Dual mobility cups have two points of articulation, one between the shell and the polyethylene (external bearing) and one between the polyethylene and the femoral head (internal bearing). Movement occurs at the inner bearing; the outer bearing only moves at extremes of movement. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a cause of much morbidity and its treatment has significant cost implications. Dual mobility cups provide an increased range of movement and a may reduce the risk of dislocation. . This paper reviews the use of these cups in THA, particularly where stability is an issue. Dual mobility cups may be of benefit in primary THA in patients at a high risk of dislocation, such as those who are older with increased comorbidities and a higher American Association of Anesthesiology grade and those with a neuromuscular disease. They may be used at revision surgery where the risk of dislocation is high, such as in patients with many prior dislocations, or those with abductor deficiency. They may also be used in THA for displaced fractures of the femoral neck, which has a notoriously high rate of dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):60–3

Introduction. Reoperations to manage unstable total hip arthroplasty are reported with a high failure rate. The dual mobility cup (figure 1) (mobile polyethylene component between the prosthetic head and the outer metal shell) is a useful option in such cases. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical and radiologic features associated with the dual mobility cup. Materials and Methods. Fifty one unstable total hip arthroplasties (32 females, 19 males) were revised using a dual mobility socket at our institution between March 2000 and February 2005. Mean age at reoperation was 67 year old (range, 35 to 98). The outcome of the revision procedure was assessed using the Harris Hip Score, and complications were determined by detailed review of the patient's records. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the involved joint were reviewed to assess the position of the prosthesis and to look for osteolysis and signs of loosening of the implant. Results. Mean follow-up was 4 years (range, 2 to 6.7). At last review 4 patients had died and one was lost to follow up. Postoperatively there was a significant improvement of the Harris Hip Score. Fifty patients (98%) had no further episodes of dislocation. There were 3 revisions for deep infection, and 2 for dissociation of the bipolar component. No cup required a revision for aseptic loosening. No radiolucent lines around the components and no osteolysis were observed at latest follow up. Conclusion. The dual mobility cup is a highly effective option to manage unstable total hip arthroplasty. Unlike constrained devices, such components provide encouraging radiologic results regarding the potential for loosening and osteolysis. Longer follow up is needed to confirm these results

Introduction. The dual mobility cup was introduced in the 1970s to allow extensive range of motion associated with great stability thanks to double articulation; the first between the head and polyethylene, the second between the polyethylene and the cup. The original plan was to install a stainless-steel uncemented cup coated with a thin layer of alumina and a metal head of 22,2 mm with a polyethylene liner of first generation. Long term follow-up case studies are cited in the literature showing excellent results in reducing dislocations; however wearing and aseptic loosening are noted. The new dual-mobility cups, with reticular polyethylene and titanium and hydroxyapatite coating are proving as reliable as the older ones in terms of stability whilst they appear to be more durable. Furthermore, cemented dual-mobility cups are available, these are the topic of this study. One of the most frequent complications in the major revisions of hip replacement is dislocation. This study summarises our experience gathered in the use of dual-mobility cups during revisions of complex cases (GIR III-IV femoral or acetabular). Materials and Methods. Between July 2014 to March 2015, we have implanted 13 cemented cups with dual-mobility (Avantage® Biomet) each in different patients, who have undergone revision with severe ostheolysis (GIR III-IV femoral or acetabular). The mean age of patients was 71.5 years old (46 to 89). Indications for revisions were: aseptic loosening in 7 patients (two at third surgery), recurrent dislocation in 3 patients, 1 septic loosening, 1 revision after spacer removal e 1 post-traumatic. We used dual-mobility cup in revision surgery when implant stability could have been compromised due to difficult positioning of acetabular component in cases of walls defects or muscolar laxity. The patients have been evaluated clinically and radiographically. Results. In most difficult cases with a severe lack of acetabular walls (9 patients), and thus difficulties in correct cup positioning, we have choosen to implant a cemented cup inside a Burch-schneider® (Zimmer) ring; in those cases where acetabular morphology was still sufficient, a dual-mobility cup was directly cemented to the bone. No dislocations occured during the folllow-up, neither infections, neurological events or DVT. Discussion. Dual mobility cups are often used both as primary implant or as a revision cup. Dislocation rate in primary total hip replacement is comparable to other kind of cup normally used, while in revision cases, the incidence of dislocation decrease from a range of 5–30% to 1,1–5,5%. Our results are not yet comparable to those in literature due to short follow-up, but first impressions are comforting thanks to the lack of dislocation even in really severe cases. Conclusions. The dual-mobility cup in acetabular revisions, is one of the possible choice to keep in mind in more complex cases, where obtaining stability is difficult or impossible using other revision implants. In the literature, the available follow up are not yet long enough to be sure of implant longevity and so it's important to pay attention to use this cup in those patients with long life expectancy

Aims. Dislocation remains a significant complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA), being the third leading indication for revision. We present a series of acetabular revision using a dual mobility cup (DMC) and compare this with our previous series using the posterior lip augmentation device (PLAD). Methods. A retrospective review of patients treated with either a DMC or PLAD for dislocation in patients with a Charnley THA was performed. They were identified using electronic patient records (EPR). EPR data and radiographs were evaluated to determine operating time, length of stay, and the incidence of complications and recurrent dislocation postoperatively. Results. A total of 28 patients underwent revision using a DMC for dislocation following Charnley THA between 2013 and 2017. The rate of recurrent dislocation and overall complications were compared with those of a previous series of 54 patients who underwent revision for dislocation using a PLAD, between 2007 and 2013. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean distribution of sex or age between the groups. The mean operating time was 71 mins (45 to 113) for DMCs and 43 mins (21 to 84) for PLADs (p = 0.001). There were no redislocations or revisions in the DMC group at a mean follow-up of 55 months (21 to 76), compared with our previous series of PLAD which had a redislocation rate of 16% (n = 9) and an overall revision rate of 25% (n = 14, p = 0.001) at a mean follow-up of 86 months (45 to 128). Conclusion. These results indicate that DMC outperforms PLAD as a treatment for dislocation in patients with a Charnley THA. This should therefore be the preferred form of treatment for these patients despite a slightly longer operating time. Work is currently ongoing to review outcomes of DMC over a longer follow-up period. PLAD should be used with caution in this patient group with preference given to acetabular revision to DMC. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):423–425

BACKGROUND PURPOSES. dislocation is a classical complication in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision. Cup fixation is the second concern. Since 1998 we routinely use cementless Dual mobility cup (DMC) in revision surgery. In order to know outcomes at 2 years, we followed a prospective series of 78 patients treated in our institution. Purpose is to demonstrate that DMC used in revision THA is safe as regards dislocation risk and bone fixation. MATERIAL METHODS. from January 2010 to January 2012 we collected cohort of 79 cases on 78 patients. Patients have been followed with a clinical and radio graphical standard examination. Mean delay between index surgery and revision was 12,9 years. Mean age at revision was 75,5 years. Two different types of DMC were used: standard DMC in 68 cases. In severe bone loss, a specific revision cup was used in 11 cases. RESULTS. at 2 years follow up, 65 patients have been reviewed. 5 patients are definitely lost to follow up. 8 patients deceased. One patient dislocated her hip at 1 month. Two early mechanical failures occurred. DISCUSSION. purpose of this short term follow up study is to emphasize low risk of dislocation and trustable fixation of a cementless DMC used in revision THA. THA. Instability is the leading cause of failure. In our series dislocation rate is 1,2%‥ 2 patients presented an early mechanical cup failure (2.5%). CONCLUSION. considering outcomes of this series, we may assess that in in THA revision surgery, DMC can be recommended

Treatment of recurrent dislocation: approximately: 1/3 of failures (probably higher in the absence of a clear curable cause). In the US: most popular treatment option: constrained liners with high redislocation and loosening rates in most reports. Several interfaces leading to various modes of failures. In Europe: dual mobility cups (or tripolar unconstrained): first design Gilles Bousquet 1976 (Saint Etienne, France), consisting of a metal shell with a highly polished inner surface articulating with a mobile polyethylene insert (large articulation). The femoral head is captured into the polyethylene (small articulation) using a snap fit type mechanism leading to a large effective unconstrained head inside the metal cup. With dual mobility, most of the movements occur in the small articulation therefore limiting wear from the large polyethylene on metal articulation. Contemporary designs include: CoCr metal cup for improved friction, outer shell coated with titanium and hydroxyapatite, possible use of screws to enhance primary stability (revision), cemented version in case of major bone defect requiring bone reconstruction. Increased stability obtained through an ultra-large diameter effective femoral head increasing the jumping distance. Dual mobility in revision for recurrent dislocation provided hip stability in more than 94% of the cases with less than 3% presenting redislocation up to 13-year follow-up. A series from the UK concerning 115 revisions including 29 revisions for recurrent dislocation reported 2% dislocation in the global series and 7% re-dislocation in patients revised for instability. A recent report of the Swedish hip arthroplasty register including 228 patients revised for recurrent dislocation showed 99% survival with revision for dislocation as the endpoint and 93% with revision for any reason as the endpoint. One specific complication of dual mobility sockets: intra-prosthetic dislocation (ie: dislocation at the small articulation): often asymptomatic or slight discomfort, eccentration of the neck on AP radiograph, related to wear and fatigue of the polyethylene rim at the capturing are through aggressive stem neck to mobile polyethylene insert contact (3rd articulation). Risk factors include: large and aggressive femoral neck design implants, small head/neck ratio, skirted heads, major fibrosis and periprosthetic ossifications. Current (over ?) use in France: 30% of primary THA, 60% in revision THA. Proposed (reasonable) indications: primary THA at high risk for dislocation, revision THA for instability and/or in case of abductors deficiency, Undisputed indication: recurrent dislocation

Purpose of the study: The concept introduced by Gilles Bousquet is an effective arm against dislocation of total hip arthroplasty (THA), as has been demonstrated in clinical series with a long follow-up. There remain certain questions concerning wear of dual mobility cups. We propose a radiostereometrical analysis (RSA) of femoral head migration in this type of implant. Our objective was to establish an accurate measurement and determine the intra- and interobserver variabilities. Material and methods: A THA model was implanted and loaded with a simulator. Penetration of the implants was measured using a specially designed polyethylene insert with increasingly concentric wear (from 0, 0.25, 0.5 to 0.75 mm). Three investigators analysed (7 times in a double-blind protocol) the RSA images of these four inserts. The investigators were an expert (I), well-trained (II), naive (III). The accuracy of the measurement as well as the intra- and interobserver variabilities were determined using the root mean square (RMS) method, the interclass coefficient of correlation (ICC), the Bland and Altman analyses, and weighted Kappa analysis. Results: Regarding accuracy, the RMS was 0.0388 [CI95: 0.02266–0.05564]. The mean error for preworn inserts was respectively 0.022mm (for 0.25mm prewear), 0.59mm (for 0.5mm), and 0.022mm (for 0.75mm). The intra-observer ICC was 0.9714 [0.9028–0.9918] for investigator I. The interobserver ICCs between investigators I and II and between I and III were respectively 0.943 and 0.968. The weighted kappa coefficients between I and II and between I and III were 0.827 and 0.849. The Bland and Altman analysis confirmed these results. Discussion: Several RSA protocols could be designed to measure wear of the dual mobility cup. We chose detection of the wear pattern instead of the tantalum beads method. Our protocol, using a simple geometric model and not the manufacturers CAD files, showed an accuracy comparable with manufacturing tolerances with low variability. Conclusion: This study validated our measurement method, a prerequisite for a randomized multicentric study which has been initiated to compare, by RSA, penetration of the head into the double mobility insert versus a fixed insert

Introduction. Polyethylene (PE) wear is clearly linked to total hip arthroplasty (THA) failure, leading to osteolysis and decreasing survivorship rates. Dual mobility cups (DMC) are widely used to prevent or treat THA instability. However some studies have pointed PE wear risk as a “dual wear” risk. Hip wear simulation is usually used to understand factors influencing wear and to differentiate design, PE types and materials performances. To date, few works have been published studying dual mobility insert wear. Objectives. Our objective was to evaluate wear of DMC with comparison with a fixed single articulating hip design and to measure wear under same conditions (loading cycle, temperature, sterilization, material and surface roughness). Methods. The test bench includes one station for a control sample and one for dynamic test. Those are driven independently one from the other. Two electrical actuators applied the forces and two forces sensors putted on the fixing plate of the acetabular part gave the corresponding values. On the dynamic station, the angular movements are generated by an electric motor. Sleeves are installed on the bowls containing the testing liquid and on the supports of acetabular parts, in order to get a tight volume that excludes contaminant particles. Wear is measured by a gravimetric method. The simulator is stopped and implants have been removed from the simulators in order to achieve weighting and observations at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 millions cycles. At the end, the sample PE insert and the control one are removed from their cup in the aim to measure the mass loss. Results. Under same conditions the gravimetric wear and the linear penetration of the head are perfectly comparable between a conventional and a dual mobility cup. Conclusion. In vitro, DMC wear is equal or less important than a standard single fixed cup and volumetric wear is lower than published data. Wear of the two joints of a DMC is not increased thanks to the recruitment phenomenon and the freedom induced by the concept

The benefit of dual mobility cup (DMC) for primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) is still controversial. This study aimed to compare 1) the complications rate, 2) the revisions rate, 3) the survival rate after monobloc DMC compared to large femoral heads (LFH) in primary THA. Between 2010 and 2019, 2,075 primary THA using cementless DMC or LFH were included. Indications for DMC were patients older than 70 years old or with high risk of dislocation. Every other patient received a LFH. Exclusion criteria were cemented implants, femoral neck fracture, a follow-up of less than one year. 1,940 THA were analyzed: 1,149 DMC (59.2%), 791 LFH (40.8%). The mean age was 73 ±9.2 years old in DMC group and 57 ±12 in LFH group. The complications and the revisions have been assessed retrospectively. The mean follow-up was 41.9 months ±14 [12–134]. There were significantly fewer dislocations in DMC group (n=2; 0.17%) compared to LFH group (n=8; 1%) (p=0.019). The femoral head size had no impact on the dislocations rate in LFH group (p=0.70). The overall complication rate in DMC (n=59; 5.1%) and LFH (n=53; 6.7%) were not statistically different (p=0.21). No specific complication was attributed to the DMC. In DMC group, 18 THA (1.6%) were revised versus 15 THA in LFH group (1.9%) (p= 0.71). There was no statistical difference for any cause of revisions in both groups. The cup aseptic revision-free survival rates at 5 years were 98% in DMC group and 97.3% in LFH group (p=0.78). Monobloc DMC had a lower risk of dislocation in a high-risk population than LFH in a low-risk population at the mid-term follow-up. There was no significant risk of specific complications or revisions for DMC in a large cohort. Monobloc DMC can be safely used in a selected high-risk population

Summary Statment. The dual-mobility cup seems to bring more stability without changing the gait pattern. Introduction. Dislocations and instability are among the worst complications after THA in elderly patient. Dual mobility cups seem to lower these risks. To our knowledge no study performed a gait analysis of dual cup in this group. Methods. Our team implanted 52 dual mobility cups (Gyros, de Puy J&J Corporation) before 2007. 7 hip revisions and 15 primary hips were reviewed in 20 patients. The mean age at the review was 79.8 years old. 15 died or were mentally too disabled to perform a gait analysis. 5 didn't give consent for a clinical study and 8 were not localizable. We performed a gait analysis using a non-invasive miniature sensors device (PhysilogTM) when patients walked freely on a flat ground. We compared our results to a control group of frail eldery patients of the same age who didn't sufferd of orthopedic condition and to a group of patient with a conventional THA from our institution and to the literature. The WOMAC and Harris Hip scores were also computed. Results. None of the 22 hips faced dislocation. The gait analysis showed good results that were superior to those of the control group of frail elderly and comparable to those of conventional THA. The cadence was of 100,3 steps/min, the double stance of 23,3%, the stance of 61,6%, the stride of 1,13 meters and the walking speed of 0,96 m/s. The mean HHS and WOMAC were 87,6 (51–100) and 11,3 (0–34). Conclusion. Our results at 5 years compared favorably with the current litterature. The increase of stability didn't impared the walking performances

Introduction. Upper femoral fractures include intra and extra-capsular fracture (ECF). For intra-capsular fracture (ICF), hemi-arthroplasty (HA) is the most commonly used treatment. Interest in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is growing because THA yields less revision (4% versus 7%) associated to better functional results despite higher dislocation rate (9% versus 3%). Regarding ECF, internal fixation is the reference treatment. THA could represent a relevant alternative. This study evaluates the efficiency of THA using dual mobility cup (THA-DMC) as treatment of these fractures specially in elderly patients. Material and method. 70 patients were operated on for upper femoral fractures with Quattro THA-DMC between May 2012 and October 2013. Minimum follow-up is one year. Seven surgeons in 4 institutions were involved. Data collected were: age, gender, type of fracture, surgical approach, mortality, revision rate and dislocation rate. Results. Seventy patients were included. 83.3 % were women. Mean age was 82.8 (51–99). 43% were ECF and 57% ICF. Postero-lateral approach represented 51% of cases, trans-trochanteric 43% and Hardinge 6%. Mortality rate was 10%. One dislocation (1.4%) occurred at one month postoperative treated by closed reduction. No revision was performed. Discussion. Even though THA is widely used to treat ICF, two recent meta-analyses concluded that THAs bring better survivorship as well as better functional results despite a higher dislocation rates. THA-DMC is a way to decrease dislocation risk as confirmed by our study. There is a lack of studies published on the treatment of ECF, precluding a proper assessment. Conclusion. Given the studies identified, the gold standard in the treatment of ICF is moving toward THA. THA-DMC could overcome the higher dislocation rate observed with standard THA

Dual mobility cups (DMC) reduce the risk of dislocation in femoral neck fractures (FNF). Direct anterior approach (DAA), historically promoted for better stability, has been developed in recent years for better functional results. The aim of this study was to compare the early functional results of DMC in FNF by DAA versus posterolateral approach (PLA). A prospective study was conducted on a continuous series of patients who received DMC for FNF by DAA or PLA. The primary endpoint was Harris Hip Score and Parker score assessed at the first follow-up visit. Intraoperative complications were collected during hospitalization. One year clinical results and all cause revision rate were also collected. Radiographic data of cup positioning and limb length were evaluated. Fifty-two patients were included in the DAA group and 54 in the PLA group. Two patients were lost to follow-up. The mean age was 72.8 years. There was no significant difference in HHS or Parker score at 3 and 12 months follow up (p=0.6, p= 0.75). DAA was associated with more intraoperative complications with 4 fractures and 1 femoral nerve deficit (p=0.018). There were 3 revisions in the DAA group (1 infection, 1 dislocation, 1 peri prosthetic fracture) and 1 in the PLA group (infection), which was not statistically significant (p=0.34). Cup anteversion was 6° greater and inclination 9° lesser in DAA group (p=0.028, p<0.01). Results suggest that DAA does not provide any early functional benefit in THA-DMC for FNF compared to PLA. It could lead to more intraoperative complications and a higher revision rate. DAA requires an experienced surgeon and careful patient selection

Dual mobility (DM) cups have 2 points of articulation – between the shell and the polyethylene (external bearing) and between the polyethylene and the femoral head (internal bearing). Primary motion occurs at the inner bearing while the outer bearing moves only in cases of extreme range of motion. Dislocation is a top reason for revision surgery and a major cost burden on society. Instability is also a significant problem after revision THA. While a variety of factors are important in hip stability, DM cups provide the safety of larger femoral heads in virtually all patients. These larger heads increase jump distance (the distance the femoral must travel before dislocation occurs) and they also increase ROM before impingement occurs. ROM and impingement are competing with each in primary THA. Especially in the flexible female with small bone structure, their increased ROM significantly increases the risk of impingement during physiologic activities. While not necessarily leading to dislocation, subluxation can occur resulting in pain. Further, ongoing impingement reduces the longevity of the PE. The ability to increase head size and head-neck ration with the DM cups in these patients is both an immediate and long-term advantage. PE thickness still can compromise the integrity of the liner. DM cups have thicker PE, especially in the smaller size cups than standard PE inserts. Even with the dual articulation, PE wear in DM cups are less, or at worst, equivalent to standard cups while at the same time providing adequate PE thickness for PE integrity and longevity

Mid and long-term follow-up of Charnley total hip arthroplasty (THA) demonstrated good functional results with 85% survivorship at 25-year follow-up. However dislocation still remains an unsolved problem. Dislocation may occur all along the patient and implant life. The aim of this study is to answer the question: does Dual Mobility Cup (DMC) decrease the dislocation risk? . Method. : We report comparative results at ten years of follow-up of 2 groups of primary cemented Charnley-type THA, one with a standard polyethylene cup (group 1, n=215) and the other one with a DMC (group 2, n=105). . Results. : In group 1, twenty-six dislocations (12.9%) occurred. In group 2 only one dislocation (0.9%) occurred. This dislocation was successfully reduced by close reduction, without any recurrence. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.0018). In group 1, reason for revision was recurrent dislocation in twenty one cases. Five patients have been revised for other reasons. The global revision rate was 12.9%. In group 2, two patients needed revision surgery for aseptic loosening. The global revision rate was 2.1%. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.0054). The goal was reached for the patients of group 2 who had more risks factors of dislocation (age, aetiology, ASA and Devane scores) than those of group 1. When using a DMC, we observed a low rate of dislocation in primary THA (0.9%). This surgical choice seems to be a secure and effective technique in Charnley-type THA, especially in a high risk population

Dual mobility components for total hip arthroplasty provide for an additional articular surface, with the goals of improving range of motion, jump distance, and overall stability of the prosthetic hip joint. A large polyethylene head articulates with a polished metal acetabular component, and an additional smaller metal head is snap-fit into the large polyethylene. The first such device was introduced for primary total hip arthroplasty by Bousquet in the 1970s, thus, the “French connection”. Dual mobility components have been released for use in North America over the past five years. In some European centers, these components are routinely used for primary total hip arthroplasty. However, their greatest utility may be to manage recurrent dislocation in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty. Several retrospective series and the Swedish hip registry have shown satisfactory results for this indication at short- to medium-term follow-up times. However, there are important concerns with polyethylene wear, late intraprosthetic dislocation, and the lack of long-term follow-up data. These components are an important option in the treatment of recurrent dislocation in younger patients, revision of failed metal-metal resurfacing, and salvage of failed constrained liners. There are more recent concerns of possible iliopsoas tendinitis, elevated metal levels with one design, and acute early intraprosthetic dislocation following attempted closed reduction. However, a dual mobility component may now be the preferred solution in revision surgery for recurrent hip dislocation.

INTRODUCTION. THA as primary treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly still remains a prominent concern. Overall dislocation rate after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is reported form 1∼5%. But, it is quiet different in situation of femur neck fracture in elderly. The THA is associated with higher rates of dislocation (8%∼11%) in eldery compared to hemiarthroplasty even though THA showed better clinical and functional scores. Recently resurgence about THA using DMC comes after improvement of manufacturing technology. The aim of this prospective multicenter study is to assess the rates of dislocation and re-operation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly with THA with Dual Mobility Cup (DMC) and to review systematically comparison of previous reports. Up to our knowledge, this is first report from asian conutry about the clinical outcomes THA using DMC for displaced femur neck fracture in elderly. METHODS. Prospective consecutive groups of patients treated for displaced femoral neck fractures by three surgeons at each three center were included. 131 hips underwent THA with DMC for acute displaced femoral neck fracture in patients aged older than 70 years. Data regarding rates of dislocation and re-operation were obtained by review of medical records. Additionally From 2009 which the US FDA first approved the DMC, the authors searched reports regarding to THA using DMC for displaced femur neck fracture in elderly using the MEDLINE including cases series and comparative studies with bipolar hemiarthroplasty and THA. Therefore, current report was compared with previous reports. RESULTS. The reports about THA using DMC for displaced femur neck fracture in elderly were limited. Most of them comes from European countries. Comparative study with THA from Sweden reported the dislocation rate of THA using DMC with average aged 75-year is 0%. In Denmark study, the bipolar hemiarthroplasty showed 14% of dislocation rate for femur neck fracture in patient aged 75 years but, THA using DMC is 4.6%. Two cases series from French reported about 1–4% in patients aged 80 years. In our multicenter study, dislocation occurred in 6/131 hips (4.6%) treated with total hip arthroplasty using DMC for displaced femur neck fracture over 70 years older patients. Reoperations including periprosthetic fracture and fixation failure of cup were required in 1/43 (2.3%) hips treated with total hip arthroplasty using DM cup. These result is comparable to European reports. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. Our findings indicate that THA with DMC can not guarantee to prevent the dislocation for high risk elderly patients, but the overall rate of dislocation can be comparable to those of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and reduced compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty. This result might be a valuable messages for burden of the medical cost by dislocation after arthroplasty especially for older patient. Therefore, adding advnatages of THA compared with hemiarthroplasty, the THA with DMC can be a wise option for displaced femoral neck fracture in eldely. But, the randomized controlled study still is needed to clarify to confirm this findings

Dual mobility components for total hip arthroplasty provide for an additional articular surface, with the goals of improving range of motion, jump distance, and overall stability of the prosthetic hip joint. A large polyethylene head articulates with a polished metal acetabular component, and an additional smaller metal or ceramic head is snap-fit into the large polyethylene. In some European centers, these components are routinely used for primary total hip arthroplasty. However, their greatest utility will be to prevent and manage recurrent dislocation in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty. Several retrospective series have shown satisfactory results for this indication at medium-term follow-up times. The author has used dual mobility components on two occasions to salvage a failed constrained liner. At least one center reports that dual mobility outperforms 40mm femoral heads in revision arthroplasty. Modular dual mobility components, with screw fixation, are the author's first choice for the treatment of recurrent dislocation, revision of failed metal-metal resurfacing, total hips, unipolar arthroplasties, and salvage of failed constrained liners. There are concerns of elevated metal levels with one design, and acute early intra-prosthetic dissociation following attempted closed reduction. Total hip surgeons no longer cement Charnley acetabular components, use conventional polyethylene, autologous blood donation, or a drain; now constrained components join these obsolete techniques! In 2017, a dual mobility component, rather than a constrained liner, is the preferred solution in revision surgery to prevent and manage recurrent dislocation.

In primary total hip replacements there are numerous options available for providing hip stability in difficult situations (i.e. Down's syndrome, Parkinson's disease). We have considered constrained liners in some of these cases.

However, in the revision situation in general and in revision for recurrent dislocation situation specifically it is important to have all options available including tripolar constrained liners in order to optimise the potential for hip stability as well as function of the arthroplasty. Even with the newer options available dislocation rates of higher than 10–15% have been reported following revision surgery at institutions where high volumes of revision surgery are performed. Because of the deficient abductors, other soft tissue laxity and the requirement for large diameter cups revision cases will always have more potential for dislocation. In these situations in the lower demand patient, constraint has provided excellent success in terms of preventing dislocation and maintaining implant construct fixation to bone at intermediate- term follow-up. Hence in these situations tripolar constrained liners remains the option we utilise. We are also confident in using this device in cases with instability or laxity where there is a secure well- positioned acetabular shell. We cement a dual mobility constrained liner in these situations using the technique described below.

Present indication for tripolar constrained liners: low demand patient, large outer diameter cups, instability with well-fixed shells that are adequately positioned, abductor muscle deficiency or soft tissue laxity, multiple operations for instability

Technique of cementing liner into shell: score acetabular shell if no holes, score liner in spider web configuration, all one or two millimeters of cement mantle

Introduction

The dual mobility design concept for acetabular liners is intended to reduce the risk of dislocation and increase range of motion, but the wear pattern of this design is unclear and may have implications in implant fixation. Additionally, the solid back cups do not have the option for supplementary screw fixation, providing an additional smooth articulating surface for the liner to move against. The objective of this study was to assess cup fixation by measuring implant migration. A secondary objective was to evaluate the mobile bearing motion after rotating the hip.

The concept of stainless steel dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty has demonstrated very low long-term instability rates and a 98% survival rate after 12 years. We systematically implanted titanium alloy acetabular cups during a one year period. The purpose of our retrospective study was to report the 18-year clinical outcome data in a homogeneous and continuous series of 103 primary total hip replacements after implantation of a cementless titanium cup. All patients were implanted with NOVAE Ti (SERF) cups made of titanium alloy combined with a retentive polyethylene liner and a 22.2 mm cobalt chrome prosthetic head. Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 53 years. All patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated. The overall 18-year actuarial cup survival rate with a 95% confidence interval was 87.4%. At last follow-up, there was no evidence of implant instability whereas acetabular aseptic loosening was reported in one case and high wear of the retentive liner in 9. The results of this investigation confirmed the long-term stability of dual-mobility implants. The main limitation of this system was early wear of the polyethylene liner in contact with the titanium metal back and reaction with third body along with loss of liner retentivity. In our study, titanium demonstrated favourable osteointegration properties but poor tribologic characteristics, therefore suggesting its interest at the bone-cup interface only

Aims

Dislocation is the most common indication for further surgery following total hip arthroplasty (THA) when undertaken in patients with a femoral neck fracture. This study aimed to assess the complication rates of THA with dual mobility components (THA-DMC) following a femoral neck fracture and to compare outcomes between THA-DMC, conventional THA, and hemiarthroplasty (HA).

Introduction. Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with prior lumbar spine fusion (LSF) are at high risk for instability with reported incidence of dislocation as high as 8.3%. The use of dual mobility cups in patients undergoing revision THA, another high risk group, has demonstrated decreased incidence of instability. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of instability in patients undergoing primary THA with a history of prior LSF using dual mobility cups. Methods. This was a multi-center retrospective study with 93 patients undergoing primary THA using a dual mobility cup with prior history of instrumented LSF. The primary outcome investigated was instability. Secondary variables investigated included number of levels fused, approach, length of stay, and other complications. The minimum follow-up time was 1 year since the majority of dislocations occur during first year following the primary THA. Results. There were 56 females and 47 males with average age of 66 years (46–87) and average BMI of 30. Mean follow up was 31 months (range 12 – 124.2). Surgical approach included: posterior (63), direct lateral (15), anterior (11), direct superior (4). 44% had one level fusion, 29% with 2 levels, and 15% with 3 or more levels fused. There were no dislocations or infections in this study group. There was one intraoperative fracture and one DVT. Conclusions. Patients undergoing primary THA with prior LSF are a high risk group with an increased risk for instability due to the loss of normal spino-pelvic relationship. The use of dual mobility cups in a high risk group of patients in this study demonstrated excellent results with no incidence of dislocation. Despite the limitations in this study with varying approaches and multiple sites, the use of dual mobility cups to decrease the incidence of instability in patients with prior LSF appears promising. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Dual mobility is a French concept that appeared in the 1970s and was initially intended to reduce dislocation rates. In recent years, this concept has evolved with new HA titanium spray coatings, new external macrostructures, and better-quality polyethylene. This has allowed to extend the indications to younger and therefore active populations. The objective of our work is to analyze at least 10 years a homogeneous and continuous series of 170 primary total hip replacements associating a latest generation Novae Sunfit. ®. dual mobility cup with a straight femoral stem. Only primary arthroplasties for osteoarthritis or necrosis were included. Total hip arthroplasty was always performed through a posterolateral approach. All patients had regular clinical and radiological follow-up. The average follow-up in our series was 11.5 years. The average age of the population is 71 years. At the last follow-up, there were 17 deaths, 6 losses to follow up and 9 adverse events, including 1 cup change for psoas impingement and 1 dislocation. The low rate of dislocation at 11 years confirms the high stability of the dual mobility, which should be recommended for primary procedure for patients at high risk of postoperative instability. The lack of intraprosthetic dislocation due to wear at 11 years of follow-up highlights the good quality of the latest generation of polyethylene, and the need to combine high-polished surfaces and a refined femoral neck with a dual mobility cup. Finally, the lack of aseptic loosening confirms the quality of the secondary fixation of these implants and justifies their wider use in all patients

Aims. With increasing burden of revision hip arthroplasty (THA), one of the major challenges is the management of proximal femoral bone loss associated with previous multiple surgeries. Proximal femoral arthroplasty (PFA) has already been popularized for tumour surgeries. Our aim was to describe the outcome of using PFA in these demanding non-neoplastic cases. Methods. A retrospective review of 25 patients who underwent PFA for non-neoplastic indications between January 2009 and December 2015 was undertaken. Their clinical and radiological outcome, complication rates, and survival were recorded. All patients had the Stanmore Implant – Modular Endo-prosthetic Tumour System (METS). Results. At mean follow-up of 5.9 years, there were no periprosthetic fractures. Clearance of infection was achieved in 63.6% of cases. One hip was re-revised to pseudo arthroplasty for deep infection. Instability was noted in eight of the hips (32%), of which seven needed further surgery. Out of these eight hips with instability, five had preoperative infection. Deep infection was noted in five of the hips (20%), of which four were primarily revised for infection. One patient had aseptic loosening of the femoral component and awaits revision surgery. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship free of revision of any component for any reason was 72% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51.3% to 92.7%), and for revisions of only femoral component for any reason was 96% (95% CI 86.3% to 105.7%) at five years. Conclusion. Dislocation and infection remain the major cause for failure, particularly in patients with pre-existing infection. The use of dual mobility cups, silver-coated implants, and less aggressive postoperative rehabilitation regimens would possibly aid in the reduction of complications. PFA performed in patients with periprosthetic fracture seem to fair better. This study supports the judicious use of PFA in non-oncological revision hip arthroplasties, and that they be performed by experienced revision arthroplasty surgeons. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):229–235

The main causes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions are loosening and instability. Use of a dual mobility cup cemented in a acetabular reconstruction cage device limits the risk of instability and does not hinder the acetabular fixation during THA revisions. The objective of this study was to analyse a retrospective series of 123 THA revisions with antiprotusio cage and dual mobility socket. Patients and methods: At a mean follow-up of 10 years, we analysed a continuous series of 123 revisions using a reconstruction device (87 Kerboull cross-plates, 12 Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cages, 24 custom-fit Novae ARM cages associated in all cases with a Novae Stick dual mobility cup cemented into the cage). There were 80 women and 43 males. The mean age at the surgery was 69.2 years old. PMA score increased from 9.6 +/− 3.06 preoperatively to 14.2 +/− 2. at the follow-up. 9 early dislocations occurred and one late dislocation. At the last follow-up, the X-rays showed nine hardware failures, including one cross-plate fracture, one hook fracture, and one flange fracture. Analysis of the radiological position of the cup showed a mean lowering of 13 mm and a 7 mm lateralisation compared to the preoperative position. 2 revisions for aseptic loosening and 3 for septic loosening were performed. This study confirms the advantage of dual mobility cups during acetabular reconstruction cemented in antiprotrusio cages as a way to limit, without eliminating, the risk of dislocation. Therefore cemented fixation of dual mobility cups in cages appears to be a reliable short-term option

Introduction. Dislocation as a primary cause of revision has been on the increase in Sweden (14% in 2014). The increasing use of Dual Mobility cups (DMC) could well be explained by the increased revision burden due to dislocation, patients undergoing revision having increased comorbidities and reports that dual articular cup designs reduce the risk of dislocation. The aim of this study was to analyze the change in utilization pattern of the dual articular designs used in acetabular revision surgery in Sweden. The short-term survival of DMC was compared to traditional designs. Patients/Materials & Methods. During years 2004–2014, 1111 (925 cemented) revisions performed with a DMC design were reported to SHAR. About half (n=426) of these cases were first time revisions performed due to dislocation. During the same time period 520 dislocations were revised for dislocation using a standard cemented cup. There was no differences regarding the age, gender and primary diagnosis (p≥0.12) between the two groups. A second cup revision for all reasons and specifically for dislocation was used as end-point. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. Results. Survival analysis at 5 years for all reasons (91.6% versus 87.9% p=0.002) and especially for reoperation because of instability (96.7 versus 90.9 p<0.0005) favors the DMC group. Discussion. We found a lower risk for a second revision when a dual mobility cup is used in revisions performed due to dislocation. Conclusion. Our findings indicate that use of a cemented DMC could be considered in first time revisions performed due to dislocation. Longer follow-up is needed to establish any long-term clinical advantages when dual mobility cups are used in revisions

Introduction. Revision procedures for unstable total hip arthroplasty have been reported with high failure rates. Many options have been proposed in such challenging cases, including dual mobility. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical and radiologic features associated with the dual mobility cup in case of revisions for instability. Materials and Methods. Sixty four total hip arthroplasties (62 patients) were revised for THA instability using a dual mobility cup at our institution between March 2000 and April 2008. Mean age at reoperation was 67.3 year old (range, 35 to 98). The outcome of the revision procedure was assessed using the Harris Hip Score, and complications were determined by detailed review of the patient's records. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the involved joint were reviewed to assess the position of the prosthesis and to look for osteolysis and signs of loosening of the implant. Results. Mean follow-up was 7.5 years (range, 3.5 to 11.1). At last review 11 patients had died and one was lost to follow up. Postoperatively there was a significant improvement of the Harris Hip Score. Sixty-three patients (98.4%) had no further episodes of dislocation. There were 3 revisions for deep infection, and 4 for mechanical failures including 2 dissociation of the bipolar component, one head-trunion dissociation, and one aseptic loosening of the acetabular construct. For the remaining patients, no radiolucent lines around the components and no osteolysis were observed at latest follow up. Conclusion. The dual mobility cup is a highly effective option to manage unstable total hip arthroplasty. Unlike constrained devices, such implants provide encouraging radiologic results regarding the potential for loosening and osteolysis at mid- to long-term

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability is well documented to be more common in specific demographic groups. We report a retrospective analysis of the use of a dual mobility implant for primary hip replacements in selected patients at risk for dislocation. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical and radiologic features associated with the dual mobility cup in case of primary THA. Materials and Methods. At our institution 119 primary THA were performed in 114 patients (74 females and 40 males) at high risk of instability between January 2000 and December 2002. 84% of the patients had at least two risk factors for dislocation. The mean age was 71 years old (range, 21.4 to 93.2 years) at the time of the arthroplasty. A dual mobility cup was used in all cases. Clinical result was assessed using Harris Hip Score, and complications were determined by detailed review of the patient's records. Radiographs of the involved joint were reviewed to assess the position of the prosthesis and to look for osteolysis and signs of loosening of the implant. Results. During the study period, 56 patients (47%) died of unrelated causes. 17 patients (15%) were lost to follow-up. For the remaining 41 patients (46 hips, 38%), the minimal follow-up was 10 years (119 to 154 months, mean 133 months). Harris hip score improved from 39.6 to 82.4 (p<0.05). Only one late dislocation was observed, 7 years after the surgery, in a 35-year old female with Mannosidosis. Two hips were revised at latest follow-up, for deep infections. No aseptic loosening of the cup or osteolysis was observed at latest follow-up. Conclusion. The dual mobility system was extremely successful in achieving stability in this continuous series of patients with increased risk for dislocation. In addition, no mechanical failure, and no osteolysis or aseptic loosening of the cup has been reported. The use of dual mobility cup to prevent instability in selected patients is a reliable option at long term follow-up

Introduction. The published results of the use of a dual mobility cup to prevent instability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) have established its efficacy. However, the monoblock, porous cobalt chromium cup design makes secure fixation difficult to achieve, limiting its use in patients with significant acetabular deformity or bone loss. Recently, a modular version of the dual mobility cup was introduced, consisting of a conventional porous shell with holes to allow augmented screw fixation, a highly polished modular metal liner, and a standard bipolar femoral head. The purpose of this report is to present its various indications, the surgical technique, and report our initial results. Methods. With IRB approval and FDA clearance, we implanted the modular dual mobility (MDM) cup in 15 patients undergoing primary and 5 patients undergoing revision THA deemed high risk for instability. Indications included septic and aseptic revision surgery, developmental hip dysplasia, avascular necrosis, recurrent dislocations, hemiarthroplasty conversion to THA, periprosthetic fracture, abductor insufficiency requiring augmented repair, and hypermobility from auto-immune inflammatory disease. Surgical Technique. The acetabulum is prepared in the standard fashion for implantation of a press-fit component. After implantation and possible screw augmentation, osteophytes are removed. A modular metal liner is manually inserted into the shell by lining up tines and then impacted into place. Concentric positioning must be confirmed. After standard femoral stem preparation, a dual-mobility head with multiple neck length options is easily assembled and placed on the trunion. The hip is then located and assessed for limb length, stability, and offset. Results. In the 15 primary THAs, successful implantation of the MDM construct was accomplished without issues related to the aforementioned technique. Adjunct screw fixation was utilized in 8 patients based on initial rim fit and bone quality. In all cases, the hip had to be manually dislocated because of increased stability. There were no peri-operative complications related to the MDM. In the 5 revision cases, insertion was possible in 4 of 5 patients. In 2 cases, the MDM liner was used in previously implanted, well-fixed and positioned metal acetabular shells compatible with the MDM insert. In 2 cases, the original metal cup was replaced with a shell compatible with the MDM insert. In the remaining patient, a failed hemi-resurfacing, the use of the MDM was abandoned because of impingement and excessive lengthening causing the inner trial head to disassociate from outer trial head. Discussion. The MDM cup offers a number of important features not available on the original dual mobility designs. These include the use of: 1) a conventional shell, inserted with familiar instrumentation; 2) a shell that can be used with either a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner or the modular polished metal liner; 3) conventional cancellous screws that makes possible augmented fixation in cases of significant bone loss or acetabular deformity. These features make possible the use of the dual mobility concept without the need to add to a hospital's cup inventory. The initial results in a variety of primary and revision conditions have been encouraging

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty in individuals treated for acute hip fracture is up to 10 times more frequent than in elective patients. Whilst approach plays a role, the effect of head sizes in conventional THA and dual mobility cups (DMC) is less studied in fracture cases. The total dislocation rate at 1-year and 3-year revision rates were recorded in this observational study on 8,031 patients with acute hip fracture, treated with a THA 2005–2014. Swedish Arthroplasty Register data were linked with the National Patient Register. Cox multivariable regression models were fitted to calculate adjusted hazard ratios stratified by approach and head size. The cumulative risk of dislocation during year 1 was 2.7% (95% CI 2.2–3.2) with lateral approach and 8.3% (7.3–9.3) with posterior approach (KM estimates). In the posterior approach group DMC was associated with a lower risk of dislocation compared to cTHA=32mm (HR=0.21; 0.07–0.68), whilst a head size <32mm carried a higher risk (HR=1.47; 1.10–1.98). These differences were no longer visible when revision in general was used as outcome. Neither of the implant designs influenced the dislocation risk when direct lateral approach was used. Male gender and severe comorbidity increased the risk. DMC with lateral approach was associated with a reduced risk of revision in general (HR=0.36; 0.13–0.99). Head size did not influence the revision risk. When aiming to reduce the risk of any dislocation, lateral approach – regardless of cup/head design – is referable. If, for any reason, posterior approach is used, DMC is associated with the lowest risk of dislocation. This is not reflected in analysing revision in general as outcome. An interpretation could be that there are different thresholds for dislocation prompting revision

Introduction. Revision surgery is generally recommended for recurrent dislocation following Total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, dislocation following revision THA continues to remain a problem with further dislocation rates upto 28% quoted in literature. We present early results of one of the largest series in U.K. using dual mobility cemented acetabular cup for recurrent hip dislocation. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 40 patients where revision of hip replacement was performed using cemented dual mobility acetabular prosthesis for recurrent dislocations from March 2006 till August 2009 at our district general hospital by a single surgeon (senior author). The series comprised of 13 men and 27 females with average age of 73.4 years (49-92). The mean follow-up period was 23 months. (36 months –6 months). All the hips that were revised had 3 or more dislocations, some them more than 10 times. The cause of dislocation was multifactorial in majority of cases including acetabular component malpositioning mainly due to loosening and wear. A cemented dual mobility cup was used in all cases. In six cases the femoral stem was also revised. Results. At mean follow up of 26 months none of the revised THA had dislocated nor did they have any features of instability. No patients were lost for follow up. Clinically and radiologically there were no features of loosening of the acetabular component. Discussion. The dual mobility cup appears to be a reliable method in treatment for recurrent total hip dislocations. Although our early results are encouraging with no loosening of acetabular components a further evaluation at longer follow- up is recommended

Introduction. Few studies are published about total hip arthroplasties (THA) in Parkinson's disease as it is often considered as a contraindication for hip replacement. THA for fracture is reported as a high complication rate surgery. Regarding bone quality these cases are assimilated to elderly patients and cemented implants are generally preferred. However, due to the improved length and quality of life, we face more potential indications for joint replacement. The aim of this study is to report our experience of cementless dual mobility implants for primary THAs for osteoarthrosis and THA revisions focusing on the risks and benefits of surgery. Material and methods. 65 THA were performed in 59 patients (34 men, 25 women, mean age 73 years, 55–79). Mean latest follow-up was 8,3 years (4–14). Indications were 42 primary THA (osteoarthrosis) and 21 revisions (11 recurrent dislocation, 6 acetabular PE wear, 4 femoral loosening). Surgical approach was always antero-lateral. All patients were implanted with the same dual mobility cementless cup. The same cementless corail-type stem was used for primary THA cases. All the cemenless implants were hydroxyapatite coated. The disability caused by the disease was classified according to Hoehn and Yahr. (19 stage 1, 21 stage 2,16 stage 3). Results. 2 patients were lost for follow-up before 2 years. general complications were 3 pulmonary infection, 7 urinary tract infection, 12 cognitive impairment and 2 sacral pressure ulcer. A post-op. wound infection (E Coli) required an early revision in 2 cases without secondary consequencies (7 and 9 years follow-up). We did not observe early or late THA dislocation except in one case at 9 years follow-up (intraprosthetic dislocation due to an increase of ilio psoas muscle retraction requiring a revision of the dual mobility mechanism). We did not observe loosening cases of the cementless cup. 4 patients fell and fractured the femur. The cementless cup was not affected. 10 patients died. Good to excellent pain relief was achieved in 53/57cases at 2 years and in 40/47 cases at latest follow-up. The progression of neurological disability was observed in most of cases. At the latest follow-up for the 47 remaining patients, we had 5 stage 1, 12 stage 2, 21 stage 3,9 stage 4. Discussion. According to literature infection and dislocation are the main concerns for THA in Parkinson patients. This study does not report any trauma cases; this may explain the rather good results on a mean follow-up to more than 8 years. Nevertheless progression of Parkinson's disease is the rule, with significant disability or even death (10 /57 cases). Cementless fixation is possible even on the acetabular side. The poor bone quality of these patients was not an argument against hydroxyapatite coated implants. Conclusion. THA in Parkinson's disease is a challenging surgery due to associated comorbidity. For all patients the functional status improved in the early follow-up and declined with the disease progression. Cementless dual mobility cups and femoral stems can be used with a very low rate of mechanical complication

Introduction. Biological repair of acetabular bone defects after impaction bone grafting (IBG) in total hip arthroplasty could facilitate future re-revisions in case of failure of the reconstruction again using the same technique. Few studies have analysed the outcome of these acetabular re-revisions. Patients and Methods. We analysed 34 consecutive acetabular re-revisions that repeated IBG and a cemented cup in a cohort of 330 acetabular IBG revisions. Fresh-frozen femoral head allografts were morselized manually. All data were prospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. The mean follow-up after re-revision was 7.2 years (2–17). Intraoperative bone defect had lessened after the first failed revision. At the first revision there were 14 hips with Paprosky 3A and 20 with Paprosky type 3B. At the re-revision there were 5 hips with Paproky 2B, 21 with Paprosky type 3A and 8 with type 3B. Lateral mesh was used in 19 hips. Results. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 45.4 (6.7) to 77.1 (15.6) at final follow-up. The radiological analysis showed cup migration in 11 hips. The mean appearance time was 25 months (3–72). Of these, migration in three cups was progressive and painful requiring re-revision. Cup tilt was found in all migrated hips. There were one dislocation requiring a cemented dual mobility cup associated with IBG and one infection resolved with resection-arthroplasty. Survival with further cup revision for aseptic loosening was 80.7% (95% Confidence Interval 57.4–100) at 11 years. In all surviving re-revisions trabecular incorporation was observed without radiolucent lines. Conclusion. Biological repair can be obtained by restoring the bone stock, even after successive acetabular reconstructions using IBG and a cemented cup

The selection of an acetabular component for primary hip arthroplasty has narrowed significantly over the past 10 years. Although monoblock components demonstrated excellent long-term success the difficulty with insertion and failure to fully appreciate full coaptation of contact with the acetabular floor has led to almost complete elimination of its utilization. Modular acetabular components usually with titanium shells and highly crosslinked polyethylene are by far the most utilised today. This is particularly true with mid-term results demonstrating excellent wear rates and extremely low failure rates and the concern of possible mechanical failure of highly crosslinked polyethylene not being a clinical problem. Ceramic liners are also used but problems with squeaking articulations and liner chipping have made highly crosslinked polyethylene the preferred liner material. Metal-on-metal except in surface replacement arthroplasty is rarely used in primary hip arthroplasty. With instability in total hip replacement still being a significant and the leading cause of revision hip replacement the dual mobility articulation has emerged as an increasingly used acetabular component. This is composed of either a monoblock cobalt chrome socket articulating with a large polyethylene liner into which the femoral head is constrained. The polyethylene liner becomes essentially a larger femoral head articulation and hip stability is significantly improved. A modular dual mobility can also be utilised with a titanium shell and a cobalt chrome liner inserted into the shell and then a dual mobility articulation. In a recent series of 182 dual mobility cups, all monoblock ADM, in high risk patients undergoing primary total hip replacement there was 1 interprosthetic dislocation which occurred during reduction of a dislocation. Average follow up was 4.4 years with a range of 2–6.6 years

The ideal operative treatment of displaced sub capital femoral fractures in the elderly is controversial. Recently, randomised controlled trials have suggested a better outcome with the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to treat displaced intra capsular fractures of the femur for elderly patients in good health. More recently the concept of dual mobility cups is being promoted to avoid dislocations in this cohort of patients. However, overall there is limited evidence to support the choice between different types of arthroplasty. Dislocation remains a main concern with THA, especially when a posterior approach is used. We analysed the outcome of 115 primary THR (112 cements and 3 uncemented) THR using a posterior approach with soft tissue repair in active elderly patients presenting with displaced intra capsular femoral neck fractures. Size 28 mm head was used in 108 and a size 32 mm head in the rest. All surgery was performed by specialist hip surgeons. Satisfactory results were noted in terms of pain control, return to pre-morbid activity and radiological evidence of bone implant osteo-integration. The 30-day mortality was nil. There were two dislocations and only one needed revision surgery due to recurrent dislocation. In conclusion, with optimal patient selection, THA seems to provide a good functional outcome and pain relief in the management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Excellent outcome can be achieved when done well using the standard cemented THR and with 28mm head. A good soft tissue repair and a specialist hip surgeon is preferable

THA in patients with acetabular bone defects is associated with a high risk of dislocation. Dual mobility (DM) cups are known to prevent and treat chronic instability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dislocation rate and survival of jumbo DM cups. This was a retrospective, continuous, multicenter study of all the cases of jumbo DM cup implantation between 2010 and 2017 in patients with acetabular bone loss (Paprosky 2A: 46%, 2B: 32%, 2C: 15% and 3A: 6%). The indications for implantation were revisions for aseptic loosening of the cup (n=45), aseptic loosening of the femoral stem (n=3), bipolar loosening (n=11), septic loosening (n=10), periprosthetic fracture (n=5), chronic dislocation (n=4), intraprosthetic dislocation (n=2), cup impingement (n=1), primary posttraumatic arthroplasty (n=8), and acetabular dysplasia (n=4). The jumbo cups used were COPTOS TH (SERF), which combines press-fit fixation with supplemental fixation (acetabular hook, two superior flanges with one to four screws, two acetabular pegs). A bone graft was added in 74 cases (80%). The clinical assessment consisted of the Harris hip score. The primary endpoint was surgical revision for aseptic acetabular loosening or the occurrence of a dislocation episode. In all, 93 patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 5.3 ± 2.3 years [0, 10]. As of the last follow-up, the acetabular cup had been changed in five cases: three due to aseptic loosening (3.2%) and two due to infection (2.1%). The survivorship free of aseptic loosening was 96.8%. Three patients (3%) suffered a dislocation. At the last follow-up visit, the mean HSS scores were 72.15, (p < 0.05). Use of a jumbo DM cup in cases of acetabular bone defects leads to satisfactory medium-term results with low dislocation and loosening rates

Dislocation post THA confers a higher risk of re-dislocation (Kotwal et al, 2009). The dual mobility (DM) cup design (1974) was aimed at improving the stability by increasing the femoral head to neck ratio (Cuthbert et al., 2019) combining the ideas of low friction arthroplasty with increased jump distance associated with a big head arthroplasty. Understand the dislocation rates, rates of aseptic loosening, infection rate and revision rates between the 2 types of constructs to provide current and up-to date evidence. Medline, pubmed, embase and Cochrane databases were used based on PRISMA guidelines. RevMan software was used for the meta-analysis. Studies (English literature) which used DM construct with atleast 6 months follow-up used as intervention and non DM construct as control were included. 2 independent reviewers conducted the review with a third reviewer in case of difference in opinion regarding eligibility. Primary outcome was dislocation rate and secondary outcome was rate of revision. 564 articles identified out of which 44 articles were screened for full texts and eventually 4 systematic review articles found eligible for the study. Thus, study became a review of systematic reviews. From the 4 systematic reviews, another 35 studies were identified for data extraction and 13 papers were used for meta-analysis. Systematic reviews evaluated, projected an average follow up of 6-8 years with significantly lower dislocation rates for DM cups. The total number of patients undergoing DM cup primary THA were 30,559 with an average age 71 years while the control group consisted of 218,834 patients with an average age of 69 years. DM group had lower rate of dislocation (p < 0.00001), total lower rate of cup revision (p < 0.00001, higher incidence of fracture (p>0.05). DM THA is a viable alternative for conventional THA. The long-term results of DM cups in primary THA need to be further evaluated using high quality prospective studies and RCTs

Instability continues to be a troublesome complication after THA and has been reported to be the main indication for revision in the United States, accounting for 22.5% of revisions. Risk factors associated with dislocation include: age of 75 years or older, body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or greater, alcohol abuse, and neuro-degenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease. Dual-mobility articulations have become an increasingly popular option for these “at risk” primary THAs. Few studies have assessed their use in this complex patient population. The purpose of this study was to assess dislocation rate, radiographic outcomes and complications of the dual-mobility articulation in the setting of primary THA for patients at high risk for dislocation at a minimum follow up of 2 years. We retrospectively reviewed 151 dual mobility acetabular components, that had been performed using a single design (ADM Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) between 2010 and 2014 at a single institution by a single surgeon. The mean age at time of index surgery was 82 years (range, 73–95), 114 patients were female, and mean BMI was 26.2 kg/m2 (range, 16.1–60.9). Dislocation rate and complications associated with dual mobility cups were reviewed, along with the radiographic outcomes after an average follow-up period of 3.6 years (range, 1.9–6.1 years). The indication for hip replacement was osteoarthritis in all cases. We had one traumatic dislocation which required component revision after intraprosthetic dislocation following an attempt of closed reduction. There were no further dislocations in this cohort. No progressive radiolucencies or component positional changes were seen on radiographic assessment. At short-term follow-up dual mobility provides a stable reconstruction in patients at high risk of dislocation with excellent radiographic results. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the durability of these reconstructions

Abstract. Introduction. Dislocation post THA confers a higher risk of re-dislocation (Kotwal et al, 2009). The dual mobility (DM) cup design (1974) was aimed at improving the stability by increasing the femoral head to neck ratio (Cuthbert et al., 2019) combining the ideas of low friction arthroplasty with increased jump distance associated with a big head arthroplasty. Aims. Understand the dislocation rates, rates of aseptic loosening, infection rate and revision rates between the 2 types of constructs to provide current and up-to date evidence. Methods. Medline, pubmed, embase and Cochrane databases were used based on PRISMA guidelines. RevMan software was used for the meta-analysis. Studies (English literature) which used DM construct with atleast 6 months follow-up used as intervention and non DM construct as control were included. 2 independent reviewers conducted the review with a third reviewer in case of difference in opinion regarding eligibility. Primary outcome was dislocation rate and secondary outcome was rate of revision. Results. 564 articles identified out of which 44 articles were screened for full texts and eventually 4 systematic review articles found eligible for the study. Thus, study became a review of systematic reviews. From the 4 systematic reviews, another 35 studies were identified for data extraction and 13 papers were used for meta-analysis. Systematic reviews evaluated, projected an average follow up of 6–8 years with significantly lower dislocation rates for DM cups. The total number of patients undergoing DM cup primary THA were 30,559 with an average age 71 years while the control group consisted of 218,834 patients with an average age of 69 years. DM group had lower rate of dislocation (p < 0.00001), total lower rate of cup revision (p < 0.00001, higher incidence of fracture (p>0.05). Conclusion. DM THA is a viable alternative for conventional THA. The long-term results of DM cups in primary THA need to be further evaluated using high quality prospective studies and RCTs. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Dislocation is a particular problem after total hip replacement in femoral neck fractures and elderly, especially female, patients. The increased rate of dislocation in this population is probably due to significant ligamentous laxity in these patients and poor coordination and proprioception. Another population of patients with increased propensity for dislocation is the revision hip replacement patient. Current dislocation rates in these patients can approach 10% with conventional implant systems. The Dual Mobility total hip system is composed of a cobalt chrome acetabular shell that has a grit blasted, beaded and/or hydroxyapatite coating to improve bone ingrowth. The polyethylene liner is highly crosslinked polyethylene and fits congruently into the cobalt chrome shell and acts like a large femoral head (usually > 40 mm). The femoral head attached to the trunnion is usually 28 mm. The femoral head snaps into the polyethylene liner to acts as a second protection against dislocation. Indications for the Dual Mobility socket are in the high risk for dislocation patient and particularly in elderly, female patients. It is also indicated in patients with neuromuscular disease who are at more risk to dislocate. To date 237 dual mobility cups have been performed with an average age of 79 and 207 of the procedures in women. The follow up extends to 5.6 years with an average of 3.5. There has been 1 dislocation which occurred after a traumatic event. There have been no mechanical failures, no infections and no other revisions in this series. Interprosthetic dislocation has been reported in long term follow up and there was, in this series, when reduction was performed on the only liner dislocation. Pain relief has been no different than conventional hip replacement and range of motion is unchanged as well

With increasing burden of revision hip arthroplasty, one of the major challenge is the management of bone loss associated with previous multiple surgeries. Proximal femoral replacement (PFR) has already been popularised for tumour surgeries. The inherent advantages of PFR over allograft –prosthesis system, which is the other option for addressing severe bone loss include, early weight bearing and avoidance of non-union and disease transmission. Our study explores PFR as a possible solution for the management of complex hip revisions. Thirty consecutive hips (29 patients) that underwent PFR between January 2009 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively for their clinical and radiological outcomes. The Stanmore METS system was used in all these patients. Mean age at the index surgery (PFR) was 72.69 years (range 50–89) with number of previous hip arthroplasties ranging from 1–5. At mean follow up of 32.27 months, there were no peri-prosthetic fractures and no mechanical failure of the implants. Clearance of infection was achieved in 80% of cases. There was 1 early failure due to intra-operative perforation of femoral canal needing further revision and two were revised for deep infection. Instability was noted in 26.7% (8) of the hips, of which, 87.5% (7) needed further revision with constrained sockets. Out of these 8 hips with instability, 5 had pre-operative infection. Deep infection was noted in 20% (6) of the hips, of which, 5 were primarily revised with PFR for septic loosening. However, further surgeries were essential for only 3 patients. One patient has symptomatic aseptic acetabular loosening and 1 had asymptomatic progressive femoral side loosening (lost to follow up). Severe proximal femoral bone loss in complex revision arthroplasties has necessitated the use of PFR prosthesis. Our study supports the fact that PFR is probably a mechanically viable option for complex revisions. Significant numbers of dislocations and infections could be attributed to the poor soft tissue envelope around the hip. Further surgical techniques in the form use of dual mobility cups and silver coated PFR implants need to be explored

Introduction. The rapidly expanding aging population in the UK are living longer than ever before, which is reflected by the rising number of relatively fit and healthy people that sustain fracture NOF (neck of femur). According to current NICE (National institute for health clinical excellence) guidelines a large proportion of fracture NOF patients meet the requirements to have a total hip arthroplasty (THA) for this injury. Dislocation rate of THA can be as high as 20% for patients with fracture NOF, which is a disastrous complication in these vulnerable patients. Numerous techniques have been adopted to minimise the risk of dislocation. The use of dual mobility (tripolar) acetabular components is one such strategy with a proven track record in the literature that is employed by surgeons at our institute. Objectives. To assess the dislocation rate in patients with fracture NOF treated with dual mobility (tripolar) THAs in our unit. Method. Retrospective study analyzing clinical notes and radiographs for dislocation rate, cup inclination, and limb length discrepancy. Results. A total of 17 patients with fracture NOF were treated with biarticular THAs during a 3½ year study period, with an average follow up of 22 months. Mean cup inclination was 42°, with mean limb length discrepancy of 3.4 mm. All patients mobilized comfortably without the use of walking aids. There have been no dislocations in our study group to date. Conclusions. This small series has excellent results, with a 0% dislocation rate, in treating fracture NOF patients with dual mobility (tripolar) acetabular cups. This is comparable to larger studies in the literature. Dual mobility cups provide a valuable option to decrease dislocation risk without increasing polyethylene wear rate. This is a safe, effective technique with a proven advantage to reduce dislocation risk in patients undergoing THA for fracture NOF

INTRODUCTION. Dislocation is one of the most important complications in THA. Dual mobility cup (DMC) inserts reduce the risk for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty by increasing the oscillation angle. A lower rate of dislocation with use of a DMC insert has been reported in different studies. But there is no available research that clearly delineates the stability advantages of DMC inserts in primary THA. The aim of our study was to evaluate the area of the safe zone for a DMC insert, compared to a fixed insert for different anteversion angles of the femoral component. Material and Methods. A model of the pelvis and femur were developed from computed tomography images. We defined the coordinate system of the pelvis relative to the anterior pelvic plane and the coordinate system of the femur relative to the posterior condylar plane. In our model, we simulated a positive anteversion position of the acetabular cup. The lower border for cup inclination is 50°. The safe zone was evaluated for the following range of motion of the implant: 120° of flexion, 90° of flexion 30° of internal rotation, 30° of extension, 40° of abduction, 40° of adduction, and 30° of external rotation. (Fig.1) The safe zone was calculated for both a fixed insert and a DMC insert over a pre-determined range of three-dimensional motion, and the effect of increasing the anteversion position of the femoral component from 5° to 35° quantified. The ratio of the safe zone for a DMC insert to a fixed insert was calculated. Results. A wider safe zone was obtained for a DMC insert over all range of motion conditions. A DMC insert increased the stability of the implant between 10° and 15° along both anterior-posterior and vertical axes of the acetabular cup. (Fig.2) When stem anteversion were varied 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, 30°, 35°, ratio of safe zone (a DMC insert / a fixed insert) were changed 8, 10.1, 6.3, 4.9, 5.2, 6.6, 10.6. (Fig.3). Discussion. The safe zone of a DMC insert is always larger than a fixed type insert. In every stem anteversion patterns, safe zones were expanded to all direction with 10° to 15°. Under 15° of stem anteversion, area of both inserts are almost stable. Area ratio is lowest with 20° of stem anteversion. Over 25° of stem anteversion, both area decreased and area ratio increased gradually. Over 30° of stem anteverison, safe zone of a fixed type are very small area. It is difficult for us to set acetabular shell in that small area. But we will get a larger area by using DMC. We performed a simulation analysis to evaluate the increase in area of the safe zone when using DMC inserts, compared to fixed inserts. To use of a DMC insert would bring in a 5–11-fold expanded area of the safe zone. In especially, DMC is a useful when stem anteversion is over 30°. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

INTRODUCTION. The Articular Surface Replacement XL system (ASRXL) with metal-on-metal (MoM) of the articular surfaces was produced by DePuy Orhopaedics since 2003 for total hip replacement. In 2010 following the notification received from the National Joint Registry (NJR) of England and Wales concerning the excessive failure rate of the ASR system (approximately 13% at 5 years), the DePuy send the recall of the product. All operated patients were checked. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We enrolled in our Followup 106 patients (51 males, 55 females, mean age 63.6) with a total of 107 implants (one is a bilateral case), subjected with clinical and instrumental investigations. The controls were performed annually; for the patients who presented positive clinical-instrumental condictions and values of Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co)> 7 mg /l it has been proposed followup closer, every 6 months for the entire life of the implant. For the evaluation of the cases in our study, we used the following scales:. Clinical Score: Harris Hip Score (pain and functional limitation). Rx score:. 0 normal;. 1 bone resorbtion and mobilization. Ultrasound score:. 0 none. 1 fluid collection <20 mm. 2 fluid collection >20 mm. 3 solid mass: metallosis. Blood metal levels of Cr-Co (μg/l = parts per billion = ppb). Normal < 3 ppb. Alert 3–7 ppb. Pathological >7 ppb. The analysis of ionemia was made at the Clinical Chemistry at Charing Cross Hospital in London. RESULTS. The followup includes 106 patients for a total of 107 hip prostheses. Of these patients, 34.5% (36 patients, 22 women and 14 men, average age 61 years, min. 34 – max. 79), had implant revision with a dual mobility cup implant. The Mean follow-up was 76.5 months. In patients who underwent revision surgery it was evaluated the trend of Cr and Co concentration in the period after the replacement. In 7 patients (2 women, 5 men) (19.4%) the replanting is caused to the mobilization of the cup, in 1 case (2.6%) to a severe functional limitation and pain. In the remaining 29 patients (19 women, 10 men) (78%) the replanting is due to high levels of Cr and Co and ultrasound positive for collection. We are following the additional 70 patients (34 women, 36 men), not revised. DISCUSSION. From our study we show that the main cause of revision was the ionemia. Analysis of variance for repeated measures shows a statistically significant reduction of the concentrations of Cr and Co as a result of the revision, supporting evidence that the wear of MoM implants was the main cause. CONCLUSION. From our analysis, we observed that the metal-metal hip replacement system DePuy J&J showed a excessive revision rate, associated with levels of metal ions significantly higher than the other hip prosthesis. The return values of ionemia, after the revision surgery, has appeared in all operated cases and the fluid collection after revision has disappeared, with a clear improvement in the clinical condition of patients

Purpose of the study: The purpose of the study was compare dislocation rates of total hip arthroplasties (THA) implanted with a dual-mobility cup versus those implanted with a conventional cup. Material and method: The first series (DM) included 105 patients who underwent first-intention THA implanted by one operator (DS) from January 2005 to June 2007. Dual mobility cups with a 28 mm head were implanted. There were 60 women and 45 men, mean age 76.6±5.65 years (range 53–93). Degenerative disease predominated (n=95, 90.%). The cups were Novae press-fit (SERF) (n=94), Stafit (Zimmer° 5N+5°? Avantage (Biomet) (n=5), and Gyros (Depuy) (n=1). The second series (S) included 108 patients who underwent the same procedure performed by the same operator (DS) from January 2003 to June 200 for the same indication. This series was the control series. There were 56 women and 52 men, mean age 74.19±5.9 years (range 53–87). Degenerative disease predominated (n=100, 92.6%). All implantations used metal-polyethylene bearing with a 28 mm head. The implants were St Nabor cups (Zimmer) (n=44), Cédior cups (Zimmer (n=41), and sealed cups (n=22). The same femoral stem with a 12–14 cone was used in both series. The reduced posterior approach was used in all cases without section of the pyramidal tendon. Inclusion required at least one year follow-up. Fischer’s test was used to compare dislocation rates. Other variables were analysed with the chi-square test. Results: Regarding the dual-mobility cup series (DM) there were no cases of dislocation. In the conventional cup series (S) there were five early dislocations (< 3 months), giving a rate of 4.63%. although the dislocation rate was obviously higher in the S series, the difference was at the limit of significance (p=0.0597). In addition, the DM population was slightly older than the S series (p=0.0026)

Purpose of the study: In 1975, Bousquet and Rambert invented the concept of dual mobility to reduce the risk of dislocation by changing the fixed insert on a Charnley implant to a mobile liner within a metal back shell held onto the femoral head by a retaining collar. This enabled implant recipients to maintain their intense activities without restriction after a first-intention procedure and to overcome muscle deficits after revisions. The screw-on PF stem was introduced in 1985. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the long-term advantages and failures of this combination. Material and method: This series included 240 hips with a PF stem and a Novae metal back cup. This was a retrospective analysis of a homogenous group of consecutive patients who underwent surgery from 1985 to 1990 (mean follow-up 22 years). Mean age at implantation was 56.7 years. This is the largest series, with the longest follow-up reported to date with dual mobile cups. The main indication was degenerative joint disease (79%) then osteonecrosis (11%). The implant was made of 316 L stainless steel. The PF was composed of the stem, a 22 mm diameter monobloc modular base and a 16 mm diameter neck. The tripodal Novae metal back cup was alumina coated. Preop, intraoperative and postop data were analysed. Clinical and radiographic follow-up (lucent lines, implant position) were noted at last follow-up. The Charnley, PMA, Devane and Sedel scores were noted. Results: The preoperative PMA was 10.8, reaching 16.9 at last follow-up. The Devane score remained unchanged at 3. The mean Brooker score was 1.2. There were no cases with crural pain. Survival at last follow-up was 80%. There were no cases of dislocation, 18 intraprosthetic dislocations (4% at 9.25 years), four revisions of implant wear (1.7% at 19 years), five femoral revisions (2%), two infections (0.8%), nine patients lost to follow-up (4%) and 100 deaths. Conclusion: The PF stem has a remarkable survival. The overall survival is comparable with series having an equivalent follow-up. The dislocation rate was zero, demonstrating the superiority of the dual mobility concept. There were several intraprosthetic displacements which came later than with Profil stems (role of the neck on the lip). The main complication was acetabular loosening, attributed to insufficient secondary fixation, improved later by adjunction of hydroxyapatite. Wear of the dual mobility cup should be modelised to define the role of osetolysis in these failures

It is accepted that larger diameter heads are more difficult to dislocate due to the increased distance the head has to travel to come out of the cup. Currently larger femoral heads are being used for their resistance to dislocation however, there remains little reporting on the effect of design of cup on jump distance. Monoblock metal on metal cups, which were designed for hip resurfacing are typically less than a hemisphere internally in order to increase the range of motion (ROM) needed when the femoral neck is retained. This does however also reduce the jump distance. We investigated several designs of cup with a variety of head sizes in order to compare ROM using a computer range of motion tool and a two dimensional jump distance with the cup at 45 degrees inclination. Jump distances were calculated for: Internally hemispheric cups in 28, 32 and 36mm bearing diameters; 28, 40 and 44mm polyethylene liners which were hemispheric but with an additional 2mm cylinder and a 0.7mm chamfer at the equator (Trident, Stryker, Mahwah, USA); 38, 48 and 54mm monoblock metal on metal resurfacing cups with a 3.5mm offset (BHR, Smith and Nephew, Memphis, USA); 40, 48, 58 dual mobility cups with an anatomic rim (Restoration ADM, Stryker, Mahwah, USA). Range of motion modeling was carried out using custom-written software according to a previously published method2 with 5 degrees of pelvic tilt and a standard femoral component. For the present study, range of motion was assessed on a standard stem with a 132° neck angle. Inclination of the cup was set to 45° and anteversion to 20°. For each implant tested, the total ROM was computed in flexion/extension, ab/adduction, and int/external rotation. Components tested for range of motion were: Trident 32, 36, 40 and 44mm Internal Diameter; Hemispheric 28 and 32mm Internal Diameter cups; MITCH TRH MoM Monoblock Resurfacing Cup (Stryker EMEA, Montreux, Switzerland) 46mm cup bearing diameter with a 2.75mm offset bore; Dual Mobility 40, 46 and 58mm cups. The metal on metal monoblock cups had a very high range of motion but a 48mm head has only a similar jump distance to a hemispheric 36mm design. The designs with the cylinder and chamfer have a markedly higher jump distance than their hemispheric equivalents but slightly reduced ROM. Interestingly, the dual mobility design has almost double the jump distance of an equivalently sized metal on metal resurfacing type cup and a higher jump distance than an equivalent head size in a conventional unipolar design. The dual mobility design has similar ROM to a 40mm head in the hemisphere with cylinder and chamfer design. ROM is slightly higher in the hemispheric and sub-hemispheric designs but this model does not take into account bony or soft tissue impingement. The role of design of ace-tabular component has a great effect on the range of motion and jump distance of bearings

Osteolysis induced by UHMWPE debris has historically been one of the major causes of long term failure of TJR. An increase in concentration of polyethylene particles in the peri-prostheic tissue has been linked to an increased incidence of osteolysis. The dual mobility hip bearing concept mates a femoral head into a polyethylene liner which has an unconstrained articulation into a metal shell. The wear mechanism of the dual mobility hip bearing is distinct from a constrained single articulation design, which may result in a difference in wear debris particles. The aim of this study is to evaluate wear debris generated from a dual mobility hip and compare it to a conventional single articulation design when both are manufactured from sequentially crosslinked and annealed polyethylene. The dual mobility hip (Restoration ADM) incorporated a 28mm CoCr femoral head into a polyethylene liner that articulates against a metal shell (48mm ID). The conventional hip (Trident®) mated a 28mm CoCr femoral head against a polyethylene liner. The polyethylene for all liners was sequentially crosslinked and annealed (X3). A hip joint simulator was used for testing at a rate of 1 Hz with cyclic Paul curve physiologic loading. A serum sample from each testing group was collected. Serum samples were protein digested following the published process by Scott et al. The digested serum was then filtered through a series of polycarbonate filter papers of decreasing size and sputter coated with gold for analysis using SEM. Image fields were randomized and wear debris was compared in terms of its length, width, aspect ration, and equivalent circular diameter (ECD). A total of 149 conventional hip particles and 114 dual mobility hip particles were imaged. Results show a majority of particles are of spherical nature and images do not indicate the presence of fibrillar or larger elongated polyethylene debris. Particle length between designs is not statistically different, while all other comparisons show statistical significance (p<0.05). It is hypothesized that the dual mobility hip system reduces the total amount of cross-shear motion on any one articulation, which aids in the reduction in wear. This design feature may be responsible for the slight difference in morphology of dual mobility wear debris when compared to the constrained hip design. The length of the particles was similar, simply indicating a different shape rather than a marked reduction in overall size. The debris generated is this study was from highly crosslinked polyethylene in two different designs, which produced a very significant decrease in quantity of particles when compared to the quantity of debris from conventional polyethylene. The wear debris was of similar length in both designs and so we do not expect any difference in biological response to debris from either device. The dual mobility design has also shown no effect of cup abduction angle on wear demonstrating forgiveness to implant positioning. This advantage, combined with the low wear rate and similar length wear particles, should lead to good clinical performance of dual mobility cups with sequentially irradiated and annealed polyethylene

Studies have indicated that the shallow Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) acetabular socket or the socket with no head center inset can significantly increase the risk of hip joint dislocation. A previous study suggested the rim loading model in UHMWPE socket and metal femoral head can generate an intrinsic dislocating force component pushing head out of socket. Recently there has been renewed interest in dual mobility articulations due to the excellent stability. The outer bearing couple of the dual mobility articulations are comprised of the UHMWPE femoral head and metal acetabular socket while inner bearing is the locked conventional metal-poly construct. The acetabular socket is also featured by an anatomically shaped head inset wall. The purpose of this study was to theoretically compare the intrinsic dislocating force between conventional metal head on UHMWPE socket articulations and the poly head on metal socket articulations used in the dual mobility cup under direct loading. The 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) models were same as previous study but with different material combinations. Sixty FEA model assemblies were consisted of CoCr or UHMWPE femoral heads and their corresponding 10mm thick generic UHMWPE or CoCr acetabular sockets. There were five different head center insets of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2mm for each of six bearing diameters of 22, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44mm for either sockets. The joint load of 2,446N was applied through the femoral head center as the same fashion as previous study. The dislocating force generated by the joint loading force intrinsically pushed femoral head out of socket. FEA results were verified with two data points of physical testing of actual UHMWPE 28mm ID liners with 0 and 1.5mm head center insets. The highest dislocating force was 1,269N per 2,446N of rim loading force for the 0mm head center inset in poly cup with 22mm CoCr femoral head or the case of easiest to dislocate. The lowest dislocating force was 17.7N per 2,446N force for the 2mm inset in CoCr socket with 44mm poly head which therefore was the least likely to dislocate. The average dislocating force decreased by 78% from metal head- poly cup couple to poly head - metal cup couple. The dislocating force decreased as the head center inset and head size increased in all material cases. The study suggests that not only the head center inset and head size but also the bearing material combinations can affect the intrinsic dislocating force component. The dual mobility poly head and metal socket couple generates less intrinsic dislocating force in all comparable conditions for conventional metal head and poly socket couple. During the hip separation and vertical placement of the cup, all variables found in this study may play the important rules to maintain joint stability. The stiffened cup rim reduces the deformation and thus reduces the potential cup wedge effect to generate dislocating force. The result of this study should provide the guidance to improve acetabular cup design for better joint stability

Aims

One-stage revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has several advantages; however, resection of the proximal femur might be necessary to achieve higher success rates. We investigated the risk factors for resection and re-revisions, and assessed complications and subsequent re-revisions.