REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY WITH CO-ORDINATE ULTRA PROSTHESIS: MEDIUM TERM RESULTS (MINIMUM 5 YEARS)

Abstract

The principles of revision total knee replacement are to understand the cause of failure, adequate surgical exposure, achieving appropriate soft tissue balance, restoration of limb and joint line alignment, correct implant alignment, and a good range of motion. It is a technically and economically demanding procedure and its successful performance requires thorough preoperative planning, adherence to the principles, availability of diverse implant options and adequate bone graft.

We prospectively assessed the survivorship of Co-ordinate Ultra prosthesis (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind) used for revision knee arthroplasty. Forty-nine patients had 53 revision knee replacements performed by the senior author between April 1999 and September 2001. Seven patients (7 knees) had died. At a mean follow-up of 6 years (range: 5–7 years), 46 knees in 42 patients were available for review. None were lost to follow-up. There were 31 women and 11 men, with a mean age of 74.2 years. The reason for revision was instability in 39 knees, infection in 3 knees, pain in 2 knees and stiffness in 2 knees.

Significant improvement was noted in the SF-12 PCS and WOMAC pain and stiffness scores at the latest follow-up. None of these patients required re-revision. None of the knees showed evidence of progressive loosening. Radio-opaque lines were found around the stems and were present in immediate post-operative radiographs; this did not indicate loosening or infection on further follow-up. Cumulative survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier method) was 100% at 7 years.

Clinical and radiological outcome analysis has revealed that the Co-ordinate Ultra revision knee system continues to function satisfactorily at a mean follow-up of 6 years.