Aim: The aim of this study was to determine if a correlation exists between the impingement test and the arthroscopic findings at the acetabular rim in non-dysplastic hips. Secondarily, we also wanted to establish if there was a correlation between the pain experienced on the impingement test and the pathology identified. Patients and Methods: Sixty-two consecutive patients who were due to have an arthroscopy of the hip in our unit were prospectively recruited into the study. All the dysplastic hips were excluded from the study. One observer was involved in examining all the patients and another one in performing all the arthroscopies. The impingement test was considered positive if at 90 degrees of flexion, adduction and internal rotation, the patient complained of discomfort or pain. If the patient experienced pain this was described as a strongly positive test and if there was discomfort experienced it was considered as a weakly positive test. The test was performed on the morning of the arthroscopy and all the intra-articular findings recorded at arthroscopy. A tear of the acetabular labrum and chondral damage in the antero-superior margin of the acetabulum were considered as positive pathology at the acetabular rim. Results : There were 40 males and 22 females in the study group. The impingement test was positive in 57 patients, strongly positive in 42 and weakly positive in 15. The arthroscopy revealed positive pathology in terms of an acetabular labrum tear and/or chondral damage at the acetabular rim in 55 patients. A negative test was recorded in 5 patients but there was positive rim pathology in two of these 5 patients. Conclusion: The impingement test correlates positively with the pathology at the acetabular rim; the sensitivity of the test for diagnosing acetabular rim pathology is 96.4 % and the specificity is only 60 % in non-dysplastic hips. However, we did not identify any correlation between the level of pain and the pathology observed

Radiodense structures resembling ossicles at the acetabular rim have received multiple names including “Os acetabuli, Os supertilii, Os marginale superius acetabuli, and Os coxae quartum”. Various theories regarding their origin have been postulated. These structures commonly are observed in dysplastic hips and hips suffering from femoro-acetabular impingement and represent fractures of the acetabular rim. In our series we observed acetabular rim fragments in 4.9% of the dysplastic hips and in 6.4% of the hips with femoro-acetabular impingement. Two different pathomechanics are responsible for the occurrence of these rim fragments. In dysplasia the short acetabular roof reduces the amount of available loading surface which leads to an overload on the lateral margin of the acetabulum, propagating the development of a fatigue fracture. However, as in all hips additional cysts were visible, it must be postulated, that cysts have to be present additionally and act as stress risers through which the rim bone eventually will fail. In hips with femoro-acetabular impingement the mode of failure is different. The relative anterior overcover in retroverted hips is subjected to stress during flexion of the hip, which is further increased by the frequent presence of an non-spheric extension of the femoral head as seen in cam impingement. The nonspheric femoral head-neck junction is jammed into the rim area. By repetitive traumatization the anterior rim eventually will fracture. The clinical importance of acetabular rim fractures in the dysplastic hip is readily understood even by an unexperienced observer. However, it has to be considered as a sign that the hip has decompensated and it usually goes with significant articular cartilage damage. Because the radiographic appearance of the hip with femoro-acetabular impingement seems normal at first sight, the mechanism leading to anterior rim fracture may be overlooked. However, recognition and adequate treatment is important to prevent further degeneration of the hip

Purpose of the study: The anterior rim of the arthroplasty cup can overhang the bone in certain situations: oversized cup, insufficient anteversion, insufficient ace-tabular reaming, cylindrospherical reaming overriding the acetabular opening. The straight or concave shape of the anterior wall of the acetabulum also affects prosthetic overhang. The purpose of this anatomic study was to use a navigation system to quantify, in vitro, the height of the iliopubic psoas notch. Material and methods: Sixty-eight acetabuli from 34 cadaver pelvi free of osteoarthritis (13 male and 21 female) were analyzed using the Stryker™ hip navigation system. Morphological data were collected for mathematical processing which defined the diameter and the center of the articular surface. Results: Considerable intra- and inter-individual differences in the shape of the acetabular rim were noted and quantified, particularly concerning the psoas notch. When the lateral view of the acetabular rim is projected onto a plane it produces a succession of three summits and three valleys explaining the difficulty encountered in obtaining a precise mean plane for the acetabular opening. Discussion: More or less pronounced protrusion of the cup could explain potentially painful anterior impingement of the psoas, especially for certain types of acetabular morphology

The acetabular rim syndrome is a pathological entity which we illustrate by reference to 29 cases. The syndrome is a precursor of osteoarthritis of the hip secondary to acetabular dysplasia. The symptoms are pain and impaired function. All our cases were treated by operation which consisted in most instances of re-orientation of the acetabulum by peri-acetabular osteotomy and arthrotomy of the hip. In all cases, the limbus was found to be detached from the bony rim of the acetabulum. In several instances there was a separated bone fragment, or 'os acetabuli' as well. In acetabular dysplasia, the acetabular rim is subject to abnormal stress which may cause the limbus to rupture, and a fragment of bone to separate from the adjacent bone margin. Dysplastic acetabuli may be classified into two radiological types. In type I there is an incongruent shallow acetabulum. In type II the acetabulum is congruent but the coverage of the femoral head is deficient

Introduction. Ectopic ossification (EO) at the acetabular rim has been suggested to be associated with pincer impingement and to lead to ossification of the labrum. However, this has never been substantiated with histological, radiographic and MRI findings in large cohorts of patients. We hypothesized that it is more a bone apposition of the acetabular rim and that it occurs more frequently in coxa profunda (CP) hips. Materials and Methods. In the first part, a cohort of 20 hips with this suspected ectopic rim ossification (EO) pattern were identified. The radiographic features that could be associated with this ossification pattern were described and evaluated by a histologic examination of intra-operative samples taken from the rim trimming. In the second part, we assessed the prevalence of this ectopic ossification process in a cohort of 203 patients treated for FAI. Results. Histologic examination revealed that new acetabular bone formation was either overgrowing the non-ossified labrum or moving it away from the native rim. Radiologically, this was associated with an “indentation sign” and/or a “double line sign”. There were no specimens that had shown any evidence of labral ossification. EO was found in 26 hips (18%) of the second cohort. Twenty of 26 hips (77%) with EO had CP morphology and 29% of CP hips had EO signs. In contrast, only 6 non-profunda hips (8%) were associated with EO. There was a high correlation between XR and MRI findings as >80% of XR findings were confirmed on MRI. Sixty-nine hips had CP morphology. The double line sign (N = 13), the indentation sign (N = 12) and a prominent lateral rim (N = 11) were found. Hips with an EO pattern were found in patients that were significantly older than those without EO (p = 0.01). The acetabular characteristics of the EO groups were not significantly different from the CP hips without EO. The femoral characteristics were significantly different between groups with lower neck shaft angles (128° vs 134°;p = 0,0002) and shorter femoral necks lengths (62mm vs 65mm; p = 0,04)) in the EO group. The mean Tonnis classification was not significantly different (p = 0,18). In addition, the mean acetabular cartilage degeneration status was not different between both groups (p = 0,9). Rim trimming down to the native acetabular bone was done in all cases either by arthroscopy (N = 40) or open surgical dislocation (N = 17). Discussion. Ectopic ossification of the acetabular rim predominantly occurs in CP and is associated with specific anatomic features of the proximal femur. This type of impingement seems to be different and less aggressive than other described impingement processes. The double line sign and indentation sign are highly indicative for this EO process and are indicative for a longstanding impingement problem. Trimming of the acetabular rim should be conducted

Purpose. The effects of Acetabular Rim Osteophytes (ARO) in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), has not been quantified. During THA their presence and location is variable, and the effect on post-operative Range of Motion (ROM) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ROM of a modern hip implant in five cadaver models utilizing computerized virtual surgery, and to analyze the effect of AROs given their location on the acetabulum, and position of the prosthesis during motion. Method. CT scans of five cadaveric pelvises and femurs were used to create 3-D Models. Surgery, using virtual Stryker components was then performed to restore the natural anatomic offset and leg length. ROM to impingement was evaluated for each model in eight vectors: flexion/extension, internal/external rotation, abduction/adduction, and 90 degrees of flexion with internal/external rotation. An Osteophyte Impingement Model was then created by elevating the natural acetabular rim by 10 millimeters circumferentially in each virtual cadaver pelvis. Using the same THA components, ROM was then evaluated in this pelvic model and compared to the cadaveric models. Results. ROM in the Osteophyte Impingement Model yielded a statistically significant decrease in five of the eight vectors tested, when compared to the Cadaveric Model: Flexion, Extension, External Rotation, Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation, and Flexion to 90 degrees with External Rotation. Only 3 of these 5 vectors were within normal human physiological ROM: Flexion, External Rotation, and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation. The osteophyte model yielded a decrease in absolute ROM in the following: Flexion to 101 vs 113 degrees (p= 0.03), External Rotation to 30.4 vs 49.5 degrees (p= 0.01), and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation 16.7 vs 31.6 degrees (p=0.01). When mapped on the acetabulum of right-sided hip, with the 12 o'clock position as the superior pole of the acetabulum, impingement on the osteophyte was noted at the following locations: with Flexion, and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation, impinged was noted between 1 and 2 o'clock on the acetabulum. In External Rotation impinged occurred between 7 and 8 o'clock on the acetabulum. Conclusion. This study showed that a 10 millimeter osteophyte can potentially decrease range of motion and lead to impingement in THA in certain planes of motions: Flexion, External Rotation and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation. The location of this impingement is between the 1 and 2 o'clock in Flexion, and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation. In External Rotation, the impingement will occur between the 7 and 8 o'clock. The above applies to a right-sided acetabulum, the left side will demonstrate the mirror image of this impingement: Between the 10 to 11 o'clock, and 4 to 5 o'clock positions respectively. Osteophytes 10 millimeters or more in height at these positions should be carefully evaluated intra-operatively and removed safely if possible

Aims

Hip arthroscopy has gained prominence as a primary surgical intervention for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to identify radiological features, and their combinations, that predict the outcome of hip arthroscopy for FAI.

Introduction

Retrieval investigations have shown that cracking or rim failure of polyethylene hip liners may occur at the superior aspect of the liner, in the area that engages the locking ring of the shell¹. Failure could occur due to acetabular liner/stem impingement and/or improper cup position. Other contributing factors may include high body mass index, patient activity and design characteristics such as polyethylene material properties, thin liner rim geometry and cup rim design. Currently no standard multi-axis simulator methodology exists for high angle rim fatigue testing, although tests have been developed using static uniaxial load frames². The purpose of this study was to develop a technique to create a clinically relevant rim crack/fracture event on a 4-axis hip simulator, and to understand the contribution of component design and loading and motion parameters.

INTRODUCTION

Within total hip replacement, articulation of the femoral head near the rim of the acetabular liner creates undesirable conditions leading to a propensity for dislocation[1], increased contact stresses[2], increased load and torque imparted on the acetabular component[3], and increased wear[4]. Propensity for rim loading is affected by prosthesis placement, as well as the kinematics and loading of the patient. The present study investigates these effects.

High tensile stress has been considered as a contributing factor to the rim fracture of polyethylene acetabular cup liner. We performed the 3 D Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to compare the stress patterns at the polyethylene liner rim as a function of polyethylene thicknesses and whether or not rim was supported by the titanium acetabular shell extension. Two 3.1 mm thick generic 52 mm titanium alloy acetabular shells with and without 2 mm high rim support extension were modelled. Six corresponding Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) liners with inner bearing diameters ranging from 22 mm to 44 mm and same outer diameters, were fixed in the shells. A 2 450 N load was applied through the corresponding CoCr femoral heads to the rims of liners while the acetabular shells were fixed on the outer spherical surface. The FEA was performed in half body of the assembly. The maximum principal stresses at the rim regions of UHMWPE liners were recorded.

The results showed that in all rim supported conditions, the maximum principal stress were in compressive patterns, a preferred pattern to reduce the potential polyethylene liner fracture. In rim unsupported conditions, the stresses was in tensile on the internal bearing surface when polyethylene liner thickness was bellow 5 mm, or was bellow 9 mm if the average maximum principal stress cross the rim was considered.

We conclude that the metal rim support changes the stress pattern in the rim region of UHMWPE liner to compressive for all liner thicknesses. The stress pattern turns to tensile, or there will be a higher potential for rim fracture, if UHMWPE liner is unsupported and the polyethylene rim thickness is less than 9 mm.

Although components used this study did not include the locking details which add higher stress concentrations, the trend of stress patterns should follow the results found in this study.

Previous studies suggested the lack of capture wall of acetabular Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) liner can significantly increase the risk of hip joint dislocation. To date, the dislocation studies have been focused on the femoral neck impingement models. The purpose of this study was to identify a new Dislocating Force (DF) generated by rim directed joint force alone and investigate the factors to affect the magnitudes of the DF. The 3 D Finite Element Analysis (FEA) models were constructed by (30) 10 mm thick UHMWPE liners with six inner bearing diameters ranging from 22 mm to 44 mm and five capture wall heights in each bearing size from 0 mm to 2 mm. A load of 2 446 N was applied through the corresponding CoCr femoral head to the rim of the liner. The DF was recorded as a function of capture wall height and head diameter. The results were verified by the physical tests of two 28 mm head bearing liners with 0 and 1.5 mm capture wall heights respectively.

The results showed that the highest DF was 1 269N in 0 mm capture wall and 22 mm head. The lowest DF was 171 N in 2 mm capture wall and 44 mm head. The DF decreased as the capture wall and head size increased. When capture wall increased from 0 mm to 1 mm, the DF was reduced more than 50%. Two experimental data points were consistent with the trend of DF curve found in the FEA.

We concluded that the new intrinsic dislocating force DF can be induced by the rim directed joint loading force alone and can reach as high as 51% of the femoral loading force. A capture wall height above 1mm can effectively reduce DF to less than 25% of the joint force. In addition, the larger head diameter also resulted in less DF generation.

Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement is caused by bone excess on the femoral neck abutting the acetabular rim. This can cause cartilage and labral damage due to increased contact pressure as the cam moves into the acetabulum. However, the damage mechanism and the influence of individual mechanical factors (such as sliding distance) are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to identify the cam sliding distance during impingement for different activities in the hip joint. Motion data for 12 different motion activities from 18 subjects, were applied to a hip shape model (selected as most likely to cause damage, anteriorly positioned with a maximum alpha angle of 80°). The model comprised of a pointwise representation of the acetabular rim and points on the femoral head and neck where the shape deviated from a sphere (software:Matlab). The movement of each femoral point was tracked in 3D while an activity motion was applied, and impingement recorded when overlap between a cam point and the acetabular rim occurred. Sliding distance was recorded during impingement for each relevant femoral point. Angular sliding distances varied for different activities. The highest mean (±SD) sliding distance was for leg-crossing (42.62±17.96mm) and lowest the trailing hip in golf swing (2.17±1.11mm). The high standard deviation in the leg crossing sliding distances, indicates subjects may perform this activity in a different manner. This study quantified sliding distance during cam impingement for different activities. This is an important parameter for determining how much the hip moves during activities that may cause damage and will provide information for future experimental studies

Aims. Research on hip biomechanics has analyzed femoroacetabular contact pressures and forces in distinct hip conditions, with different procedures, and used diverse loading and testing conditions. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize the available evidence in the literature for hip contact pressures and force in cadaver and in vivo studies, and how joint loading, labral status, and femoral and acetabular morphology can affect these biomechanical parameters. Methods. We used the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews for this literature search in three databases. After screening, 16 studies were included for the final analysis. Results. The studies assessed different hip conditions like labrum status, the biomechanical effect of the cam, femoral version, acetabular coverage, and the effect of rim trimming. The testing and loading conditions were also quite diverse, and this disparity limits direct comparisons between the different researches. With normal anatomy the mean contact pressures ranged from 1.54 to 4.4 MPa, and the average peak contact pressures ranged from 2 to 9.3 MPa. Labral tear or resection showed an increase in contact pressures that diminished after repair or reconstruction of the labrum. Complete cam resection also decreased the contact pressure, and acetabular rim resection of 6 mm increased the contact pressure at the acetabular base. Conclusion. To date there is no standardized methodology to access hip contact biomechanics in hip arthroscopy, or with the preservation of the periarticular soft-tissues. A tendency towards improved biomechanics (lower contact pressures) was seen with labral repair and reconstruction techniques as well as with cam correction. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(12):712–721

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) results from a morphological deformity of the hip and is associated with osteoarthritis (OA). Increased bone mineral density (BMD) is observed in the antero-superior acetabulum rim where impingement occurs. It is hypothesized that the repeated abnormal contact leads to damage of the cartilage layer, but could also cause a bone remodelling response according to Wolff's Law. Thus the goal of this study was to assess the relationship between bone metabolic activity measured by PET and BMD measured in CT scans. Five participants with asymptomatic cam deformity, three patients with uni-lateral symptomatic cam FAI and three healthy controls were scanned in a 3T PET-MRI scanner following injection with [18F]NaF. Bone remodelling activity was quantified with Standard Uptake Values (SUVs). SUVmax was analyzed in the antero-superior acetabular rim, femoral head and head-neck junction. In these same regions, BMD was calculated from CT scans using the calibration phantom included in the scan. The relationship between SUVmax and BMD from corresponding regions was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R. 2. ) from linear regression. High bone activity was seen in the cam deformity and acetabular rim. SUVmax was negatively correlated with BMD in the antero-superior region of the acetabulum (R. 2. =0.30, p=0.08). SUVmax was positively correlated with BMD in the antero-superior head-neck junction of the femur (R. 2. =0.359, p=0.067). Correlations were weak in other regions. Elevated bone turnover was seen in patients with a cam deformity but the relationship to BMD was moderate. This study demonstrates a pathomechanism of hip degeneration associated with FAI deformities, consistent with Wolff's law and the proposed mechanical cause of hip degeneration in FAI. [18F]-NaF PET SUV may be a biomarker of degeneration, especially in early stages of degeneration, when joint preservation surgery is likely to be the most successful

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) deformities are a potential precursor to hip osteoarthritis and an important contributor to non-arthritic hip pain. Some hips with FAI deformities develop symptoms of pain in the hip and groin that are primarily position related. The reason for pain generation in these hips is unclear. Understanding potential impingement mechanisms in FAI hips will help us understand pain generation. Impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim has been proposed as a pathomechanism in FAI hips. This proposed pathomechanism has not been quantified with direct measurements in physiological postures. Research question: Is femoroacetabular clearance different in symptomatic FAI hips compared to asymptomatic FAI and control hips in sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (FADIR) and squatting postures?. We recruited 33 participants: 9 with symptomatic FAI, 13 with asymptomatic FAI, and 11 controls from the Investigation of Mobility, Physical Activity, and Knowledge Translation in Hip Pain (IMAKT-HIP) cohort. We scanned each participant's study hip in sitting FADIR and squatting postures using an upright open MRI scanner (MROpen, Paramed, Genoa, Italy). We quantified femoroacetabular clearance in sitting FADIR and squatting using beta angle measurements which have been shown to be a reliable surrogate for acetabular rim pressures. We chose sitting FADIR and squatting because they represent, respectively, passive and active maneuvers that involve high flexion combined with internal/external rotation and adduction/abduction, which are thought to provoke impingement. In the squatting posture, the symptomatic FAI group had a significantly smaller minimum beta angle (−4.6º±15.2º) than the asymptomatic FAI (12.5º ±13.2º) (P= 0.018) and control groups (19.8º ±8.6º) (P=0.001). In the sitting FADIR posture, both symptomatic and asymptomatic FAI groups had significantly smaller beta angles (−9.3º ±14º [P=0.010] and −3.9º ±9.7º [P=0.028], respectively) than the control group (5.7º ±5.7º). Our results show loss of clearance between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim (negative beta angle) occurred in symptomatic FAI hips in sitting FADIR and squatting. We did not observe loss of clearance in the asymptomatic FAI group for squatting, while we did observe loss of clearance for this group in sitting FADIR. These differences may be due to accommodation mechanisms in the active, squatting posture that are not present in the passive, sitting FADIR posture. Our results support the hypothesis that impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim is a pathomechanism in FAI hips leading to pain generation

Aims. Cam and pincer morphologies are potential precursors to hip osteoarthritis and important contributors to non-arthritic hip pain. However, only some hips with these pathomorphologies develop symptoms and joint degeneration, and it is not clear why. Anterior impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim in positions of hip flexion combined with rotation is a proposed pathomechanism in these hips, but this has not been studied in active postures. Our aim was to assess the anterior impingement pathomechanism in both active and passive postures with high hip flexion that are thought to provoke impingement. Methods. We recruited nine participants with cam and/or pincer morphologies and with pain, 13 participants with cam and/or pincer morphologies and without pain, and 11 controls from a population-based cohort. We scanned hips in active squatting and passive sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation using open MRI and quantified anterior femoroacetabular clearance using the β angle. Results. In squatting, we found significantly decreased anterior femoroacetabular clearance in painful hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies (mean -11.3° (SD 19.2°)) compared to pain-free hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies (mean 8.5° (SD 14.6°); p = 0.022) and controls (mean 18.6° (SD 8.5°); p < 0.001). In sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation, we found significantly decreased anterior clearance in both painful (mean -15.2° (SD 15.3°); p = 0.002) and painfree hips (mean -4.7° (SD 13°); p = 0.010) with cam and/pincer morphologies compared to the controls (mean 7.1° (SD 5.9°)). Conclusion. Our results support the anterior femoroacetabular impingement pathomechanism in hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies and highlight the effect of posture on this pathomechanism. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):988–996

Aims. The effect of pelvic tilt (PT) and sagittal balance in hips with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with acetabular retroversion (AR) is controversial. It is unclear if patients with AR have a rotational abnormality of the iliac wing. Therefore, we asked: are parameters for sagittal balance, and is rotation of the iliac wing, different in patients with AR compared to a control group?; and is there a correlation between iliac rotation and acetabular version?. Methods. A retrospective, review board-approved, controlled study was performed including 120 hips in 86 consecutive patients with symptomatic FAI or hip dysplasia. Pelvic CT scans were reviewed to calculate parameters for sagittal balance (pelvic incidence (PI), PT, and sacral slope), anterior pelvic plane angle, pelvic inclination, and external rotation of the iliac wing and were compared to a control group (48 hips). The 120 hips were allocated to the following groups: AR (41 hips), hip dysplasia (47 hips) and cam FAI with normal acetabular morphology (32 hips). Subgroups of total AR (15 hips) and high acetabular anteversion (20 hips) were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. Results. PI and PT were significantly decreased comparing AR (PI 42° (SD 10°), PT 4° (SD 5°)) with dysplastic hips (PI 55° (SD 12°), PT 10° (SD 6°)) and with the control group (PI 51° (SD 9°) and PT 13° (SD 7°)) (p < 0.001). External rotation of the iliac wing was significantly increased comparing AR (29° (SD 4°)) with dysplastic hips (20°(SD 5°)) and with the control group (25° (SD 5°)) (p < 0.001). Correlation between external rotation of the iliac wing and acetabular version was significant and strong (r = 0.81; p < 0.001). Correlation between PT and acetabular version was significant and moderate (r = 0.58; p < 0.001). Conclusion. These findings could contribute to a better understanding of hip pain in a sitting position and extra-articular subspine FAI of patients with AR. These patients have increased iliac external rotation, a rotational abnormality of the iliac wing. This has implications for surgical therapy with hip arthroscopy and acetabular rim trimming or anteverting periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):813–824

Introduction. Malalignment of cup in total hip replacement (THR) increases rates of dislocation, impingement, acetabular migration, pelvic osteolysis, leg length discrepancy and polyethylene wear. Many surgeons orientate the cup in the same anteversion and inclination as the inherent anatomy of the acetabulum. The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and acetabular rim can be used as a reference. No study has yet defined the exact orientation of the TAL. The aim of this study was to describe the orientation of acetabular margin and compare it with TAL orientation. Materials and Methods. Sixty eight hips with osteoarthritis undergoing THR with computer navigation were investigated. Anterior pelvic plane was registered using anterior superior iliac spines and pubic symphysis. Orientation of the natural acetabulum as defined by the acetabular rim with any osteophytes excised was measured. Since TAL is a rectangular band like structure, three recordings were done for each corresponding to the outer middle and inner margin of the band. All the readings were given by software as radiological anteversion and inclination. Results. All patients were Caucasian, 30 males and 38 females with mean age 67.4 years (SD 9.6) and BMI 30 (SD 5). Inclination was 54.7(SD7.9), 53(SD6.9), 47.5(SD6.8), 42.1(6.7) and anteversion 5.7(SD8.7), 5.4(SD9.9), 9.7(SD9.6), 13.5(SD9.4) for acetabular rim, outer, middle and inner borders of the TAL respectively. For inclination TAL outer border was not significantly different to acetabular rim (mean difference 1.7°, 95%CIs −0.2° to 3.6°, p=0.082) but the middle (mean difference 7.3°, 95%CIs 5.6° to 8.9°) and inner (mean difference 12.6°, 95%CIs 11.0° to 14.2°) borders were (both p<0.001). For anteversion TAL outer border was not significantly different to acetabular rim (mean difference 0.2°, 95%CIs −1.3° to 1.8°, p=0.758) but the middle and inner borders were (mean difference −4.0° 95%CIs −5.5° to −2.5° and −7.9°, 95%CIs −9.6° to −6.1° respectively, both p<0.001). Anteversion for males was significantly lower than females with a mean difference of 4 for the rim and 5.7, 4.8 and 5.1 for the TAL outer, middle and inner margins respectively. Overall 57,53,40&26 of 68 patients had a combined inclination and anteversion of the native acetabulum that fell outside the “safe zone” of Lewinnek with acetabular rim, outer, middle and inner margins of TAL respectively. Compared to Lewinnek safe zones for inclination TAL inner margin performed best with 14.7% outliers and acetabular rim performed worst with 72% outliers. For anteversion TAL inner margin performed best with 25% outliers while outer margin of TAL performed worst with 39.7% outliers. Conclusion. Orientation of the acetabulum differs a lot between individuals. The TAL middle and inner margins differ in orientation as compared to acetabular rim and TAL outer border. TAL inner border provides the best bet for placing the cup in Lewinnek's safe zone. When using the natural acetabular orientation or TAL as a guide, it should not be assumed this will orientate the cup in Lewinnek safe zone although the validity of safe zones itself is questionable. Variation between patients must be taken into account and the difference between males and females, particularly in terms of anteversion, should be considered

To quantify the acetabular coverage of the femoral head, Lequesne's vertical-center-anterior edge (VCA) angle is used on the false profile view. Lateral coverage is determined by Wiberg's lateral-center-edge (LCE) angle on an ap pelvic view. The delimitation of the weightbearing area is defined by the end of the subchondral sclerosis line for both views. To our knowledge the exact anatomic location of the points used for measurement on the acetabular rim are not known. Six hips from three cadaver pelvises (3 male and 3 female) were investigated. The anterior and lateral points of interested were identified radiographically using fluoroscopy and marked with 1mm ceramic bullets. Standard false profile views and ap pelvic views in neutral inclination and rotation were taken to check the correct location of the ceramic bullets. A CT of each pelvis was made to locate the ceramic bullets and to define the exact anatomic location of the measurement points on the o'clock position. 6 o‘clock was defined as the midpoint between anteroinferior and the posteroinferior rim edges. Values were normalized for a right hip. The mean clockface location for the VCA was 1:33 (range, 1:15 to 1:40) and for the LCE 0:38 (range, 0:20 to 0:50). The LCEA is slightly anterior to the 12 o'clock position and remains useful to quantify the lateral coverage. Surprisingly, the point used for measuring the VCA is only about 30° (1h) anterior of the point used for measuring the LCEA. Its value for determining anterior cover has to be questioned. The discrepancy to other studies in the literature is because this study identifies and measures the end of the weight bearing zone, and not the border of the bony acetabulum

Mixed Reality has the potential to improve accuracy and reduce required dissection for the performance of peri-acetabular osteotomy. The current work assesses initial proof of concept of MR guidance for PAO. A PAO planning module, based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging, allows for the planning of PAO cut planes and repositioning of the acetabular fragment. 3D files (holograms) of the cut planes and native and planned acetabulum positions are exported with the associated spatial information. The files are then displayed on mixed reality head mounted device (HoloLens2, Microsoft) following intraoperative registration using an FDA-cleared mixed reality application designed primary for hip arthroplasty (HipInsight). PAO was performed on both sides of a bone model (Pacific Research). The osteotomies and acetabular reposition were performed in accordance with the displayed holograms. Post-op CT imaging was performed for analysis. Cutting plane-accuracy was evaluated using a best-fit plane and 2D angles (°) between the planned and achieved supra (SA)- and retroacetabular (RA) osteotomy and retroacetabular and ischial osteotomies (IO) were measured. To evaluate the accuracy of acetabular reorientation, we digitized the acetabular rim and calculated the acetabular opening plane. Absolute errors of planned and achieved operative inclination and anteversion (°) of the acetabular fragment, as well as 3D lateral-center-edge (LCE) angles were calculated. The mean absolute difference between the planned and performed osteotomy angles was 3 ± 3°. The mean absolute error between planned and achieved operative anteversion and inclination was 1 ± 0° and 0 ± 0° respectively. Mean absolute error between planned and achieved 3D LCE angle was 0.5 ± 0.7°. Mixed-reality guidance for the performance of pelvic osteotomies and acetabular fragment reorientation was feasible and highly accurate. This solution may improve the current standard of care by enabling reliable and precise reproduction of the desired acetabular realignment

We examined the relationship between the size of the femoral cam in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and acetabular pathomorphology to establish if pincer impingement exists in patients with a femoral cam. CT scans of 37 symptomatic impinging hips with a femoral cam were analysed in a three-dimensional study and were compared with 34 normal hips. The inclination and version of the acetabulum as well as the acetabular rim angle and the bony acetabular coverage were calculated. These measurements were correlated with the size and shape of the femoral cams. While the size of the femoral cam varied characteristically, the acetabular morphology of the two groups was similar in terms of version (normal mean 23° (. sd. 7°); cam mean 22° (. sd.  9°)), inclination (normal mean 57° (. sd. 5°); cam mean 56° (. sd. 5°)), acetabular coverage (normal mean 41% (. sd. 5%); cam mean 42% (. sd. 4%)) and the mean acetabular rim angle (normal mean 82° (. sd. 5°); cam mean 83° (. sd. 4°)). We found no correlation between acetabular morphology and the severity of cam lesion and no evidence of either global or focal over-coverage to support the diagnosis of ‘mixed’ FAI. The femoral cam may provoke edge loading but removal of any acetabular bearing surface when treating cam FAI might induce accelerated wear. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:314–19

INTRODUCTION. Mal-positioning of the acetabular component in total hip replacement (THR) could lead to edge loading, accelerated component wear, impingement and dislocation [1,2]. In order to achieve a successful position for the acetabular component, the assessment of the acetabular orientation with reference to different coordinate systems is important [3]. The aims of the present study were to establish a pelvic coordinate system and a global body coordinate system, and to assess the acetabular orientations of natural hips with reference to the two coordinate systems. METHODS. Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic (CT) images of 56 subjects (28 males and 28 females) lying supine were obtained from a public image archive (Cancer Image Archive, website: . www.cancerimagingarchive.net. ). 3D solid models of pelvis and spine were generated from the CT images. Two coordinate systems, pelvic and global body coordinate systems, were established. The pelvic coordinate system was established based on four bony landmarks on the pelvis: the bilateral anterior superior iliac spines (RASIS and LASIS) and the bilateral pubic tubercles (RPT and LPT). The global body coordinate system was generated based on the bony landmarks on the spine: the geometric centers of five lumbar vertebrae bodies and the most dorsal points of five corresponding spinous processes, as well as the anterior sacral promontory (Fig 1a and 1b). The acetabular rim plane was obtained by fitting a set of point along the acetabular rim to a plane using least squares method. The acetabular orientation was defined as the three coordinate components (x-, y- and z- components) of the unit normal vector of the acetabular rim plane in the two coordinate systems (Fig. 1c). RESULTS. Statistically significant differences of y- and z- components of the unit normal vector of the acetabular rim plane were calculated in the two coordinate systems (p<0.05). However, no significant difference of x- components was found (p=0.22) (Fig. 2). The differences of y- and z- components of the unit normal vector between the two coordinate system measurements were positive for most subjects. In addition, the differences and their standard deviations were larger for females compared to those for males (Fig. 3). DISCUSSION. Significantly different acetabular orientations were measured in the two coordinate systems, with larger variations in the global body coordinate system. The statistical analysis indicates that the different orientations measured in the two coordinate systems are primarily attributed to the pelvic tilt in the sagittal plane. The results also indicates that there was a trend of forward inclination of pelvis for most subjects considered in the present study and that the females generally have larger forward inclination and greater variation of pelvic tilt compared to males. SIGNIFICANCE. The study suggested that the consideration of pelvic tilt in THR placement is necessarily required in order to achieve a successful positioning of THR component with respect to the biomechanical axis of the body

Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has become the mainstay of treatment. However, chondral lesions are frequently encountered and have become a determinant of less favourable outcomes following arthroscopic intervention. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes of hip arthroscopy (HA) in patients with FAI and concomitant chondral lesions classified as per Outerbridge. A systematic search was performed using the PRISMA guidelines on four databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Studies which included HA as the primary intervention for management of FAI and classified chondral lesions according to the Outerbridge classification were included. Patients treated with open procedures, for osteonecrosis, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, and previous ipsilateral hip fractures were excluded. From a total of 863 articles, twenty-four were included for final analysis. Demographic data, PROMs, and radiological outcomes and rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Improved post-operative PROMs included mHHS (mean difference:-2.42; 95%CI:-2.99 to −1.85; p<0.001), NAHS (mean difference:-1.73; 95%CI: −2.23 to −1.23; p<0.001), VAS (mean difference: 2.03; 95%CI: 0.93-3.13; p<0.001). Pooled rate of revision surgery was 10% (95%CI: 7%-14%). Most of this included conversion to THA, with a 7% pooled rate (95%CI: 4%-11%). Patients had worse PROMs if they underwent HA with labral debridement (p=0.015), had Outerbridge 3 and 4 lesions (p=0.012), concomitant lesions of the femoral head and acetabulum lesions (p=0.029). Reconstructive cartilage techniques were superior to microfracture (p=0.042). Even in concomitant lesions of the femoral head and acetabulum, employing either microfracture or cartilage repair/reconstruction provided a benefit in PROMs (p=0.027). Acceptable post-operative outcomes following HA with labral repair/reconstruction and cartilage repair in patients with FAI and concomitant moderate-to-severe chondral lesions, can be achieved. Patients suffering from Outerbridge 3 and 4 lesions, concomitant acetabular rim and femoral head chondral lesions that underwent HA with labral debridement, had worse PROMs. Reconstructive cartilage techniques were superior to microfracture. Even in concomitant acetabular and femoral head chondral lesions, employing either microfracture or cartilage repair/reconstruction was deemed to provide a benefit in PROMs

Introduction: There have been several recent studies outlining the role of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as a cause of early osteoarthritis in the non-dysplastic hip. The lesions can either be on the femoral side “cam” or acetabular “pincer”. The aim of surgical treatment of FAI is to improve the femoral head neck offset thereby improving joint clearance and preventing abutment of the femoral neck against the acetabulum. The classic treatment for FAI pioneered by Ganz involves dislocation of the femoral head through a trochanteric flip osteotomy. The procedure is extensive, technically difficult and not without complications. Hip arthroscopic debridement of FAI lesions offers similar results to open procedures allowing for full inspection of the joint and the treatment of any chondral lesion but with a quicker recovery time. It nonetheless has a very long learning curve and even in the most experienced hands the treatment of impingement lesions is complicated and technically challenging. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to assess the degree of exposure obtained using two different limited anterior approaches to the hip which would allow effective surgical treatment of cam and pincer FAI. Methods: We investigated two mini anterior approaches to the hip joint based on the Heuter and direct anterior approach to compare the parts of the acetabulum and femoral head exposed for the treatment of FAI in a total of 20 hips in 10 (5 male, 5 female) cadaveric specimens. Neurovascular structures were recorded in relation to the two approaches. The area of femoral head and acetabular rim exposed via each approach was documented and quantified. Results: We found that the two approaches were easy and reproducible. Both allowed exposure to the anterolateral aspect of the femoral head. The mean length of acetabular rim accessible via the Heuter approach was 1.9cm (1.1–2.4) and 2.2cm (1.2–3) using the direct anterior approach The area of acetabular rim accessible varied according to the approach (p< 0.001). We also found that the position of the anterior inferior iliac spine in relation to the acetabular rim also affected the area of acetabular rim exposed (p< 0.001). The most proximal nerve branch to sartorious was found 7.3cm (6.5–8.7cm) distal to the anterior inferior iliac spine. The most proximal nerve branch to rectus femoris was located 8.6cm (7–10) distal to the anterior inferior iliac spine and was consistently found to be distal to the nerve to sartorious. Discussion: Treating impingement of the hip through a direct open approach is not a novel idea. A recent report of failed arthroscopic labral debridement, describes treatment of the underlying bony impingement in some cases by a combination of hip arthroscopy followed by anterior arthrotomy. In summary cam and pincer impingement of the hip can be treated by either the direct anterior or Heuter approach. The choice of approach would be dictated after careful consideration as to which portion of the anterior acetabular rim required surgery, with more lateral acetabular lesions being favoured by the Heuter approach and more medial impingement sites by the anterior approach we have described

Introduction and Objective. To estimate the prevalence of acetabular ossifications in the adult population with asymptomatic, morphologically normal hips at CT and to determine whether the presence of labral ossifications is associated with patient-related (sex, age, BMI), or hip-related parameters (joint space width, and cam- and pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement morphotype). Materials and Methods. We prospectively included all patients undergoing thoracoabdominal CT over a 3-month period. After exclusion of patients with a clinical history of hip pathology and/or with signs of osteoarthritis on CT, we included a total of 150 hips from 75 patients. We analyzed the presence and the size of labral ossifications around the acetabular rim. The relationships between the size of labral ossifications and patient- and hip-related parameters were tested using multiple regression analysis. Results. The prevalence of labral ossifications in this population of asymptomatic, non-OA hips was 96% (95%CI=[80.1; 100.0]). The presence of labral ossifications and their size were correlated between right and left hips (Spearman coefficient=0.64 (95%CI=[0.46; 0.79]), p<0.05)). The size of labral ossifications was significantly associated with age (p<0.0001) but not with BMI (p=0.35), gender (p=0.05), joint space width (p≥0.53 for all locations) or any of the qualitative or quantitative parameters associated with femoroacetabular morphotype (all p≥0.34). Conclusions. Labral ossifications are extremely common in asymptomatic, non-osteoarthritic hips. Their size is not correlated with any patient-, or hip-related parameters except for the age. These findings suggest that the diagnosis of osteoarthritis or femoroacetabular impingement morphotype should not be made based on the sole presence of acetabular labral ossifications

Introduction. Optimal orientation of the acetabular cup is vital issue not only for primary but revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Especially in revision THA, malorientation of the cup is likely to occur because anatomical landmark around acetabular rim often disappeared by the osteolytic bony destruction or the process of cup removal. As a consequence, higher dislocation rate and accelerated wear of bearing surface compared with primary THA, which affect the outcome of revision THA, are concerned. On the other hand, computer aided navigation system has been developed in recent years because of substantial errors of manual technique in cup placement even with experienced surgeon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the cup orientation in revision cementless THA using CT based navigation system. Materials and Methods. Thirteen patients who underwent revision cementless THA with CT based navigation system (Stryker Japan) were employed for this study. The average age at surgery was 64 years (range, 45–78 years, 3 men and 11 women). Primary surgery was cementless THA in 4 and BHA in 9 hips. Disorder which led to revision THA was loosening of the cup, massive retroacetabular osteolysis, and severe proximal migration of bipolar outer head. In most cases, acetabular rim was not conserved. After removal of the cup or outer head, we revised acetabular components with cementless hemispherical TriAD cups (Stryker Japan) using direct lateral approach in lateral decubitus position. For all the patients, post-operative CT scans were performed and the cup inclination and anteversion angle were measured using 3D image-processing software (Stryker, Japan). The difference between the intra-operative target angle and the angle measured from the post-operative CT image were calculated. Results. The average cup orientation measured by postoperative CT was 39.6±3.8° (range, 34–46°) in inclination and 20.5±5.0° (range, 17–29°) in anteversion. The accuracy (calculated as a mean of the absolute difference between intra-operative target angle and post-operative CT angle) of inclination and anteversion angle were 2.0 ± 1.8° (range, 0–5°) and 2.3±2.2° (range, 0–5°), respectively. The accuracy was within 5° in all cases and there was no postoperative dislocation. Discussion. Our study showed that CT based navigation system provided accurate orientation of the acetabular component even in revision cementless THA as well as in primary THA. Although the basic process of the navigation system in revision THA is same as primary THA, several pitfalls exist. Metal artifact from preexisting hardware such as screws, cup, and head-neck of the stem makes it difficult to do preoperative planning, intraoperative point matching, and surface registration. We have to pay maximum attention to avoid including metal artifact especially around acetabular rim when editing surface of the pelvis at preoperative planning, and also avoid pointing the area around acetabular rim when doing surface registration intraoperatively

Cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is currently treated by resecting the femoral cam lesion. Some surgeons advocate additional anterosuperior acetabular rim resection. However, the exact acetabular contribution to cam-FAI has yet to be described. Using 3D-CT analysis, we set out to quantify the acetabular rim shape and orientation in this condition, and to determine the roles of these factors in cam-FAI. The acetabula of twenty consecutive cam hips (defined by α-angle of Notzli greater than 55° on plain radiographs) undergoing image based navigated surgery. These were compared with twenty normal hips (defined as disease free sockets with a normal femoral head-neck junction) obtained from a CT colonoscopy database. Using 3D reconstruction software, the pelvis was aligned to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Starting at the most anterior rim point, successive markers were placed along the rim. A best-fit acetabular rim plane (ARP) was derived, and the subtended angle (SA) between each rim marker and a normal vector from the acetabular centre was calculated. Values above 90° indicated a peak, with less than 90° representing a trough. Inclination and version were measured from the APP. Our results showed that the rim profile of both cam-type and normal acetabular is an asymmetric succession of three peaks and three troughs. However, the cam-type acetabulum is significantly shallower overall than normal (Mean SA: 84±5° versus 87±4°, p< 0.0001). In particular, at anatomical points in the impingement zone between 12 and 3 o’clock, the subtended angle of cam hips were never higher than normal, and, in fact, at certain points were lower (iliac eminence: 90±5° vs. 93±4° p=0.0094, iliopubic trough: 79±5° vs. 83±4° p=0.0169, pubic eminence 83±7° vs. 84±4° p=0.4445). The orientation of cam and normal hips were almost identical (Inclination: 53±4°vs. 51±3° p=0.2609 and Anteversion: 23±7° vs. 24±6° p=0.3917). We concluded that cam-type acetabula are significantly shallower than normal. The subtended angles at all points around the hip were lower, and in particular, in the impingement zone between 12 and 3 o’clock not one cam had a subtended angle over 90°. We have therefore been unable to support the hypothesis of mixed-type FAI in cam-type hips. Bony rim resection in cam hips therefore runs the risk of rendering the acetabulum more morphologically abnormal and even functionally dysplastic. We do not recommend acetabular rim resection in patients with pure cam-type impingement, and await the longer-term results of this practice with apprehension

Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (cam-FAI) can be treated with femoral neck osteochondroplasty to increase the clearance between the femoral head/neck and the acetabular rim. Because femur-acetabulum contact is very difficult to assess directly in patients, it is not clear if this surgery achieves its objective of reducing femur-acetabulum contact, and it is not clear how much of the femoral head/neck region should be resected to allow clearance in all activities. Our research question was: “Does femoral neck osteochondroplasty increase femur-acetabulum clearance in an extreme hip posture in patients with cam FAI?”. We recruited 8 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic femoral neck osteochondroplasty to treat cam-type FAI. We assessed clearance between the acetabulum and the femoral neck before surgery and at 6 months post-op using an upright open MRI scanner that allowed the hip to be scanned in flexed postures. We scanned each subject in a supine hip flexion (90 degree), adduction and internal rotation (FADIR) posture. We measured the beta angle, which describes clearance between the acetabular rim and the femoral head/neck deformity. Osteochondroplasty increased clearance from a mean beta angle of −9.4 degrees (SD 19.3) to 4.4 degrees (SD 16.2°) (p<0.05). This finding suggests that femoral neck osteochondroplasty increases femur-acetabulum clearance substantially for a posture widely accepted to provoke symptoms in patients with cam-FAI

Lesions of the acetabular rim have been implicated as a cause of hip pain in various pathologic conditions and are considered to predispose the hip to development of accelerated degenerative disease. In developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and anterior femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), intrinsically normal intraarticular soft tissue structures are exposed to joint loading forces that physically exceed their tolerance level posing these pathomorphologies as precursors of osteoarthritis. In DDH, the deficient acetabular coverage of the femoral head has been related to osteoarthrosis, while the orientation of the femoral head is considered to play a less important role. The resulting instability and anterolateral migration tendency of the femoral head leads to chronic shear stresses at the acetabular margin. In FAI, repetitive peak contact pressures occur when the femoral head-neck junction abuts against the acetabular rim during joint flexion. Predisposing morphologies are femoral abnormalities such as an insufficient femoral head-neck offset seen in head tilt or pistol grip deformities, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, or malunited femoral neck fractures with the orientation and shape of the acetabulum contributing to this pathology. In classical DDH and FAI, diagnosis is primarily based on clinical signs and symptoms and conventional radiography. However, in cases of clinical and radiographic borderline disease establishment of the correct diagnosis is sometimes difficult. This presentation reports how the MRarthrographic appearance of acetabular rim pathologies can be used to differentiate both conditions. In DDH and FAI, labral pathologies localize identically with a predilection to the anterosuperior quadrant of the acetabulum. Labral tears are found in 64% in both groups. The volume of the labrum is increased in 86% DDH hips but in none of the FAI hips. Ganglion formation in the periacetabular area is seen in 71% DDH and 21% FAI hips. These findings provide evidence that the anterosuperior acetabular rim represents the initial fatiguing site of the hip under both DDH and FAI. The capability of MR-arthrography to depict differences in labral pathologies suggests this method as a helpful diagnostic tool to define the most appropriate treatment strategy specifically in borderline cases

Major bone loss involving the acetabulum can be seen during revision THA due to component loosening, migration or osteolysis and can also occur as a sequela of infected THA. Uncemented porous ingrowth components can be used for reconstruction of the vast majority of revision cases, where smaller segmental or cavitary defects are typically present. But when stable structural support on host bone is lacking, highly porous metal acetabular augments have been described as an alternative to large structural allograft. The fundamental concept behind these acetabular augments is the provision of critical additional fixation, structural support and increased contact area against host bone over the weeks following surgery while the desired ingrowth into porous implant surfaces is occurring. Three separate patterns of augment placement have been utilised in our practice since the development of these implants a decade ago: Type 1 - augment screwed onto the superolateral acetabular rim in a “flying buttress” configuration for treatment of a segmental rim defect, Type 2 – augment placed superiorly against host and then fixed to the acetabular component adjacent to the cup to fill a mainly elliptical cavitary defect, and Type 3 – augment(s) placed medial to the cup to fill a protrusio type cavitary or combined cavitary segmental defect of the superomedial or medial wall, and allow peripheral cup placement against the still intact acetabular rim. In all cases the acetabular component and augment interface is fixed together with cement, with care to prevent any cement extrusion between any implant and the bone. When possible, we now prefer to place the acetabular component first and fix it provisionally with 2 or more screws, and then place the augments second as this is technically quicker and easier. This order of insertion is only possible in type 1 and a few select type 2 cases. Type 3 cases always require placement of one or more augments first, before cup insertion. Supplemental cancellous bone graft is used routinely, but the need for structural bone is avoided. From 2000 through 2007, porous tantalum acetabular augments were used very selectively in 85 revision THA procedures out of total of the 1,789 revision hip cases performed at our institution. All cases had associated massive acetabular deficiency precluding stable mechanical support for a cup alone. Fifty-eight hips had complete radiographic and clinical follow at minimum 5 years. The majority of patients had either Paprosky type 3A defects (28/58, 48%) or 3B defects (22/58, 38%). Ten out of 58 had pre-operative pelvic discontinuities. Three separate patterns of augment placement were utilised: Type 1 - augment screwed onto the superolateral acetabular rim (21%), Type 2 – augment fixed to the acetabular component adjacent to the cup to fill a mainly elliptical cavitary defect (34%), and Type 3 – augment(s) placed medial to the cup to fill a protrusio type cavitary or combined cavitary segmental defect of the superomedial medial wall (45%). At 5 years, 2/58 (3%) were revised for aseptic loosening and another 6/58 demonstrated incomplete radiolucencies between the acetabular shell and zone 3. One of the revised cups and 5 of 6 of the cups with radiolucencies had an associated pelvic discontinuity. Highly porous metal acetabular augments are an infrequently needed, but extremely valuable, versatile and reliable adjunctive fixation method for use with uncemented acetabular components during complex revision THA associated with major bone deficiency. Smaller patients are more likely to require this approach as reaming away defects to allow insertion of a jumbo cup is more difficult with a smaller AP dimension to the acetabular columns and less local bone for implant support. Intermediate term durability and apparent radiographic incorporation has been very good despite the complex reconstructions originally required. This technique can allow the avoidance of structural bone grafting for even the most massive of bone defect problems, but additional followup is needed to see how durable these encouraging results are over the longer term

Introduction. In recent years, there has been a significant advancement in our understanding of femoro-acetabular impingement and associated labral and chondral pathology. Surgeons worldwide have demonstrated the successful treatment of these lesions via arthroscopic and open techniques. The aim of this study is to validate a simple and reproducible classification system for acetabular chondral lesions. Methods. In our classification system, the acetabulum is first divided into 6 zones as described by Ilizalithurri VM et al [Arthroscopy 24(5) 534-539]. The cartilage is then graded as 0 to 4 as follows: Grade 0 – normal articular cartilage lesions; Grade 1 softening or wave sign; Grade 2 - cleavage lesion; Grade 3 - delamination and Grade 4 –exposed bone. The site of the lesion is further typed as A, B or C based on whether the lesion is 1/3 distance from acetabular rim to cotyloid fossa, 1/3 to 2/3 distance from acetabular rim to cotyloid fossa and > 2/3 distance from acetabular rim to cotyloid fossa. For validating the classification system, six surgeons reviewed 14 hip arthroscopy video clips. All surgeons were provided with written explanation of our classification system. Each surgeon then individually graded the cartilage lesion. A single observer then compared results for observer variability using kappa statistics. Results. We observed a high inter-observer reliability of the classification system with a kappa coefficient of 0.89 (range 0.78 to 0.91) and high intra-observer reliability with a kappa coefficient of 0.91 (range 0.89 to 0.96). In conclusion we have developed a simple reproducible classification system for acetabular cartilage lesions seen at hip arthroscopy

Introduction:. The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) antomy is not a well explored aspect of the hip joint with limited morphological description in the reviewed literature. It is often used as an anatomical landmark for orientation of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA). There is debate as to whether it represents an appropriate guide to cup placement in THA. Present descriptions in orthopaedic literature conside it as a single plane structure to which the surgeon can align the cup. The aim of the current study was to investigate the morphology of the TAL and it was hypothesised that the current description of it being a plane would prove insufficient. Materials and methods:. Seven dry bone hemi-pelves were reconstructed using a microscribe and rhinoceros 4.0 3D software to visualise attachment sites. Three hips from two female donors were dissected to expose the acetabulum and the TAL. This structure was removed and a footprint taken of its perimeter and attachment sites for measurement of ligament length, breadth and area of attachment from digital photographs. Finally, 3D models of the dissected acetabuli with an outline of the TAL and attachment sites were created as before. Results:. The TAL extended beyond the acetabular notch, around the circumference of the acetabular rim. Two attachment sites were identified in each specimen, found at two sites in the superior half of the acetabular rim; one anterior and one posterior. In one specimen, an additional attachment site was identified on the posterior horn. TAL length in each specimen as measured from 2D digital photographs were 132 mm, 117 mm and 179 mm, with attachment areas of 215 mm. 2. , 150 mm. 2. and 350 mm. 2. , respectively. There was marked variation in ligament breadth both between and within individual specimens, ranging from 2.6 to 5.3mm in the smallest specimen and 3.2 to 6.3mm in the largest specimen. The whole structure as one does not conform to be a plane of orientation. Discussion:. Contrary to previous literature assumption, the TAL extended far beyond the acetabular notch. Likewise, its attachment sites were found further round the acetabular rim than previously described. The unexpected breadth may explain the disagreement between studies looking at the structure as an anatomical plane. Further biomechanical research may determine which part – if any – of the ligament, should the acetabular component be orientated to. The details will be presented in the paper

Background. Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is increasingly recognised as a cause of mechanical hip symptoms in sportspersons. In femoro-acetabular impingement abnormal contact occurs between the proximal femur and the acetabular rim during terminal motion of the hip as a result of abnormal morphologic features involving the proximal femur (CAM) or the acetabulum (Pincer) or both (Mixed) leading to lesions of acetabular labrum and the adjacent acetabular cartilage. It is likely that it is a cause of early hip degeneration. Ganz developed a therapeutic procedure involving trochanteric flip osteotomy and dislocation of the hip, and have reported good results. We have developed an arthroscopic technique to reshape the proximal femur and remove prominent antero-superior acetabular rim thereby relieving impingement. Methods. Twelve patients presented with mechanical hip symptoms and had demonstrable cam-type (eight patients) or mixed (four patients) FAI on radially-reconstructed MR arthrography, were treated by arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty and acetabular rim resection if indicated. All patients were competing at the highest level in their respective sport (football, rugby and athletics). All patients were followed up and post-operative Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS, maximum possible score 100) compared with pre-operative NAHS. Results. There were no complications. All patients were asked to be partially weight-bearing with crutches for four weeks and most returned to training within six weeks. All of them returned to competitive sports by 14 weeks. Symptoms improved in all patients, with mean NAHS improving from 72 pre-operatively to 97 at 3 months. Conclusion. Arthroscopic reshaping to relieve FAI is feasible, safe and reliable. However it is technically difficult and time-consuming. The results are comparable to open dislocation and debridement, but avoid the prolonged disability and the complications associated with trochanteric flip osteotomy. This is important in elite athletes as they can return to training and competitive sports much quicker with less morbidity

Introduction: In recent years, there has been a significant advancement in our understanding of femoro-acetabular impingement and associated labral and chondral pathology. Surgeons worldwide have demonstrated the successful treatment of these lesions via arthroscopic and open techniques. The aim of this study is to validate a simple and reproducible classification system for acetabular chondral lesions. Methods: In our classification system, the acetabulum is first divided into 6 zones as described by Ilizalithurri VM et al [Arthroscopy 24(5) 534–539]. The cartilage is then graded as 0 to 4 as follows: Grade 0 – normal articular cartilage lesions; Grade 1 softening or wave sign; Grade 2 – cleavage lesion; Grade 3 – delamination and Grade 4 -exposed bone. The site of the lesion is further typed as A, B or C based on whether the lesion is 1/3 distance from acetabular rim to cotyloid fossa, 1/3 to 2/3 distance from acetabular rim to cotyloid fossa and > 2/3 distance from acetabular rim to cotyloid fossa. For validating the classification system, six surgeons reviewed 14 hip arthroscopy video clips. All surgeons were provided with written explanation of our classification system. Each surgeon then individually graded the cartilage lesion. A single observer then compared results for observer variability using kappa statistics. Results: We observed a high inter-observer reliability of the classification system with a kappa coefficient of 0.89 (range 0.78 to 0.91) and high intra-observer reliability with a kappa coefficient of 0.91 (range 0.89 to 0.96). Discussion: In conclusion we have developed a simple reproducible classification system for acetabular cartilage lesions

Abstract. Background. Optimal acetabular component position in Total Hip Arthroplasty is vital for avoiding complications such as dislocation, impingement, abductor muscle strength and range of motion. Transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and posterior labrum have been shown to be a reliable landmark to guide optimum acetabular cup position. There have been reports of iliopsoas impingement caused by both cemented and uncemented acetabular components. Acetabular component mal-positioning and oversizing of acetabular component are associated with iliopsoas impingement. The Psoas fossa (PF) is not a well-regarded landmark to help with Acetabular Component positioning. Our aim was to assess the relationship of the TAL and PF in relation to Acetabular Component positioning. Methods. A total of 12 cadavers were implanted with the an uncemented acetabular component, their position was initially aligned to TAL. Following optimal seating of the acetabular component the distance of the rim of the shell from the PF was noted. The Acetabular component was then repositioned inside the PF to prevent exposure of the rim of the Acetabular component. This study was performed at Smith & Nephew wet lab in Watford. Results. Out of the twelve acetabular components that were implanted parallel to the TAL, all had the acetabular rim very close or outside to the psoas notch with a potential to cause iliopsoas impingement. Alteration of the acetabular component position was necessary in all cadavers to inside the PF to prevent iliopsoas impingement. It was evident that the edge of PF was not aligned with TAL. Conclusion. Optimal acetabular component position is vital to the longevity and outcome following THA. TAL provides a landmark to guide acetabular component position. We feel the PF is a better landmark to allow appropriate positioning of the acetabular component inside bone without exposure of the component rim and thus preventing iliopsoas impingement at the psoas notch. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Geometric variations of the hip joint can give rise to repeated abnormal contact between the femur and acetabular rim, resulting in cartilage and labrum damage. Population-based geometric parameterisation can facilitate the flexible and automated in silico generation of a range of clinically relevant hip geometries, allowing the position and size of cams to be defined precisely in three dimensions. This is advantageous compared to alpha angles, which are unreliable for stratifying populations by cam type. Alpha angles provide an indication of cam size in a single two-dimensional view, and high alpha angles have been observed in asymptomatic individuals. Parametric geometries can be developed into finite element models to assess the potential effects of morphological variations in bone on soft tissue strains. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the capabilities of our parameterisation research tool by assessing impingement severity resulting from a range of parametrically varied femoral and acetabular geometries. Methods. Custom made MATLAB (MathWorks) and Python codes. [1]. were used to generate bone surfaces, which were developed into finite element models in Abaqus (SIMULIA). Parametric femoral surfaces were defined by a spherical proximal head and ellipse sections through the neck/cam region. This method produced surfaces that were well fitted to bone geometry segmented from CT scans of cam patients and capable of producing trends in results similar to those found using segmented models. A simplified spherical geometry, including the labrum and acetabular cartilage, represented the acetabulum. Femoral parameters were adjusted to define relevant variations in cam size and position. Two radii (small and large cams) and two positions (anterior and superior cams) were defined resulting in four models. Alpha angles of these parametric femurs were measured in an anterior-posterior view and a cross-table lateral view using ImageJ (NIH). A further model was developed using a femur with a medium cam size and position, and the level of acetabular coverage and labrum length were varied. Bones were modelled as rigid bodies and soft tissues were modelled as transversely isotropic linearly elastic materials. With the acetabulum fully constrained in all cases, the femurs were constrained in translation and rotated to simulate flexion followed by internal rotation to cause impingement against the labrum. Results and Discussion. Models generated using the parametric approach showed that potential for tissue damage, indicated through local strain, was not predicted by measured alpha angle, but resulted from cam extent and position as defined by the ellipses. When variations were made to the acetabular rim, an increase in bone coverage had the greatest effect on impingement severity, indicated by strain in the cartilage labral-junction. An increase in labral length increased labral displacement, but had less effect on cartilage-labral strain. Patient specific models currently require full image segmentation, but there is potential to further develop these parametric methods to assess likely impingement severity based on a series of measures of the neck and acetabulum when three-dimensional imaging of patients is available

Background: Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is increasingly recognised as a cause of mechanical hip symptoms in sportspersons. In femoro-acetabular impingement abnormal contact occurs between the proximal femur and the acetabular rim during terminal motion of the hip as a result of abnormal morphologic features involving the proximal femur (CAM) or the acetabulum (Pincer) or both (Mixed) leading to lesions of acetabular labrum and the adjacent acetabular cartilage. It is likely that it is a cause of early hip degeneration. Ganz developed a therapeutic procedure involving trochanteric flip osteotomy and dislocation of the hip, and have reported good results. We have developed an arthroscopic technique to reshape the proximal femur and remove prominent antero-superior acetabular rim thereby relieving impingement. Methods: Twelve patients presented with mechanical hip symptoms and had demonstrable cam-type (eight patients) or mixed (four patients) FAI on radially-reconstructed MR arthrography, were treated by arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty and acetabular rim resection if indicated. All patients were competing at the highest level in their respective sport (football, rugby and athletics). All patients were followed up and post-operative Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS, maximum possible score 100) compared with pre-operative NAHS. Results: There were no complications. All patients were asked to be partially weight-bearing with crutches for four weeks and most returned to training within six weeks. All of them returned to competitive sports by 14 weeks. Symptoms improved in all patients, with mean NAHS improving from 72 preoperatively to 97 at 3 months. Conclusion: Arthroscopic reshaping to relieve FAI is feasible, safe and reliable. However it is technically difficult and time-consuming. The results are comparable to open dislocation and debridement, but avoid the prolonged disability and the complications associated with trochanteric flip osteotomy. This is important in elite athletes as they can return to training and competitive sports much quicker with less morbidity

The acetabular labrum is a soft-tissue structure which lines the acetabular rim of the hip joint. Its role in hip joint biomechanics and joint health has been of particular interest over the past decade. In normal hip joint biomechanics, the labrum is crucial in retaining a layer of pressurised intra-articular fluid for joint lubrication and load support/distribution. Its seal around the femoral head is further regarded as a contributing to hip stability through its suction effect. The labrum itself is also important in increasing contact area thereby reducing contact stress. Given the labrum’s role in normal hip joint biomechanics, surgical techniques for managing labral damage are continuously evolving as our understanding of its anatomy and function continue to progress. The current paper aims to review the anatomy and biomechanical function of the labrum and how they are affected by differing surgical techniques. Take home message: The acetabular labrum plays a critical role in hip function and maintaining and restoring its function during surgical intervention remain an essential goal. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:730–5

The present study investigates the repeatability of two new methods of measuring acetabular wear with differing levels of automation. Experimental evaluation showed that the more automated method was more repeatable. Both methods segmented the femoral head and acetabular rim with ellipses. The displacement of the ellipse centres was measured and the difference at year 1 and 5 taken as a measure of wear. Measurements were obtained twice for each case. The less automated of the two methods involved the annotation of 9 points on the femoral head and 18 on the acetabular rim to which two least squares ellipse fits[. 1. ] were performed. The second and more automated method was active ellipses[. 2. ][. 3. ]. This method uses iterative robust ellipse fitting and a model of appearance learned from a training set to cause two ellipses to converge on the contours of the femoral head and acetabular rim from a single starting point. Fifty cases with radiographs taken at year 1 and year 5 were measured by both methods. The radiographs contained CPTs with 28mm heads and were digitized at 150 dpi. Fifty postoperative radiographs containing 22.225mm Zimmer CPT heads trained the more automated method. None of the radiographs had metal backed cups or highly eccentric rims. The repeatability coefficient (2 standard deviations) of the active ellipses was 0.23mm and that of the best annotator was 0.40mm while the worst was 2.69mm due to an outlying measurement. Limits of agreement were calculated between the two methods as −0.61mm to 0.91mm and show the active ellipses could replace annotation. Given that the active ellipses are nearly twice as repeatable this is desirable. The range of difference in measurements for the active ellipses is less than that of the annotator

Pincer femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is cited as being the result of a socket that is either too deep or retroverted, or both. Using 3D-CT analysis, we set out to quantify the acetabular rim shape and orientation to determine the roles of these two factors in FAI. Twenty pincer acetabulae were selected from patients undergoing image based navigated surgery, where the lateral centre edge angle was greater than 40° on plain radiographs. The normal group of disease free sockets were obtained from a CT colonography database. Using 3D reconstruction of their CT scans, a novel method of mapping the acetabular rim profile was created. The pelvis was aligned to the anterior pelvic plane. Starting at the most anterior rim point, successive markers were placed along the rim. A best fit plane (ARP) through the acetabulum was derived, and the subtended angle (SA) between each rim marker and a normal vector from the acetabular centre was calculated. Values above 90° indicated a peak, with less than 90° representing a trough. Inclination and version were measured from a horizontal plane and the ARP, in the coronal and axial view respectively. The results showed that asymmetric acetabular rim profiles in normal and pincer hips were very similar. However, pincer hips are significantly deeper overall (Mean SA 96±5° vs. 87±4° p< 0.00001) and at each anatomical point of the three eminences (pubic [SA: Normal 84±4° vs. Pincer 94±7° p< 0.00001], iliac [SA: 93±4° vs. 100±6° p=0.00021] and ischial [SA: 92±3° vs. 102±8° p=0.00005]) and two troughs (ilio-pubic [SA: Normal 83±4° vs. Pincer 94±8° p=0.00001] and ilio-ischial [SA: 92±3° vs. 102±8° p=0.00002]). The orientation of normal and pincer were almost identical (Inclination: 51±3° vs. 51±6° p=0.54 and Version: 24±6° vs. 25°±7° p=0.67). We conclude that the rim shape of pincer hips follows the same contour as normal hips. In agreement with current radiographic diagnosis, pincer-type hips are characterised by a deeper acetabulum. This ‘overcoverage’ of the femoral head confirms the biomechanical model of pincer-type impingement. Both inclination and version in these two groups were almost identical, with no truly retroverted acetabulum seen. Pincer impingement resulting from ‘acetabular retroversion’ is a concept currently based upon radiographic signs that we have been unable to confirm in this small 3D study using the subtended angle as the key descriptor of acetabular morphology

Standard evaluation and diagnosis of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingment (FAI) relies on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, clinical evaluation, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the current evaluation techniques do not offer a method for accurately defining the amount of acetabular rim overcoverage in pincer-type FAI. Several studies have remarked on the particular problems with radiographic evaluation, including beam divergence, difficulty with defining the acetabular rim, and pelvic tilt. Some studies have proposed methods to mitigate these issues; however, radiographic analysis still relies on projected and distorted images, making it difficult to acquire an accurate quantitative estimate of the amount of crossover. We propose a technique that utilises computed tomography (CT) data to accurately quantify the amount of acetabular crossover while accounting for known diagnostic problems, specifically pelvic tilt. This work describes a novel method that utilises CT data of a patient's afflicted hip joint region to assess the amount of acetabular overcoverage due to pincer deformity. The amount of overcoverage was assessed using a spline curve defined through the segmentation of the acetabular rim from CT data. To mitigate pelvic tilt, the user selected points to define both the pubic symphysis and the promontory in a lateral digitally reconstructed radiograph. The algorithm corrected the pelvic tilt by adjusting to a defined neutral position (in our case, a 60°), and the user adjusted for slight rotation differences ensuring there was a vertical line connecting the symphysis and the sacrococcygeal joint. After successfully repositioning the pelvis, the algorithm computed the amount of acetabular overcoverage. The algorithm identified the superolateral point of the acetabulum and the most inferior points of the anterior and posterior rim. A line, the mid-acetabular axis, was constructed between the superolateral point and the midpoint of the most inferior points on the anterior and posterior rims; the mid-acetabular axis was extended anterior and posterior to create a plane. Crossover occurred when the anterior rim of the acetabulum intersected this plane. If an intersection occurred, the algorithm measured the length of the mid-acetabular axis, and the length and width of the section representing overcoverage. These points were then projected onto anteroposterior DRRs and again measured to generate a basis of comparison. We tested our method on four cadaveric specimens to analyze the relationship between radiographic assessment and our technique. We simulated varying degrees of impingement in the cadavers by increasing the amount of pelvic tilt and defining that as the neutral position for a given trial. Moreover, we assessed interobserver variability in repositioning the pelvis as to the effect this would have on the final measurement of crossover length and width. The software achieved consistent, quantitative measurements of the amount of acetabular overcoverage due to pincer deformity. When compared with conventional radiographic measurements for crossover, there was a significant different between the two modalities. Specifically, both the ratios of crossover length to acetabular length and crossover width to crossover length were less using the CT-based approach (p < 0.001). Moreover, there were no significant differences between observers using our approach. The proposed technique can form the basis for a new way to diagnosis and measure acetabular overcoverage resulting in pincer impingement. This computational method can help clinicians to accurately correct for tilt and rotation, and subsequently provide consistent, quantitative measurement of acetabular overcoverage

Hip impingement is a diagnosis that has been increasingly recognized among young patients with hip pain. Two different types of impingement have been described. Over coverage impingement, or a “pincer” effect, occurs between the anterior wall or labrum of the acetabulum and the femoral head. This is typically due to a decrease in anteversion of the acetabulum or over-coverage of the femoral head (coxa profunda or protrusio). A so-called cam-effect impingement occurs when the femoral head-neck junction has an abnormally large radius resulting in insufficient offset. Widening of the femoral neck reduces its concavity, creating an impingement over the acetabular rim. Thus, the anterolateral junction is forced under the acetabular rim, resulting in labral injury and deterioration of the cartilage. Options for treatment of impingement include non-operative management, arthroscopic débridement, trimming of the anterior aspect of the acetabular rim after surgical dislocation of the hip, periacetabular osteotomy when impingement is secondary to an acetabular torsion abnormality, and surgical resection of a femoral neck bump and/or part of the anterolateral aspect of the neck when the primary anatomic abnormality is secondary to insufficient head-neck offset. Resection of a portion of the anterolateral aspect of the femoral head-neck junction improves the femoral head-neck ratio, increasing the range of motion before impingement occurs. Recently, surgical dislocation has been used for achieving full access to the femoral head and the acetabulum. Surgical dislocation and resection osteochondroplasty were performed in 22 hips from January 2001 to Decem-ber 2004 because of anterior impingement resulting from an idiopathic nonspherical femoral head, mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis, or poor offset at the head-neck junction. Osteonecrosis was not observed in the hips treated with this method. Pain and function markedly improved after the index operation. Two patients required hardware removal. Treatment goals in young patients with hip impingement should be pain relief and, prevention of further damage to the cartilage and subsequent osteoarthritis. Surgeons using this technique need to know the amount of bone that can be removed safely before catastrophic weakening of the femoral neck occurs

Introduction. The Exeter RimFit™ flanged cemented cup features ultra-highly cross-linked polyethylene and was introduced onto the market in the UK in 2010. We aimed to examine the rates of radiolucent lines observed when the Rimfit™ cup was implanted using a ‘rimcutter’ technique with the cup sitting on a prepared acetabular rim, and a ‘trimmed flange’ technique were the flange is cut so that it sits inside the prepared acetabular rim. Patients/Materials & Methods. The radiographs of 150 (75 ‘rimcutter’, 75 ‘trimmed flange’) Rimfit™ hip replacements were critically evaluated to assess for radiolucency at the cement bone interface. This group was then compared to a historic pre-Rimfit™ cohort of 76 patients. Results. Rimfit™ Cups inserted using the rimcutter technique exhibited significantly higher rates of radiolucency than cups inserted using the trimmed flange technique at 1 year post surgery (1 Delee and Charnley zone: rimcutter=73/77 (95%) versus trimmed flange=14/75 (19%); 2 zones: 43/75 (57%) versus 0/75 (0%); all 3 zones: 13/75 (17%) versus 0/75 (0%):(p<0.01)). There were significantly more radiolucencies for the ‘rimcutter’/Rimfit™ group when compared to a historic group of non-‘rimcutter’/non-Rimfit™ cups implanted by the same surgeon (p<0.01). Discussion. 95% of Rimfit™ cups inserted using the rimcutter technique exhibited radiolucent lines at 12 months. This may be due to increased flange stiffness related to the ultra-highly cross-linked polyethylene and the closer seal due to the narrow circumferential ridge created by the rimcutter. Insertion of the cup may lead to lower initial cement penetration which further deteriorates with weight bearing due to the flange offloading the socket. This may be exacerbated by hydraulic pumping of fluid trapped under the flange at the time of implantation that further degrades the cement bone interface. Conclusion. On the basis of these results we have stopped using the Rimfit™ cup in combination with the rimcutter device and technique

Major bone loss involving the acetabulum can be seen during revision THA due to component loosening, migration or osteolysis and can also occur as a sequela of infected THA. Uncemented porous ingrowth components can be used for reconstruction of the vast majority of revision cases, where smaller segmental or cavitary defects are typically present. But when stable structural support on host bone is lacking, highly porous metal acetabular augments have been described as an alternative to large structural allograft, avoiding the potential for later graft resorption and the resulting loss of mechanical support that can follow. The fundamental concept behind these acetabular augments is the provision of critical additional fixation, structural support and increased contact area against host bone over the weeks following surgery while the desired ingrowth into porous implant surfaces is occurring. Three separate patterns of augment placement have been utilised in our practice since the development of these implants a decade ago: Type 1 – augment screwed onto the superolateral acetabular rim in a “flying buttress” configuration for treatment of a segmental rim defect, Type 2 – augment placed superiorly against host and then fixed (with cement) to the acetabular component adjacent to the cup to fill a mainly elliptical cavitary defect, and Type 3 – augment(s) placed medial to the cup to fill a protrusio type cavitary or combined cavitary segmental defect of the superomedial or medial wall, and allow peripheral cup placement against the still intact acetabular rim. In all cases the acetabular component and augment interface is fixed together with cement, with care to prevent any cement extrusion between any implant and the bone. When possible, we now prefer to place the acetabular component first and fix it provisionally with 2 or more screws, and then place the augments second as this is technically quicker and easier. This order of insertion is only possible though in type 1 and a few select type 2 cases. Type 3 cases always require placement of one or more augments first, before cup insertion. Supplemental cancellous bone graft is used routinely, but the need for structural bone is avoided. Highly porous metal acetabular augments are an infrequently needed, but extremely valuable, versatile and reliable adjunctive fixation method for use with uncemented acetabular components during complex revision THA associated with major bone deficiency. Smaller (often female) patients are more likely to require this approach as reaming away defects to allow insertion of a jumbo cup is more difficult in small patients with a smaller AP dimension to the acetabular columns and less local bone for implant support. Intermediate term durability and apparent radiographic incorporation has been very good despite the complex reconstructions originally required. This technique can allow the avoidance of structural bone grafting for even the most massive of bone defect problems, but additional followup is needed to see how durable these encouraging results are over the longer term

To assess the current literature on suture anchor placement for the purpose of identifying factors that lead to suture anchor perforation and techniques that reduce the likelihood of complications. Three databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE) were searched, and two reviewers independently screened the resulting literature. Methodological quality of all included papers was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment tool. Results are presented in a narrative summary fashion using descriptive statistics. Fourteen studies were included in this review. Four case series (491 patients, 56.6% female, mean age 33.9 years), nine controlled cadaveric/laboratory studies (111 cadaveric hips and 12 sawbones, 42.2% female, mean age 60.0 years), and one randomized controlled trial (37 hips, 55.6% female, mean age 34.2 years) were included. Anterior cortical perforation by suture anchors led to pain and impingement of pelvic neurovascular structures. The anterior acetabular positions (three to four o'clock) had the thinnest bone, smallest rim angles, and highest incidence of articular perforation. Drilling angles from 10° to 20° measured off the coronal plane were acceptable. The mid-anterior (MA) and distal anterolateral (DALA) portals were used successfully, with some studies reporting difficulty placing anchors at anterior locations via the DALA portal. Small-diameter (< 1 .8-mm) suture anchors had a lower in vivo incidence of articular perforation with similar stability and pull-out strength in biomechanical studies. Suture anchors at anterior acetabular rim positions (3–4 o'clock) should be inserted with caution. Large-diameter (>2.3-mm) suture anchors increase the likelihood of articular perforation without increasing labral stability. Inserting small-diameter (< 1 .8-mm) all-suture suture anchors (ASAs) from 10° to 20° using curved suture anchor drill guides, may increase safe insertion angles from all cutaneous portals. Direct arthroscopic visualization, use of fluoroscopy, distal-proximal insertion, and the use of nitinol wire can help prevent articular violation

Major bone loss involving the acetabulum can be seen during revision THA due to component loosening, migration or osteolysis and can also occur as a sequela of infected THA. Uncemented porous ingrowth components can be used for reconstruction of the vast majority of revision cases, where smaller segmental or cavitary defects are typically present. But when stable structural support on host bone is lacking, highly porous metal acetabular augments have been described as an alternative to large structural allograft, avoiding the potential for later graft resorption and the resulting loss of mechanical support that can follow. The fundamental concept behind these acetabular augments is the provision of critical additional fixation, structural support and increased contact area against host bone over the weeks following surgery while the desired ingrowth into porous implant surfaces is occurring. Technique: Three separate patterns of augment placement have been utilised in our practice since the development of these implants: Type 1 - augment screwed onto the superolateral acetabular rim in a “flying buttress” configuration for treatment of a segmental rim defect, Type 2 – augment placed superiorly against host and then fixed (with cement) to the acetabular component adjacent to the cup to fill a mainly elliptical cavitary defect, and Type 3 – augment(s) placed medial to the cup to fill a protrusio type cavitary or combined cavitary segmental defect of the superomedial or medial wall, and allow peripheral cup placement against the still intact acetabular rim. In all cases the acetabular component and augment interface is fixed together with cement, with care to prevent any cement extrusion between any implant and the bone. When possible, we now prefer to place the acetabular component first and fix it provisionally with 2 or more screws, and then place the augments second as this is technically quicker and easier. This order of insertion is only possible though in type 1 and a few select type 2 cases. Type 3 cases always require placement of one or more augments first, before cup insertion. Supplemental cancellous bone graft is used routinely. Results: From 2000 through 2007, porous tantalum acetabular augments were used very selectively in 85 revision THA procedures out of total of 1,789 revision hip cases performed at our institution in that time frame. All cases had associated massive acetabular deficiency precluding stable mechanical support for a cup alone. Fifty-eight hips had complete radiographic as well as clinical follow at minimum 5 years. The majority of patients had either Paprosky type 3A defects (28/58, 48%) or 3B defects (22/58, 38%). Ten out of 58 had pre-operative pelvic discontinuities. At 5 years, 2/58 (3%) were revised for aseptic loosening and another 6/58 demonstrated incomplete radiolucencies between the acetabular shell and zone 3. One of the revised cups and 5 of 6 of the cups with radiolucencies had an associated pelvic discontinuity. Summary: Highly porous metal acetabular augments are an infrequently needed, but extremely valuable, versatile and reliable adjunctive fixation method for use with uncemented acetabular components during complex revision THA associated with major bone deficiency. Intermediate term durability and apparent radiographic incorporation has been very good despite the complex reconstructions originally required. This technique can allow the avoidance of structural bone grafting for even the most massive of bone defect problems, but additional followup is needed to see how durable these encouraging results are over the longer term

The β-angle is a radiological tool for measuring the distance between the pathological head-neck junction and the acetabular rim with the hip in 90° of flexion in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Initially it was measured using an open-chamber MRI. We have developed a technique to measure this angle on plain radiographs. Correlation analysis was undertaken to determine the relationship between the range of movement and the β-angle in 50 patients with femoroacetabular impingement and 50 asymptomatic control subjects. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the β-angle was also evaluated. Patients with femoroacetabular impingement had a significantly smaller (p < 0.001) mean β-angle (15.6°, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.3 to 17.7) compared with the asymptomatic group (38.7°, 95% CI 36.5 to 41.0). Correlation between internal rotation and the β-angle was high in the impingement group and moderate in the asymptomatic group. The β-angle had excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability in both groups. Our findings suggest that the measurement of the β-angle on plain radiography may represent a valid, reproducible and cost-effective alternative to open MRI in the assessment of the pathological bony anatomy in patients with cam, pincer and mixed femoroacetabular impingement

Recently, femoroacetabular impingement has been recognised as a cause of early osteoarthritis. There are two mechanisms of impingement: 1) cam impingement caused by a non-spherical head and 2) pincer impingement caused by excessive acetabular cover. We hypothesised that both mechanisms result in different patterns of articular damage. Of 302 analysed hips only 26 had an isolated cam and 16 an isolated pincer impingement. Cam impingement caused damage to the anterosuperior acetabular cartilage with separation between the labrum and cartilage. During flexion, the cartilage was sheared off the bone by the non-spherical femoral head while the labrum remained untouched. In pincer impingement, the cartilage damage was located circumferentially and included only a narrow strip. During movement the labrum is crushed between the acetabular rim and the femoral neck causing degeneration and ossification. Both cam and pincer impingement lead to osteoarthritis of the hip. Labral damage indicates ongoing impingement and rarely occurs alone

HXLPE acetabular liners were introduced to reduce wear-related complications in THA. However, post-irradiation thermal free radical stabilization can compromise mechanical properties, leave oxidation-prone residual free radicals, or both. Reports of mechanical failure of HXLPE acetabular liner rims raise concerns about thermal free radical stabilization and in vivo oxidization on implant properties. The purpose of this study is to explore the differences in the mechanical, physical and chemical properties of HXLPE acetabular liner rims after extended time in vivo between liners manufactured with different thermal free radical stabilization techniques. Remelted, single annealed and sequentially annealed retrieved HXLPE acetabular liners with in vivo times greater than 4.5 years were obtained from our implant retrieval laboratory. All retrieved liners underwent an identical sanitation and storage protocol. For mechanical testing, a total of 55 explants and 13 control liners were tested. Explant in vivo time ranged from 4.6 – 14 years and ex vivo time ranged from 0 – 11.6 years. Rim mechanical properties were tested by microindentation hardness testing using a Micromet II Vickers microhardness tester following ASTM standards. A subset of 16 explants with ex vivo time under one year along with five control liners were assessed for oxidation by FTIR, crystallinity by Raman spectroscopy, and evidence of microcracking by SEM. No significant difference in in vivo or ex vivo was found between thermal stabilization groups in either set of explants studied. In the mechanically tested explants, there was no significant correlation between in vivo time and Vickers hardness in any thermal stabilization group. A significant correlation was found between ex vivo time and hardness in remelted liners (r=.520, p = .011), but not in either annealed cohort. ANCOVA with ex vivo time as a covariate found a significant difference in hardness between the thermal free radical stabilization groups (p 0.1) was found in retrieved remelted (25%), single annealed (100%) and sequentially annealed (75%) liner rims. Crystallinity was increased in the subsurface region relative to control liners for both annealed, but not remelted, liner rims. Hardness was increased in oxidized rims for both annealed cohorts but not in the remelted cohort. Microcracking was only found along the surface of one unoxidized remelted liner rim. Mechanical properties were reduced at baseline and worsened after in vivo time for remelted HXLPE liner rims. Rim oxidation was detected in all groups. Oxidation was associated with increased crystallinity and hardness in annealed cohorts, but not remelted liners. Increased crystallinity and oxidation do not appear to be directly causing the worsened mechanical behavior of remelted HXLPE liner rims after extended in vivo time

Optimal alignment of the acetabular cup component is crucial for good outcome of total hip arthroplasty [THA]. Increased accuracy of implant positioning may improve clinical outcome. To achieve this, patient specific instrumentation was developed. A patient-specific guide manufactured by 3D printing was designed to aid in positioning of the cup component with a pre-operatively defined anteversion and inclination angle. The guide fits perfectly on the acetabular rim. An alignment K-wire in a pre-operatively planned orientation is used as visual reference during cup implantation. Accuracy of the device was tested on 6 cadaveric specimens. During the experiment, cadavers were positioned for a THA procedure using a posterolateral approach. A normal-sized incision was made and approach used as in the conventional surgical procedure. The PSI was subsequently fitted onto the acetabular rim and secured into its unique position due to its patient specific design. The metallic pin was placed in a drill hole of the PSI. Post-operative CT image data of each acetabulum with the placed pin were transferred to Mimics and the 3D model was registered to the pre-operative one. The anteversion and inclination of the placed pin was calculated and compared to the pre-operatively planned orientation. The absolute difference in degrees was evaluated. A secondary test was carried out to assess the error during impaction while observing the alignment K-wire as a visual reference. In a laboratory setting, error during impaction with a visual reference of the K-wire was measured. Deviation from planning showed to be on average 1.04° for anteversion and 2.19° for inclination. By visually aligning the impactor with this alignment K-wire, the surgeon may achieve cup placement as pre-operatively planned. The effect of the visual alignment itself was also evaluated in a separate test-rig showing minimal deviations in the same range. The alignment validation test resulted in an average deviation of 1.2° for inclination and 1.4° for anteversion between the metallic alignment K-wire used as visual reference and the metallic K-wire impacted by the test subjects. The inter-user variability was 0.9° and 0.8° for anteversion and inclination respectively. The intra-user variability was 1.6° and 1.0° for anteversion and inclination respectively. Tests per test subject were conducted in a consecutive manner. We investigated the accuracy of two factors affecting accuracy in the cup insertion with PSI, i.e. accuracies of the errors of bony fitting and cup impaction. Since the accuracy of the major contributing factors to the overall accuracy of PSI for cup insertion with linear visual reference of a metallic K-wire was within the acceptable range of 2 to 3 degrees, we state that the PSI we have designed assists to achieve the preoperatively planned orientation of the cup and as such leads to the reduction of outliers in cup orientation. This acetabular cup orientation guide can transfer the pre-operative plan to the operating room