Abstract
Purpose of the study: Changes in prosthetic design to adapt to knee flexion greater than 120 degrees can modify the bone-prosthesis fixation and also displace the femorotibial contact. The purpose of this study was to analyze mid-term results in a consecutive series of 186 arthroplasties and to examine the femorotibial kinematics in vivo.
Material and methods: A posterior stabilized cemented prosthesis with a plateau with motion limited to rotation was used. Design changes concerned: lengthening of the posterior femoral condyle, scooping out the poly-ethylene anteriorly with reorientation and change in the height of the posterior stabilization stem. The same technique was used for all patients who followed the same rehabilitation protocol. Mean age was 69 years (range 22–87). All patients were evaluated clinically with the IKS score and radiologically on the anterioposterior and lateral images. An in vivo analysis of the femorotibial kinematics in the weight bearing condition was also performed in 20 patients under fluoroscopic control with automatic 3D modelization.
Results: Mean follow-up was 40 months (range 2–5 years). Mean IKS function score improved from 34 preoperatively to 96 at last follow-up. The knee score improved from 53 on average to 91 at last follow-up. The mean flexion was 115° (range 45–135°) preop-eratively and 120° (115–145°) at last follow-up. One implant was removed for infection and arthrolysis was performed for one case of stiff joint. Radiographically: the mean postoperative femorotibial alignment was 179° (178–181°), the mean tibial slope 3.8° (0–10°°, the mean patellar height (0.8° (0.56–1°), and the mean elevation of the joint space (4.5 mm. There were two cases of progressive lucent lines in the tibial zone which were stable at last follow-up. All patients analyzed showed a mean posterior displacement of the femorotibial point of contact of 9.7 mm at flexion.
Discussion and conclusion: Changes in prosthesis design to adapt to greater range of flexion do not appear to have a negative effect at mid-term on implant fixation. The clinical flexion ranges obtained were encourageing and the correlation with kinematic results show that the degree of preoperative flexion remains a determining factor for the postoperative outcome. Posterior displacement of the femoro-tibial point of contact, observed in all patients examined fluoroscopically, certainly contributed to the good postoperative flexion.
Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.