Aims. This study investigated vancomycin-microbubbles (Vm-MBs) and meropenem (Mp)-MBs with ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) to disrupt biofilms and improve bactericidal efficiency, providing a new and promising strategy for the treatment of device-related infections (DRIs). Methods. A film hydration method was used to prepare Vm-MBs and Mp-MBs and examine their characterization. Biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Escherichia coli were treated with different groups. Biofilm biomass differences were determined by staining. Thickness and bacterial viability were observed with confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Colony counts were determined by plate-counting. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observed bacterial morphology. Results. The Vm-MBs and Mp-MBs met the experimental requirements. The biofilm biomass in the Vm, Vm-MBs, UTMD, and Vm-MBs + UTMD groups was significantly lower than in the control group. MRSA and E. coli biofilms were most notably damaged in the Vm-MBs + UTMD group and Mp-MBs + UTMD group, respectively, with mean 21.55% (SD 0.08) and 19.73% (SD 1.25) remaining in the biofilm biomass. Vm-MBs + UTMD significantly reduced biofilm thickness and bacterial viability (p = 0.005 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Mp-MBs + UTMD could significantly decrease biofilm thickness and bacterial viability (allp < 0.001). Plate-counting method showed that the numbers of MRSA and E. coli bacterial colonies were significantly lower in the Vm-MBs + UTMD group and the Mp, Mp-MBs, UTMD, Mp-MBs + UTMD groups compared to the control group (p = 0.031). SEM showed that the morphology and structure of MRSA and E. coli were significantly damaged in the Vm-MBs + UTMD and Mp-MBs + UTMD groups. Conclusion. Vm-MBs or Mp-MBs combined with UTMD can effectively disrupt biofilms and protectively release antibiotics under ultrasound mediation, significantly reducing bacterial viability and improving the bactericidal effect of antibiotics. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(9):441–451

The August 2024 Foot & Ankle Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: ESWT versus surgery for fifth metatarsal stress fractures; Minimally invasive surgery versus open fusion for hallux rigidus; Diabetes and infection risk in total ankle arthroplasty; Is proximal medial gastrocnemius recession useful for managing chronic plantar fasciitis?; Fuse the great toe in the young!; Conservative surgery for diabetic foot osteomyelitis; Mental health and outcome following foot and ankle surgery.

Aims

Although low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) combined with disinfectants has been shown to effectively eliminate portions of biofilm in vitro, its efficacy in vivo remains uncertain. Our objective was to assess the antibiofilm potential and safety of LIPUS combined with 0.35% povidone-iodine (PI) in a rat debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) model of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Orthopedic Device-Related Infections (ODRIs) are a major medical challenge, particularly due to the involvement of biofilm-encased and multidrug-resistant bacteria. Current treatments, based on antibiotic administration, have proven to be ineffective. Consequently, there is a need for antibiotic-free alternatives. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are a promising solution due to their broad-spectrum of activity, high efficacy at very low concentrations, and low propensity to induce resistance. We aim to develop a new AMP-based chitosan nanogel to be injected during orthopedic device implantation to prevent ODRIs. Chitosan was functionalized with norbornenes (NorChit) through the reaction with carbic anhydride and then, a cysteine-modified AMP, Dhvar5, a peptide with potent antibacterial activity, even against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was covalently conjugated to NorChit (NorChit- Dhvar5), through a thiol-norbornene photoclick chemistry (UV= 365 nm). For NorChit-Dhvar5 nanogels production, the NorChit-Dhvar5 solution (0.15% w/v) and Milli-Q water were injected separately into microfluidic system. The nanogels were characterized regarding size, concentration, and shape, using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) and Dynamic light scattering (DLS). The nanogels antibacterial properties were assessed in Phosphate Buffer (PBS) for 6 h, against four relevant microorganisms (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. aureus and MRSA, and in Muller- Hinton Broth (MHB), 50% (v/v) in PBS, supplemented with human plasma (1% (v/v)), for 6 and 24 h against MRSA. The obtained NorChit-Dhvar5 nanogels, presented a round-shaped and ∼100 nm. NorChit- Dhvar5 nanogels in a concentration of 10. 10. nanogels/mL in PBS were capable of reducing the initial inoculum of P. aeruginosa by 99%, S. aureus by 99%, and MRSA by 90%. These results were corroborated by a 99% MRSA reduction, after 24 h in medium. Furthermore, NorChit-Dhvar5 nanogels do not demonstrate signs of cytotoxicity against MC3T3-E1 cells (a pre-osteoblast cell line) after 14 days, having high potential to prevent antibiotic-resistant infection in the context of ODRIs

Aim. Bacteriophages are remerging as alternative and adjunctive therapy for fracture-related infection (FRI). However, current administration protocols involve prolonged retention of a percutaneous draining tube with potential risk of developing superinfection. In this study, we applied a cocktail of in vitro evolved biofilm-targeting phages for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a hydrogel platform co-delivering vancomycin. In vitro synergy and antibiofilm activity was assessed and a subsequent in vivo study was performed in a mouse FRI model with MRSA. Method. Two evolved bacteriophages (MRSA-R14 and COL-R23) with improved antibiofilm activity against a clinical isolate (MRSA3) were tested in combination with vancomycin and a carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) hydrogel in vitro and in vivo. MRSA3 bacterial biofilms were formed on sterile 4 mm sintered porous glass beads at 37 °C for 24 h. Biofilms were exposed to i-phage cocktail (10. 7. PFU/ml), ii-vancomycin at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 10 and 100 times the MIC, or iii-combination of phage cocktail and vancomycin. Recovered biofilm cells, were quantified by colony counting. The stability and release profiles of phage cocktail and vancomycin in co-delivery hydrogel were assessed in vitro for 8 days and 72 hrs, respectively, and subsequently tested in the treatment of 5-day-old MRSA3 infection of a femoral plate osteotomy in mice. Results. In vitro: The cocktail of evolved phages (10. 7. PFU/ml, 1:1) combined with 0.5 MIC vancomycin achieved 99.72% reduction in MRSA3 biofilm in vitro compared to the growth control. This combination was stable in the co-delivery hydrogel over 8 days. The release profile showed that 57% of phages and 80% of vancomycin were released after 72hrs, which was identical to the performance for gels loaded with phage or antibiotic alone. In the in vivo study, the bacterial load from animals that received co-delivery hydrogel and systemic vancomycin was significantly reduced compared to controls, animals that received systemic vancomycin and animals that received co-delivery hydrogel alone (p<0.05). Conclusions. Our study demonstrates the potential of using evolved phages in combination with vancomycin and hydrogel delivery systems for the treatment of MRSA-related infections. Further research in this area may lead to the development of specific therapies for biofilm-related infection

Aim. Antibiotics have limited activity in the treatment of multidrug-resistant or chronic biofilm-associated infections, in particular when implants cannot be removed. Lytic bacteriophages can rapidly and selectively kill bacteria, and can be combined with antibiotics. However, clinical experience in patients with surgical infections is limited. We investigated the outcome and safety of local application of bacteriophages in addition to antimicrobial therapy. Method. 8 patients (2 female and 6 male) with complex orthopedic and cardiovascular infections were included, in whom standard treatment was not feasible or impossible. The treatment was performed in agreement with the Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki. Commercial or individually prepared bacteriophages were provided by ELIAVA Institute in Tbilisi, Georgia. Bacteriophages were applied during surgery and continued through drains placed during surgery three times per day for the following 5–14 days. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 28 months. Results. Median age was 57 years, range 33–75 years. Two patients were diagnosed with a persistent knee arthrodesis infection, one chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), one cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection and four patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) infection. The isolated pathogens were multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=3), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (n=4), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (n=1) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) (n=1). 4 infections were polymicrobial. 5 patients underwent surgical debridement with retention of the implant, 1 patient with PJI underwent the exchange of the prosthesis and one patient with LVAD infection was treated conservatively. All patients received intravenous and oral antibiotic therapy and local application of bacteriophages. At follow-up of 12 month, 5 patients were without signs or symptoms of infection, whereas in one patient with LVAD infection, a relapse was observed with emergence of phage-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this patient, no surgical revision was performed. Conclusions. Bacteriophage therapy may represent a valid additional approach, when standard antimicrobial and surgical treatment is not possible or feasible, including in difficult-to-treat infections. In our case series, 5 of 6 patients were infection free after 1 year. Further studies need to address the optimal bacteriophage administration route, concentration, duration of treatment and combination with antimicrobials

Aims

Achievement of accurate microbiological diagnosis prior to revision is key to reducing the high rates of persistent infection after revision knee surgery. The effect of change in the microorganism between the first- and second-stage revision of total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) on the success of management is not clear.

The August 2023 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty; Antibiotic length in revision total hip arthroplasty; Preoperative colonization and worse outcomes; Short stem cemented total hip arthroplasty; What are the outcomes of one- versus two-stage revisions in the UK?; To cement or not to cement? The best approach in hemiarthroplasty; Similar re-revisions in cemented and cementless femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty; Are hip precautions still needed?

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the consensus best practice approach for the investigation and management of children (aged 0 to 15 years) in the UK with musculoskeletal infection (including septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, pyomyositis, tenosynovitis, fasciitis, and discitis). This consensus can then be used to ensure consistent, safe care for children in UK hospitals and those elsewhere with similar healthcare systems.

The June 2023 Research Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee; Predicted waiting times for orthopaedic surgery: an urgent need to address the deficit in capacity; Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for reducing the swelling of upper and lower limb joint fractures; Desperate patients will accept higher risks; How long does it take to find a positive culture in periprosthetic joint infection?

Local antimicrobial therapy is an integral aspect of treating orthopaedic device related infection (ODRI), which is conventionally administered via polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. PMMA, however, is limited by a suboptimal antibiotic release profile and a lack of biodegradability. In this study, we compare the efficacy of PMMA versus an antibioticloaded hydrogel in a single- stage revision for chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ODRI in. sheep. Antibiofilm activity of the antibiotic combination (gentamicin and vancomycin) was determined in vitro. Swiss alpine sheep underwent a single-stage revision of a tibial intramedullary nail with MRSA infection. Local gentamicin and vancomycin therapy was delivered via hydrogel or PMMA (n = 5 per group), in conjunction with systemic antibiotic therapy. In vivo observations included: local antibiotic tissue concentration, renal and liver function tests, and quantitative microbiology on tissues and hardware post-mortem. There was a nonsignificant reduction in biofilm with an increasing antibiotic concentration in vitro (p = 0.12), confirming the antibiotic tolerance of the MRSA biofilm. In the in vivo study, four out of five sheep from each treatment group were culture negative. Antibiotic delivery via hydrogel resulted in 10–100 times greater local concentrations for the first 2–3 days compared with PMMA and were comparable thereafter. Systemic concentrations of gentamicin were minimal or undetectable in both groups, while renal and liver function tests were within normal limits. This study shows that a single-stage revision with hydrogel or PMMA is equally effective, although the hydrogel offers certain practical benefits over PMMA, which make it an attractive proposition for clinical use

Aim. The rise of multidrug-resistant bacteria and the decreasing efficacy of antibiotic therapy in successfully treating biofilm-associated infections are prompting the exploration of alternative treatment options. This study investigates the efficacy of different bioactive glass (BAG) formulations - alone or combined with vancomycin - to eradicate biofilm. Further, we study the influence of BAG on pH and osmotic pressure as important factors limiting bacterial growth. Method. Different BAG-S53P4 formulations were used for this study, including (a) BAG-powder (<45 μm), (b) BAG-granules (500–800 μm), (c) a cone-shaped BAG-scaffold and (d) two kinds of BAG-putty containing granules, with no powder (putty-A) or with additional powder (putty-B), and a synthetic binder. Inert glass beads were included as control. All formulations were tested in a concentration of 1750 g/ml in Müller-Hinton-Broth. Targeted bacteria included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and epidermidis (MRSE). Vancomycin was tested at the minimum-inhibitory-concentration for each strain (1 µg/ml for MRSA; 2 μg/ml for MRSE). To investigate the antibiofilm effect of BAG alone or combined with vancomycin, 3 hour-old MRSA or MRSE biofilms were formed on porous glass beads and exposed to BAG ± vancomycin for 24h, 72h and 168h. After co-incubation, biofilm-beads were deep-washed in phosphate-buffered saline and placed in glass vials containing fresh medium. Recovering biofilm bacteria were detected by measuring growth-related heat production at 37°C for 24h by isothermal microcalorimetry. Changes in pH and osmotic pressure over time were assessed after co-incubation of each BAG formulation in Müller-Hinton-Broth for 0h, 24h, 72h and 168h. Results. All BAG formulations showed antibiofilm activity against MRSA and MRSE in a time-dependent manner, where longer incubation times revealed higher antibiofilm activity. BAG-powder and BAG-putty-B were the most effective formulations suppressing biofilm, followed by BAG-granules, BAG-scaffold and finally BAG-putty-A. The addition of vancomycin had no substantial impact on biofilm suppression. An increase in pH and osmotic pressure over time could be observed for all BAG formulations. BAG-powder reached the highest pH value of 12.5, whereas BAG-putty-A resulted in the lowest pH of 9. Both BAG-putty formulations displayed the greatest increase on osmotic pressure. Conclusions. BAG-S53P4 has demonstrated efficient biofilm suppression against MRSA and MRSE, especially in powder-containing formulations. Our data indicates no additional antibiofilm improvement with addition of vancomycin. Moreover, high pH appears to have a larger antimicrobial impact than high osmolarity. Acknowledgements. This work was supported by PRO-IMPLANT Foundation (Berlin, Germany). The tested materials were provided by Bonalive Biomaterials Ltd (Turku, Finland)

Aims. Treatment outcomes for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) using systemic vancomycin and antibacterial cement spacers during two-stage revision arthroplasty remain unsatisfactory. This study explored the efficacy and safety of intra-articular vancomycin injections for PJI control after debridement and cement spacer implantation in a rat model. Methods. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA), MRSA inoculation, debridement, and vancomycin-spacer implantation were performed successively in rats to mimic first-stage PJI during the two-stage revision arthroplasty procedure. Vancomycin was administered intraperitoneally or intra-articularly for two weeks to control the infection after debridement and spacer implantation. Results. Rats receiving intra-articular vancomycin showed the best outcomes among the four treatment groups, with negative bacterial cultures, increased weight gain, increased capacity for weightbearing activities, increased residual bone volume preservation, and reduced inflammatory reactions in the joint tissues, indicating MRSA eradication in the knee. The vancomycin-spacer and/or systemic vancomycin failed to eliminate the MRSA infections following a two-week antibiotic course. Serum vancomycin levels did not reach nephrotoxic levels in any group. Mild renal histopathological changes, without changes in serum creatinine levels, were observed in the intraperitoneal vancomycin group compared with the intra-articular vancomycin group, but no changes in hepatic structure or serum alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase levels were observed. No local complications were observed, such as sinus tract or non-healing surgical incisions. Conclusion. Intra-articular vancomycin injection was effective and safe for PJI control following debridement and spacer implantation in a rat model during two-stage revision arthroplasties, with better outcomes than systemic vancomycin administration. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(6):371–385

Aims

Two-stage exchange revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed in case of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been considered for many years as being the gold standard for the treatment of chronic infection. However, over the past decade, there have been concerns about its safety and its effectiveness. The purposes of our study were to investigate our practice, collecting the overall spacer complications, and then to analyze their risk factors.

Aims. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are rare, but represent a great burden for the patient. In addition, the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasing. The aim of this rat experiment was therefore to compare the antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of PJIs caused by MRSA. Methods. For this purpose, sterilized steel implants were implanted into the femur of 77 rats. The metal devices were inoculated with suspensions of two different MRSA strains. The animals were divided into groups and treated with vancomycin, linezolid, cotrimoxazole, or rifampin as monotherapy, or with combination of antibiotics over a period of 14 days. After a two-day antibiotic-free interval, the implant was explanted, and bone, muscle, and periarticular tissue were microbiologically analyzed. Results. Vancomycin and linezolid were able to significantly (p < 0.05) reduce the MRSA bacterial count at implants. No significant effect was found at the bone. Rifampin was the only monotherapy that significantly reduced the bacterial count on implant and bone. The combination with vancomycin or linezolid showed significant efficacy. Treatment with cotrimoxazole alone did not achieve a significant bacterial count reduction. The combination of linezolid plus rifampin was significantly more effective on implant and bone than the control group in both trials. Conclusion. Although rifampicin is effective as a monotherapy, it should not be used because of the high rate of resistance development. Our animal experiments showed the great importance of combination antibiotic therapies. In the future, investigations with higher case numbers, varied bacterial concentrations, and changes in individual drug dosages will be necessary to be able to draw an exact comparison, possibly within a clinical trial. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(3):143–151

Aims

Despite recent literature questioning their use, vancomycin and clindamycin often substitute cefazolin as the preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially in the setting of documented allergy to penicillin. Topical povidone-iodine lavage and vancomycin powder (VIP) are adjuncts that may further broaden antimicrobial coverage, and have shown some promise in recent investigations. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to compare the risk of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary TKA patients who received cefazolin and VIP to those who received a non-cephalosporin alternative and VIP.

Aims

To explore the effect of different durations of antibiotics after stage II reimplantation on the prognosis of two-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Aims

Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited.

Aims

One-stage revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has several advantages; however, resection of the proximal femur might be necessary to achieve higher success rates. We investigated the risk factors for resection and re-revisions, and assessed complications and subsequent re-revisions.