Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of disorders that affect movement and posture caused by injury to the developing brain. While prematurity and low birth weight are common causes in developed countries, birth asphyxia, kernicterus, and infections have been identified as predominant aetiologies in Africa. There is, however, very little information on the aetiology of CP in South Africa. The purpose of this study was to determine the aetiology, severity, and topographical distribution of CP in children undergoing orthopaedic surgery at our tertiary paediatric unit. A retrospective folder review was performed for patients with CP that underwent orthopaedic surgery from July 2018 to June 2022. Data was collected on perinatal circumstances, aetiology or risk factors for developing CP, severity of disability as classified by the Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS) and topographical distribution. Descriptive analysis was performed. Two-hundred-and-thirty-four patients were included in the analysis. No specific aetiology could be identified in 51 (21.9%) patients. Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) accounted for 23.6% of patients and was the most common aetiology across the different categories except for patients graded as GMFCS 2, in whom prematurity was the most common aetiology. Congenital brain malformations (10.5%) and cerebral infections, including HIV encephalopathy (11.4%) were the next most frequent aetiologies, followed by prematurity (7.6%), ischaemic stroke (6.8%) and intraventricular haemorrhage (6.3%). Fifty-two percent of patients were classified as GMFCS 4 or 5. There was a predominance of quadriplegic patients (37%) compared to hemiplegics (29%), diplegics (30%) and monoplegics (4%). Most patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery for musculoskeletal sequelae of CP were severely disabled quadriplegic patients in whom HIE was the predominant cause of CP. This emphasises the need for intervention at a primary care level to decrease the incidence of this frequently preventable condition.
Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures encountered in the clinical setting, with a reported incidence of 17%. Of these common fractures, it has been said 60% are intra-articular in nature. Intra-articular or unstable and comminuted fractures represent severe, high energy injuries. There is a considerable amount of controversy as to which fixation method is superior. Even the OA concludes; “comparing external fixation (EF) with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures described no consistent benefit of one treatment over another”. There are only a few randomised control trials that go beyond one year to cover the long-term follow up (over two years). There has yet to be a meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus external fixation. We aim to show from this meta-analysis if there is any significant difference in the outcomes of either fixation method in the long-term. We pooled the data of all available randomised control trials that compare the long-term outcomes of ORIF against external fixation of distal radius fractures. We completed a systematic review of PubMed, embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library, from inception to December 2014. We then preformed our meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software.Background
Method
The elbow is the second most common site of non prosthetic joint dislocation. Simple elbow dislocation alone contributes to 11-28% of all elbow injuries. Post-reduction treatment methods include traditional plaster of Paris (POP) immobilisation followed by physiotherapy, sling application followed by early mobilisation and rapid motion. The aim of the study was to evaluate the final outcome and cost-effectiveness of the pop and the sling groups. Retrospective cohort studyIntroduction
Study Design
The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and outcome of bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction. In patients presenting with an ACL-deficient knee, 2 – 4% have bilateral ACL deficiency. A staged or simultaneous approach can be adopted when the patient requires reconstructive surgery for both knees. We report a case series of 8 patients (6 male, 2 female, average age 30.4 years) who underwent bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction. Simultaneous or bilateral ACL reconstruction using ipsilateral patella tendon graft has been reported as a safe procedure with outcome and complication rate no different to unilateral procedures. Considerable cost savings of simultaneous over staged procedures have also been described. There are no case series in the published literature that describe the use of hamstring tendon autograft for bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction. We used two camera stack systems and instrument sets to allow for simultaneous bilateral surgery by two surgical teams. Quadrupled hamstring tendon graft was used in 4 patients although in one patient patella tendon graft was used on the second side due to poor quality of hamstring tendons. Patella tendon graft was also used in a further 4 patients. At two weeks all patients were able to discard crutches and were independent in mobility. There was no difference in outcome at one year between those patients undergoing bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction in comparison to the outcomes of unilateral ACL reconstruction with respect to Lysholm, Tegner and IKDC scores. The mean follow up period was 2.3 years. Our results demonstrate that bilateral simultaneous ACL reconstruction is safe and cost effective. A simultaneous approach also has the benefit of reducing the overall period of rehabilitation required by the patient. We report good short-term functional outcome but no long-term data is yet available.
Between 1994 and 2006, 58 patients underwent decompression of radial tunnel. The senior author using an anterior approach performed all procedures. 43 patients were available for follow-up evaluation at an average of 47.3 months (12–156 months). The average age of patients was 49.7 years (35 – 72 years) and the mean duration of their symptoms was 18 months (6 – 56 months). There were 12 patients (13 extremities) over 5 years follow-up. All had a trial of conservative treatment with steroid injections, physiotherapy and ultrasound therapy. All except 2 had nerve conduction studies which were inconclusive. The results were evaluated using Mayo elbow scores and DASH scores. Mayo scores improved from a mean of 62.37 pre-op to 87.13 post-op (p<
0.05) and DASH scores improved from 67.58 pre-op to 40.12 post-op (p<
0.04). 35 patients (81.3%) were satisfied with the surgery while 8 patients were not (4 patients had other pathologies). There were few complications – neuropathic pain-1, neuropraxia – 1 and residual pain – 2. Six patients who had simultaneous release of lateral epicondylar muscles and radial tunnel did extremely well and were satisfied. Hence there is a role for simultaneous decompression of tennis elbow and radial tunnel as recent studies suggest that extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon forms a continuous fascial sheath from lateral epicondyle to radial tunnel structures blending with supinator muscle. Based on our results, surgical decompression of radial tunnel gives good results in majority of patients with persistent radial tunnel symptoms with long-term relief.
Between 1994 and 2006, 83 patients (84 elbows) underwent the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi (OK) procedure by the senior author. Of these, 30 patients with over 5 years follow-up where available for review. There were 24 males and 6 females mean age 59.8 (range 34 – 81). 27 patients had primary osteoarthritis and the rest developed post-traumatic arthritis. Mean duration of symptoms was 25.5 (range 12 – 72) months. 30 patients had more than 5-year follow-up with a mean of 96 months (range 60–150) months. Their mean pre-operative flexion improved from 115° (range 90° – 150°) to 134° (range 100° – 160°) post-operatively (p<
0.001) and mean pre-operative extension deficit improved from 28° (range 10° – 50°) to 13° (range 5° – 30°) post-operatively (p<
0.001). The mean MEPS improved from 52 (range 25 – 70) pre-operatively to 84 (range 55 – 100) post-operatively (p<
0.038). The mean pre-operative DASH score improved from 63 (range 37 – 92) to 41 (range 24 – 75) postoperatively (p<
0.001). The mean pre-operative DEORS improved from 6.3 to 4.9 post-operatively (p<
0.001). Majority of the patients [22 patients (73.3%)] returned to their previous work including all 5 professional sportsmen. There were few complications -2 superficial wound infections, and numbness along ulnar nerve distribution in 1 patient. Of the 17 patients who had recurrence after 5 years, 4 patients had to undergo revision surgery (3 improved). 23 patients (76.6%) were satisfied with the results of the surgery. Conclusions: The OK procedure gives excellent to good results in 70.9% of patients at a mean of 9 years. Both flexion and extension improved significantly with very few complications with this open surgical technique. Although 17 out of 30 patients had recurrence on X ray beyond 5 years, only 4 required revision procedures.
To date there has been only one published series of elbow arthroplasty in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic arthritis. These patients pose particular problems because of the size and variable shape of the humerus and ulna together with the soft tissue contractures and bony erosion which can sometimes be severe. We have reviewed the results of elbow arthroplasty using the unlinked Kudo 5 and the linked Coonrad-Morrey implants which in our practice have different indications dependent upon bone stock and stability.
The Copeland Shoulder Arthroplasty is a cementless, pegged humeral head surface replacement. The design is based on the principle of minimal bone resection and has been in clinical use since 1986. The only published series to date, that of Levy and Copeland, reported results for 103 patients which were comparable to those obtained with stemmed implants. We report the outcome at our institution using the same prosthesis with a hydroxyapatite coating. 81 shoulders (74 patients) underwent resurfacing hemiarthroplasty through an anterior deltopectoral approach. Preoperative diagnoses were: osteoarthritis (39), rheumatoid arthritis (29), rotator cuff arthropathy (1), post-traumatic arthrosis (2). They were followed for an average 28 months. 10 were lost to follow-up (8 deaths). Constant scores improved from a mean preoperative figure of 15.7 to 54.0 (p<
0.01) at last follow-up. For rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis the scores improved from 15.2 to 50.4 (p<
0.01) and 16.0 to 55.4 (p,<
0.01) respectively. There was a 13% complication rate with one case requiring revision for loosening to a stemmed implant. Most were cases requiring subsequent acromioplasty. In one case the glenoid rim was fractured during head dislocation. There was a low rate of perioprosthetic radiolucency (4.2%) which may relate to the hydroxyappatite coating within the shell of the prosthesis. Ipsilateral stemmed elbow replacement was performed in some cases without a double stress riser effect. Periprosthetic humeral neck fracture as managed non-operatively with uneventful union.
16 patients had died and 8 patients were lost to follow up. 62 elbow replacements in 46 patients were evaluated at a mean follow up of 79 months [29–137 months] using the Mayo Clinic Performance Index. Postoperative radiographs were also reviewed for loosening using standard anteroposterior and lateral films.
A 5 year review into the workload and subsequent financial implications of pelvic and acetabular reconstruction at a regional tertiary referral centre. To ascertain the level and means of financial recompense for performing pelvic/acetabular reconstruction on patients from other healthcare trusts at a tertiary referral centre. The records of all 120 patients who underwent either pelvic or acetabular reconstruction between 1995–2000 were examined. Epidemiological data and information on all possible costs of their stay was accumulated (itemised finance department figures were used). The individual patient billing system of ECRs (Extra Contractual Referrals) was changed in 1998 and replaced by the OATs system (Out of Area Treatments) whereby an annual lump sum was received based on historic referral patterns. We investigated the financial effects that occurred. 60 out of 120 patients treated, were from other health-care trusts. From 1995–1998, 25 ECR patients were treated at an estimated cost of £480, 000. The trust received £280, 000, a net loss of £200, 000. From 1998–2000, 34 OATS patients were treated at an estimated cost of £650, 000, amounting to a net gain of £1. 15 million pounds. ‘Out of area’ referrals for pelvic and acetabular reconstruction have increased by 50 % in the last 2 years. However the new payment system i. e. OATS has resulted in the tertiary referral centre being generously rewarded, unlike prior to 1998 and the old ECR system. It is therefore recommended that annual review must be carried out to ensure that funding will meet the demand for specialist services in the future and prevent subsidisation of some centres by other trusts.
5A large amount has been written about whiplash injuries of the neck, but many of these patients are often referred to shoulder units for assessment either acutely or years after the accident because of continuing symptoms. Although neck pain is the commonest complaint tenderness on examination is sided and within the trapezius muscle in virtually all cases. Pain referred to the shoulder is also reported in 36 – 67% whilst interscapular pain occurs in 20 – 72%, depending on the time from injury. We have reviewed a personal series of the senior author of over 700 cases. The consistent finding in these patients is tenderness localised to a specific part of the trapezius in the base of the neck, which is sided. Tenderness on the same side is also present along the vertebral border of the scapula to its lower pole in over 90%, provided the scapula is protracted. A further finding in some patients is a high arc of pain on abducting the arm, thus simulating an acromioclavicular joint problem, but in these cases the pain is localised to the trapezius. These findings are in addition to those of the neck, which may show some restricted movement due to pain. The trapezius tenderness can be abolished by the injection of local anaesthetic into the trigger spot at the base of the neck (whiplash injection test), which also resolves most of the above signs and allows further assessment of the shoulder without the referred pain from the injected area.
The purpose of this study was to look at the results of using the Copeland surface replacement in the treatment of arthritis of the shoulder. We report the results of 61 Type 3 Copeland surface replacements in 57 patients. Operations were performed in 33 cases of Rheumatoid Arthritis, 27 cases of Osteoarthritis and 1 case of posttraumatic arthritis. Hemiar-throplasty was performed via a Deltopectoral approach by the senior author in all cases. There were 38 females and 19 males with a minimum follow up of 1 year and a mean follow up of 26 months (range 12–65). Patients were scored pre and post operatively using the Constant score. Average pre-op score was 15.6 and post-operatively was 52.5. There was one case of loosening ( ? secondary to infection) requiring revision to a stemmed implant. Two patients required Sub-Acromial decompression for postoperative impingement. All patients considered their shoulder improved following this procedure. There was no evidence of radiolucency in any postoperative radiograph. Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty in our series show similar results to previously reported series of stemmed implants and to the published results available for this implant.
In the last six months 6 cases of subacute epiphyseal osteomyelitis have presented to the Paediatric Orthopaedic Department at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff. We present a clinical review of these cases illustrating the salient points in their varied presentation and management, together with the results of a retrospective analysis of the incidence of this rare condition. We ask “is there an increasing incidence of this rare condition or have we become increasingly aware of this potential diagnosis in children?”