We report septic shock as postoperative complication following an instrumented posterior spinal arthrodesis on a patient with multiple body piercings. The management of this potentially catastrophic complication and outcome of treatment is been discussed. Body piercing has become increasingly more common due to change in culture or as a fashion statement. This has been associated with local or generalized ill effects including tissue injury, skin and systemic infections, and septic shock. There is no clear guideline pathway regarding removal and reinsertion of body piercings in patients who undergo major surgery. Complications following Orthopaedic or Spinal procedures associated with body piercing have not been reported.Purpose of the study
Summary of Background Data
To investigate the efficacy of pedicle screw instrumentation in correcting spinal deformity in patients with quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Also to assess quality of life and functional improvement after deformity correction as perceived by the parents of our patients. All pedicle screw constructs have been commonly used to correct adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. There is limited information on their effectiveness in treating patients with cerebral palsy and neuromuscular scoliosis.Purpose of the study
Summary of Background Data
To investigate the efficacy of pedicle screw instrumentation in correcting thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis in adolescent patients. Thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis has been traditionally treated through an anterior approach and instrumented arthrodesis with the aim to include in the fusion the Cobb-to-Cobb levels and preserve distal mobile spinal segments. Posterior instrumentation has been extensively used for thoracic or thoracic and lumbar scoliosis. In the advent of all-pedicle screw constructs there is debate on whether thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis is best treated through an anterior or a posterior instrumented arthrodesis.Purpose of the study
Summary of Background Data
To compare the effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw techniques in correcting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pedicle screw constructs have been extensively used in the treatment of adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis. It has been suggested that greater implant density may achieve better deformity correction. However, this can increase the neurological risk related to pedicle screw placement, prolong surgical time and blood loss and result in higher instrumentation cost.Purpose of the study
Summary of Background Data
We reviewed 31 consecutive patients with Friedreich’s
ataxia and scoliosis. There were 24 males and seven females with
a mean age at presentation of 15.5 years (8.6 to 30.8) and a mean
curve of 51° (13° to 140°). A total of 12 patients had thoracic
curvatures, 11 had thoracolumbar and eight had double thoracic/lumbar.
Two patients had long thoracolumbar collapsing scoliosis with pelvic
obliquity and four had hyperkyphosis. Left-sided thoracic curves in
nine patients (45%) and increased thoracic kyphosis differentiated
these deformities from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. There were
17 patients who underwent a posterior instrumented spinal fusion
at mean age of 13.35 years, which achieved and maintained good correction
of the deformity. Post-operative complications included one death due
to cardiorespiratory failure, one revision to address nonunion and
four patients with proximal junctional kyphosis who did not need
extension of the fusion. There were no neurological complications
and no wound infections. The rate of progression of the scoliosis
in children kept under simple observation and those treated with bracing
was less for lumbar curves during bracing and similar for thoracic
curves. The scoliosis progressed in seven of nine children initially
treated with a brace who later required surgery. Two patients presented
after skeletal maturity with balanced curves not requiring correction.
Three patients with severe deformities who would benefit from corrective
surgery had significant cardiac co-morbidities.
This review of the literature presents the current understanding of Scheuermann’s kyphosis and investigates the controversies concerning conservative and surgical treatment. There is considerable debate regarding the pathogenesis, natural history and treatment of this condition. A benign prognosis with settling of symptoms and stabilisation of the deformity at skeletal maturity is expected in most patients. Observation and programmes of exercise are appropriate for mild, flexible, non-progressive deformities. Bracing is indicated for a moderate deformity which spans several levels and retains flexibility in motivated patients who have significant remaining spinal growth. The loss of some correction after the completion of bracing with recurrent anterior vertebral wedging has been reported in approximately one-third of patients. Surgical correction with instrumented spinal fusion is indicated for a severe kyphosis which carries a risk of progression beyond the end of growth causing cosmetic deformity, back pain and neurological complications. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of different techniques and types of instrumentation. Techniques include posterior-only and combined anteroposterior spinal fusion with or without posterior osteotomies across the apex of the deformity. Current instrumented techniques include hybrid and all-pedicle screw constructs.
A review of the current literature shows that there is a lack of consensus regarding the treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Most of the views and recommendations provided in various reports are weakly supported by evidence. There is a limited amount of information about the natural history of the condition, making it difficult to compare the effectiveness of various conservative and operative treatments. This systematic review summarises the current knowledge on spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis and attempts to present a rational approach to the evaluation and management of this condition in children and adolescents.
We report five children who presented at the mean age of 1.5 years (1.1 to 1.9) with a progressive thoracolumbar kyphosis associated with segmental instability and subluxation of the spine at the level above an anteriorly-wedged hypoplastic vertebra at L1 or L2. The spinal deformity appeared to be developmental and not congenital in origin. The anterior wedging of the vertebra may have been secondary to localised segmental instability and subsequent kyphotic deformity. We suggest the term ‘infantile developmental thoracolumbar kyphosis with segmental subluxation of the spine’ to differentiate this type of deformity from congenital displacement of the spine in which the congenital vertebral anomaly does not resolve. Infantile developmental kyphosis with segmental subluxation of the spine, if progressive, may carry the risk of neurological compromise. In all of our patients the kyphotic deformity progressed over a period of three months and all were treated by localised posterior spinal fusion. At a mean follow-up of 6.6 years (5.0 to 9.0), gradual correction of the kyphosis was seen on serial radiographs as well as reconstitution of the hypoplastic wedged vertebra to normality. Exploration of the arthrodesis was necessary at nine months in one patient who developed a pseudarthrosis.
None of the patients developed postoperative wound infections, either early or late. There were no major medical complications following surgery in this group of patients that would result in prolonged intensive care unit or hospital stay. Four of the 14 patients (28.6%) who had initially undergone a posterior spinal arthrodesis alone developed an asymptomatic pseudarthrosis with failure of the instrumentation. The non-union was treated successfully in 2 of these 4 patients with a combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion. The repair of the pseudarthrosis was performed through a repeat posterior spinal fusion in the remaining 2 patients and one of these patients necessitated a second revision procedure to address recurrence of the non-union.
Eight patients (57%) underwent surgical treatment at a mean age of 9.8 years (range: 2.9–19). Four patients had a combined anterior-posterior spine arthrodesis. The remaining four patients had a posterior spinal arthrodesis.
Segmental vessel ligation during anterior spinal surgery has been associated with paraplegia. However, the incidence and risk factors for this devastating complication are debated. We reviewed 346 consecutive paediatric and adolescent patients ranging in age from three to 18 years who underwent surgery for anterior spinal deformity through a thoracic or thoracoabdominal approach, during which 2651 segmental vessels were ligated. There were 173 patients with idiopathic scoliosis, 80 with congenital scoliosis or kyphosis, 43 with neuromuscular and 31 with syndromic scoliosis, 12 with a scoliosis associated with intraspinal abnormalities, and seven with a kyphosis. There was only one neurological complication, which occurred in a patient with a 127° congenital thoracic scoliosis due to a unilateral unsegmented bar with contralateral hemivertebrae at the same level associated with a thoracic diastematomyelia and tethered cord. This patient was operated upon early in the series, when intra-operative spinal cord monitoring was not available. Intra-operative spinal cord monitoring with the use of somatosensory evoked potentials alone or with motor evoked potentials was performed in 331 patients. This showed no evidence of signal change after ligation of the segmental vessels. In our experience, unilateral segmental vessel ligation carries no risk of neurological damage to the spinal cord unless performed in patients with complex congenital spinal deformities occurring primarily in the thoracic spine and associated with intraspinal anomalies at the same level, where the vascular supply to the cord may be abnormal.