Abstract
Purpose of the study
To compare the effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw techniques in correcting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Summary of Background Data
Pedicle screw constructs have been extensively used in the treatment of adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis. It has been suggested that greater implant density may achieve better deformity correction. However, this can increase the neurological risk related to pedicle screw placement, prolong surgical time and blood loss and result in higher instrumentation cost.
Methods
We reviewed the medical notes and radiographs of 139 consecutive adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis (128 female-11 male, prospectively collected single surgeon's series). We measured the scoliosis, thoracic kyphosis (T5-T12), and lumbar lordosis (L1-L5) before and after surgery, as well as at minimum 2-year follow-up. SRS 22 data was available for all patients.
Results
All patients underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis using pedicle screw constructs. Mean age at surgery was 14.5 years. We had 2 separate groups: in Group 1 (43 patients) correction was performed over 2 rods using bilateral segmental pedicle screws; in Group 2 (96 patients) correction was performed over 1 rod using unilateral segmental pedicle screws with the 2nd rod providing stability of the construct through 2-level screw fixation both proximal and distal. Group 1. Mean Cobb angle before surgery for upper thoracic curves was 37°. This was corrected by 71% to mean 11° (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle before surgery for main thoracic curves was 65°. This was corrected by 71% to mean 20° (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle before surgery for thoracolumbar/lumbar curves was 60°. This was corrected by 74% to mean 16° (p<0.001). No patient lost >2° correction at follow-up. Mean preoperative thoracic kyphosis was 24° and lumbar lordosis 52°. Mean postoperative thoracic kyphosis was 21° and lumbar lordosis 50° (p>0.05). Mean theatre time was 5.5 hours, hospital stay 8.2 days and intraoperative blood loss 0.6 blood volumes. Complications: 1 transient IOM loss/no neurological deficit; 1 deep wound infection leading to non-union and requiring revision surgery; 1 rod trimming due to prominent upper end. Mean preoperative SRS 22 score was 3.9; this improved to 4.5 at follow-up (p<0.001). Pain and self-image demonstrated significant improvement (p=0.001, p<0.001 respectively) with mean satisfaction rate 4.9. Group 2. Mean Cobb angle before surgery for upper thoracic curves was 42°. This was corrected by 52% to mean 20° (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle before surgery for main thoracic curves was 62°. This was corrected by 70% to mean 19° (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle before surgery for thoracolumbar/lumbar curves was 57°. This was corrected by 72% to mean 16° (p<0.001). No patient lost >2° correction at follow-up. Preoperative scoliosis size for all types of curves correlated with increased surgical time (r=0.6, 0.4). Mean preoperative thoracic kyphosis was 28° and lumbar lordosis 46°. Mean postoperative thoracic kyphosis was 25° and lumbar lordosis 45° (p>0.05). Mean theatre time was 4.2 hours, hospital stay 8.4 days and intraoperative blood loss 0.4 blood volumes. Complications: 1 deep and 1 superficial wound infections treated with debridement; 1 transient brachial plexus neurapraxia; 1 SMA syndrome. Mean preoperative SRS 22 score was 3.7; this improved to 4.5 at follow-up (p<0.001). Pain, function, self-image and mental health demonstrated significant improvement (p<0.001 for all parameters) with mean satisfaction rate 4.8.
Comparison between groups showed no significant difference in regard to age at surgery, preoperative and postoperative scoliosis angle for main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, as well as SRS scores and length of hospital stay. Better correction of upper thoracic curves was achieved in Group 1 (p<0.05), but upper thoracic curves in Group 2 were statistically more severe before surgery (p<0.05). Increased surgical time and blood loss was recorded in Group 1 (p<0.05, p=0.05 respectively). The implant cost was reduced by mean 35% in Group 2 due to lesser number of pedicle screws.
Conclusion
Unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation has achieved excellent deformity correction in adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis, which was maintained at follow-up. This has been associated with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates. The unilateral technique using segmental pedicle screw correction has reduced surgical time, intraoperative blood loss and implant cost without compromising surgical outcome for the most common thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. The bilateral technique achieved better correction of upper thoracic scoliosis.
Ethics: Audit/service standard in trust,
Interest statement: None
