imported into ABAQUS (SIMULIA, U.S.) finite element software and loads were applied simulating 15°,30°,45°,60°,75°, and 90° of abduction based on published instrumented in-vivo implant data. The micromotion normal and tangential to the bone surface, and effective load transfer area were recorded for each implant and abduction angle. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to perform statistical analysis. Maximum normal micromotion was found to be significantly less when using the standard baseplate (5±4 μm), as opposed to the full-wedge (16±7 μm, p=0.004), 3 mm lateralized (10±6 μm, p=0.017), and 6 mm lateralized (16±8 μm, p=0.007) baseplates (Fig.2). The half-wedge baseplate (11±7 μm) also produced significantly less micromotion than the full-wedge (p=0.003), and the 3 mm lateralized produced less micromotion than the full wedge (p=0.026) and 6 mm lateralized (p=0.003). Similarly, maximum tangential micromotion was found to be significantly less when using the standard baseplate (7±4 μm), as opposed to the half-wedge (12±5 μm, p=0.014), 3 mm lateralized (10±5 μm, p=0.003), and 6 mm lateralized (13±6 μm, p=0.003) baseplates (Fig.2). The full wedge (11±3 μm), half-wedge, and 3 mm lateralized baseplate also produced significantly less micromotion than the 6 mm lateralized (p=0.027, p=012, p=0.02, respectively). Both normal and tangential micromotion were highest at the 30° and 45° abduction angles (Fig.2). The effective load transfer area (ELTA) was lowest for the full wedge, followed by the half wedge, 6mm, 3mm, and standard baseplates (Fig.3) and increased with abduction angle. Glenoid baseplates with reduced lateralization and flat backside geometries resulted in the best outcomes with regards to normal and tangential micromotion. However, these types of implants are not always feasible due to the required amount of bone removal, and medialization of the bone-implant interface. Future work should study the acceptable levels of bone removal for patients with E-type glenoid erosion and the corresponding best implant selections for such cases. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly used to treat patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Loosening of the glenoid component remains one of the principal modes of failure and is the main complication leading to revision. For optimal RSA implant osseointegration to occur, the micromotion between the baseplate and the bone must not exceed a threshold of 150 µm. Excess micromotion contributes to glenoid loosening. This study assessed the effects of various factors on glenoid baseplate micromotion for primary fixation of RSA. A half-fractional factorial experiment design (2k-1) was used to assess four factors: central element type (central peg or screw), central element cortical engagement according to length (13.5 or 23.5 mm), anterior-posterior (A-P) peripheral screw type (nonlocking or locking), and bone surrogate density (10 or 25 pounds per cubic foot [pcf]). This created eight unique conditions, each repeated five times for 40 total runs. Glenoid baseplates were implanted into high- or low-density Sawbones™ rigid polyurethane (PU) foam blocks and cyclically loaded at 60 degrees for 1000 cycles (500 N compressive force range) using a custom designed loading apparatus. Micromotion at the four peripheral screw positions was recorded using linear variable displacement transducers (LVDTs). Maximum micromotion was quantified as the displacement range at the implant-PU interface, averaged over the last 10 cycles of loading. Baseplates with short central elements that lacked cortical bone engagement generated 373% greater maximum micromotion at all peripheral screw positions compared to those with long central elements (p < 0.001). Central peg fixation generated 360% greater maximum micromotion than central screw fixation (p < 0.001). No significant effects were observed when varying A-P peripheral screw type or bone surrogate density. There were significant interactions between central element length and type (p < 0.001). An interaction existed between central element type and level of cortical engagement. A central screw and a long central element that engaged cortical bone reduced RSA baseplate micromotion. These findings serve to inform surgical decision-making regarding baseplate fixation elements to minimize the risk of glenoid loosening and thus, the need for revision surgery

Aims. Both the femoral and tibial component are usually cemented at revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), while stems can be added with either cemented or press-fit (hybrid) fixation. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term stability of rTKA with cemented and press-fitted stems, using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Methods. This is a follow-up of a randomized controlled trial, initially involving 32 patients, of whom 19 (nine cemented, ten hybrid) were available for follow-up ten years postoperatively, when further RSA measurements were made. Micromotion of the femoral and tibial components was assessed using model-based RSA software (RSAcore). The clinical outcome was evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and visual analogue scale (pain and satisfaction). Results. The median total femoral translation and rotation at ten years were 0.39 mm (interquartile range (IQR) 0.20 to 0.54) and 0.59° (IQR 0.46° to 0.73°) for the cemented group and 0.70 mm (IQR 0.15 to 0.77) and 0.78° (IQR 0.47° to 1.43°) for the hybrid group. For the tibial components this was 0.38 mm (IQR 0.33 to 0.85) and 0.98° (IQR 0.38° to 1.34°) for the cemented group and 0.42 mm (IQR 0.30 to 0.52) and 0.72° (IQR 0.62° to 0.82°) for the hybrid group. None of these values were significantly different between the two groups and there were no significant differences between the clinical scores in the two groups at this time. There was only one re-revision, in the hybrid group, for infection and not for aseptic loosening. Conclusion. These results show good long-term fixation with no difference in micromotion and clinical outcome between fully cemented and hybrid fixation in rTKA, which builds on earlier short- to mid-term results. The patients all had type I or II osseous defects, which may in part explain the good results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):875–883

Objectives. Initial stability of tibial trays is crucial for long-term success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in both primary and revision settings. Rotating platform (RP) designs reduce torque transfer at the tibiofemoral interface. We asked if this reduced torque transfer in RP designs resulted in subsequently reduced micromotion at the cemented fixation interface between the prosthesis component and the adjacent bone. Methods. Composite tibias were implanted with fixed and RP primary and revision tibial trays and biomechanically tested under up to 2.5 kN of axial compression and 10° of external femoral component rotation. Relative micromotion between the implanted tibial tray and the neighbouring bone was quantified using high-precision digital image correlation techniques. Results. Rotational malalignment between femoral and tibial components generated 40% less overall tibial tray micromotion in RP designs than in standard fixed bearing tibial trays. RP trays reduced micromotion by up to 172 µm in axial compression and 84 µm in rotational malalignment models. Conclusions. Reduced torque transfer at the tibiofemoral interface in RP tibial trays reduces relative component micromotion and may aid long-term stability in cases of revision TKA or poor bone quality. Cite this article: Mr S. R. Small. Micromotion at the tibial plateau in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: fixed versus rotating platform designs. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:122–129. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000481

Introduction. Initial stability of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tibial trays is necessary to facilitate biological fixation. Previous experimental and computational studies describe a dynamic loading micromotion test used to evaluate the initial stability of a design. Experimental tests were focused on cruciate retaining (CR) designs and walking gait loading. A FEA computational study of various constraints and activities found CR designs during walking gait experienced the greatest micromotion. This experimental study is a continuation of testing performed on CR and walking gait to include a PS design and stair descent activity. Methods. The previously described experimental method employed robotic loading informed by a custom computational model of the knee. Different TKA designs were virtually implanted into a specimen specific model of the knee. Activities were simulated using in-vivo loading profiles from instrumented tibia implants. The calculated loads on the tibia were applied in a robotic test. Anatomically designed cementless tibia components were implanted into a bone surrogate. Micromotion of the tray relative to the bone was measured using digital image correlation at 10 locations around the tray. Three PS and three CR samples were dynamically loaded with their respective femur components with force and moment profiles simulating walking gait and stair descent activities. Periods of walking and stair descent cycles were alternated for a total of 2500 walking cycles and 180 stair descent cycles. Micromotion data was collected intermittently throughout the test and the overall 3D motion during a particular cycle calculated. The data was normalized to the maximum micromotion value measured throughout the test. The experimental data was evaluated against previously reported computational finite element model of the micromotion test. Results. The maximum average micromotion was on the CR design during walking gait. The greatest CR micromotion during stair descent was 67% of the maximum. The maximum micromotion in the PS design was 55% of the CR walking maximum and occurred during stair descent. The next highest PS value was 52% during walking. The absolute difference in these values was under 3 µm. The majority of the PS micromotion values around the tray were less than 50% that of the maximum micromotion of the CR design. Discussion. The experimental continuation of this investigation into cementless tray stability aligned with computational results in this model. The computational model predicted the PS tray would have 50% of the micromotion of the CR design, which was close to the experimental test. For CR, the computational rank order for walking and stair descent was also the same in the experimental follow-up. Future work in this investigation will include continued validation of the computational and experimental models, including more designs. Further exploration into accounting for patient and surgical variability should be explored. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Early micromotion of hip implants measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a predictor for late aseptic loosening. Computed Tomography Radiostereometric Analysis (CT-RSA) can be used to determine implant micro-movements using low-dose CT scans. CT-RSA enables a non-invasive measurement of implants. We evaluated the precision of CT-RSA in measuring early stem migration. Standard marker-based RSA was used as reference. We hypothesised that CT-RSA can be used as an alternative to RSA in assessing implant micromotions. We included 31 patients undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Distal femoral stem migration at 1 year was measured with both RSA and CT-RSA. Comparison of the two methods was performed with paired-analysis and Bland-Altman plots. Furthermore, the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the CT-RSA method was evaluated. No statistical difference was found between RSA and CTMA measurements. The Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between marker-based RSA and CT-RSA. The intra- and interobserver reliability of the CT-RSA method was found to be excellent (≥0.992). CT-RSA is comparable to marker-based RSA in measuring distal femoral stem migration. CTMA can be used as an alternative method to detect early implant migration

INTRODUCTION. The increasing incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) after total hip arthroplasty presents growing concerns due to challenges in treatment and increased mortality. PFF are often observed when the prosthesis is implanted in varus, especially with blade-type stems. To help elucidate its impact on the PFF risk, the specific research question is: What is the effect of misalignment of a blade-type stem (resulting in down-sized prosthesis) on 1)the distribution and magnitude of cortical stresses and 2)implant-bone micromotion. METHOD. We developed two finite element models consisting of an average female femur implanted within a generic blade-type stem prosthesis, (i)in neutral alignment, and (ii)oriented in 5° of varus, coupled with corresponding down-sizing of the prosthesis. Each model consisted of 1.1million elements, while the average mesh length at the implant-bone interface was 0.4mm. Elastic moduli of 15GPa(cortex), 150MPa(trabecular bone), and 121GPa(implant), and Poisson's ratio of 0.3 were assumed. The distal end was fixed and the interface was defined as a surface-to-surface contact with friction coefficients (dynamic 0.3; static 0.4). Walking and stair-climbing were simulated by loading the joint contact and muscle forces after scaling to the subjects’ body weight. The peak von Mises stress and the average stress within the surface having 1cm diameter and the center at where the peak stress occurred at each contacting area, the interfacial micromotion along medial, lateral side were analyzed. For statistical analysis, two-tailed t-test was performed between the neutral and varus cases over four loading cycles with significance level of p<0.05. RESULTS. Neutral alignment led to three areas of cortical/implant contact with focal load transfer via those areas, whereas varus placement limited to two areas (Figure 1). In both simulations, the greatest stress was observed at the proximal medial contact. With varus, average and peak stresses increased by 39% and 65% during walking and 28% and 35% during stair-climbing, respectively (Table 1). Micromotion was greatest over the proximal third of the interface, especially along lateral side (Figure 2). The 90. th. percentile values with the varus exceeded the neutral by 35% with walking and 28% with stair-climbing over the lateral interface. DISCUSSION. The proximal medial location of the greatest stress correlates well with clinical observations in PFF involving a posteromedial calcar fragment. Based on current lesser stress than the reported yield stress, loading during daily living activities may result in microdamage rather than an immediate PFF. However, impact loading such as hammering for stem insertion may introduce PFF at the location, especially with in varus. The increase in interfacial micromotion is expected to lead to increase in the risk for implant loosening, also leading to PFF. Further study is needed to confirm the validity and generalizability of these findings. SIGNIFICANCE/CLINICAL RELEVANCE. This study demonstrates the importance of proper alignment of femoral stems of a blade-type design. The misalignment (resulting in down-sizing) increased stress up to 65% and micromotion up to 35% around prosthesis, even during daily activities, thus increased attention to proper implant alignment and sizing is suggested when using components of this design. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Survival rates of recent total ankle replacement (TAR) designs are lower than those of other arthroplasty prostheses. Loosening is the primary indication for TAR revisions [NJR, 2014], leading to a complex arthrodesis often involving both the talocrural and subtalar joints. Loosening is often attributed to early implant micromotion, which impedes osseointegration at the bone-implant interface, thereby hampering fixation [Soballe, 1993]. Micromotion of TAR prostheses has been assessed to evaluate the stability of the bone-implant interface by means of biomechanical testing [McInnes et al., 2014]. The aim of this study was to utilise computational modelling to complement the existing data by providing a detailed model of micromotion at the bone-implant interface for a range of popular implant designs, and investigate the effects of implant misalignment during surgery. Methods. The geometry of the tibial and talar components of three TAR designs widely used in Europe (BOX®, Mobility® and SALTO®; NJR, 2014) was reverse-engineered, and models of the tibia and talus were generated from CT data. Virtual implantations were performed and verified by a surgeon specialised in ankle surgery. In addition to the aligned case, misalignment was simulated by positioning the talar components in 5° of dorsi- or plantar-flexion, and the tibial components in ± 5° and 10° varus/valgus and 5° and 10° dorsiflexion; tibial dorsiflexed misalignement was combined with 5° posterior gap to simulate this misalignment case. Finite element models were then developed to explore bone-implant micromotion and loads occurring in the bone in the implant vicinity. Results. Micromotion and bone loads peaked at the end of the stance phase for both the tibial and talar components. The aligned BOX and SALTO demonstrated lower tibial micromotion (with under 30% of bone-implant interface area subjected to micromotion larger than 100µm, as opposed to > 55% for Mobility; Figure 1). Talar micromotion was considerably lower for all designs, and no aligned talar component demonstrated micromotion larger than 100µm. The aligned SALTO showed the largest talar micromotion (Figure 2). Dorsiflexed implantation of all tibial components increased micromotion and bone strains compared to the reference case; interestingly, the SALTO tibial component, which demonstrated the lowest micromotion for the aligned case, also demonstrated the smallest changes in micromotion due to malpositioning (Figure 3). The posterior gap between the tibia and implant further increased bone strains. Dorsi- or plantar-flexed implantation of all talar components considerably increased micromotion and bone loads compared to the reference case (Figure 2), often resulting in micromotion exceeding 100µm. The SALTO talar component demonstrated the smallest changes in micromotion due to malpositioning. Discussion. The aligned Mobility had greater tibial micromotion than the SALTO and BOX, which agrees with higher revision rates reported in registry data (e.g. NZJR, 2014). The increased micromotion associated with dorsi- or plantar-flexion misalignment highlights the importance of aligning the implant correctly, and implies that SALTO can be more “forgiving” for malpositioning than the other TAR designs. Implant design and alignment are therefore important factors that affect the implant fixation and performance of the reconstructed ankle

Introduction. The use of bone cement as a fixation agent has ensured the long-term functionality of THA implants . 1. However, some studies have shown the undesirable effect of wear of stem-cement interface, due to the release of metals and polymeric debris lead to implant failure . 2,3. Debris is generated by the micromotion together with a severely corrosive medium present in the crevice of stem-cement interface . 3,4. FEA studies showed that micromotion can affect osseointegration and fretting wear . 5,6. The aim of this research is to investigate if the micromotions measures from in silico analysis of the stem-cement correlate with the fretting-corrosion damage observed on in vitro testing. Methods. The in vitro fretting-corrosion testing was made with positioning and loading based on ISO 7206-4 and ISO 7206-6. It was used Exeter stems embedded in bone cement (PMMA) and immersed in a saline solution (9.0 g/L of NaCl). A fatigue testing system (Instron 8872, USA) was used to conduct the test, applying a sinusoidal cyclic load at 5.0 Hz. The tests were finished after 10 million cycles and images of stem surfaces were taken with a photographic camera (Canon EOS Rebel T6i, Japan) and a stereoscope (Leica M165C, Germany). For the computational analysis, the same testing configurations were modeled on software ANSYS. The analysis was performed using linear isotropic elasticity for both stem (E=193GPa; ⱱ=0.27; σ. y. =400MPa) and PMMA cement (E=2.7GPa; ⱱ=0.35; σ. u. =76MPa). 7,8. . A second-order tetrahedral element was used to mesh all components with a size of 0.5 mm in the stem-cement contact area, increasing until 1.0 mm outside from them. A frictional contact (µ=0.25) with an augmented Lagrange formulation was used. The third cycle of loading was evaluated and a variation of sliding distance less than 10% was set as convergence criteria. The micromotion was measured as the sliding distance on the stem-cement interface. Results and Discussion. The in silico analysis showed the presence of areas almost without micromotion in the proximal lateral and distal medial regions. In these regions, there is no evidence of fretting-corrosion after the in vitro testing. The lack of micromotion is caused by the debonding due to testing configurations and implant design. The absence of contact doesn't allow wear by abrasion or third body, avoiding the fretting-corrosion damage. For the regions distal lateral and proximal medial, it is possible to observe fretting-corrosion due to micromotions, which is supported by the in silico analysis results. The region proximal medial had the highest micromotion on computational analysis and the fretting-corrosion was more severe on laboratory testing, reinforcing the relevance of micromotion in the fretting-corrosion damage on the stem-cement interface. Conclusion. The results indicate a correlation of micromotion calculated by in silico analysis and fretting-corrosion damage observed on in vitro testing. The developed FEA model may be a useful tool to predict the fretting-corrosion damage on the THA implants on pre-clinical testing. Additional efforts are needed to apply this tool on bone-implant systems to predict fretting-corrosion damage observed in vivo. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

INTRODUCTION. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) provides an effective alternative to anatomic shoulder replacements for individuals with cuff tear arthropathy, but certain osteoarthritic glenoid deformities make it challenging to achieve sufficient long term fixation. To compensate for bone loss, increase available bone stock, and lateralize the glenohumeral joint center of rotation, bony increased offset RSA (BIO-RSA) uses a cancellous autograft for baseplate augmentation that is harvested prior to humeral head resection. The motivations for this computational study are twofold: finite element (FE) studies of BIO-RSA are absent from the literature, and guidance in the literature on screw orientations that achieve optimal fixation varies. This study computationally evaluates how screw configuration affects BIO-RSA graft micromotion relative to the implant baseplate and glenoid. METHODS. A senior shoulder specialist (GSA) selected a scapula with a Walch Type B2 deformity from patient CT scans. DICOM images were converted to a 3D model, which underwent simulated BIO-RSA with three screw configurations: 2 divergent superior & inferior locking screws with 2 convergent anterior & posterior compression screws (SILS); 2 convergent anterior & posterior locking screws and 2 superior & inferior compression screws parallel to the baseplate central peg (APLS); and 2 divergent superior & inferior locking screws and 2 divergent anterior & posterior compression screws (AD). The scapula was assigned heterogeneous bone material properties based on the DICOM images’ Hounsfield unit (HU) values, and other components were assigned homogenous properties. Models were then imported into an FE program for analysis. Anterior-posterior and superior-inferior point loads and a lateral-medial distributed load simulated physiologic loading. Micromotion data between the RSA baseplate and bone graft as well as between the bone graft and glenoid were sub-divided into four quadrants. RESULTS. In all but 1 quadrant, APLS performed the worst with the graft having an average micromotion of 347.1µm & 355.9 µm relative to the glenoid and baseplate, respectively. The SILS configuration ranked second, having 211.2 µm & 274.4 µm relative to the glenoid and baseplate. AD performed best, allowing 247.4 µm & 225.4 µm of graft micromotion relative to the glenoid and baseplate. DISCUSSION. Both APLS and SILS techniques are described in the literature for BIO-RSA fixation; however, the data indicate that AD is superior in its ability to reduce graft micromotion, and thus some revision to common practices may be necessary. While these micromotion data are larger than data in the extant RSA literature, there are several factors that account for this. First, to properly model the difference between locking and compression screws, we simulated friction between the compression screw heads and baseplate rather than a tied constraint as done in other studies, resulting in larger micromotion. Second, the trabecular bone graft is at greater risk of deforming than metallic spacers used when studying micromotion with glenosphere lateralization, increasing graft deflection magnitude. Future work will investigate the effects of various BIO-RSA variables. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Typical failure of cementless total hip arthroplasty is the lack of initial stability. Indeed, presence of motion at the bone implant-interface leads to formation of fibrous tissue that prevents bone ingrowth, which in turn may lead to loosening of the implant. It has been shown that interfacial micromotion around 40 produces partial ingrowth, while micromotion exceeding 150 completely inhibits bone ingrowth. Finite element analyses (FEA) are widely used to evaluate the initial stability of cementless THA in pre-clinical validation. Untill now, most FE models developed to predict initial stability of cementless implants were performed based on static load, by selecting the greatest load at a particular time of the cycle activity, but in fact the hip is exposed to varied load during the activity. The aim of this study is to investigate the difference in the predicted micromotion induced by static, quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. Materials & Methods. Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed on a Profemur®TL implanted into a composite bone. The implant orientation was validated in a previous study [3]. All materials were defined as linear isotropic homogeneous. Static and dynamic FEA was performed for the loading conditions defined by simulating stair-climbing. In the static analysis, the applied resultant force (calculated with a body weight of 836N) were 951N and 2107N to simulate the abductor muscle and the hip joint contact forces, respectively [4]. In the dynamic analysis, the applied resultant force can be seen on Fig. 1. The initial stability was extracted on 54 points (Fig. 2) located on the plasma spray surface by calculating the difference between the final displacement of the prosthesis and the final displacement of the composite bone. Results. The mean micromotion predicted with the static loading conditions is 32μm with a maximum of 76μm whereas the maximum micromotion predicted with dynamic loading conditions is 36μm with a maximum of 86μm. Micromotion predicted with dynamic load greater than the micromotion predicted with static load on 35 out of 54 points. In the superior portion of the prosthesis, micromotion predicted with static loading condition is greater on medial posterior and in lateral anterior faces. In the inferior portion, the micromotion. Discussion. Micromotion predicted by the dynamic loading condition is greater than that predicted with static loading condition. Moreover, 22 points are in the range of 50–150μm (range for partial osseointegration) with dynamic condition, whereas only 16 points are in this range with static condition. On the posterior inferior face, all points are in this range with the dynamic condition, whereas only 2 with static condition. However micromotion predicted at all points either by static or dynamic conditions are lower than 150μm, the threshold value with regard to osseointegration

Introduction:. Primary stability is crucial for long-term fixation of cementless tibial trays. Micromotion less than 50 μm is associated with stable bone ingrowth and greater than 150 μm causes the formation of fibrous tissue around the implant [1, 2]. Finite element (FE) analysis of complete activities of daily living (ADL's) have been used to assess primary stability, but these are computationally expensive. There is an increasing need to account for both patient and surgical variability when assessing the performance of total joint replacement. As a consequence, an implant should be evaluated over a spectrum of load cases. An alternative approach to running multiple FE models, is to perform a series of analyses and train a surrogate model which can then be used to predict micromotion in a fraction of the time. Surrogate models have been used to predict single metrics, such as peak micromotion. The aim of this work is to train a surrogate model capable of predicting micromotion over the entire bone-implant interface. Methods:. A FE model of an implanted proximal tibia was analysed [3] (Fig. 1). A statistical model of knee kinetics, incorporating subject-specific variability in all 6-DOF joint loads [4], was used to randomly generate loading profiles for 50 gait cycles. A Latin Hypercube (LH) sampling method was applied to sample 6-DOF loads of the new population throughout the gait cycle. Kinetic data was sampled at 10, 50 and 100 instances and FE predictions of micromotion were calculated and used to train a surrogate model capable of describing micromotion over the entire bone-implant interface. The surrogate model was tested for an unseen gait cycle and the resulting micromotions were compared with FE predictions. Results and discussion:. Accuracy of the surrogate model increased with increasing sample size in the training set; with a LH sample of 10, 50 and 100 trials, the surrogate model predicted micromotion at the bone-implant interface during gait with RMS accuracy of 61, 44 and 33 μm, respectively (Fig. 2). Similar range in micromotion was measured in FE and surrogate models; although the surrogate model tended to over-predict micromotion early in the gait cycle (Fig. 2). There was good agreement in location and magnitude of micromotion at the interface surface through out the gait cycle (Fig. 3). Although encouraging, further work is required to optimize the number and distribution of the training samples to minimize the error in the surrogate model. Analysis time for the FE model was 15 hours, compared to 30 seconds for the surrogate model. The results suggest that surrogate models have significant potential to rapidly predict micromotion over the entire bone-implant interface, allowing for a greater range in loading conditions to be explored than would be possible through conventional methods

Introduction. In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), non-cemented implants rely on initial fixation to stabilize the implant in order to facilitate biologic fixation. The initial fixation can be affected by several different factors from type of implant surface, implant design, patient factors, and surgical technique. The initial fixation is traditionally quantified by measuring the motion between the implant and underlying bone during loading (micromotion). Extraction force has also been quantified for cementless devices. The question remains does an increase or decrease in extraction force affect micromotion based on the fact that most loading at the knee joint is in compression. The objective of this research is to investigate if there is any correlation between extraction force and implant micromotion. Methods. The relationship between extraction force and micromotion was evaluated by performing a series of experiments using a synthetic bone analog and a tibial baseplate with hexagon pegs. Tunnels for the hexagon pegs were machined into the synthetic bone analog with different diameters, from 9.7 to 11.7 mm. The smaller diameter tunnels increase the press fit between the peg and bone. Sixty-six implants were tested to determine maximum extraction force. The implants were extracted using an electro-mechanical testing frame at a rate of 0.4 inches / minute. Two different types of bone analogs were used for this evaluation. One was an open-cell foam with a density of 12.5 lb/ft. 3. and the other was a closed-cell foam with a density of 20 lb/ft. 3. . Twelve TKA implants were tested to determine the maximum anterior-lift off micromotion during a posterior load application. A posterior stabilized polyethylene insert and mating femoral component were used during the loading. The posterior load cycled from 90 to 900 N for 500 cycles. The micromotion was evaluated with the femur at 90 degrees of flexion. Differential Variable Reluctance Transducers (DVRTs) were located under the four corners of the implant to quantify the superior-inferior motion of the implant. A composite synthetic bone analog was used for this evaluation, with open-cell foam (12.5 lb/ft. 3. ) on the inside and closed-cell foam (50 lb/ft. 3. ) on the outside. Results. The extraction force was higher for the denser closed-cell foam (Figure 1A). The extraction force generally increased with decreasing tunnel diameter, but there was a plateau of extraction force between 10.9 mm and 10.1 mm for the open-cell foam and peaked at 10.7mm for the closed-cell foam. The micromotion in both posterior DVRTs were found to be similar for all tunnel diameters. The micromotion in both anterior DVRTs increased slightly when increasing tunnels diameters from 10.2 mm to 10.7 and 11.2 mm, but increased dramatically when increasing the tunnel diameter to 11.7 mm. Discussion. In this study using a synthetic bone model, a decrease in extraction force was found to correlate with an increase in anterior lift-off micromotion (Figure 2). Next steps are to confirm these results from this simplified model in a more physiologic model with cadaveric bone and activity based loading. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

INTRODUCTION. Recently there have been case reports of component fractures and elevated metal ion levels potentially resulting from the use of cobalt-chrome modular necks in total hip arthroplasty. One potential cause that has been suggested is fretting corrosion caused by micromotion at the taper junction between the modular neck and the femoral stem. The objective of the current study was to investigate the effects of various impaction and loading methods on micromotion at the modular neck-femoral stem interface in a total hip replacement system. METHODS. A femoral stem was potted using dental acrylic and displacement transducers were inserted to measure micromotion in the modular neck pocket (Figure 1a). An 8° varus, long, cobalt-chrome, modular neck and 28 mm XXL cobalt-chrome femoral head were inserted in the femoral stem using various assembly techniques (a) hand assembly, (b) impaction loads: 2, 3, 4, 6, 16.4 kN and (c) in- vivo simulated impaction loads (constructs were placed on top of a block of ballistic gel (Clear Ballistic LLC, Fort Smith AR) and impacted): 2, 4, and 16.4 kN (Figure 1b). Impaction was obtained by placing the construct in a drop tower and impacting them. All constructs were oriented in 10/9 as per ISO 7206-6 and tested in an MTS machine with a sinusoidal load of 2.3 kN for 1,000 cycles in air at frequency of 10 Hz (Figure 1a). Micromotion data was recorded. To simulate the loading experienced with heavier patients and/or higher impact activities, selected constructs (as shown in Table 1) were sinusoidally loaded with 5.34 Kn load. Three samples were tested for all methods described above. RESULTS. Micromotion decreased as impaction forces increased (Table 1). There was a significant reduction in micromotion for impaction forces of 4, 6, and 16.4 kN when compared to hand assembled constructs. There was also a significant difference between 16.4 kN and each of the other impaction methods. The presence of ballistic gel to simulate in-vivo impaction did not significantly affect micromotion for any of the impaction forces. Increasing the loading force to 5.34 kN significantly increased micromotion for each of the assembly methods. DISCUSSION. Modular necks assembled by hand generated nearly twice as much micromotion as those assembled with 16.4 kN impaction force. There was significantly less micromotion following impaction with 16.4 kN than all other impaction forces, which reinforces the manufacturer's recommendation of impacting the neck with 3 firm mallet blows (∼ 17 kN). To the authors' knowledge this is the first study to simulate in-vivo impaction using ballistic gel. The use of ballistic gel did not result in statistically significant increases in micromotion. This suggests the recommendation of three firm mallet blows is still appropriate during in-vivo impaction. As expected, increased loading forces resulted in greater micromotion. This implies that apart from assembly impaction forces, increased load forces present in heavier patients or due to higher activity levels may result in higher levels of micromotion. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Introduction. Cementless unicondylar knee implants are intended to offer surgeons the potential of a faster and less invasive surgery experience in comparison to cemented procedures. However, initial 8 week fixation with micromotion less than 150µm is crucial to their survivorship1 to avoid loosening2. Methods. Test methods by Davignon et al3 for micromotion were used to assess fixation of the MAKO UKR Tritanium (MAKO) (Stryker, NJ) and the Oxford Cementless UKR (Biomet, IN). Data was analyzed to determine the activities of daily living (ADL) that generate the highest forces and displacements4, 5. Stair ascent with 3.2BW compressive posterior tibial load was identified to be an ADL which may cause the most micromotion5. Based on previous studies6, 10,000 cycles was set as the run-time. The AP and IE profiles were scaled back to 60% for the Oxford samples to prevent the congruent insert from dislocating. A four-axis test machine (MTS, MN) was used. The largest size UKRs were prepared per manufacturer's surgical technique. Baseplates were inserted into Sawbones (Pacific Research, WA) blocks1. Femoral components were cemented to arbors. The medial compartment was tested, and the lateral implants were attached to balance the loads. Five tests were conducted for each implant with a new Sawbones and insert for each test per the test method3. The ARAMIS System (GOM, Germany) was used to measure relative motion between the baseplate and the Sawbones at three anteromedial locations (Fig. 1). Peak-Peak (P-P) micromotion was calculated in the compressive and A/P directions. FEA studies replicating the most extreme static loading positions for MAKO micromotion were conducted to compare with the physical test results using ANSYS14.5 (ANSYS, PA). Results. MAKO had a maximum axial motion of 36µm (SD=5.28) at gage 2. Oxford had an average gage 1 axial and A/P motion of 109µm (SD=31.77) and 44mm (SD=28.62) respectively (Fig. 2A). FEA correlated well with the MAKO results (Fig. 2B). Discussion. Oxford has been shown to have microseparation in lab testing conditions and the studies by Liddle et al7 under the same stair ascent activity. However, based on our results, MAKO and Oxford are both expected to allow interdigitation for long-term fixation. The Sawbones model does not allow plastic deformation in axial compression and subsequent stabilization, which could allow Oxford to achieve the fixation and clinical success shown in outcome studies. A/P prep for Oxford allows for 3mm gap between the keel and the bone which may explain the variability in the X direction. Distal flatness of the Oxford varied by 0.5mm as shown on Figure 3. The flatness of the boundary of the implant may explain the elevated micromotion observed for Oxford implant. Future studies will concentrate on FEA of manufactured Oxford components to take into account the geometric discrepancies from a perfectly flat model. Davignon et al3 and this study show that the MAKO is expected to achieve long-term fixation in the initial fixation stages similar to the clinically successful Oxford cementless UKR

Introduction. The success of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), primary as well as for revision, largely depends on the initial stability of the femoral implant. In this respect, several studies have estimated that the micromotion at the bone-implant interface should not exceed 150µm (Jasty 1997, Viceconti 2000) in order to ensure optimal bonding between bone and implant. Therefore, evaluating the initial stability through micromotion measurements serves as a valid method towards reviewing implant design and its potential for uncemented THAs. In general, the methods used to measure the micromotion assume that the implant behaves as a rigid body. While this could be valid for some primary stems (Østbyhaug 2010), studies that support the same assumption related to revision implants were not found. The aim of this study is to assess the initial stability of a femoral revision stem, taking into account possible non-rigid behaviour of the implant. A new in vitro measuring method to determine the micromotion of femoral revision implants is presented. Both implant and bone induced displacements under cyclic load are measured locally. Methods. A Profemur R modular revision stem (MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. Arlington, TN, United States of America) and artificial femora (composite bone 4th generation #3403, Sawbones Europe AB, Malmö, Sweden) prepared by a surgeon were used. The micromotions were measured in proximal-distal, medial-lateral or anterior-posterior directions at four locations situated in two transverse planes, using pin and bushing combinations. At each measuring location an Ø8mm bushing was attached to the bone, and a concentric Ø3mm pin was attached to the implant [Fig.1 and 2]. A supporting structure used to hold either guiding bushings or linear variable displacement transducers (LVDT) is attached to the proximal part of the implant. The whole system was installed on a hydraulic force bench (PC160N, Schenck GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and 250 physiological loading cycles were applied [Fig.3]. Results. By combining the local bone and implant displacements, the relative average micromotion appeared to be less than 25µm in the proximal region and less than 50µm in the distal region. These data correspond to a regular implant-bone fit. Also the micromotion is on average larger in the medial-lateral plane than in the posterior-anterior plane. If the implant deformations were not taken into account then the average values for micromotion were overestimated up to 20µm at proximal levels, and up to 140µm at distal levels. Conclusion. Good initial stability is achieved in each case, suggesting a successful long-term outcome. These findings are consistent with a success rate of 96% reported for the used implant over an average of 10 years (Köster 2008). To adequately evaluate the initial stability of femoral implants, the non-rigid behaviour cannot be ignored. Acknowledgments. This research is supported by BVOT (Belgian Association for Orthopaedics and Traumatology) and Impulse Fund KU Leuven