Musculoskeletal infection is a devastating complication in both trauma and elective orthopaedic surgeries that can result in significant morbidity. Aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and complications of local antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic calcium sulphate beads (Stimulan Rapid Cure) in the hands of different surgeons from multiple centres in surgically managed bone and joint infections. Between January 2019 and December 2022, 106 patients with bone and joint infections were treated by five surgeons in five hospitals. Surgical debridement and calcium sulphate bead insertion was performed for local elution of antibiotics in high concentration. In all, 100 patients were available for follow-up at regular intervals. Choice of antibiotic was tailor made for each patient in consultation with microbiologist based on the organism grown on culture and the sensitivity. In majority of our cases, we used a combination of vancomycin and culture sensitive heat stable antibiotic after a thorough debridement of the site. Primary wound closure was achieved in 99 patients and a split skin graft closure was done in one patient. Mean follow-up was 20 months (12 to 30).Aims
Methods
Internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures is evolving as newer implants are being developed. Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) is a recently introduced implant from AO/ASIF designed to compact the cancellous bone and may be particularly useful in unstable and osteoporotic hip fractures. This study is a single and independent centre experience of this implant used in management of acute hip fractures. 68 patients involving 68 PFNA nailing procedures done over a period of 2 years (2007–09) were included in the study. Average follow-up period of patients was 1 year. AO classification for trochanteric fractures was used to classify all the fractures. Radiological parameters including tip-apex distance and neck shaft angle measurement were assessed.Introduction
Methods
The failure and subsequent withdrawal of the ASR device in both its resurfacing and THR form has been well documented. The National Joint Registry report of 2010 quoted figures of 12–13% failure at five years. Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) is a poorly understood condition and patients developing severe metal reactions may go unrecognised for sometime. In 2004 a single surgeons prospective study of the ASR bearing surface was undertaken. We present the ARMD failure rates of the ASR resurfacing and ASR THR systems. The diagnosis of ARMD was made by the senior author and was based on clinical history, examination, ultrasound findings, metal ion analysis of blood and joint fluid, operative findings and histopathological analysis of tissues retrieved at revision. Mean follow up was 52 months (24–81) and 70 patients were beyond 6 years of the procedure at the time of writing. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was carried out firstly with joints designated “failure” if the patient had undergone revision surgery or if the patient had been listed. A second survival analysis was carried out with a failure defined as a serum cobalt > 7µg/L. Full explant analysis was carried out for retrieved prostheses.Background
Patients and Methods
Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) is an increasingly recognised complication of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. A previous study described poor results following revision and recommended early intervention1. We determined the outcome of revision for ARMD and present the largest case series to date. Between 2005 and 2010, 98 patients (101 hips) underwent revision for ARMD. The diagnosis of ARMD was based on clinical history, examination, appearance at revision and histology. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Patient satisfaction, Harris hip scores (HHS) and metal ions were analysed.Introduction
Methods
We conducted independent wear analysis of retrieved metal on metal (MoM) hip components from around the world. All patients with resurfaced hips who developed adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) were found to have increased wear of the bearing surfaces. This was untrue in patients with large diameter (?36mm) MoM total hip replacements. This led us to search for other factors leading to ARMD. MoM THR explants retrieved from 78 patients suffering ARMD underwent full volumetric wear analysis of bearing surface and taper-junctions using coordinate measuring machine. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) used to characterise material composition of specific areas.Introduction
Methods
The aim of this study is to review the functional outcome of the patients treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for FBSS. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 39 patients diagnosed with FBSS and treated with PLIF between June 2000 and December 2008 by the senior author in our unit. Pain and function were evaluated by VAS for Back (VAS-BP) & leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires, and were completed pre- & post-operatively. There were 39 patients (20 women & 19 men) and mean age at operation was 47.3 years (range of 32 to 76.1 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 39.14 months (range 5.21 -73.5 months). Thirty-one patients were diagnosed as Post laminectomy syndrome and 8 patients as post-discectomy syndrome. The mean pre and post-operative ODI values were 54.13 and 29.14 respectively. The mean pre-operative VAS back and leg pain scores were 7.38 and 6.51 respectively. The mean post-operative VAS for back and leg pain scores were reduced to 4.05 (Pre-op:7.38) and 3.69 (Mean pre-op 6.51)respectively. The mean preoperative SF-36 bodily pain component score was 27.42 and the mean postoperative score was 40.50. Four patients had uncomplicated dural tears that resolved completely. Two patients had superficial wound infection that resolved with oral antibiotics. PLIF is one of the safe and effective treatment option for FBSS and it has shown good results in our series.
Infection in total knee replacement is a devastating complication. Current literature supports two-stage revision as the gold standard treatment. The alternative single stage procedure has been reported to have favourable results. We assessed the early clinical results of single stage revision for infected total knee replacement. Between February 2005 and August 2007, 12 patients had revision total knee replacement for infection by the senior authors at two centres. In the majority of the patients, the infective organism was isolated by arthroscopic synovial biopsy prior to revision. Standard single stage procedure included the explantation, debridement and re-implantation of the prosthesis. All the patients received intravenous antibiotics for six weeks and oral antibiotics were continued for further 6 weeks. All the patients had the inflammatory markers monitored during follow-up. Significant improvement was noted in the SF-12 PCS, WOMAC pain and stiffness scores at the latest follow-up. None of these patients required re-revision. Radiological evaluation was done using the Knee Society system. None of the knees showed evidence of progressive loosening. Radio-opaque lines were found around the stems and were present on immediate post-operative radiographs; this did not indicate loosening or infection at a mean follow-up of two years. Early clinical and radiological results of the single stage revision for infected total knee replacement appear to be promising. One operation, one anaesthetic and quicker recovery are the advantages for the patient and with the reduced hospital stay it is cost-effective. The problems of stiffness in the knee and muscle wasting with cement spacer are avoided.
The principles of revision total knee replacement are to understand the cause of failure, adequate surgical exposure, achieving appropriate soft tissue balance, restoration of limb and joint line alignment, correct implant alignment, and a good range of motion. It is a technically and economically demanding procedure and its successful performance requires thorough preoperative planning, adherence to the principles, availability of diverse implant options and adequate bone graft. We prospectively assessed the survivorship of Co-ordinate Ultra prosthesis (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind) used for revision knee arthroplasty. Forty-nine patients had 53 revision knee replacements performed by the senior author between April 1999 and September 2001. Seven patients (7 knees) had died. At a mean follow-up of 6 years (range: 5–7 years), 46 knees in 42 patients were available for review. None were lost to follow-up. There were 31 women and 11 men, with a mean age of 74.2 years. The reason for revision was instability in 39 knees, infection in 3 knees, pain in 2 knees and stiffness in 2 knees. Significant improvement was noted in the SF-12 PCS and WOMAC pain and stiffness scores at the latest follow-up. None of these patients required re-revision. None of the knees showed evidence of progressive loosening. Radio-opaque lines were found around the stems and were present in immediate post-operative radiographs; this did not indicate loosening or infection on further follow-up. Cumulative survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier method) was 100% at 7 years. Clinical and radiological outcome analysis has revealed that the Co-ordinate Ultra revision knee system continues to function satisfactorily at a mean follow-up of 6 years.
A consecutive group of 150 patients undergoing primary TKA performed by a single surgeon using single prosthesis were studied prospectively. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of TKA in obese and non-obese patients. The patients were categorized into two groups: non-obese (body mass index (BMI <
30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI >
30 to 40 kg/m2). The Primary outcome measures: SF-12 and WOMAC scores were used as generic outcome measures, and the Knee Society scores were used to assess clinical outcome of TKA. The scores were done pre-operatively and at 1, 3 and 5 years post-operatively. Secondary outcome measures included patellar position, anterior knee pain, infections, revision rates, deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, length of hospital stay and mortality. Seventeen patients have died since and none were lost to follow-up. Obese patients had less benefit and overall KSS outcome scores at one year (p-value 0.05) but had similar scores at 3 and 5 years (p-values 0.3 and 0.5). Pre-operative WOMAC and SF-12 scores were significantly worst in obese patients (p-value 0.009 and 0.005) but had the similar outcome at 1, 3 and 5 years. Three patients in the series required revision surgery for infection. One patient had DVT and another had PE post-operatively. Overall obese patients although had lower KSS scores at one year but had better outcome in SF-12 and WOMAC scores at one year. There was no difference at 3 and 5 years. We found that body weight did not influence adversely the outcome of TKA at medium term.
We measured patellar height, VMO length on the axial views of the scans. The VMO insertion was calculated from the data and we divided the patients into proximal and distal groups in relation to the VMO termination on the patella. The proximal group included patients with VMO termination proximal to the mid-point of the patella and distal group included patients with VMO termination at or distal to the mid-point of the patella.
To calculate the patellar height the apex of the patella was considered as ‘Reference Slice 1’. The consecutive slices were followed distally to the last slice in which the patella was visible. From ‘Reference Slice 1’ VMO muscle was followed distally to the slice in which the muscle was last visible. We calculated the patella height and VMO muscle length as the product of the number of MRI slices and MRI slice thickness.
A statistically significant inverse relationship was noted between the level of insertion of VMO and the age of the patient.
We reviewed the clinical and radiological outcome of 72 Co-ordinate prostheses (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind) used for revision knee arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon from May 1994 to December 1997. Twenty-three patients (25 knees) since died. Two were lost to follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 10 years (range 9–12years), 45 knees in 43 patients were available for review. There were 12 men and 31 women with a mean age of 71.34 years (range 43 to 87 years). The reason for revision was instability in 38 knees, infection in 5 knees and stiffness in 2 knees. There was a significant improvement in the SF-12 PCS and WOMAC pain and stiffness scores at the latest follow-up. Five of these knees had to have re-revision surgery. One patient had a re-revision for aseptic loosening, one patient for recurrent dislocation of patella. Three patients underwent repeat procedures for infection. Radiological evaluation using the Knee Society system revealed well-fixed components in 35 knees (77.78%). The radiolucencies of varying degrees were present in 10 knees (22.22%). Eight had non-progressive radiolu-cencies and did not show any evidence of loosening. 25 (55.5%) knees had halo sign (radiopaque line) present around the prosthesis (7 were femoral side, 4 were tibial side and 14 around both the prosthesis). Using Kaplan Meier method the cumulative survival rate was 88.87% at 12 years, removal of the prosthesis or re-revision were used as end points. An analysis of clinical and standard radiographic outcomes has revealed that the Co-ordinate revision knee system continues to function satisfactorily at a mean of 10 years.
The use of effective pre-operative preparation solution is an important step in limiting surgical wound contamination and preventing infection, particularly in forefoot surgery. The most effective way is unknown. In recent studies, >
70% of aerobic bacterial cultures of specimens taken from the nail folds following skin preparation with povidine iodine were positive. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of pre-operative Triclosan (Aquasept) shower, skin preparation using povidone iodine and ethyl alcohol in reducing post-operative forefoot infection. Between February 2005 and August 2005, all patients undergoing forefoot surgery under the care of the senior author were followed prospectively. There were 50 women and 10 men with an average age of 55 years (17–92 years), who underwent 92 forefoot procedures. The surgeries included 35 (38%) osteotomies, 31 (34%) arthrodeses, and 9 (10%) Morton’s neuroma excisions and 17 (18%) soft tissue procedures. As a standard protocol, pre-operatively all patients had Triclosan shower on the day of surgery, the foot/feet were painted with povidone iodine and was covered with a sterile towel in the ward. At induction, everyone received cefuroxime 1.5gm (IV); the feet were prepared using povidone iodine and then ethyl alcohol and dried. Patients were followed up in the clinic at 2weeks, 6weeks and 3months, further follow-up if necessary. None of the patients in the study developed deep infection. Two patients required oral antibiotics for superficial infection (one pin track infection after distal inter-phalangeal joint fusion of second toe, one following scarf osteotomy) We conclude that the method used in this study was very effective in preventing infection following forefoot surgery.
To assess the outcome and implant removal rate following surgical stabilisation of patella fracture. Sixty-seven patients who underwent surgical stabilisation of patella fracture between January 1999 and December 2004 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the adequacy of fracture stabilisation, fracture union and implant removal rate. Forty-three were men and 24 were women with a mean age of 49 years (ranged 14–90 years). Table below demonstrates the injury, fracture patterns and fixation methods. There were 3 open fractures and associated injuries were noted in 22 patients. All fractures united even though the fixation was inadequate in 46 patients. Two superficial infections responded to oral antibiotics. One patient had revision surgery at 6 weeks. Twenty-two patients required implant removal between 2 and 20 months (average 11 months) for implant related symptoms. Of the 22 (32.8%) patients requiring implant removal, 16/40 (40%) were less than 60 years and 6/27 (22.2%) were over 60 years. Mean follow up in asymptomatic patients was 8 months (3 to 18 months) and in patients with implant related problems was 17 months (10 to 36 months). Four patients were lost to follow up. Surgical stabilisation by current techniques demonstrated satisfactory fracture union. However, one in three required second surgery for implant related symptoms. In the under 60 years group, the implant removal rate increased to 40%. Newer techniques to avoid skin irritation need to be considered.