Aims

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) with prior multiple failed surgery for reinfection represent a huge challenge for surgeons because of poor vascular supply and biofilm formation. This study aims to determine the results of single-stage revision using intra-articular antibiotic infusion in treating this condition.

Aims. Femoral cement-in-cement revision is a well described technique to reduce morbidity and complications in hip revision surgery. Traditional techniques for septic revision of hip arthroplasty necessitate removal of all bone cement from the femur. In our two centres, we have been using a cement-in-cement technique, leaving the distal femoral bone cement in selected patients for septic hip revision surgery, both for single and the first of two-stage revision procedures. A prerequisite for adoption of this technique is that the surgeon considers the cement mantle to be intimately fixed to bone without an intervening membrane between cement and host bone. We aim to report our experience for this technique. Methods. We have analyzed patients undergoing this cement-in-cement technique for femoral revision in infection, and present a consecutive series of 89 patients. Follow-up was undertaken at a mean of 56.5 months (24.0 to 134.7) for the surviving cases. Results. Seven patients (7.9%) required further revision for infection. Ten patients died of causes unrelated to their infection before their two-year review (mean 5.9 months; 0.9 to 18.6). One patient was lost to follow-up at five months after surgery, and two patients died of causes unrelated to their hip shortly after their two-year review was due without attending. Of the remaining patients, 69 remained infection-free at final review. Radiological review confirms the mechanical success of the procedure as previously described in aseptic revision, and postoperative Oxford Hip Scores suggest satisfactory functional outcomes. Conclusion. In conclusion, we found that retaining a well-fixed femoral cement mantle in the presence of infection and undertaking a cement-in-cement revision was successful in 82 of the patients (92.1%) in our series of 89, both in terms of eradication of infection and component fixation. These results are comparable to other more invasive techniques and offer significant potential benefits to the patient. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):212–220

Aim

Due to medical and organizational factors, it occurs in everyday practice that spacers are left in place longer than originally planned during a two-stage prosthesis exchange in the case of prosthetic joint infections. Patients are severely restricted in their mobility and, after initial antibiotic administration, the spacer itself only acts as a foreign body. The aim of this study is to analyze whether the duration of the spacer in situ has an influence on the long-term success of treatment and mortality.

Aims

Current guidelines consider analyses of joint aspirates, including leucocyte cell count (LC) and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) as a diagnostic mainstay of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). It is unclear if these parameters are subject to a certain degree of variability over time. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the variation of LC and PMN% in patients with aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Aims

Histology is an established tool in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Different thresholds, using various infection definitions and histopathological criteria, have been described. This study determined the performance of different thresholds of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (≥ 5 PMN/HPF, ≥ 10 PMN/HPF, ≥ 23 PMN/10 HPF) , when using the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria for PJI.

Femoral cement-in-cement revision is a well described technique to reduce morbidity and complications in hip revision surgery. Traditional techniques for septic revision necessitate removal of all bone cement from the femur. In our two institutions, we have been using a cement-in-cement technique, leaving the distal femoral cement in selected cases for septic hip revision surgery. Between February 2010 and September 2019, 89 patients with prosthetic hip infection underwent first or single stage procedures leaving the distal femoral cement in situ and performing a cement-in-cement revision. The mean patient age was 72.0 years (24–92). The median time from the last arthroplasty procedure was 29.0 months (1–294). 81 patients underwent revision using a cemented Exeter stem, 7 patients received an articulating spacer, and one patient underwent excision arthroplasty with the distal cement left in situ. Patients received clinical and radiographic follow-up with a mean of 42.8 months (range 11.0–120.1 months). Oxford hip scores were collected from each institution's existing databases. 9 patients (10.1%) died within one year of surgery. No deaths were directly related to joint infection or the surgery. One patient was lost to follow up before one year. Of the remainder, 7 patients (8.9%) required further procedures for infection and were therefore considered to be treatment failures. 6 patients (7.6%) underwent planned second stage procedures with no recurrence of infection. 7 patients (8.9%) had further surgery for non-infective reasons. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of infection free survival at one year was 93.7% (95% CI 88.4 to 99.0%). No patients underwent revision for stem loosening. Oxford hip scores were available at over one year postoperatively for 51 patients with a mean score of 30.6, and a mean gain of 11.9. In our combined cohort of patients, cement-in-cement revision had an infection eradication rate of 91.1%. Patient selection is crucial, and the procedure can only be performed when there is a well-fixed cement mantle. However, when strict criteria are followed, this technique offers potential significant benefits to surgeons performing this challenging surgery, and more importantly the patients undergoing them

Aim

Traditionally, serum white blood count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) have been utilized as markers to evaluate septic arthritis (SA). Recently, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been identified as prognostic factors for treatment failure, mortality and morbidity in various clinical settings. To date, these markers have not been utilized for evaluating outcomes after hip and knee SA.

Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the ability of admission NLR and PLR to predict treatment failure and postoperative 90-day mortality in hip and knee SA.

Aim. The effectiveness of mandatory joint aspiration prior to re-implantation in patients with a cement spacer already in place is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of culturing articular fluid obtained by joint aspiration prior to re-implantation in patients who underwent a two stage septic revision. Method. A retrospective observational study was conducted, assessing51 patients that underwent a two stage septic hip or knee revision from 2010 to 2017. According to the results of intraoperative cultures, after the first stage revision each patient was treated with an antibiotic protocol for 6–8 weeks. Following two weeks without antibiotics, a culture of synovial fluid was obtained. Synovial fluid was obtained by direct joint aspiration in cases of knee spacers by and by joint aspiration guided by fluoroscopy in the theatre room in cases of hip spacers. Synovial fluid was transferred into a Vacutainer ACD. ®. flask. Samples were processed and analysed in the microbiology laboratory. Gram stains were performed and the sample was subsequently transferred into a BacALERT bottle (bioMérieux, France) and incubated in a BacALERT instrument for seven days. Results of these cultures were recorded and compared with cultures obtained during re-implantation surgery. Results. Of the 51 patients analysed, 9 were excluded because joint aspiration was not performed or the samples were not correctly processed. The remaining 42 patients (21 hip and 21 knee spacers) were included in the final analysis. In 40 cases, the culture of synovial fluid was negative while in the remaining two cases (hip spacers) no analysis was possible due to dry aspiration. In 5 of the patients, two or more intraoperative synovial fluid cultures taken during the re-implantation surgery were positive. Conclusions. Although in theory, synovial fluid culture may provide useful information regarding the infection status of the joint, in our study, we found no evidence to support mandatory joint aspiration prior to re-implantation in patients with a cement spacer in place

Reconstruction of massive acetabular bone defects in primary and revision THA is challenging for reconstructive joint surgeons. The use of porous metal augments is one of the options. The advantages of porous metal augments are easy to use, modularity and lack of resorption. We investigated the radiological results of porous metal augments used for massive acetabular bone defects in primary and revision THA. Forty-one hips in forty patients had porous metal augments between 2011 and 2016. Thirty of the procedures were revision arthroplasties and 11 were primary procedures (Crowe type III in 5 hips, Crowe type IV in 3, septic hip sequalae in 2 and RA in one). Four of the revisions were second-stage reimplantation after infection. The Paprosky classification for revision was 2B in 4 hips, 2C in one, 3A in 3 and 3B in 22. Regenerex augments were used in 39 hips and trabecular metal augments were used in 2. Thirty-six cups were cemented and 5 cups were uncemented. Mean follow-up was 37.6 months (range, 1–82). Radiographic findings of osteointegration between host bone and the porous metal augments were assessed. The presence or absence of radiolucent lines between cement or cup/host bone and augment/host bone interface was noted. Two revisions were performed due to infection, one month and 66 months after operation. The other implants were stable without any complications. Osteointegration between host bone and the porous metal augments were recognized in 36 hips. Radiolucent lines between cement/host bone interface, less than 1 mm in width, were visualized in 2 hips. Porous metal augments are convenient and our short-term results showed excellent radiological results for massive acetabular bone defects in primary and revision THA

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of positive cultures during the second stage of a two-stage revision arthroplasty and to analyse the association between positive cultures and an infection-free outcome.

In patients with primary hip replacement for previous infective arthritis the risk of recurrence of infection is of major concern. In addition, the safe time interval post infective arthritis for primary hip replacement is not known. Clinical & radiological results of consecutive series of 80 primary hip replacements performed for septic / tuberculous arthritis at Wrightington hospital from 1970 to 2008. Data was collected till latest follow up. Re-infection or revision for any reason was considered as primary end point for survivorship. Average age at primary hip replacement was 55.55 years (24 – 75). Mean follow up was 14.47 years (2–41). Twelve patients in septic hip group (n=42) needed revision out of which 6 (14%) were for infection. The survival rate for recent septic arthritis group (<10 years) was 60% at 7.5 years, whereas in old septic arthritis group (>10 years) it was 94.45% at 15.3 years, considering infection as end point. The survival rate was 60% for recent septic arthritis and 78.13% for old septic arthritis group over the same period of time considering revision for any reason as end point. In tuberculous group (n=38), the survival rate was 76.32% at 14.5 years of follow up, considering revision for any reason as end point. Significantly high re-infection rate in patients with recent septic arthritis was noted. No recurrence of infection in patients with old septic arthritis. No reactivation of tuberculosis in tuberculous arthritis group. This is the largest series with longest follow-up on primary total hip replacement for infective arthritis till date. Recent septic arthritis (<10Y) was a statistically high risk factor for recurrence of infection. Old septic arthritis is reasonably safe with 94.45% success rate at 15 years follow up. Old tuberculous arthritis is not a risk factor for hip replacement

Background. The patients with high hip dislocation due to the sequelae of septic hip or neglected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) show severely impaired gait pattern. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for these patients are expected to restore gait pattern by establishing better joint stability and biomechanics. To our knowledge, no study have investigated about objective change in gait parameters after total hip arthroplasty (THA) for these patients. So, we are to prospectively evaluate change in gait patterns after THA. Methods. Between 2012 and 2013, 11 patients with highly dislocated hip underwent unilateral THA with subtrochanteric osteotomy. There was 6 patients with DDH sequelae and 5 patients with septic hip sequelae. Spatio-temporal gait analysis was performed preoperatively and at 12 months after THA. We followed the patient 3, 6, 12 months and then annually postoperatively. The gait patterns were analyzed by several parameters such as cadence, speed, stride length, step length, step time, initial double support (IDS), terminal double support (TDS), stance phase and swing phase by a three-dimensional (3D) high-speed motion-capturing system (eight Eagle® cameras; Motion Analysis, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). Also dynamic range of motion (ROM) of hip joint and ground-reaction forces (GFR) were recorded. Clinical outcome was evaluated by using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Radiographic assessments were evaluated for the changes in leg length discrepancy (LLD). Results. For operated limb, the mean period of TDS significantly increased from 8.6 % to 11.3 % respectively (p=0.038). As IDS, single support and TDS improved, mean period of stance phase increased from 54.4 % to 60.1 % of gait cycle and swing phase was relatively reduced from 45.4% to 39.9% (p=0.005) On the other hand, there were decrease in cadence, speed, step length on the affected limb postoperatively (p>0.05). In force graph, all patients showed significant increase of the peak force postoperatively. The first peak force (Fz1) was improved from 0.76 N (0.60 – 0.98) to 0.95 N (0.79 – 1.16) (p=0.007). The second peak force (Fz2) was improved from 0.70 N (0.44–0.96) to 0.94 N (0.85 – 1.14) (p=0.007). For the dynamic ROM, there were increase in sagittal plane motion and decrease in transverse and coronal plane. All of the changes were significantly not difference than preoperatively. Clinically, mean HHS was improved from 57.2 (range, 43–67) to 79.6 (range, 61–88) at last follow-up (p<0.05). In radiographic assessment, the patients showed 9.8 mm (range, 2.1 – 22.1) residual LLD at last follow-up. Conclusions. In the present study, patients with high hip dislocation who underwent primary THA showed improvement of gait pattern closer to that of normal hip joint. Although the patients showed improvement in gait analysis and clinical outcomes, but do not reach normal hip joint level and showed little residual antalgic gait pattern after THA

A total of 31 patients, (20 women, 11 men; mean age 62.5 years old; 23 to 81), who underwent conversion of a Girdlestone resection-arthroplasty (RA) to a total hip replacement (THR) were compared with 93 patients, (60 women, 33 men; mean age 63.4 years old; 20 to 89), who had revision THR surgery for aseptic loosening in a retrospective matched case-control study. Age, gender and the extent of the pre-operative bone defect were similar in all patients. Mean follow-up was 9.3 years (5 to 18).

Pre-operative function and range of movement were better in the control group (p = 0.01 and 0.003, respectively) and pre-operative leg length discrepancy (LLD) was greater in the RA group (p < 0.001). The post-operative clinical outcome was similar in both groups except for mean post-operative LLD, which was greater in the study group (p = 0.003). There was a significant interaction effect for LLD in the study group (p < 0.001). A two-way analysis of variance showed that clinical outcome depended on patient age (patients older than 70 years old had worse pre-operative pain, p = 0.017) or bone defect (patients with a large acetabular bone defect had higher LLD, p = 0.006, worse post-operative function p = 0.009 and range of movement, p = 0.005), irrespective of the group.

Despite major acetabular and femoral bone defects requiring complex surgical reconstruction techniques, THR after RA shows a clinical outcome similar to those obtained in aseptic revision surgery for hips with similar sized bone defects.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1478–84.

Introduction. Antibiotic loaded polymethyle methacrylate spacers are commonly used in the management of septic hip replacements. Aim. The aim of this study was to determine wear patterns on the articulating surfaces of these spacers, as well as to determine the extent of PMMA particulate debris generation. Method. We took tissue specimens around the acetabulae in 12 cases at the time of the second stage procedure for septic total hip revisions. These were subjected to histological analysis to determine the extent of PMMA particulate debris contamination. We also performed a basic explant retrieval analysis of the articulating surfaces of the PMMA spacers to determine any specific wear patterns. Results. We found numerous PMMA particles in the acetabular soft tissues biopsied. The particle concentration was highest in the area of the acetabular fovea. We could also demonstrate specific wear patterns on the spacers that could be correlated with the generally mismatched articulating couple between the spacer and the bony acetabulum. We could also demonstrate some boney destruction present in the acetabulum with long-term spacer use. Conclusions. We concluded that significant amounts of PMMA particulate debris are generated by these articulating antibiotic spacers. The total volume of this debris may be determined by specific wear patterns on the spacers’ surfaces. We recommend a thorough debridement to decrease the PMMA particle load generated. Consideration in respect of the bearing surface implanted after the explantation of the PMMA spacer should take into account the effect of the debris on the bearing surfaces. We also make recommendations in respect of the design of these PMMA spacers

We compared the accuracy of the growth remaining method of assessing leg-length discrepancy (LLD) with the straight-line graph method, the multiplier method and their variants. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 44 patients treated by percutaneous epiphysiodesis for LLD. All were followed up until maturity. We used the modified Green–Anderson growth-remaining method (Method 1) to plan the timing of epiphysiodesis. Then we presumed that the other four methods described below were used pre-operatively for calculating the timing of epiphysiodesis. We then assumed that these four methods were used pre-operatively. Method 2 was the original Green–Anderson growth-remaining method; Method 3, Paley’s multiplier method using bone age; Method 4, Paley’s multiplier method using chronological age; and Method 5, Moseley’s straight-line graph method. We compared ‘Expected LLD at maturity with surgery’ with ‘Final LLD at maturity with surgery’ for each method. Statistical analysis revealed that ‘Expected LLD at maturity with surgery’ was significantly different from ‘Final LLD at maturity with surgery’. Method 2 was the most accurate. There was a significant correlation between ‘Expected LLD at maturity with surgery’ and ‘Final LLD at maturity with surgery’, the greatest correlation being with Method 2. Generally all the methods generated an overcorrected value. No method generates the precise ‘Expected LLD at maturity with surgery’. It is essential that an analysis of the pattern of growth is taken into account when predicting final LLD. As many additional data as possible are required.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:993–1000.

In this retrospective study we evaluated the proficiency of shelf autograft in the restoration of bone stock as part of primary total hip replacement (THR) for hip dysplasia, and in the results of revision arthroplasty after failure of the primary arthroplasty. Of 146 dysplastic hips treated by THR and a shelf graft, 43 were revised at an average of 156 months, 34 of which were suitable for this study (seven hips were excluded because of insufficient bone-stock data and two hips were excluded because allograft was used in the primary THR). The acetabular bone stock of the hips was assessed during revision surgery. The mean implant–bone contact was 58% (50% to 70%) at primary THR and 78% (40% to 100%) at the time of the revision, which was a significant improvement (p < 0.001). At primary THR all hips had had a segmental acetabular defect > 30%, whereas only five (15%) had significant segmental bone defects requiring structural support at the time of revision. In 15 hips (44%) no bone graft or metal augments were used during revision.

A total of 30 hips were eligible for the survival study. At a mean follow-up of 103 months (27 to 228), two aseptic and two septic failures had occurred. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the revision procedures demonstrated a ten-year survival rate of 93.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78 to 107) with clinical or radiological failure as the endpoint. The mean Oxford hip score was 38.7 (26 to 46) for non-revised cases at final follow-up.

Our results indicate that the use of shelf autografts during THR for dysplastic hips restores bone stock, contributing to the favourable survival of the revision arthroplasty should the primary procedure fail.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:777–81.

Purpose. We analyzed a consecutive series of 36 total hip arthroplasties using cementless conical stem with a shortening osteotomy combined with greater trochanter transfer in cases with a high dislocated hip. Material and Methods. The causes of total hip arthroplasty were the sequelae of a septic hip in 20 cases and developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in 16 cases. Mean patient age was 43.4 and the mean follow-up period was 3.3 years. We compared perioperative parameters, clinical, radiological results and complications between the two groups. Results. Mean Harris hip score improved from 42.4 to 84.2 in septic hip group and from 46.3 to 85.0 in DDH group. The mean leg lengthening and time to greater trochanter union was 36.5 mm, 3.7 months in septic hip group and 38.6 mm, 3.5 months in DDH group. Conclusions. Total hip arthroplasty using subtrochanteric osteotomy produced satisfactory clinical and radiological results and there is no significant difference between the two groups

Two-stage revision arthroplasty is the gold standard for treatment of infection after total hip Arthroplasty and end stage septic arthritis of the hip. In the first stage we used a modified technique to insert an inexpensive modular femoral component coated with antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate articulating with a polyethylene liner. The construct was used in 8 patients with infected arthroplasty, and 6 patients with septic arthritis of the hip. Two patients were excluded (no second stage). Of the remaining 12 patients, only one patient had persistent infection after the first stage; 11 patients received a successful re-implantation at the second-stage. The technique provide a construct that can be used safely and successfully in the awaiting period between the two stages of revision arthroplasty.

Introduction. Septic arthritis of the hip in the newborn baby can result in severe long term sequelae in the form of dislocation of the hip, loss of movement and growth disturbance with leg length discrepancy. Reconstructive procedures for this difficult problem have not been satisfactory. Patient and methods. This series comprises eight patients with septic hip sequelae . All of them had old septic hip and leg length discrepancy ranging from 4 cm to 15 cm. all underwent hip stabilization by pelvic support osteotomy and simultaneous limb lengthening and angular deformities correction using the Ilizarov frame. The age at the operation range from 8 years to 19 years, with an average follow up 4 years. Results. The average of limb lengthening gained was 9cm. All hips remain stable and loss of the range of hip and knee motion was not significant. Other complications include pin tract infection one delayed consolidation of callus and one fracture of callus. Conclusion. The Ilizarov hip reconstruction is a good option for the treatment of the late sequelae of infantile hip infection in adolescents. It should be considered a promising choice for the management of late sequelae of infantile hip infection