Introduction. Gait laboratory measurement of whole-body kinematics and ground reaction forces during a wide range of activities is frequently performed in joint replacement patient diagnosis, monitoring, and rehabilitation programs. These data are commonly processed in musculoskeletal modeling platforms such as OpenSim and Anybody to estimate muscle and joint reaction forces during activity. However, the processing required to obtain musculoskeletal estimates can be time consuming, requires significant expertise, and thus seriously limits the patient populations studied. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of deep learning methods for estimating muscle and joint reaction forces over time given kinematic data, height, weight, and ground reaction forces for total knee replacement (TKR) patients performing activities of daily living (ADLs). Methods. 70 TKR patients were fitted with 32 reflective markers used to define anatomical landmarks for 3D motion capture. Patients were instructed to perform a range of tasks including gait, step-down and sit-to-stand. Gait was performed at a self-selected pace, step down from an 8” step height, and sit-to-stand using a chair height of 17”. Tasks were performed over a force platform while force data was collected at 2000 Hz and a 14 camera motion capture system collected at 100 Hz. The resulting data was processed in OpenSim to estimate joint reaction and muscle forces in the hip and knee using static optimization. The full set of data consisted of 135 instances from 70 patients with 63 sit-to-stands, 15 right-sided step downs, 14 left-sided step downs, and 43 gait sequences. Two classes of neural networks (NNs), a recurrent neural network (RNN) and temporal convolutional neural network (TCN), were trained to predict activity classification from joint angle, ground reaction force, and anthropometrics. The NNs were trained to predict muscle and joint reaction forces over time from the same input metrics. The 135 instances were split into 100 instances for training, 15 for validation, and 20 for testing. Results. The RNN and TCN yielded classification accuracies of 90% and 100% on the test set. Correlation coefficients between ground truth and predictions from the test set ranged from 0.81–0.95 for the RNN, depending on the activity. Predictions from both NNs were qualitatively assessed. Both NNs were able to effectively learn relationships between the input and output variables. Discussion. The objective of the study was to develop and evaluate deep learning methods for predicting patient mechanics from standard gait lab data. The resulting models classified activities with excellent performance, and showed promise for predicting exact values for loading metrics for a range of different activities. These results indicate potential for real-time prediction of musculoskeletal metrics with application in patient diagnostics and rehabilitation. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Background. Previous in vivo fluoroscopic studies have documented that subjects having a PS TKA experience a more posterior condylar contact position at full extension, a high incidence of reverse axial rotation and mid flexion instability. More recently, a PS TKA was designed with a Gradually Reducing Radius (Gradius) curved condylar geometry to offer patients greater mid flexion stability while reducing the incidence of reverse axial rotation and maintaining posterior condylar rollback. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with a Gradius curved condylar geometry to determine if these subjects experience an advantage over previously designed TKA. Methods. In vivo kinematics for 30 clinically successful patients all having a Gradius designed PS fixed bearing TKA with a symmetric tibia were assessed using mobile fluoroscopy. All of the subjects were scored to be clinically successful. In vivo kinematics were determined using a 3D-2D registration during three weight-bearing activities: deep-knee-bend (DKB), gait, and ramp down (RD). Flexion measurements were recorded using a digital goniometer while ground reaction forces were collected using a force plate as well. The subjects then assessed for range of motion, condyle translation and axial rotation and ground reaction forces. Results. During a DKB, subjects implanted a Gradius designed, PS fixed bearing TKA design exhibited an average of 3.35 mm of posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle and 2.73 mm of the medial condyle with an average axial rotation of 4.90° in the first 90° of flexion. The average max flexion was 111.4°. From full extension to maximum flexion, the average axial rotation was 4.73°, while the subjects experienced 5.34 and 1.97 mm on the lateral and medial condyle rollback, respectively. During mid flexion from 30 to 60 degrees of flexion, the subjects experienced 1.34° of axial rotation, −1.13 and −0.11 mm of lateral and medial condyle motion. Conclusions. Subjects in this study did experience good weight-bearing flexion and magnitudes of axial rotation and posterior femoral rollback similar to previous PS TKA designs. During mid flexion, subjects in this study did experience less mid flexion paradoxical sliding than other PS TKA, leading to greater mid flexion stability for the patients

Background. High functional aspirations and an active ageing population equate to a growing number of patients awaiting hip arthroplasty demanding superior biomechanical function. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanics of top walking speed between two commonly used hip arthroplasty procedures to determine if a performance advantage existed. Methods. A retrospective comparative study was performed using sixty-seven subjects, twenty-two subjects in both hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty groups along with twenty-three healthy controls. All arthroplasty subjects were recruited based on high psychometric scoring and had been performed through a posterior approach, and had been discharged from follow-up. On an instrumented treadmill each subject was measured by a researcher blinded to which procedure that patient had undergone. After a six minute acclimatization period, the speed was increased incrementally until top walking performance had been attained. At all increments, ground reaction forces and temporospatial measurements were collected. Results. The two arthroplasty groups were well matched demographically, with no significant differences with regards to age, sex, height, BMI and pre-operative radiological severity. Treadmill temporospatial analysis demonstrated significant differences between the two groups. The hip resurfacing group were able to walk statistically faster (p=0.023) with an increased step length(p=0.041). The top walking speed mean of 2.06m/sec by the resurfacing almost matched the healthy controls. Assessing ground reaction forces and symmetry also demonstrated hip resurfacing was superior (Graph 1). [Graph 1: Mean Gait Biomechanics at Top Speed]. Conclusion. This study is the first to focus on high end performance following hip arthroplasty, encouraging patients to achieve as high a speed as they comfortably could. The total hip arthroplasty group walked nine percent faster than the previously published top speed of 1.73m/sec, however the resurfacings still walked ten percent faster, matching the normal controls for speed and step length

Individuals with multi-compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) frequently experience challenges in activities of daily living (ADL) such as stair ambulation. The Levitation “Tri-Compartment Offloader” (TCO) knee brace was designed to reduce pain in individuals with multicompartment KOA. This brace uses novel spring technology to reduce tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces via reduced quadriceps forces. Information on brace utility during stair ambulation is limited. This study evaluated the effect of the TCO during stair descent in patients with multicompartment KOA by assessing knee flexion moments (KFM), quadriceps activity and pain. Nine participants (6 male, age 61.4±8.1 yrs; BMI 30.4±4.0 kg/m2) were tested following informed consent. Participants had medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grades two to four) diagnosed by an orthopaedic surgeon. Joint kinetics and muscle activity were evaluated during stair descent to compare three bracing conditions: 1) without brace (OFF); 2) brace in low power (LOW); and 3) brace in high power (HIGH). The brace spring engages from 60° to 120° and 15° to 120° knee flexion in LOW and HIGH, respectively. Individual brace size and fit were adjusted by a trained researcher. Participants performed three trials of step-over-step stair descent for each bracing condition. Three-dimensional kinematics were acquired using an 8-camera motion capture system. Forty-one spherical reflective markers were attached to the skin (on each leg and pelvis segment) and 8 markers on the brace. Ground reaction forces and surface EMG from the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) were collected for the braced leg. Participants rated knee pain intensity performing the task following each bracing condition on a 10cm Visual Analog Scale ranging from “no pain” (0) to “worst imaginable pain” (100). Resultant brace and knee flexion angles and KFM were analysed during stair contact for the braced leg. The brace moment was determined using brace torque-angle curves and was subtracted from the calculated KFM. Resultant moments were normalized to bodyweight and height. Peak KFMs were calculated for the loading response (Peak1) and push-off (Peak2) phases of support. EMG signals were normalized and analysed during stair contact using wavelet analysis. Signal intensities were summed across wavelets and time to determine muscle power. Results were averaged across all 3 trials for each participant. Paired T-tests were used to determine differences between bracing conditions with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (α=0.025). Peak KFM was significantly lower compared to OFF with the brace worn in HIGH during the push-off phase (p Table 1: Average peak knee flexion moments, quadriceps muscle power and knee pain during stair descent in 3 brace conditions (n=9). Quadriceps activity, knee flexion moments and pain were significantly reduced with TCO brace wear during stair descent in KOA patients. These findings suggest that the TCO assists the quadriceps to reduce KFM and knee pain during stair descent. This is the first biomechanical evidence to support use of the TCO to reduce pain during an ADL that produces especially high knee forces and flexion moments. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

The optimal correction of the weight bearing line during High Tibial Osteotomy has not been determined. We used finite element modelling to simulate the effect that increasing opening wedge HTO has on the distribution of stress and pressure through the knee joint during normal gait. Subject-specific models were developed by combining geometry from 7T MRI scans and applied joint loads from ground reaction forces measured during level walking. Baseline stresses and pressures on the articulating proximal tibial cartilage and menisci were calculated. Progressive osteotomies were then simulated to shift the weight-bearing line from the native alignment towards/into the lateral compartment (between 40 – 80% of medial-lateral tibial width). Changes in calculated stresses and pressures were recorded. Both stress and pressure decreased in the medial compartment and increased in the lateral compartment as increasingly valgus osteotomies were simulated. The models demonstrated a consistent “safe zone” for weight bearing line position at 50%-65% medial-lateral tibial width, outside of which compartment stresses and pressures substantial increased. This study suggests a safe correction zone within which a medial opening wedge HTO can be performed correcting the WBL to 55% medio-lateral width of the tibia

Identifying knee osteoarthritis (OA) patient phenotypes is relevant to assessing treatment efficacy, yet biomechanical variability has not been applied to phenotyping. This study aimed to identify demographic and gait related groups (clusters) among total knee arthroplasty (TKA) candidates, and examine inter-cluster differences in gait feature improvement post-TKA. Knee OA patients scheduled for TKA underwent three-dimensional gait analysis one-week pre and one-year post-TKA, capturing lower-limb external ground reaction forces and kinematics using a force platform and optoelectronic motion capture. Principal component analysis was applied to frontal and sagittal knee angle and moment waveforms (n=135 pre-TKA, n=106 post-TKA), resulting in a new uncorrelated dataset of subject PCscores and PC vectors, describing major modes of variability throughout one gait cycle (0–100%). Demographics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), gait speed), and gait angle and moment PCscores were standardized and assessed for outliers. One patient exceeding Tukey's outer (3IQR) fence was removed. Two-dimensional multidimensional scaling followed by k-medoids clustering was applied to scaled demographics and pre-TKA PCscores [134×15]. Number of clusters (k=2:10) were assessed by silhouette coefficients, s, and stability by Adjusted Rand Indices (ARI) of 100 data subsets. Clusters were validated by examining inter-cluster differences at baseline, and inter-cluster gait changes (PostPCscore–PrePCscore, n=105) by k-way ANOVA and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) criterion. Four (k=4) TKA candidate groups yielded optimum clustering metrics (s = 0.4, ARI=0.75). Cluster 1 was all-males (male:female=19:0) who walked with faster gait speeds (1>2,3), larger flexion angle magnitudes and stance-phase angle range (PC1 & PC4 1>2,3,4), and more flexion (PC2 1>2,3,4) and adduction moment (PC2 & PC3 1>2,3) range patterns. Cluster 1 had the most dynamic kinematics and kinetic loading/unloading range amongst the clusters, representing a higher-functioning (less “stiff”) male subset. Cluster 2 captured older (2>1,3) males (31:1) with slower gait speeds (2 4), and lower flexion angle magnitude (PC1 3 2,3) and less stiff kinematic and kinetic patterns relative to Clusters 2 and 3, representing a higher-functioning female subset. Radiographic severity did not differ between clusters (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade, p=0.9, n=102), and after removing demographics and re-clustering, gender differences remained (p < 0 .04). Pre-TKA, higher-functioning clusters (1&4) had more dynamic loading/un-loading kinetic patterns. Post-TKA, high-functioning clusters experienced less gait improvement (flexion angle PC2, 1,4 < 3, p≥0.004, flexion moment PC2, 4 < 2,3), with some sagittal range patterns decreasing postoperatively. TKA candidates can be characterized by four clusters, differing by demographics and biomechanical severity features. Post-TKA, functional gains were cluster-specific, stiff-gait clusters experienced more improvement, while higher-functioning clusters experienced less gain and showed some decline. Results suggest the presence of cohorts who may not benefit functionally from TKA. Cluster profiling may support triaging and developing targeted OA treatment strategies, meeting individual function needs

The literature indicates that femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients do not return to the level of controls (CTRL) following surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare hip biomechanics during stair climbing tasks in FAI patients before and two years after undergoing corrective surgery against healthy controls (CTRL). A total of 27 participants were included in this study. All participants underwent CT imaging at the local hospital, followed by three-dimensional motion analysis done at the human motion biomechanics laboratory at the local university. Participants who presented a cam deformity >50.5° in the oblique-axial or >60° in the radial planes, respectively, and who had a positive impingement test were placed in the FAI group (n=11, age=34.1±7.4 years, BMI=25.4±2.7 kg/m2). The remaining participants had no cam deformity and negative impingement test and were placed in the CTRL group (n=16, age=33.2±6.4 years, BMI=26.3±3.2 kg/m2). The CTRL group completed the biomechanics protocol once, whereas the FAI group completed the protocol twice, once prior to undergoing corrective surgery for the cam FAI, and the second time at approximately two years following surgery. At the human motion biomechanics laboratory, participants were outfitted with 45 retroreflective markers placed according to the UOMAM marker set. Participants completed five trials of stairs task on a three step instrumented stair case to measure ground reaction forces while 10 Vicon MX-13 cameras recorded the marker trajectories. Data was processed using Nexus software and divided into stair ascent and stair descent tasks. The trials were imported into custom written MatLab software to extract peak pelvis and hip kinematics and hip kinetic variables. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine significant (p < 0.05) differences between the groups. No significant differences occurred during the stair descent task between any of the groups. During the stair ascent task, the CTRL group had significantly greater peak hip flexion angle (Pre-Op=58±7.1°, Post-Op=58.1±6.6°, CTRL=64.1±5.1°) and sagittal hip range of motion (ROM) (Pre-Op=56.7±6.7°, Post-Op=56.3±5.5°, CTRL=61.7±4.2°) than both the pre- and post-operative groups. Pre-operatively, the FAI group had significantly less peak hip adduction angle (Pre-Op=2±4.5°, Post-Op=3.4±4.4°, CTRL=5.5±3.7°) and hip frontal ROM (Pre-Op=9.9±3.4°, Post-Op=11.9±5.4°, CTRL=13.4±2.5°) compared to the CTRL group. No significant differences occurred in the kinetic variables. Our findings are in line with the Rylander and colleagues (2013) who also found that hip sagittal ROM did not improve following corrective surgery. Their study included a mix of cam and pincer-type FAI, and had a mean follow-up of approximately one year. Our cohort included only cam FAI and they had a mean follow-up of approximately two years, indicating with the extra year, the patients still did not show sagittal hip kinematics improvement. In the frontal plane, there was no significant difference between the post-op and the CTRL, indicating that the postoperative FAI reached the level of the CTRLs. This is in line with recent work that indicates a more medialized hip contact force vector following surgery, suggesting better hip stabilization

Introduction. Alignment of the acetabular cup and femoral components directly affects hip joint loading and potential for impingement and dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) [1]. Changes to the lines of action and moment generating capabilities of the muscles as a result of component position may influence overall patient function. The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of component placement on hip joint contact forces (JCFs) and muscle forces during a high demand step down task and to identify important alignment parameters using a probabilistic approach. Methods. Three patients following THA (2 M: 28.3±2.8 BMI; 1 F: 25.7 BMI) performed lower extremity maximum isometric strength tests and a step down task as part of a larger IRB-approved study. Patient-specific musculoskeletal models were created by scaling a model with detailed hip musculature [2] to patient segment dimensions and mass. For each model, muscle maximum isometric strengths were optimized to minimize differences between model-predicted and measured preoperative maximum isometric joint torques at the hip and knee. Baseline simulations used patient-specific models with corresponding measured kinematics and ground reaction forces to predict hip JCFs and muscle forces using static optimization. To assess the combined effects of stem and cup position and orientation, a 1000 trial Monte Carlo simulation was performed with input variability in each degree of freedom based on the ±1 SD range in component placement relative to native geometry reported by Tsai et al. [3] (Figure 1). Maximum confidence bounds (1–99%) were predicted for the hip JCF magnitude and muscle forces for three prime muscles involved in the task (gluteus medius, gluteus minimus and psoas). HJC confidence bounds were compared to Orthoload measurements from telemetric implants from 6 patients performing the step down task. Sensitivity of hip JCF and muscle force outputs was quantified by Pearson Product-Moment correlation between the input parameter and the value of each output averaged across four points in the cycle. Results. Variation in the placement of the stem and cup produced an average maximum confidence bound (1–99%) in hip JCF of 277.7±91.1N and forces of 259.4±58.3N in the gluteus medius for all three patients (Figure 2). Sensitivity to cup and stem placement varied among the three patients; however, in general, hip JCFs were more sensitive to the position of the stem than the cup (Figure 3). Hip JCF was most sensitive to stem anteversion (0.64±0.10) and the superior/inferior stem position (0.42±0.19). Discussion. Variation in stem anteversion and medial/lateral cup position contributed the largest amount of variability in hip JCF and muscle forces during a step down task. The probabilistic analysis characterized bounds for output parameters, considering interactions between alignment parameters. Alignments that avoid increases in JCF and muscle loading during high demand tasks may lead to earlier recovery of function, by reducing muscle fatigue and the need to develop compensatory movement patterns. Acknowledgements. This research was supported in part by DePuy-Synthes

Introduction:. Direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be a muscle sparing approach. The purpose of this study was to compare gait patterns over time between patients undergoing THA via DAA and posterior approach (PA). Methods:. 22 patients with unilateral primary hip osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled and gait analysis was performed prior to, at 6 months and 1 year following THA via DAA and PA. All PA THA's were performed by a single surgeon from January 2008 to February 2009; all DAA THA's were performed by the same surgeon at the same institution from January 2010 to May 2011 with similar design of uncemented acetabular, femoral components and bearing surfaces. Reflective markers were placed on the lower extremity and motion data collected using six infrared cameras (Qtrac, Qualysis). Ground reaction forces were recorded with a multicomponent force plate (Kistler). A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare changes in gait parameters over time. Harris Hip Score was used to quantify pain and function. Results:. There were 11 patients in both groups with similar age, sex and BMI distribution. Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated improvement in flexion/extension range of motion (ROM) (p = 0.006), peak flexion (p = 0.05) and extension moments (p = 0.004) with no differences between groups. Internal/external ROM improved significantly and was higher in DAA group as compared to PA group (p = 0.05). Gait velocity and single-leg stance time improved significantly in PA group (p = 0.001), but they were similar between groups postoperatively. Pain and function scores were also similar. Conclusions:. THA performed via DAA and PA offer similar improvement in gait parameters at 6 months and 1 year follow-up with the exception of internal/external ROM. This might be indicative of altered hip mechanics related to release and repair of external rotators during PA THA

Intro. Across much of medicine, activity levels predict life expectancy, with low levels of activity being associated with increased mortality, and higher levels of activity being associated with longer healthier lives. Resurfacing is a technically demanding procedure that has suffered significant fallout from the failure of a couple of poorly performing designs. However strong evidence associates resurfacing with improved life expectancy in both the short and longer term following surgery. We wondered if there was any relationship between the function of hips following surgery and the extent of that surgery. Could a longer stem inside the femur be the reason for a slightly reduced step length? We proposed the nul hypothesis that there was no clinically relevant difference between stem length and gait. Method. After informed consent each subject was allowed a 5 minute acclimatisation period at 4km/hr on the instrumented treadmill (Kistler Gaitway, Amherst, NY). Their gait performance on an increasing incline at 5, 10 and 15%. At all 0.5km incremental intervals of speed, the vertical component of the ground reaction forces, center of pressure and temporal measurements were collected for both limbs with a sampling frequency of 100Hz over 10sec. They were also asked to log onto our JointPRO website and report their function using Oxford, EQ5D, and Imperial scores. Owing to current restrictions in indications, the patient groups selected were not comparable. However, from our database of over 800 patients who have been through the gait lab. 82 subjects were tested from 2 diagnostic groups (29 conventional THR, 27 hip resurfacing) and compared with a slightly younger group of 26 healthy controls. Patients were excluded if less than 12 months postop, or with any other documented joint disease or medical comorbidities which might affect gait performance. Body weight scaling was also applied to the outputted mechanical data to correct for mass differences. All variables for each subject group were compared to each other using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post hoc test with significance set at α=0.05. Results. The experimental groups were reasonably matched for sex, height and BMI, although the controls were rather younger, and the hip replacements rather older (young hip resurfacings were excluded for lack of good controls). Any differences did not reach significance. Oxford hip scores and EQ5D were almost identical for the two experimental groups. The THR group walked 10% slower than control (1.8 (±0.2)m/sec vs 2.0 (±0.1)m/sec). while the HRA group walked 5% faster (2.1(±0.2)m/sec). The difference between THR and control was significant (p<0.05). (See Figure 1). Discussion. This data records a 15% difference in top walking speed between THR and HRA, far exceeding the 5% threshold of clinical relevance. We therefore consider this improved functional outcome to be clinically relevant, and report with increasing confidence that hip resurfacings is an effective intervention in the treatment of hip disease with clinically relevant superiority over THR, even in a group with an average age of 60

Introduction. Financial and human cost effectiveness is an increasing evident outcome measure of surgical innovation. Considering the human element, the aim is to restore the individual to their “normal” state by sparing anatomy without compromising implant performance. Gait lab studies have shown differences between different implants at top walking speed, but none to our knowledge have analysed differing total hip replacement patients through the entire range of gait speed and incline to show differences. The purpose of this gait study was to 1) determine if a new short stem femoral implant would return patients back to normal 2) compare its performance to established hip resurfacing and long stem total hip replacement (THR) implants. Method. 110 subjects were tested on an instrumented treadmill (Kistler Gaitway), 4 groups (short-stem THR, long-stem THR, hip resurfacing and healthy controls) of 28, 29, 27, and 26 respectively. The new short femoral stem patients (Furlong Evolution, JRI) were taken from the ongoing Evolution Hip trial that have been tested on the treadmill minimum 12months postop. The long stem total hip replacements and hip resurfacing groups were identified from our 800+ patient treadmill database, and only included with tests minimum 12 months postop and had no other joint disease or medical comorbidities which would affect gait performance. All subjects were tested through their entire range of gait speeds and incline after having a 5 minute habituation period. Speed were increased 0.5kmh until maximum walking speed achieved and inclines at 4kmh for 5,10,15%. At all incremental intervals of speed 10seconds ere collected, including vertical ground reaction forces (normalized to body mass), center of pressure and temporal measurements were for both limbs (fs=100Hz). Symmetry Index(SI) were calculated on a range of features comparing leg with implanted hip to the contralateral normal hip. Group means for each feature for each subject group were compared using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post-hoc test with significance set at α=0.05. Results. The four groups were reasonably matched for demographics and the implant groups for subjective outcome measures (Oxford Score & EQ5D). Hip resurfacing group had a clear top walking speed advantage, but when assessing SI on all speeds and incline, no groups were significantly different (Figure 1-3). Push-off and step length was statistically less favorable for the short/long stemmed THR group (p=0.005–0.05) depending on speed/incline comparing only implanted side. Discussion. The primary aim of this study was to determine if implant design affected gait symmetry and performance. Interestingly, irrespective of implant design, symmetry with regards to weight acceptance, impulse, push-off and step length was returned to normal when comparing to healthy controls. However individual implant performance on the flat and incline, showed inferior (p<0.05) push-off force and step length in the short stem and long stem THR groups when compared to controls. Age and gender may have played a part for the short stem group. It appears that the early gait outcomes for the short stem device are promising. Assessment at the 3-year mark should be conclusive

Introduction. Femoral component design is a key part of hip arthroplasty performance. We have previously reported that a hip resurfacing offered functional improved performance over a long stem. However resurfacing is not popular for many reasons, so there is a growing trend towards shorter femoral stems, which have the added benefit of ease of introduction through less invasive incisions. Concern is also developing about the impact of longer stems on lifetime risk of periprosthetic fracture, which should be reduced by the use of a shorter stem. For these reasons, we wanted to know whether a shorter stem offered any functional improvement over a conventional long stem. We surmised that longer stems in hip implants might stiffen the femoral shaft, altering the mechanical properties. Materials and Methods. From our database of over 800 patients who have been tested in the lab, we identified 95 patients with a hip replacement performed on only one side, with no other lower limb co-morbidities, and a control group:. 19 with long stem implant, age 66 ± 14 (LONG). 40 with short stem implant, age 69 ± 9 (SHORT). 26 with resurfacing, age 60 ± 8 (RESURF). 43 healthy control with no history of arthroplasty, age 59 ± 10 (CONTROL). All groups were matched for BMI and gender. Participants were asked to walk on an instrumented treadmill. Initially a 5 minute warm up at 4 km/h, then tests at increasing speed in 0.5 km/h increments. Maximum walking speed was determined by the patients themselves, or when subjects moved from walking to running. Ground reaction forces (GRF) were measured in 20 second intervals at each speed. Features were calculated based on the mean GRF for each trial, and on symmetry measures such as first peak force (heel strike), second peak force (toe-off), the rate at which the foot was loaded and unloaded, and step length. Results. When measured by top walking speed, stemmed implants of either type appear slower than those which do not include the femoral shaft (resurfacing). The latter group walking speed was equal to the control group (Figure 1). When looking at the whole gait cycle at any one speed, no major differences appear in the first or second peak forces (Figure 2 – 5km/h, implanted side compared). When checked for asymmetry, resurfacing patients did not demonstrate any asymmetry between legs, while either stemmed groups demonstrated slight differences between legs in terms of force related features (Figure 3). Discussion. We sought to show if stem length has an impact on top walking speed and asymmetry of gait. This small study contributes to that debate. We could not demonstrate any functional superiority of the short over the long stem, but the short femoral stem seems to transmit load just as well as the longer stem, allowing good load transfer at toe-off, and comparable walking speed. The results stress the advantages of non stemmed implants as published before. Our study adds to the discussion as to whether long stems are still needed in primary arthroplasty

Introduction. Although Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to correct abnormal frontal plane knee biomechanics, little is known about this effect beyond 6 months. The purpose of this study was to compare sequentially the knee adduction moment during level-walking before and after TKA in varus knees. We hypothesized that adduction moment would diminish after TKA proportionate to the tibio-femoral realignment in degrees. Methods. Fifteen patients (17 TKA's) with varus knees were prospectively enrolled and gait analysis performed prior to, 6 months and 1 year following TKA. Reflective markers were placed on the lower extremity and motion data collected using six infrared cameras (Qtrac, Qualysis). Ground reaction forces were recorded with a multicomponent force plate (Kistler). A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare changes in the peak adduction moment and peak dynamic varus angle over time. Results. TKA corrected static knee alignment from 2.2 (2.5) degrees varus to 3.5 (2.7) degrees valgus (P < 0.001). Peak dynamic varus angle during gait was reduced from 9.7 (6.5) degrees to 3.6 (5.8) degrees at 6 months and 5.2 (7.6) degrees at 1 year (Main Effect of Time; P=0.005). Peak adduction moment was significantly reduced to 85% of pre-op level at 6 months (P=0.037) but subsequently increased to 94% of pre-op level at 1 year (P = 0.539). Post-op improvement in static alignment did not correlate with the change in adduction moment at any follow-up period (P = 0.671). A significant correlation was found between the increase in dynamic varus angle and the subsequent increase in adduction moment from the six-month to the one-year follow-up (P = 0.008). Conclusion. TKA improves knee adduction moment at 6 months but this effect is lost with time (1 year). Despite restoration of static knee alignment and soft tissue balance, loading conditions at medial compartment remain high, predisposing to medial polyethylene wear, a finding reported by retrieval studies

For a proper rehabilitation of the knee following knee arthroplasty, a comprehensive understanding of bony and soft tissue structures and their effects on biomechanics of the individual patient is essential. Musculoskeletal models have the potential, however, to predict dynamic interactions of the knee joint and provide knowledge to the understanding of knee biomechanics. Our goal was to develop a generic musculoskeletal knee model which is adaptable to subject-specific situations and to use in-vivo kinematic measurements obtained under full-weight bearing condition in a previous Upright-MRI study of our group for a proper validation of the simulation results. The simulation model has been developed and adapted to subject-specific cases in the multi-body simulation software AnyBody. For the implementation of the knee model a reference model from the AnyBody Repository was adapted for the present issue. The standard hinge joint was replaced with a new complex knee joint with 6DoF. The 3D bone geometries were obtained from an optimized MRI scan and then post-processed in the mesh processing software MeshLab. A homogenous dilation of 3 mm was generated for each bone and used as articulating surfaces. The anatomical locations of viscoelastic ligaments and muscle attachments were determined based on literature data. Ligament parameters, such as elongation and slack length, were adjusted in a calibration study in two leg stance as reference position. For the subject-specific adaptation a general scaling law, taking segment length, mass and fat into account, was used for a global scaling. The scaling law was further modified to allow a detailed adaption of the knee region, e.g. align the subject-specific knee morphology (including ligament and muscle attachments) in the reference model. The boundary conditions were solely described by analytical methods since body motion (apart from the knee region) or force data were not recorded in the Upright-MRI study. Ground reaction forces have been predicted and a single leg deep knee bend was simulated by kinematic constraints, such as that the centre of mass is positioned above the ankle joint. The contact forces in the knee joint were computed using the force dependent kinematic algorithm. Finally, the simulation model was adapted to three subjects, a single leg deep knee bend was simulated, subject-specific kinematics were recorded and then compared to their corresponding in-vivo kinematic measurements data. We were able to simulate the whole group of subjects over the complete range of motion. The tibiofemoral kinematics of three subjects could be simulated showing the overall trend correctly, whereas absolute values partially differ. In conclusion, the presented simulation model is highly adaptable to an individual situation and seems to be suitable to approximate subject-specific knee kinematics without consideration of cartilage and menisci. The model enables sensitivity analyses regarding changes in patient specific knee kinematics following e.g. surgical interventions on bone or soft tissue as well as related to the design and placement of partial or total knee joint replacement. However, model optimisation, a higher case number, sensitivity analyses of selected parameters and a semi-automation of the workflow are parts of our ongoing work

Telemetric knee implants have provided invaluable insight into the forces occurring in the knee during various activities. However, due to the high amount of cost involved only a few of them have been developed. Mathematical modeling of the knee provides an alternative that can be easily applied to study high number of patients. However, in order to ensure accuracy these models need to be validated with in vivo force data. Previously, mathematical models have been developed and validated to study only specific activities. Therefore, the objective of this study was compare the knee force predictions from the same model with that obtained using telemetry for multiple activities. Kinematics of a telemetric patient was collected using fluoroscopy and 2D to 3D image registration for gait, deep knee bend (DKB), chair rise, step up and step down activities. Along with telemetric forces obtained from the implant, synchronized ground reaction forces (GRF) were also collected from a force plate. The relevant kinematics and the GRF were input into an inverse dynamic model of the human leg starting from the foot and ending at the pelvis (Figure 1). All major ligaments and muscles affecting the knee joint were included in the model. The pelvis and the foot were incorporated into the system so as to provide realistic boundary conditions at the hip and the ankle and also to provide reference geometry for the attachment sites of relevant muscles. The muscle redundancy problem was solved using the pseudo-inverse technique which has been shown to automatically optimize muscle forces based on the Crowninshield-Brand cost function. The same model, without any additional changes, was applied for all activities and the predicted knee force results were compared with the data obtained from telemetry. Comparison of the model predictions for the tibiofemoral contact forces with the telemetric implant data revealed a high degree of correlation both in the nature of variation of forces and the magnitudes of the forces obtained. Interestingly, the model predicted forces with a high level of accuracy for activities in which the flexion of the knee do not vary monotonically (increases and decreases or vice-versa) with the activity cycle (gait, step up and step down). During these activities, the difference between the model predictions with the telemetric data was less than 5% (Figure 2). For activities where flexion varies monotonically (either increases or decreases) with activity (DKB and chair rise) the difference between the forces was less than 10% (Figure 3). The results from this study show that inverse dynamic computational models of the knee can be robust enough to predict forces occurring at the knee with a high amount of accuracy for multiple activities. While this study was conducted only on one patient with a telemetric implant, the required inputs to the model are generic enough so that it is applicable for any TKA patient with the mobility to conduct the desired activity. This allows kinetic data to be provided for the improvement of implant design and surgical techniques accessibly and relatively inexpensively

Mathematical modeling provides an efficient and easily reproducible method for the determination of joint forces under in vivo conditions. The need for these new modeling methodologies is needed in the lumbar spine, where an understanding of the loading environment is limited. Few studies using telemetry and pressure sensors have directly measured forces borne by the spine; however, only a very small number of subjects have been studied and experimental conditions were not ideal for giving total forces acting in the spine. As a result, alternative approaches for investigating the lumbar spine across different clinical pathologies are essential. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop of an inverse dynamic mathematical model for theoretically deriving in-vivo contact forces as well as musculotendon forces in patients having healthy, symptomatic, pathological and post-operative conditions of the lumbar spine. Fluoroscopy and 3D-to-2D image registration were used to obtain kinematic data for patients performing flexion-extension of the lumbar spine. This data served as input into the multi-body, mathematical model. Other inputs included patient-specific bone geometries, recreated from CT, and ground reaction forces. Vertebral bones were represented as rigid bodies, while massless frames symbolized the lower body, torso and abdominal wall (Figure 1). In addition, ligaments were selected and modeled as linear spring elements, along with relevant muscle groups. The muscles were divided into individual fascicles and solved for using a pseudo-inverse algorithm which enabled for decoupling of the derived resultant torques defining the desired kinetic trajectory for the muscles. The largest average contact forces in the model for healthy, symptomatic, pathological, and post-operative lumbar spine conditions occurred at maximum flexion at L4L5 level and were predicted to be 2.47 BW, 2.33 BW, 3.08 BW, and 1.60 BW, respectively. The FE rotation associated with these theoretical force values was 43.0° in healthy, 40.5° in symptomatic, 44.4° in pathological, and 22.8° in post-operative patients. The smallest forces occurred as patients approached the upright, standing position, followed by slight increases in the contact force at full extension. The theoretically derived muscle forces exhibited similar contributory force profiles in the intact spine (healthy, symptomatic, and pathologic); however, surgically implanted spines experienced an increase in the contribution of the external oblique muscles accompanied with decreased slope gradients in the muscle force profiles (Figure 2). These altered force patterns may be associated with the decrease in the predicted contact forces in post-operative patients. In addition, the decreased slope gradients in surgically implanted patients corresponds with the observed difficulty of performing the prescribed motion, possibly due to improper muscle firing, thereby leading to slower motion cycles and less ranges-of-motion. On the contrary, patients having an intact spine performed the activity at a faster speed and to greater ranges-of-motion, which corresponds with the higher contact forces derived in the model. In conclusion, this research study presented the development of a mathematical modeling approach utilizing patient-specific data to generate theoretical in-vivo joint forces. This may serve to help progress the understanding for the kinetic characteristics of the native and surgically implanted lumbar spine

INTRODUCTION. A recent PRCT failed to demonstrate superiority of HRA over THA at low speeds. Having seen HRA walk much faster, we wondered if faster walking speed might reveal larger differences. We therefore asked two simple questions:. Does fast or uphill walking have an effect on the observed difference in gait between limbs implanted with one HRA and one THA?. If there is a difference in gait between HRA and THA implanted legs, which is more normal?. METHODS. Participants All patients who had one HR and one THR on the contralateral side were identified from the surgical logs of two expert surgeons. Both surgeons used a posterior approach to the hip and repaired the external rotators on closure. All consenting patients were assessed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) to ensure they had good functioning hips. There were 3 females and 6 males in the study group, who had a mean age of 67 (55–76) vs the control group 64 (53–82, p = 0.52). The BMIs of the two groups did not differ significantly (28 v 25, p = 0.11). The mean average oxford score of included patients was 44 (36–48). Radiographs of all subjects were examined to ensure that implanted components were well fixed. The mean time from THA operation to gait assessment was 4 years (1–17 yrs) and that for HRA was 6 years (0.7–10 yrs, p = 0.31). Subjects in this study had a mean TWS of 6.8 km/hr (5–9.5), and a mean TWI of 19 degrees (10–25 degrees). RESULTS. Gait Assessment At Slow And Top Walking Speeds: Mean differences in maximum weight acceptance, maximum push off and impulse correlated strongly with increasing speeds (p < 0.005). At top walking speed however, mean ground reaction forces were greater in the resurfacing group for four out of five of the key GRFs measured. Statistical significance was reached in two out of these variables (p = 0.03). The mean maximum weight acceptance was 71N or 8% greater in the resurfacing group. Gait Assessment Walking On The Flat And Uphill: Once subjects reached their steepest achievable incline, there were more obvious differences between the implanted legs with maximum weight acceptance being significantly greater (p = 0.42) in the HRA implanted limb. When the gait cycles were plotted, the HRA implanted limbs most resembled the normal asymptomatic control group (Graph 1). DISCUSSION. The self determined top walking speeds of subjects were considerably higher than that of other studies testing arthroplasty subjects 6.8 km/hr (5.5–9.5 km/hr). There were strong correlations between the differences in weight acceptance, push- off and impulse as speed increased. Relationship between up hill walking and gait differences: The patient self determined TWI mean average was 19 degrees (10–25 degrees). Testing people at their TWI did reveal a significant difference in favour of the HRA hip (p = 0.02). Hip resurfacing seems to allow for greater levels of function using hill walking and speed walking on a treadmill as a surrogate. There appears to be a functional advantage of having a HRA over THA in patients wishing to return to levels of activity more rigorous than walking at slow speeds on the flat

Accurate in vivo knee joint contact forces are required for joint simulator protocols and finite element models during the development and testing of total knee replacements (Varadarajan et al., 2008.) More accurate knowledge of knee joint contact forces during high flexion activities may lead to safer high flexion implant designs, better understanding of wear mechanisms, and prevention of complications such as aseptic loosening (Komistek et al., 2005.) High flexion is essential for lifestyle and cultural activities in the developing world, as well as in Western cultures, including ground-level tasks and chores, prayer, leisure, and toileting (Hemmerich et al., 2006.) In vivo tibial loads have been reported while kneeling; but only while the subject was at rest in the kneeling position (Zhao et al., 2007), meaning that the loads were submaximal due to muscle relaxation and thigh-calf contact support. The objective of this study was to report the in vivo loads experienced during high flexion activities and to determine how closely the measured axial joint contact forces can be estimated using a simple, non-invasive model. It provides unique data to better interpret non-invasively determined joint-contact forces, as well as directly measured tiobiofemoral joint contact force data for two subjects. Two subjects with instrumented tibial implants performed kneeling and deep knee bend activities. Two sets of trials were carried out for each activity. During the first set, an electromagnetic tracking system and two force plates were used to record lower limb kinematics and ground reaction forces under the foot and under the knee when it was on the ground. In the second set, three-dimensional joint contact forces were directly measured in vivo via instrumented tibial implants (Heinlein et al., 2007.) The measured axial joint contact forces were compared to estimates from a non-invasive joint contact force model (Smith et al., 2008.). The maximum mean axial forces measured during the deep knee bend were 24.2 N/kg at 78.2° flexion (subject A) and 31.1 N/kg at 63.5° flexion (subject B) during the deep knee bend (Figure 1.) During the kneeling activity, the maximum mean axial force measured was 29.8 N/kg at 86.8° flexion (subject B.) While the general shapes of the model-estimated curves were similar to the directly measured curves, the axial joint contact force model underestimated the measured contact forces by 7.0 N/kg on average (Figure 2.) The most likely contributor to this underestimation is the lack of co-contraction in the model. The study protocol was limited in that data could not be simultaneously collected due to electromagnetic interference between the motion tracking system and the inductively powered instrumented tibial component. Because skin-mounted markers were used, kinematics may be affected by skin motion artefacts. Despite these limitations, this study presents valuable information that will advance the development of high flexion total knee replacements. The study provides in vivo measurements and non-invasive estimates of joint contact forces during high flexion activities that can be used for joint simulator protocols and finite element modeling