Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee remains a challenging problem since the evolution of the disease may be different in each compartment of the knee, as well as the state of the ligaments. Total knee arthroplasty may provide a reliable long-lasting option but do not preserve the bone stock. In another hand, compartmental arthroplasty is a bone and ligament sparing solution to manage limited osteoarthritis of the knee affecting the medial, lateral or the patello-femoral compartment.1, 2, 3 Patient's selection and surgical indication are based on the physical examination and on the radiological analysis including full-length x-rays and stress x-rays. Clinical experience has shown the need for high flexion in patients who have both high flexibility and a desire to perform deep flexion. Additionally the shape differences related to anatomy or the patient expectations after the surgery may also affect the surgeon decision. 4 The limited incision into the extensor mechanism allows a quicker recovery which represents a functional improvement for the patient additionally to the cosmetic result. A dedicated physiotherapy starting on the following day allowing weight bearing exercises protected by crutches and focusing on early mobilization and range of motion combined to a multimodal pain management approach is critical despite the type of individualized solution chosen for the patient knee. 5 Since bony landmarks may be different form a patient to another one as well as anatomical shapes, several tools have been developed in order to provide the surgeons an assisted tool during the surgery adapted to each knee, this include navigation, patient specific instrumentation and robotic surgery.
Improving the adaptation between the implant and the patient bone during total hip arthroplasty (THA) may improve the survival of the implant. This requires a perfect understanding of the tridimensional characteristics of the patient hip. The perfect evaluation of the tridimensional anatomy of the patient hip can be done pre-operatively using X-rays and CT-scan. All patients underwent a standard x-rays evaluation in the same center according to the same protocol. Pre-operatively, the frontal analysis of the hip geometry was performed and the optimal center of rotation, CCD angle, neck length and lever arm was analyzed to choose the optimal solution for proper balance of the hip in order to obtain adequate range of motion, appropriate leg length, and correct tension of the abductors muscles. Standard or lateralized monoblock stems can be valid or modular neck shape can be choosen among 9 available shape. These 9 frontal shapes are available in standard, anteverted or retroverted shapes, leading to 27 potential neck combinations. In case of important hip deformation, a custom implant can be used in order to balance the extra-medullar geometry without compromising the intra-medullary adaptation of the stem. We prospectively included 209 hips treated in our institution with total hip arthroplasty performed using a supine Watson-Jones approach and the same anatomic stem. The mean patient age was 68 years and the mean BMI 26 Kg/m². Intra-operatively the sagittal anatomy of the hip was analyzed and standard, ante or retro modular necks were tested for the frontal shape defined pre-operatively. According to the pre-operative frontal planning, non-standard necks were required in 24 % of the cases to restore the anatomy of the hip. Intra-operatively, a sagittal correction using anteverted neck was required in 5% of the cases and retroverted necks in 18% of the cases. Harris hip score improved from 56 to 95 points at min. 5 year follow-up. No leg length discrepancy greater than 1 cm was observed. Restoration of the lever arm (mean 39.3 mm, range 30 to 49 mm) and of the neck length (55.2, range 43 to 68 mm) was adapted for 95% compared to the non operate opposite side. Disturbed anatomy like in DDH or post-traumatic cases may require additional solutions to balance the hip such combined osteotomy or customized stem and neck.
Recent studies have concluded that gender influences hip morphology at the time of surgery as well as dysplastic development of the hip. This may lead to a particular choice of implant including stem design and/or neck modularity. In this study we hypothesized that not only gender but also morphotype and etiology (primary osteoarthritis versus aseptic osteonecrosis) may be a significant factor to predict the anatomy of the hip at the time of total hip arthroplasty (THA). We reviewed 690 patients undergoing THA for primary arthritis (OA) or avascular osteonecrosis (AVN) between April 2000 and June 2005 and stratified each into three groups based on their anatomic constitution: endomorph (EN), ectomorph (ECT), or mesomorph (ME) (determined by the ratio: pelvic width/total leg length measured on full-length X-rays). Two independent observers measured twice four parameters on preoperative CT scan: neck-shaft-angle angle (NSA), femoral offset value (FO), helitorsion (Ht) value and femoral neck anteversion (Av).Introduction:
Methods:
Treatment of limited osteoarthritis of the knee remains a challenging problem. Total knee arthroplasty may provide a reliable long-lasting option but do not preserve the bone stock. In another hand, compartmental arthroplasty with or without osteotomy is a bone and ligament sparing solution to manage limited osteoarthritis of the knee. Considering the renewed interest for combined compartmental implants we aimed to evaluate the average 12-year clinical and radiological outcome of a consecutive series of patients treated with compartmental knee arthroplasty combined or not with osteotomy. We retrospectively reviewed all 255 patients (274 knees) treated in our institution with a compartmental arthroplasty combined or not with an osteotomy for a diagnosis of either bi or tricompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee between April 1972 and December 2000. The series included: 100 cases of combined lateral and medial UKA, 77 combined medial UKA and patello-femoral arthroplasty (PFA), 19 cases of combined Bi-UKA and PFA, 14 cases of UKA and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), 7 cases of combined lateral-UKA and PFA and HTO, 16 cases of combined lateral-UKA and PFA and 13 cases of combined bi-UKA and HTO. Patient’s selection and surgical indication was based on the physical exam and on the radiological analysis including full-length x-rays and stress x-rays. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed at a minimum follow-up of 5 years (mean, 12 years; range, 5–23 years) by an independent observer. The Knee Society knee and function scores improved respectively from 43 to 89 and from 47 to 90 at last-follow-up. The mean active knee flexion improved from 116° ± 6° (range, 100°–145°) pre-operatively to 129° ± 5° (range, 117°–149°) at final follow-up. The restoration of the mechanical axis of the knee was achieved in all the cases. Dramatic failures were observed for patient with uncemented PFA. Considering revision for any reason as the endpoint, the 17-years survivorship was 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.62 to 0.75). Our results suggested that combined compartmental arthroplasty with or without osteotomy can restore function and alignment of the knee in compartmental arthritis. This combined surgery represents a bone and ligament sparing alternative to TKA which can be considerate as a true minimally invasive solution.
Improving the adaptation between the implant and the patient bone during total hip arthroplasty (THA) may improve the survival of the implant. This requires a perfect understanding of the tridimensional characteristics of the patient hip. The perfect evaluation of the tridimensional anatomy of the patient hip can be done pre-operatively using CT-scan and in case of important hip deformation, a custom implant can be used. When this solution is not available, modular necks may be a reliable alternative using standard x-rays and intraoperative adaptation. We aimed to evaluate:
The usefulness of modular neck to restore the anatomy of the hip and the short-term clinical and radiological results of a consecutive series of THA using modular neck. We prospectively included 209 hips treated in our institution with a modular neck total hip arthroplasty between January 2006 and December 2007. All patients underwent a standard xrays evaluation in the same center according to the same protocol. Pre-operatively, the frontal analysis of the hip geometry was performed and the optimal center of rotation, CCD angle, neck length and lever arm was analyzed to choose the optimal modular neck shape among 9 available shape. These 9 frontal shapes are available in standard, anteverted or retroverted shapes, leading to 27 potential neck combinations. The mean patient age was 68 years and the mean BMI 26 Kg/m2 All the procedures were performed supine using a Watson-Jones approach and the same anatomic stem. Intra-operatively the sagittal anatomy of the hip was analyzed and a standard, ante or retro modular necks were tested for the frontal shape defined pre-operatively. According to the pre-operative frontal planning, nonstandard necks were required in 24 % of the cases to restore the anatomy of the hip. Intra-operatively, a sagittal correction using anteverted neck was required in 5% of the cases and retroverted necks in 18% of the cases. Harris hip score improved from 56 to 95 points at last follow-up. No leg length discrepancy greater than 1 cm was observed. Restoration of the lever arm (mean 39.3 mm, range 30 to 49 mm) and of the neck length (55.2, range 43 to 68 mm) was adapted for 95% compared to the non operate opposite side. No loosening was observed. According to our results modular neck combined are useful and reliable to restore optimal hip geometry and in this series 25% of the patient would have had imperfect extra-medullary hip geometry with a standard prosthesis. The good clinical and radiological short-term results should be confirmed at longer follow-up.
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a logic procedure when osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis is limitad to one femorotibial compartment. The indications for the procedure includes osteoarthrosis or osteonecrosis with full-thickness loss of articular cartilage limited to one of the tibiofemoral knee compartments. Physical examination should ensure full range of knee motion. Frontal and sagittal knee stability has to be tested. A particular attention should be given to the state of the anterior cruciate ligament. The status of the patellofemoral joint should be analysed by physical examination and patellofemoral view at 30, 60 and 90° of flexion. Preoperative anteroposterior varus and valgus stress radiographs should be done to confirm the complete loss of articular cartilage in the involved compartment, the full thickness cartilage in the opposite compartment and the possibility of full correction of the deformity to neutral. The so-called minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedure using a specific instrumentation is able to provide quicker recovery since the extensor mechanism disruption is eliminated. More importantly the radiological evaluation has shown that precise implantation of the components is possible with an MIS approach which is important for the long term results of the arthroplasty. The clinical results at ten years of follow-up of cemented metal-backed UKA performed through a conventional approach have shown results comparable to those obtained with total knee arthroplasty. The in vivo kinematic evaluation of patients implanted with UKA has shown that kinematics similar to the normal knee can be obtained, enhancing the importance of a functional anterior cruciate ligament. Recent design improvements have increased the femorotibial area of contact to accommodate high flexion angles. Additionally our experience has demonstrated that modern UKA is a valid alternative for young and active patients with unicompartmental tibiofemoral noninflammatory disease, including both osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis. Compared to medial UKA lateral UKA represents in our experience only 5% of all UKA implantations. However the long term results of lateral UKA compares at least equally with those reported for medial UKA.
objective and subjective functional improvement; patient satisfaction and preference and cost-utility ratio after gender specific TKA or standard component implanted on the same women.
At 10 years we have a survivorship, if femoral aseptic loosening is used as an end point, of 97.6%. There was a deep infection rate of 1.2%, and a dislocation rate of 1.9%. There were no cases of thigh pain, and no intra-operative femoral neck/shaft fractures.
A clinical and radiographic study was conducted on 97 total hip arthroplasties (79 patients) performed for congenital hip dislocation using three-dimensional custom cementless stem. The mean age was 48 years (17 to 72). The mean follow up was 123 months (83 to 182). According to Crowe, there were 37 class 1, 28 class 2, 13 class 3 and 19 class 4. The average lengthening was 25 mm (5 to 58 mm), the mean femoral anteversion 38.6° (2° to 86°) and the correction in the prosthetic neck −23.6° (71° to 13°). The average Harris hip score improved from 58 to 93 points. Six hips (6.2%) required a revision. The survival rate was 97.7% ± 0.3% at 13 years. Custom cementless stem allows anatomical reconstruction and good functional results in a young and active population with disturbed anatomy, while avoiding a femoral osteotomy.
all three cuts are performed via a single intra-pelvic approach; For severe extreme dysplasia (Hip Study Group classification), a two-thirds triple osteotomy is performed (original technique). Currently the best indication appears to be a young patient (less than 30 years) with moderate to severe dysplasia, without intra-articular suffering and without any sign of early stage joint degradation.