A940. HIP GEOMETRY AND MODULAR NECKS IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract

Improving the adaptation between the implant and the patient bone during total hip arthroplasty (THA) may improve the survival of the implant. This requires a perfect understanding of the tridimensional characteristics of the patient hip. The perfect evaluation of the tridimensional anatomy of the patient hip can be done pre-operatively using CT-scan and in case of important hip deformation, a custom implant can be used. When this solution is not available, modular necks may be a reliable alternative using standard x-rays and intraoperative adaptation. We aimed to evaluate:

1. The usefulness of modular neck to restore the anatomy of the hip and

2. the short-term clinical and radiological results of a consecutive series of THA using modular neck.

We prospectively included 209 hips treated in our institution with a modular neck total hip arthroplasty between January 2006 and December 2007. All patients underwent a standard xrays evaluation in the same center according to the same protocol. Pre-operatively, the frontal analysis of the hip geometry was performed and the optimal center of rotation, CCD angle, neck length and lever arm was analyzed to choose the optimal modular neck shape among 9 available shape. These 9 frontal shapes are available in standard, anteverted or retroverted shapes, leading to 27 potential neck combinations. The mean patient age was 68 years and the mean BMI 26 Kg/m² All the procedures were performed supine using a Watson-Jones approach and the same anatomic stem. Intra-operatively the sagittal anatomy of the hip was analyzed and a standard, ante or retro modular necks were tested for the frontal shape defined pre-operatively.

According to the pre-operative frontal planning, nonstandard necks were required in 24 % of the cases to restore the anatomy of the hip. Intra-operatively, a sagittal correction using anteverted neck was required in 5% of the cases and retroverted necks in 18% of the cases.

Harris hip score improved from 56 to 95 points at last follow-up. No leg length discrepancy greater than 1 cm was observed. Restoration of the lever arm (mean 39.3 mm, range 30 to 49 mm) and of the neck length (55.2, range 43 to 68 mm) was adapted for 95% compared to the non operate opposite side. No loosening was observed.

According to our results modular neck combined are useful and reliable to restore optimal hip geometry and in this series 25% of the patient would have had imperfect extra-medullary hip geometry with a standard prosthesis. The good clinical and radiological short-term results should be confirmed at longer follow-up.