header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

SEPTIC SHOCK AFTER POSTERIOR SPINAL ARTHRODESIS ON A PATIENT WITH SCHEUERMANN'S KYPHOSIS AND MULTIPLE BODY PIERCINGS

Combined British Scoliosis Society/Nordic Spinal Deformity Society (BSS/NSDS)



Abstract

Purpose of the study

We report septic shock as postoperative complication following an instrumented posterior spinal arthrodesis on a patient with multiple body piercings. The management of this potentially catastrophic complication and outcome of treatment is been discussed.

Summary of Background Data

Body piercing has become increasingly more common due to change in culture or as a fashion statement. This has been associated with local or generalized ill effects including tissue injury, skin and systemic infections, and septic shock. There is no clear guideline pathway regarding removal and reinsertion of body piercings in patients who undergo major surgery. Complications following Orthopaedic or Spinal procedures associated with body piercing have not been reported.

Methods

We reviewed the medical notes and radiographs of an adolescent patient with severe Scheuermann's kyphosis and multiple body piercings who underwent an uneventful posterior spinal arthrodesis with pedicle hook/screw/rod instrumentation and autologous iliac crest bone graft and developed septic shock.

Results

Septic shock developed on postoperative day 2 after reinsertion of all piercings following patient's request. The patient became systemically very unwell and required intensive medical management, as well as a total course of antibiotics of 3 months. The piercings remained in situ. She did not develop a wound infection despite the presence of bacteraemia (coagulase-negative Staphylococci/Streptococci warneri) and spinal instrumentation. The patient had no new piercings subsequent to her deformity procedure. Two and a half years after spinal surgery she reported no medical problems, had a balanced spine with no loss of kyphosis correction and no evidence of nonunion or recurrence of deformity.

Conclusion

The development of septic shock as a result of piercing reinsertion in the postoperative period has not been previously reported. This is an important consideration to prevent potentially life-threatening complications following major spinal surgery. Despite the wide array of complications associated to body art there are no clear guidelines for body piercing. There is growing public awareness and several countries are laying regulations which have not yet been internationally standardized. A clear practice guideline in the perioperative management of piercings is needed as the incidence of body piercing and associated complications is rising. There is need for surgeons to be aware of the hazards of body piercing and its implications. We propose that multiple piercings should not be reinserted after major surgery and appropriate counseling should be provided to the patients as part of the consent process.



Ethics: None,

Interest statement: None