Aims. The use of 3D printing has become increasingly popular and has been widely used in orthopaedic surgery. There has been a trend towards an increasing number of publications in this field, but existing literature incorporates limited high-quality studies, and there is a lack of reports on outcomes. The aim of this study was to perform a scoping review with Level I evidence on the application and effectiveness of 3D printing. Methods. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The keywords used for the search criteria were ((3d print*) OR (rapid prototyp*) OR (additive manufactur*)) AND (orthopaedic). The inclusion criteria were: 1) use of 3D printing in orthopaedics, 2) randomized controlled trials, and 3) studies with participants/patients. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane Collaboration Tool and PEDro Score. Pooled analysis was performed. Results. Overall, 21 studies were included in our study with a pooled total of 932 participants. Pooled analysis showed that operating time (p < 0.001), blood loss (p < 0.001), fluoroscopy times (p < 0.001), bone union time (p < 0.001), pain (p = 0.040), accuracy (p < 0.001), and functional scores (p < 0.001) were significantly improved with 3D printing compared to the control group. There were no significant differences in complications. Conclusion. 3D printing is a rapidly developing field in orthopaedics. Our findings show that 3D printing is advantageous in terms of operating time, blood loss, fluoroscopy times, bone union time, pain, accuracy, and function. The use of 3D printing did not increase the risk of complications. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(12):807–819

3D printing techniques have attracted a lot of curiosity in various surgical specialties and the applications of the 3D technology have been explored in many ways including fracture models for education, customized jigs, custom implants, prosthetics etc. Often the 3D printing technology remains underutilized in potential areas due to costs and technological expertise being the perceived barriers. We have applied 3D printing technology for acetabular fracture surgeries with in-house, surgeon made models of mirrored contralateral unaffected acetabulum based on the patients’ trauma CT Scans in 9 patients. The CT Scans are processed to the print with all free-ware modeling software and relatively inexpensive printer by the surgeon and the resulting model is used as a ‘reduced fracture template’ for pre-contouring the standard pelvic reconstruction plates. This allows use of the standard surgical implants, saves time on intra-operative plate contouring, and also aids in reduction to an extent. We share through this presentation the workflow of the freeware softwares to use in order to use this surgical planning and implant preparation that may remove the perceived barriers of cost and technology from surgeons that wish to explore using 3D printing technology for acetabular fracture management and may extend applications to other regions

In the last years, 3d printing has progressively grown and it has reached a solid role in clinical practice. The main applications brought by 3d printing in orthopedic surgery are: preoperative planning, custom-made surgical guides, custom-made im- plants, surgical simulation, and bioprinting. The replica of the patient's anatomy, starting from the elaboration of medical volumetric images (CT, MRI, etc.), allows a progressive extremization of treatment personalization that could be tailored for every single patient. In complex cases, the generation of a 3d model of the patient's anatomy allows the surgeons to better understand the case — they can almost “touch the anatomy” —, to perform a more ac- curate preoperative planning and, in some cases, to perform device positioning before going to the surgical room (i.e. joint arthroplasty). 3d printing is also commonly used to produce surgical cutting guides, these guides are positioned intraoperatively on given landmarks to guide the surgeon to perform a specific surgical act (bone osteotomy, bone resection, implant position, etc.). In total knee arthroplasty, custom-made cutting guides have been developed to help the surgeon align the femoral and tibial components to the pre-arthritic condition with- out the use of the intramedullary femoral guide. 3d printed custom-made implants represent an emerging alternative to biological reconstructions especially after oncologic resection surgery or in case of complex arthroplasty revision surgery. Custom-made implants are designed to re- place the original shape and size of the patient's bone and they allow an extreme personalization of the treatment for every single patient. Patient-specific surgical simulation is a new frontier that promises great benefits for surgical training. a solid 3d model of the patient's anatomy can faithfully reproduce the surgical complexity of the patient and it allows to generate surgical simulators with increasing difficulty to adapt the difficulties of the course with the level of the trainees performing structured training paths: from the “simple” case to the “complex” case

An overview about 3D printing technology in orthopaedic applications will be given based on examples. The process from early prototypes to certified implants coming from serial production will be demonstrated also considering relevant surrounding conditions. Today's focus is mostly on orthopaedic implants, but there is a high potential for new implant-related surgical instrument solutions taking into account up-coming clinical demands and user needs accessible by actual 3D printing technologies

Conventional 3D printing by itself is incapable of creating pores on a micro scale within deposited filaments throughout 3D scaffolds. These pores and hence larger surface areas are needed for cells to be adhered, proliferated, and differentiated. The aim of this work was to fabricate 3D polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds with internal multiscale porosity by using two different 3D printing techniques (ink/pellet of polymer-salt composite in low/high temperature printing) combined with salt leaching to improve cell adhesion, and cell proliferation besides to change degradation rate of PCL scaffolds:. 1. Non-solvent phase separation integrated 3D printing of polymer-salt inks with various salt content (i.e., low temperature ink-based printing, LT). 2. FDM printing of composite polymer-salt pellets which will be obtained by casting and evaporating of prepared ink (i.e., high temperature composite-pellet-based printing, HT). Further, the two approaches were followed by post salt leaching. Stem cells were able to attach on the surface and grow up to 14 days based on increasing cellular activities

Anatomically specific fixation devices have become mainstream, yet there are anatomical regions and clinical conditions where no pre-contoured plates are available, such as for glenohumeral arthrodesis. In a case series of 4 glenohumeral arthrodesis patients, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon at GCUH implemented 3D printing technology to create reconstructions of each patient's shoulder girdle to pre-contour arthrodesis plates. Our aim was to quantify the cost-benefit & intra-operative time savings of this technique in glenohumeral arthrodesis. We hypothesized that the use of 3D printing for creating patient specific implants through pre-operative contouring of plates will lead to intra-operative time and cost savings by minimising time spent bending plates during surgery. This study analysed 4 patients who underwent shoulder arthrodesis by a single consultant orthopaedic surgeon at GCUH between 2017-2021. A CT-based life-size model of each patient's shoulder girdle was 3D printed using freely available computer software programs: 3D Slicer, Blender, Mesh Mixer & Cura. Once the patient's 3D model was created, plate benders were used to contour the plate pre-op, which was then sterilised prior to surgery. Arthrodesis was performed according to AO principles of fixation. The time spent pre-bending the plate using the 3D model was calculated to analyse the intra-op time and cost-saving benefits. For the 4 cases, the plate pre-bending times were 45, 40, 45 & 20 minutes (average 38.8 mins). The intra-op correction time to make small adjustments to the plate was 2 min/ case. 3 plates needed minor (3 degree) adjustment to fine-tune scapula spine contouring. 1 plate needed a 5 degree correction to fine-tune hand position. On average, the pre-bending of the plate saved approximately 38.8 mins intra-op/ case. These shorter anaesthetic and operating times equate to approximately $2586 saving/ case, given an estimate of $4000/hour of theatre costs. We conclude that pre-bending plates around 3D-printed life-size models of an individual's shoulder girdle prior to surgery results in approximately 38.8 mins time saving intra-op when used in shoulder arthrodesis. This is a viable and effective technique that will ultimately result in significant operative time and financial savings

3D printing can be used for the regeneration of complex tissues with intricate 3D microarchitecture. Trabecular bone is a complex and porous structure with a high degree of anisotropy. Changes in bone microarchitecture are associated with pathologies such as osteoporosis [1]. The objective of this study is to determine the viability of using 3D printing to replicate trabecular bone structures with a good control over the microarchitecture and mechanical properties. Cylindrical samples of bovine trabecular bone were used in this study. Micro-computed tomography (microCT) was carried out and an isotropic voxel size of 22 µm was obtained (Xradia Versa 520, Zeiss, USA). After 3D reconstruction the main microstructure characteristics were analysed using ImageJ (NIH, US). The 3D printed bone replicas were created by segmenting the microCT imaged bone tissue and then converted into a STL file using Avizo (FEI, US). The 3D printer used for this study was the ProJet 5500X (3D Systems, US), which allows a number of different materials to be printed in the same built with a resolution of 25 µm. Preliminary results were obtained using one single material (VisiJet CR-WT, Tensile Modulus: 1–1.6 GPa, Tensile Strength: 37–47 MPa). The 3D printed bone replicas followed a critical cleaning step to remove any remaining support material in the pores. MicroCT was then carried out for the bone replicas obtaining the same isotropic voxel size as for their biological counterparts. ImageJ was used to obtain the main microstructure characteristics. The values of bone volume fraction (BV/TV), mean trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), mean trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp), and degree of anisotropy (DA) were measured for bone samples and their 3D printed replicas [2]. Preliminary results on the first bone sample with its 3D printed replica showed similar apparent trabecular structures. Their respective BV/TV was found to be 0.24 (bone) and 0.43 (replica). The Tb.Th and Tb.Sp were 0.222 mm and 0.750 mm respectively for the bone and 0.376 mm and 0.575 mm for the replica. Finally, their respective DA was found to be 0.68 (bone) and 0.66 (replica). The main microstructure characteristics analyzed showed some differences between the bone sample and the 3D printed replica. In particular, the 3D microstructures resulted over-dimensioned mainly due to factors such as microCT voxel size, resolution of the 3D printer and supporting material removal. However this is a preliminary investigation. Further analysis will focus on optimizing the microCT imaging as well as the 3D printing process to achieve more accurate bone replicas. In addition, multi-material printing will be employed to optimize some of the mechanical properties obtained through in situ microCT testing and FE subject-specific modelling

While the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for more accessible anatomy instruction tools, it is also well known that the time allocated to practical anatomy teaching has reduced in the past decades. Notably, the opportunity for anatomy students to learn osteology is not prioritised, nor is the ability of students to appreciate osteological variation. As a potential method of increasing accessibility to bone models, this study describes the process of developing 3D-printed replicas of human bones using a combination of structured light scanning (SLS) technology and 3D printing. Human bones were obtained from the Anatomy Lab at the University of Edinburgh and were digitised using SLS via an Einscan H scanner. The resulting data was then used to print multiple replicas of varying materials, colours, scales and resolutions on an Ultimaker S3 3D printer. To gather opinion on these models and their variables, surveys were completed by anatomy students and educators (n=57). Data was collected using a Likert scale response, as well as free-text answers to gather qualitative information. 3D scans of the scapula, atlas (C1 vertebrae) and femur were successfully obtained. Plastic replicas were produced with defined variables in 4 separate stations e.g. different colours, to obtain results from survey respondents. For colour, 87.7% of survey respondents preferred white models, with 7% preferring orange and 5.3% preferring blue. For material, 47.4% of respondents preferred PLA (Polylactic acid), while 33.3% preferred ABS (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), 12.3% preferred Pet-G (Polyethylene terephthalate glycol), 3.5% preferred Glassbend and 3.5% had no preference. Additional results based on scale and resolution were also collected. This initial study has demonstrated a proof-of-concept workflow for SLS technology to be combined with 3D printing to produce plastic replicas of human bones. Our study has provided key information about the colour, scale, material and resolution required for these models. Our future work will focus on determining accuracy of the models and their use as teaching aids for osteology education

A complete design-manufacturing process for delivering customized foot orthoses by means of digital technologies is presented. Moreover, this feasibility study aims to combine a semi-automatic modelling approach with the use of low-cost devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing. In clinical practice, traditional methods for manufacturing customized foot orthoses are completely manual, mainly based on plaster casting plus hand fabrication, and are widely used among practitioners. Therefore, results depend on skills and expertise of individual orthoptists and podiatrists that need considerable training and practice in order to obtain optimal functional devices. On the other side, novel approaches for design and manufacturing customized foot orthoses by means of digital technologies (generally based on 3D scanning, 3D modelling and 3D printing) are recently reported as a valid alternative method to overcome these limitations. This study has been carried out in an interdisciplinary approach between the staff of Design and Methods in Industrial Engineering and the staff of Podology with the aim to assess the feasibility of a novel user-friendly and cost-effective solution for delivering customized functional foot orthoses. More specifically, a Generative Design (GD) workflow has been developed to enable practitioners without enough CAD skills to easily 3D modelling and interactively customize foot orthoses. Additionally, low-cost devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing that have been acquired by the Podology Lab, were also tested and compared with the high-cost ones of the Department of Industrial Engineering. The complete process is divided into three main steps. The first one regards the digitization of the patient's foot by means of 3D laser scanner devices. Then a user-friendly 3D modelling approach, developed for this purpose as GD workflow, allows interactively generating the customized foot orthosis, also adjusting several features and exporting the watertight mesh in STL format. Finally, the last step involves Additive Manufacturing systems to obtain the expected physical item ready to use. First, for what concerns the digitizing step, the acquired data resulting from 3D scanning by means of the low-cost system (Sense 3D scanner) appears accurate enough for the present practical purposes. Then, with respect to the 3D modelling step, the proposed GD workflow in Grasshopper is intuitive and allows easily and interactively customizing the final foot orthosis. Finally, regarding the Additive Manufacturing step, the low cost 3D printer (Wasp Delta 40 70) is capable to provide adequate results for the shell of the foot orthosis. Moreover, this system appears really versatile in reason of the capability to print in a wide range of different filaments. Therefore, since the market of 3D printing filaments is rapidly growing, building sessions with different materials (both flexible and rigid such, for example, PLA, AB and PETG) were completed. This study validated, in terms of feasibility, that the use of a GD modelling approach, in combination with low-cost devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing, is a real alternative to conventional processes for providing customized foot orthosis. Moreover, the interdisciplinary approach allowed the transfer of skills and knowledge to the practitioners involved and, also, the low-cost devices Sense 3D scanner and Wasp Delta 40 70 that have been acquired by the Podology Lab, were demonstrated suitable for this kind of applications

Among the advanced technology developed and tested for orthopaedic surgery, the Rizzoli (IOR) has a long experience on custom-made design and implant of devices for joint and bone replacements. This follows the recent advancements in additive manufacturing, which now allows to obtain products also in metal alloy by deposition of material layer-by-layer according to a digital model. The process starts from medical image, goes through anatomical modelling, prosthesis design, prototyping, and final production in 3D printers and in case post-production. These devices have demonstrated already to be accurate enough to address properly the specific needs and conditions of the patient and of his/her physician. These guarantee also minimum removal of the tissues, partial replacements, no size related issues, minimal invasiveness, limited instrumentation. The thorough preparation of the treatment results also in a considerable shortening of the surgical and of recovery time. The necessary additional efforts and costs of custom-made implants seem to be well balanced by these advantages and savings, which shall include the lower failures and revision surgery rates. This also allows thoughtful optimization of the component-to-bone interfaces, by advanced lattice structures, with topologies mimicking the trabecular bone, possibly to promote osteointegration and to prevent infection. IOR's experience comprises all sub-disciplines and anatomical areas, here mentioned in historical order. Originally, several systems of Patient-Specific instrumentation have been exploited in total knee and total ankle replacements. A few massive osteoarticular reconstructions in the shank and foot for severe bone fractures were performed, starting from mirroring the contralateral area. Something very similar was performed also for pelvic surgery in the Oncology department, where massive skeletal reconstructions for bone tumours are necessary. To this aim, in addition to the standard anatomical modelling, prosthesis design, technical/technological refinements, and manufacturing, surgical guides for the correct execution of the osteotomies are also designed and 3D printed. Another original experience is about en-block replacement of vertebral bodies for severe bone loss, in particular for tumours. In this project, technological and biological aspects have also been addressed, to enhance osteointegration and to diminish the risk of infection. In our series there is also a case of successful custom reconstruction of the anterior chest wall. Initial experiences are in progress also for shoulder and elbow surgery, in particular for pre-op planning and surgical guide design in complex re-alignment osteotomies for severe bone deformities. Also in complex flat-foot deformities, in preparation of surgical corrections, 3D digital reconstruction and 3D printing in cheap ABS filaments have been valuable, for indication, planning of surgery and patient communication; with special materials mimicking bone strength, these 3D physical models are precious also for training and preparation of the surgery. In Paediatric surgery severe multi planar & multifocal deformities in children are addressed with personalized pre-op planning and custom cutting-guides for the necessary osteotomies, most of which require custom allografts. A number of complex hip revision surgeries have been performed, where 3D reconstruction for possible final solutions with exact implants on the remaining bone were developed. Elective surgery has been addressed as well, in particular the customization of an original total ankle replacement designed at IOR. Also a novel system with a high-tibial-osteotomy, including a custom cutting jig and the fixation plate was tested. An initial experience for the design and test of custom ankle & foot orthotics is also in progress, starting with 3D surface scanning of the shank and foot including the plantar aspect. Clearly, for achieving these results, multi-disciplinary teams have been formed, including physicians, radiologists, bioengineers and technologists, working together for the same goal

The aim of this study is to print 3D polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds at high and low temperature (HT/LT) combined with salt leaching to induced porosity/larger pore size and improve material degradation without compromising cellular activity of printed scaffolds. PCL solutions with sodium chloride (NaCl) particles either directly printed in LT or were casted, dried, and printed in HT followed by washing in deionized water (DI) to leach out the salt. Micro-Computed tomography (Micro-CT) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were performed for morphological analysis. The effect of the porosity on the mechanical properties and degradation was evaluated by a tensile test and etching with NaOH, respectively. To evaluate cellular responses, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (hBMSCs) were cultured on the scaffolds and their viability, attachment, morphology, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation were assessed. Micro-CT and SEM analysis showed that porosity induced by the salt leaching increased with increasing the salt content in HT, however no change was observed in LT. Structure thickness reduced with elevating NaCl content. Mass loss of scaffolds dramatically increased with elevated porosity in HT. Dog bone-shaped specimens with induced porosity exhibited higher ductility and toughness but less strength and stiffness under the tension in HT whereas they showed decrease in all mechanical properties in LT. All scaffolds showed excellent cytocompatibility. Cells were able to attach on the surface of the scaffolds and grow up to 14 days. Microscopy images of the seeded scaffolds showed substantial increase in the formation of extracellular matrix (ECM) network and elongation of the cells. The study demonstrated the ability of combining 3D printing and particulate leaching together to fabricate porous PCL scaffolds. The scaffolds were successfully printed with various salt content without negatively affecting cell responses. Printing porous thermoplastic polymer could be of great importance for temporary biocompatible implants in bone tissue engineering applications

Purpose. The purpose was to compare the accuracy of the method using 3D printing model with the method using picture archiving and communication system (PACS) images in high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Materials and methods. This study analyzed 40 patients with varus deformity and medial osteoarthritis. From 2012 to 2016, patients underwent HTO using either 3D printing model (20 knees) or method based on a PACS image (20 knees). After obtaining the correction angle for the target point (62.5% point of the mediolateral tibial plateau width), in the 3D printing method, the wedge-shaped 3D-printed model was designed with the measured angle and osteotomy section and was produced by the 3D printer. The PACS method used preoperative radiographs to shift the weight bearing axis. The accuracy of the HTO and the proportion of acceptable range (62.5 ± 5%) at each method was compared using the full-length lower limb radiographs at the sixth postoperative week. The pre and postoperative posterior tibial slope angle was also compared at each method. Results. The weight bearing line on the tibial plateau was corrected from a preoperative 21.1 ± 11.8% to a postoperative 61.6 ± 3.4% in the 3D group and from 19.5 ± 12.3% to 61.4 ± 8.0% in the PACS group. The patients in an acceptable range were more in 3D printing group (80%) than in PACS group (60%) (p=0.028). The mean of absolute difference with the target point was less in 3D printing groups (2.4 ± 2.5) than PACS group (6.2 ± 5.1) (p=0.006). The posterior tibial slope was not significantly different in 3D printing group (8.6° to 8.9°, p=0.073), whereas different in PACS group (9.9° to 10.5°, p=0.042). Conclusions. In HTO, correction based on the 3D printing method was more accurate than correction using the PACS method

Summary Statement. We are taking very expensive cutting edge technology, usually reserved for industry, and using it with the help of open source free software and a cloud 3D printing services to produce custom and anatomically unique patient individual implants for only £32. This is approx. 1/100. th. of the traditional cost of implant production. Introduction. 3D printing and rapid prototyping in surgery is an expanding technology. It is often used for preoperative planning, procedure rehearsal and patient education. There have been recent advances in orthopaedic surgery for the development of patient specific guides and jigs. The logical next step as the technology advances is the production of custom orthopaedic implants. Our aim was to use freely available open source software, a personal computer and consumer access online cloud 3D printing services to produce an accurate patient specific orthopaedic implant without utilising specialist expertise, capital expenditure on specialist equipment or the involvement of traditional implant manufacturing companies. This was all to be done quickly, cost effectively and in department. Methods & Materials. Using standard computed tomography (CT) scan and the standard file format of digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) data, a 3D surface reconstruction was made of a cadaveric radial head using the software OsiriX (DICOM image processing software for Apple OS X). This data was then processed in Meshlabs (a system for the processing and editing of unstructured 3D triangular meshes) to create a mirror image 3D model of the radial head with a stem added to produce prosthesis suitable to replace the contra lateral radial head. Both packages are distributed under open-source licensing—Lesser General Public Licence (LGPL)—and are therefore free. This was then uploaded and 3D printed using a process of selective laser sintering (SLS) in stainless steel via the commercial cloud printing service . Shapeways.com. . Results & Conclusions. The model produced was an accurate mirror image replica of the patient's original anatomy (all measurements equal +/− 0.2mm using TS411212 Digital Vernier Expert Caliper 300mm P=0.001 Showing no significant statistical difference. Production from original CT scan took a total of 10 days and the total cost including shipping was £32. This was then re-implanted in to the contra lateral cadaveric radius. We achieved our aims and goals of quick, cost effective and accurate implant creation

Introduction. The ability to create patient-specific implants (PSI) at the point-of-care has become a desire for clinicians wanting to provide affordable and customized treatment. While some hospitals have already adopted extrusion-based 3D printing (fused filament fabrication; FFF) for creating non-implantable instruments, recent innovations have allowed for the printing of high-temperature implantable polymers including polyetheretherketone (PEEK). With interest in FFF PEEK implants growing, it is important to identify methods for printing favorable implant characteristics such as porosity for osseointegration. In this study, we assess the effect of porous geometry on the cell response and mechanical properties for FFF-printed porous PEEK. We also demonstrate the ability to design and print customized porous implants, specifically for a sheep tibial segmental defect model, based on CT images and using the geometry of triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS). Methods. Three porous constructs – a rectilinear pattern and gyroid/diamond TPMSs – were designed to mimic trabecular bone morphology and manufactured via PEEK FFF. TPMSs were designed by altering their respective equation approximations to achieve desired porous characteristics, and the meshes were solidified and shaped using a CAD workflow. Printed samples were mCT scanned to determine the resulting pore size and porosity, then seeded with pre-osteoblast cells for 7 and 14 days. Cell proliferation and alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) were evaluated, and the samples were imaged via SEM. The structures were tested in compression, and stiffness and yield strength values were determined from resulting stress-strain plots. Roughness was determined using optical profilometry. Finally, our process of porous structure design/creation was modified to establish a proof-of-concept workflow for creating PSIs using geometry established from segmented sheep tibia CT images. Results. ALP activity measurements of the porous PEEK samples at 7 and 14 days were significantly greater than for solid controls (p < 0.001 for all three designs, 14 days). No difference between the porous geometries was found. SEM imaging revealed cells with flat, elongated morphology attached to the surface of the PEEK and into the pore openings, with filopodia and lamellipodia extensions apparent. mCT imaging showed average pore size to be 545 ± 43 µm (porosity 70%), 708 ± 64 µm (porosity 68%), and 596 ± 94 µm (porosity 69%) for the rectilinear, gyroid, and diamond structures, respectively. The average error between the theoretical and actual values was −16.3 µm (pore size) and −3.3 % (porosity). Compression testing revealed elastic moduli ranging from 210 to 268 MPa for the porous samples. Yield strengths were 6.6 ± 1.2 MPa for lattice, 14.8 ± 0.7 MPa for gyroid, and 17.1 ± 0.6 for diamond. Average roughness ranged from 0.8 to 3 µm. Finally, we demonstrated the ability to design and print a fully porous implant with the geometry of a sheep tibia segment. Assessments of implant geometrical accuracy and mechanical performance are ongoing. Discussion. We created porous PEEK with TPMS geometries via FFF and demonstrated a positive cellular response and mechanical characteristics similar to trabecular bone. Our work offers an innovative approach for advancing point-of-care 3D printing and PSI creation

3D printing and rapid prototyping in surgery is an expanding technology. It is often used for preoperative planning, procedure rehearsal and patient education. There have been recent advances in orthopaedic surgery for the development of patient specific guides and jigs. The logical next step as the technology advances is the production of custom orthopaedic implants. I aimed to use freely available open source software and online cloud 3D printing services to produce a patient specific orthopaedic implant without requiring the input of a university department, specialised equipment or implant companies. Using standard CT scan DICOM data, a 3D surface reconstruction was made of a patient's uninjured radial head using open source DICOM viewer OsiriX. This was then manipulated in other open source software packages called Meshlabs and Netfabb to create a mirror image 3D model of the radial head with a stem to produce a prosthesis suitable to replace the contralateral fractured radial head. This was then uploaded and printed in stainless steel via cloud printing service . Shapeways.com. . The model produced was an exact replication of the patient's original anatomy, except a mirror image suitable for replacement of the contralateral side. The process did not involve any specialist equipment or input from an academic department or implant company. It took a total of 10 days to produce and cost less than £40. From this study I was able to show that production of patient specific orthopaedic implants is possible. It also highlights that the technology is accessible to all, and does not require any special equipment or large investment. It can be achieved quickly and for a very small financial outlay. As a proof of concept it has been very successful

Collagen is a key component of the extracellular matrix in a variety of tissues and hence is widely used in tissue engineering research, yet collagen has had limited uptake in the field of 3D printing. In this study we successfully adapted an existing electronic printing method, aerosol jet printing (AJP), to print high resolution 3D constructs of recombinant collagen type III (RHCIII). Circular samples with a diameter of 4.5mm and 288 layers thick, or a diameter of 6.5mm and 400 layers thick were printed on glass cover slips with print lines of 60µm. Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier-Transorm Infa-red (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy performed on the 4 of the printed samples and dried non-printed RHCIII samples showed that no denaturation had occurred due to the printing process. Printed samples were crosslinked using EDC [N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride, Sigma Aldrich] to improve their stability and mechanical strength. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) performed showed a marked difference in the denaturation temperature between crosslinked printed samples and fibrillar non-printed samples and nano-indentation showed that the construct was relatively stiff. Previous results with similar samples have shown that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) align with and travel parallel to print direction. Results obtained from these samples show signs that they might be applied in other areas such as bone tissue engineering

Introduction. The ability to manufacture implants at the point-of-care has become a desire for clinicians wanting to provide efficient patient-specific treatment. While some hospitals have adopted extrusion-based 3D printing (fused filament fabrication; FFF) for creating non-implantable instruments with low-temperature plastics, recent innovations have allowed for the printing of high-temperature polymers such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Due to its low modulus of elasticity, high yield strength, and radiolucency, PEEK is an attractive biomaterial for implantable devices. Though concerns exist regarding PEEK for orthopaedic implants due to its bioinertness, the creation of porous networks has shown promising results for bone ingrowth. In this study, we endeavor to manufacture porous PEEK constructs via clinically-used FFF. We assess the effect of porous geometry on cell response and hypothesize that porous PEEK will exhibit greater preosteoblast viability and activity compared to solid PEEK. The work represents an innovative approach to advancing point-of-care 3D printing, cementless fixation for total joint arthroplasty, and additional applications typically reserved for porous metal. Methods. Three porous constructs – a rectilinear pattern and two triply period minimal surface (TPMSs) - were designed to mimic the morphology of trabecular bone. The structures, along with solid PEEK samples for use as a control, were manufactured via FFF using PEEK. The samples were mCT scanned to determine the resulting pore size and porosity. The PEEK constructs were then seeded with pre-osteoblast cells for 7 and 14 days. Cell proliferation and alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) were evaluated at each time point, and the samples were imaged via SEM. Results. mCT imaging showed the pores in the PEEK constructs to be open and interconnected. The average pore size was 535 ± 92 µm for the rectilinear, 484 ± 237 µm for the diamond, and 669 ± 216 µm for the gyroid. Porosity was 71% for the rectilinear, 76% for the diamond, and 68% for the gyroid. The average error between the theoretical and actual values was −37.3 µm for pore size and −2.3 % for porosity. Normalized ALP activity of the three porous PEEK samples at 7 days were found to be significantly greater than the solid sample (p < 0.05 rectilinear, p < 0.005 gyroid, p < 0.001 diamond). At 14 days, the same relationships were observed (p < 0.001 for all three designs). No difference between the three geometries was found. SEM imaging revealed cells with flat, elongated morphology attached to the surface of the PEEK. The 14-day samples appeared to have proliferated well and spread along the PEEK pores. Extensions of filopodia and lamellipodia were observed along with large blankets of cells covering the PEEK surface. Discussion. We demonstrated the ability of FFF printed porous PEEK surfaces to promote cellular processes necessary for bone-implant fixation. While all porous structures showed promising results, more investigation into their material characteristics and osteogenic potential are necessary to determine which geometry may be suitable for orthopaedic use. Our work offers an innovative approach to advancing point-of-care 3D printing, cementless implant fixation, and additional applications typically reserved for porous metal

Many orthopaedic procedures require implants to be trialled before definitive implantation. Where this is required, the trials are provided in a set with the instrumentation. The most common scenario this is seen in during elective joint replacements. In Scotland (2007) the Scottish Executive (. http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/cmo/CMO(2006)13.pdf. ) recommended and implemented individually packed orthopaedic implants for all orthopaedic sets. The premise for this was to reduce the risk of CJD contamination and fatigue of implants due to constant reprocessing from corrosion. During many trauma procedures determining the correct length of plate or size of implant can be challenging. Trials of trauma implants is no longer common place. Many implants are stored in closed and sealed boxes, preventing the surgeon looking at the implant prior to opening and contaminating the device. As a result many implants are incorrectly opened and either need reprocessed or destroyed due to infection control policy, thus implicating a cost to the NHS. With even the simplest implants costing several hundreds of pounds, this cost is a very significant waste in resources that could be deployed else where. My project was to develop a method to produce in department accurate, cheap and disposable trials for implants often used in trauma, where the original manufacturer do not offer the option of a trial off the shelf. The process had to not involve contaminating or destroying the original implant in the production of a trial. Several implants which are commonly used within Glasgow Royal Infirmary and do not have trials were identified. These implants were then CT scanned within their sealed and sterile packaging without contamination. Digital 3D surface renders of the models were created using free open source software (OsiriX, MeshLab, NetFabb). These models were then processed in to a suitable format for 3D printing using laser sintering via a cloud 3D printing bureau (. Shapeways.com. ). The implants were produced in polyamide PA220 material or in 316L stainless steel. These materials could be serialized using gamma irradiation or ethylene oxide gas. The steel models were suitable for autoclaving in the local CSSU. The implants produced were accurate facsimiles of the original implant with dimensions within 0.7mm. The implants were cost effective, an example being a rim mesh was reproduced in polyamide PA220 plastic for £3.50 and in 316L stainless steel for £15. The models were produced within 10 days of scanning. The stainless steel trials were durable and suitable for reprocessing and resterilisation. The production of durable, low cost and functional implant trials all completed in department was successful. The cost of production of each implant is so low that it would be offset if just one incorrect implant was opened during a single procedure. With some of the implants tested, the trials would have paid for themselves 100 times. This is a simple and cost saving technique that would help reduce department funding and aid patient care

3D imaging is commonly employed in the surgical planning and management of bony deformity. The advent of desktop 3D printing now allows rapid in-house production of specific anatomical models to facilitate surgical planning. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of creating 3D printed models in a university hospital setting. For requested cases of interest, CT DICOM images on the local NHS Picture Archive System were anonymised and transferred. Images were then segmented into 3D models of the bones, cleaned to remove artefacts, and orientated for printing with preservation of the regions of interest. The models were printed in polylactic acid (PLA), a biodegradable thermoplastic, on the CubeX Duo 3D printer. PLA models were produced for 4 clinical cases; a complex forearm deformity as a result of malunited childhood fracture, a pelvic discontinuity with severe acetabular deficiency following explantation of an infected total hip replacement, a chronically dislocated radial head causing complex elbow deformity as a result of a severe skeletal dysplasia, and a preoperative model of a deficient proximal tibia as a result of a severe tibia fracture. The models materially influenced clinical decision making, surgical intervention planning and required equipment. In the case of forearm an articulating model was constructed allowing the site of impingement between radius and ulnar to be identified, an osteotomy was practiced on multiple models allowing elimination of the block to supination. This has not previously been described in literature. The acetabulum model allowed pre-contouring of a posterior column plate which was then sterilised and eliminated a time consuming intraoperative step. While once specialist and expensive, in house 3D printing is now economically viable and a helpful tool in the management of complex patients

Many orthopaedic procedures require implants to be trialled before definitive implantation. Where this is required, the trials are provided in a set with the instrumentation. The most common scenario this is seen in during elective joint replacements. In Scotland (2007) the Scottish Executive (. http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/cmo/CMO(2006)13.pdf. ) recommended and implemented individually packed orthopaedic implants for all orthopaedic sets. The premise for this was to reduce the risk of CJD contamination and fatigue of implants due to constant reprocessing from corrosion. During many trauma procedures determining the correct length of plate or size of implant can be challenging. Trials of trauma implants is no longer common place. Many implants are stored in closed and sealed boxes, preventing the surgeon looking at the implant prior to opening and contaminating the device. As a result many implants are incorrectly opened and either need reprocessed or destroyed due to infection control policy, thus implicating a cost to the NHS. With even the simplest implants costing several hundreds of pounds, this cost is a very significant waste in resources that could be deployed else where. My project was to develop a method to produce in department accurate, cheap and disposable trials for implants often used in trauma, where the original manufacturer do not offer the option of a trial off the shelf. The process had to not involve contaminating or destroying the original implant in the production of a trial. Several implants which are commonly used within Glasgow Royal Infirmary and do not have trials were identified. These implants were then CT scanned within their sealed and sterile packaging without contamination. Digital 3D surface renders of the models were created using free open source software (OsiriX, MeshLab, NetFabb). These models were then processed in to a suitable format for 3D printing using laser sintering via a cloud 3D printing bureau (. Shapeways.com. ). The implants were produced in polyamide PA220 material or in 316L stainless steel. These materials could be serialized using gamma irradiation or ethylene oxide gas. The steel models were suitable for autoclaving in the local CSSU. The implants produced were accurate facsimiles of the original implant with dimensions within 0.7mm. The implants were cost effective, an example being a rim mesh was reproduced in polyamide PA220 plastic for £3.50 and in 316L stainless steel for £15. The models were produced within 10 days of scanning. The stainless steel trials were durable and suitable for reprocessing and resterilisation. The production of durable, low cost and functional implant trials all completed in department was successful. The cost of production of each implant is so low that it would be offset if just one incorrect implant was opened during a single procedure. With some of the implants tested, the trials would have paid for themselves 100 times. This is a simple and cost saving technique that would help reduce department funding and aid patient care