Aims. The primary aim was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of routine operative fixation for all patients with humeral shaft fractures. The secondary aim was to estimate the health economic implications of using a Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures (RUSHU) of < 8 to facilitate selective fixation for patients at risk of nonunion. Methods. From 2008 to 2017, 215 patients (mean age 57 yrs (17 to 18), 61% female (n = 130/215)) with a nonoperatively managed humeral diaphyseal fracture were retrospectively identified. Union was achieved in 77% (n = 165/215) after initial nonoperative management, with 23% (n = 50/215) uniting after surgery for nonunion. The EuroQol five-dimension three-level health index (EQ-5D-3L) was obtained via postal survey. Multiple regression was used to determine the independent influence of patient, injury, and management factors upon the EQ-5D-3L. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of < £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained was considered cost-effective. Results. At a mean of 5.4 yrs (1.2 to 11.0), the mean EQ-5D-3L was 0.736 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.697 to 0.775). Adjusted analysis demonstrated the EQ-5D-3L was inferior among patients who united after nonunion surgery (β = 0.103; p = 0.032). Offering routine fixation to all patients to reduce the rate of nonunion would be associated with increased treatment costs of £1,542/patient, but would confer a potential EQ-5D-3L benefit of 0.120/patient over the study period. The ICER of routine fixation was £12,850/QALY gained. Selective fixation based on a RUSHU < 8 at six weeks post-injury would be associated with reduced treatment costs (£415/patient), and would confer a potential EQ-5D-3L benefit of 0.335 per ‘at-risk patient’. Conclusion. Routine fixation for patients with humeral shaft fractures to reduce the rate of nonunion observed after nonoperative management appears to be a cost-effective intervention at five years post-injury. Selective fixation for patients at risk of nonunion based on their RUSHU may confer even greater cost-effectiveness, given the potential savings and improvement in health-related quality of life. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):566–572

Aims. The aims of this study were to describe the epidemiology of metacarpal shaft fractures (MSFs), assess variation in treatment and complications following standard care, document hospital resource use, and explore factors associated with treatment modality. Methods. A multicentre, cross-sectional retrospective study of MSFs at six centres in the UK. We collected and analyzed healthcare records, operative notes, and radiographs of adults presenting within ten days of a MSF affecting the second to fifth metacarpal between 1 August 2016 and 31 July 2017. Total emergency department (ED) attendances were used to estimate prevalence. Results. A total of 793 patients (75% male, 25% female) with 897 MSFs were included, comprising 0.1% of 837,212 ED attendances. The annual incidence of MSF was 40 per 100,000. The median age was 27 years (IQR 21 to 41); the highest incidence was in men aged 16 to 24 years. Transverse fractures were the most common. Over 80% of all fractures were treated non-surgically, with variation across centres. Overall, 12 types of non-surgical and six types of surgical treatment were used. Fracture pattern, complexity, displacement, and age determined choice of treatment. Patients who were treated surgically required more radiographs and longer radiological and outpatient follow-up, and were more likely to be referred for therapy. Complications occurred in 5% of patients (39/793). Most patients attended planned follow-up, with 20% (160/783) failing to attend at least one or more clinic appointments. Conclusion. MSFs are common hand injuries among young, working (economically active) men, but there is considerable heterogeneity in treatment, rehabilitation, and resource use. They are a burden on healthcare resources and society, thus further research is needed to optimize treatment. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):652–661

Aims. Fractures of the humeral shaft represent 3% to 5% of all fractures. The most common treatment for isolated humeral diaphysis fractures in the UK is non-operative using functional bracing, which carries a low risk of complications, but is associated with a longer healing time and a greater risk of nonunion than surgery. There is an increasing trend to surgical treatment, which may lead to quicker functional recovery and lower rates of fracture nonunion than functional bracing. However, surgery carries inherent risk, including infection, bleeding, and nerve damage. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of functional bracing compared to surgical fixation for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Methods. The HUmeral SHaft (HUSH) fracture study is a multicentre, prospective randomized superiority trial of surgical versus non-surgical interventions for humeral shaft fractures in adult patients. Participants will be randomized to receive either functional bracing or surgery. With 334 participants, the trial will have 90% power to detect a clinically important difference for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score, assuming 20% loss to follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include function, pain, quality of life, complications, cost-effectiveness, time off work, and ability to drive. Discussion. The results of this trial will provide evidence regarding clinical and cost-effectiveness between surgical and non-surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Ethical approval has been obtained from East of England – Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee. Publication is anticipated to occur in 2024. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(4):343–349

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to determine the rates of return to work (RTW) and sport (RTS) following a humeral shaft fracture. The secondary aim was to identify factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS. Methods. From 2008 to 2017, all patients with a humeral diaphyseal fracture were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics and injury characteristics were recorded. Details of pre-injury employment, sporting participation, and levels of return post-injury were obtained via postal questionnaire. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale was used to quantify physical activity among active patients. Regression was used to determine factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS. Results. The Work Group comprised 177 patients in employment prior to injury (mean age 47 years (17 to 78); 51% female (n = 90)). Mean follow-up was 5.8 years (1.3 to 11). Overall, 85% (n = 151) returned to work at a mean of 14 weeks post-injury (0 to 104), but only 60% (n = 106) returned full-time to their previous employment. Proximal-third fractures (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 14.2); p = 0.029) were independently associated with failure to RTW. The Sport Group comprised 182 patients involved in sport prior to injury (mean age 52 years (18 to 85); 57% female (n = 104)). Mean follow-up was 5.4 years (1.3 to 11). The mean UCLA score reduced from 6.9 (95% CI 6.6 to 7.2) before injury to 6.1 (95% CI 5.8 to 6.4) post-injury (p < 0.001). There were 89% (n = 162) who returned to sport: 8% (n = 14) within three months, 34% (n = 62) within six months, and 70% (n = 127) within one year. Age ≥ 60 years was independently associated with failure to RTS (aOR 3.0 (95% CI 1.1 to 8.2); p = 0.036). No other factors were independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS. Conclusion. Most patients successfully return to work and sport following a humeral shaft fracture, albeit at a lower level of physical activity. Patients aged ≥ 60 yrs and those with proximal-third diaphyseal fractures are at increased risk of failing to return to activity. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):236–244

Aims. To compare results of institutional preferences with regard to treatment of soft tissues in the setting of open tibial shaft fractures. Methods. We present a retrospective review of open tibial shaft fractures at two high-volume level 1 trauma centres with differing practices with regard to the acute management of soft tissues. Site 1 attempts acute primary closure, while site 2 prefers delayed closure/coverage. Comparisons include percentage of primary closure, number of surgical procedures until definitive closure, percentage requiring soft tissue coverage, and percentage of 90-day wound complication. Results. Overall, there were 219 patients at site 1 and 282 patients at site 2. Differences in rates of acute wound closure were seen (168 (78%) at site 1 vs 101 (36%) at site 2). A mean of 1.5 procedures for definitive closure was seen at site 1 compared to 3.4 at site 2. No differences were seen in complication, nonunion, or amputation rates. Similar results were seen in a sub-analysis of type III injuries. Conclusion. Comparing outcomes of open tibial shaft fractures at two institutions with different rates initial wound management, no differences were seen in 90-day wound complications, nonunion rates, or need for amputation. Attempted acute closure resulted in a lower number of planned secondary procedures when compared with planned delayed closure. Providers should consider either acute closure or delayed coverage based on the injury characteristics, surgeon preference and institutional resources without concern that the decision at the time of index surgery will lead to an increased risk of complication. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:481–487

Aims. Lower limb fractures are common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and represent a significant burden to the existing orthopaedic surgical infrastructure. In high income country (HIC) settings, internal fixation is the standard of care due to its superior outcomes. In LMICs, external fixation is often the surgical treatment of choice due to limited supplies, cost considerations, and its perceived lower complication rate. The aim of this systematic review protocol is identifying differences in rates of infection, nonunion, and malunion of extra-articular femoral and tibial shaft fractures in LMICs treated with either internal or external fixation. Methods. This systematic review protocol describes a broad search of multiple databases to identify eligible papers. Studies must be published after 2000, include at least five patients, patients must be aged > 16 years or treated as skeletally mature, and the paper must describe a fracture of interest and at least one of our primary outcomes of interest. We did not place restrictions on language or journal. All abstracts and full texts will be screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias and quality of evidence will be analyzed using standardized appraisal tools. A random-effects meta-analysis followed by a subgroup analysis will be performed, given the anticipated heterogeneity among studies, if sufficient data are available. Conclusion. The lack of easily accessible LMIC outcome data, combined with international clinical guidelines that are often developed by HIC surgeons for use in HIC environments, makes the clinical decision-making process infinitely more difficult for surgeons in LMICs. This protocol will guide research on surgical management, outcomes, and complications of lower limb shaft fractures in LMICs, and can help guide policy development for better surgical intervention delivery and improve global surgical care. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(11):1020–1026

Helical plates are preferably used for proximal humeral shaft fracture fixation and potentially avoid radial nerve irritation as compared to straight plates. Aims:(1) to investigate the safety of applying different long plate designs (straight, 45°-, 90°-helical and ALPS) in MIPO-technique to the humerus. (2) to assess and compare their distances to adjacent anatomical structures at risk. MIPO was performed in 16 human cadaveric humeri using either a straight plate (group1), a 45°-helical (group2), a 90°-helical (group3) or an ALPS (group4). Using CT-angiography, distances between brachial arteries and plates were evaluated. Following, all specimens were dissected, and distances to the axillary, radial and musculocutaneous nerve were evaluated. None of the specimens demonstrated injuries of the anatomical structures at risk after MIPO with all investigated plate designs. Closest overall distance (mm(range)) between each plate and the radial nerve was 1(1-3) in group1, 7(2-11) in group2, 14(7-25) in group3 and 6(3-8) in group4. It was significantly longer in group3 and significantly shorter in group1 as compared to all other groups, p<0.001. Closest overall distance (mm(range)) between each plate and the musculocutaneous nerve was 16(8-28) in group1, 11(7-18) in group2, 3(2-4) in group3 and 6(3-8) in group4. It was significantly longer in group1 and significantly shorter in group3 as compared to all other groups, p<0.001. Closest overall distance (mm(range)) between each plate and the brachial artery was 21(18-23) in group1, 7(6-7) in group2, 4(3-5) in group3 and 7(6-7) in group4. It was significantly longer in group1 and significantly shorter in group3 as compared to all other groups, p<0.021. MIPO with 45°- and 90°-helical plates as well as ALPS is safely feasible and showed a significant greater distance to the radial nerve compared to straight plates. However, distances remain low, and attention must be paid to the musculocutaneous nerve and the brachial artery when MIPO is used with ALPS, 45°- and 90°-helical implants. Anterior parts of the deltoid insertion will be detached using 90°-helical and ALPS implants in MIPO-technique

Segmental fractures of the femoral neck and shaft present a treatment challenge. A diagnostic difficulty sometimes arises because the classical signs present in an isolated fractured neck of femur are masked by the associated femoral shaft fracture. Especially where there is no preoperative pelvic radiograph, the femoral neck fracture may present as an incidental finding at the time the shaft fracture is treated. Because much of the impact at the time of injury is taken up by the femoral shaft, the fracture of the femoral neck is often undisplaced. Between January 1995 and April 2001, we treated 36 patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures at GaRankuwa Hospital. Within 24 to 48 hours of injury, eight patients were treated with AO screws and DCP, two with DHS and DCP, 13 with Recon nails and 13 with UFN and Miss-a-nail. In four months 28 patients went on to uneventful union. Complications included two cases of implant failure, two of avascular necrosis, two of failed reduction of femoral neck fracture, one of sepsis and one of nonunion of the femoral shaft. The complications, especially implant failure and failed reduction, occurred mainly in patients who were operated on at night and by junior members of staff

Patients with a femoral shaft fracture requiring intra-medullary nailing were recruited to investigate if the femoral canal could be a potential source of inflammatory cytokines, previously implicated in the pathogenesis of life-threatening inflammatory complications. Femoral and peripheral blood samples were obtained at the time of surgery from patients with a femoral shaft fracture requiring intramedullary nailing. The local femoral intramedullary and peripheral release of a group of ten Th1 and Th2 cytokines concentrations (IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, GM-CSF, TNF-a and IFN-g) after femoral shaft fracture and intramedullary reaming, if performed, was measured using a Human Cytokine Antibody 10-plex Bead Kit. A control group of patients(n=3) undergoing hip replacement was established to allow comparison with the normal femoral intramedullary cytokine environment. 21 patients with a femoral shaft fracture were recruited. Femoral shaft fracture caused a significant increase in the local femoral concentrations of IL-6 (median 3967pg/ml; range 128–25,689pg/ml) and IL-8 (median 238pg/ml; range 8–8,288pg/ml) compared to the femoral control group(p=0.0005 and p=0.001 respectively). No significant local femoral release of the other cytokines was demonstrated. In the patients who underwent intramedullary reaming of the femoral canal (n=6), a further significant local release of IL-6 (median post-ream 15,903pg/ml; range 1,854–44,922pg/ml) and IL-8 (median post-ream 1,443pg/ml; range 493–3,734pg/ml) was demonstrated (p=0.01 and p=0.03 respectively), thus showing that intramedullary reaming can cause a significant local inflammatory response. Femoral shaft fracture produces a local inflammatory response releasing large amounts of the cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 into the local femoral environment but not of the other Th1 and Th2 cytokines studied. Reaming, produced significant elevation in local femoral IL-6 and IL-8 concentration, suggesting a local femoral response as a result of this procedure. Possibly, local femoral environment may act as a cell-priming or stimulating zone, for circulating inflammatory cells

Objectives. Healing in cancellous metaphyseal bone might be different from midshaft fracture healing due to different access to mesenchymal stem cells, and because metaphyseal bone often heals without a cartilaginous phase. Inflammation plays an important role in the healing of a shaft fracture, but if metaphyseal injury is different, it is important to clarify if the role of inflammation is also different. The biology of fracture healing is also influenced by the degree of mechanical stability. It is unclear if inflammation interacts with stability-related factors. Methods. We investigated the role of inflammation in three different models: a metaphyseal screw pull-out, a shaft fracture with unstable nailing (IM-nail) and a stable external fixation (ExFix) model. For each, half of the animals received dexamethasone to reduce inflammation, and half received control injections. Mechanical and morphometric evaluation was used. Results. As expected, dexamethasone had a strong inhibitory effect on the healing of unstable, but also stable, shaft fractures. In contrast, dexamethasone tended to increase the mechanical strength of metaphyseal bone regenerated under stable conditions. Conclusions. It seems that dexamethasone has different effects on metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone healing. This could be explained by the different role of inflammation at different sites of injury. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4:170–175

This single-centre prospective randomised trial aimed to assess the superiority of operative fixation compared with non-operative management for adults with an isolated, closed humeral shaft fracture. 70 patients were randomly allocated to either open reduction and internal fixation (51%, n=36/70) or functional bracing (49%, n=34/70). 7 patients did not receive their assigned treatment (operative n=5/32, non-operative n=2/32); results were analysed based upon intention-to-treat. The primary outcome measure was the DASH score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included treatment complications, union/nonunion, shoulder/elbow range of motion, pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). At 3 months, 66 patients (94%) were available for follow-up; the mean DASH favoured surgery (operative 24.5, non-operative 39.4; p=0.006) and the difference (14.9 points) exceeded the MCID. Surgery was also associated with a superior DASH at 6wks (operative 38.4, non-operative 53.1; p=0.005) but not at 6 months or 1yr. Brace-related dermatitis affected 7 patients (operative 3%, non-operative 18%; OR 7.8, p=0.049) but there were no differences in other complications. 8 patients (11%) developed a nonunion (operative 6%, non-operative 18%; OR 3.8, p=0.140). Surgery was associated with superior early shoulder/elbow range of motion, and pain, EuroQol and SF-12 Mental Component Summary scores. There were no other differences in outcomes between groups. Surgery confers early advantages over bracing, in terms of upper limb function, shoulder/elbow range of motion, pain and HRQoL. However, these benefits should be considered in the context of potential operative risks and the absence of any difference in patient-reported outcomes at 1yr

Acute fractures of the humeral shaft are usually managed conservatively. The rate of union is high, whereas that of nonunion ranges from 1 – 6%. Various risk factors for nonunion have been identified, including the following: open fracture, mid shaft fracture, transverse or short-oblique fracture, comminuted fracture, unstable fixation, fracture gap. This paper evaluates the results of treatment of humeral shaft fracture by open reduction and internal fixation with DCP, supplemented with cancelous bone graft but not in all cases. One hundred and five cases of nonunion of a humeral shaft fracture between 1988 and 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. The study population comprised 66 males and 39 females with an average of 46.2 years (range, 17 – 81 years). Sixty seven fractures were defined as atrophic nonunion, and 20 as hypertrophic nonunion, whereas 18 could not be defined clearly. All the fractures were managed by open reduction and internal fixaztion with DCP and cancelous bone graft. The mean follow up period was 20 months (range, 14 – 28 months). All nonunion fractures united within an average of 16 weeks (range 10–26 weeks). Complications included 4 patients with temporary radial nerve palsies, and 3 patients with wound infections. At the final follow-up shoulder and elbow functions of the operated limbs were all satisfactory. Fixation by DCP with supplemental cancellous bone graft is a reliable and effective treatment for nonunion of a humeral shaft fracture

Tibial shaft fracture occurs commonly in the young active population with high demands. Tibial fracture is potentially life changing. There are no published studies with long-term follow-up to provide accurate prognostic information regarding return to leisure activities, employment and driving. We aim to define the patient demographic and mechanism of injury and quantify the time period following tibial shaft fracture to return to sport and sporting level achieved at long-term follow-up. A retrospective multi-centre study was performed. Data collection was by questionnaire including Tegner activity scale score for sporting level and closed questioning on employment and driving. Ninety-three patients were recruited with an average 46 month (18–64mo) follow-up period. Patients were predominantly male (77%) with a median age at injury of 37 years. Road traffic accidents were responsible for 43% of injuries; sport 31%; falls 25% and assault 1%. High energy mechanisms accounted for 49% of injuries Seventy-eight percent of patients felt that prognostic information given at the time of injury was inaccurate. At follow-up, only 31% had regained their original level of sporting ability. Median Tegner score prior to injury score was 5 and at 18 months the mean score fell by 1.85. Patients sustaining high energy injuries were worst affected, dropping an average of 2.13 compared to low energy mechanisms with an average fall of 1.35 on the Tegner scale (p=0.503). High demand patients had a greater reduction in functional outcome, with a fall of 0.8 for patients with pre-injury activity level of 1–3 compared to the fall of 2.6 on the scale for more active patients scoring 7–9 pre-injury. Tibial fracture can result in significant long-term morbidity. Patients sustaining high energy injuries and high demand patients have significantly worse outcome. Patients are unlikely to achieve their pre-injury level of sporting activity at 2 years

This study investigated the effect presence, method, and timing of fixation of femoral shaft fractures have on the morbidity and mortality of patients with pulmonary contusion. In the multiply-injured patient with femoral shaft fractures, early (< 24 hours) fracture stabilization with closed, reamed, statically-locked intramedullary nailing has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. Controversy exists as to whether such treatment compromises the outcome in patients that have significant co-existing pulmonary injury. This study is the first to specifically investigate the sub-group of patients that have pulmonary contusion. A retrospective review of patients presenting to a Level One trauma center from 1990 to 2002 with pulmonary contusion identified three hundred and twenty-two cases. Patient characteristics of age, sex, GCS, ISS, AIS, presence of femoral shaft fracture, method and timing of treatment of femoral shaft fracture, and presence of other pulmonary injuries were recorded, as were the outcomes of pulmonary complications (acute lung injury (ALI), ARDS, fat embolism syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia), days on ventilatory support, days in the intensive care unit and ward, and death. There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics between groups with and without femoral shaft fracture. Except for an increased likelihood of the femoral shaft fracture group having ALI (RR 1.11), there were no significant differences in outcomes between the femur fracture/non-femur fracture groups. As well, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the groups that had fracture fixation before or after twenty-four hours or had the fracture fixed with or without intramedullary nailing. The presence, method, and timing of treatment of femoral shaft fractures do not increase the morbidity or mortality of trauma patients that have pulmonary contusion

Background. This is a continued assessment of the effectiveness of a locked intramedullary device in the treatment of acute clavicle shaft fractures. Results of patients treated thus far were assessed, including patients reported on previously. Description of methods. Patients admitted with midshaft clavicle fractures were assessed to determine whether operative fixation of the fracture was required. Indications for surgery were midshaft clavicle fractures with 100% displacement; more than 1.5 cm of shortening, presence of a displaced butterfly segment, bilateral clavicle fractures, ipsilateral displaced glenoid neck fractures, skin and neurovascular compromise. Patients that matched the criteria for surgery were treated operatively with an intramedullary locked device by the author. Post-operatively, patients were kept in a shoulder immobilizer for a period of 6 weeks. Patients were invited to attend a scheduled follow-up visit where the data was collected that comprised the review. All patients were assessed by the surgeon, a radiologist, a physiotherapist and an occupational therapist. Scar size and quality, Dash score, Constant Shoulder score, complications and the radiological picture were assessed. Summary of results. 50 patients (52 clavicle fractures – 2 patients sustained bilateral fractures), 28 males and 22 females with a mean age of 30 attended the schedule data collection visit and were included in the study. 48 clavicles achieved complete union with the remaining 4 fractures progressing normally to union at 10 and 12 weeks post surgery. No additional complications than those reported on previously were encountered. Conclusion. Locked intramedullary fixation of clavicle shaft fractures that match the criteria for operative fixation continues to give good results. No non-unions were found and a high level of patient satisfaction was achieved. The operative technique continues to be refined leading to less fixation related complications. MULTIPLE DISCLOSURES

Background. Although minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has become popular option for humeral shaft fractures, indirect reduction and its maintenance are technically challenging. The purpose of this study is to describe a reproducible technique utilizing an external fixator during MIPO and to assess its outcomes. Methods. Twenty-nine cases with a mean age of 37.1 years were included. There were 7 simple (type A) and 22 comminuted (type B or C) fractures. Indirect reduction was achieved and maintained by a monolateral external fixator on the lateral aspect of humeral shaft, and MIPO was performed on the anterior surface. Union, alignment, complications, and functional results of the shoulder and elbow were assessed. Results. Twenty-eight of 29 fractures were united with a mean of 19.1 weeks including 3 delayed unions. The mean follow-up period was 20.8 months. There was one hypertrophic nonunion, which was healed after fixing two additional screws. None had angulation greater than 10 degrees in the coronal and sagittal planes. Mean constant shoulder score and mean Mayo elbow performance score were 89.1 and 95.5, respectively. There was no direct damage to nerves related to the pin of external fixator, while two cases of radial neuropraxia developed, which recovered within 2 months after operation. Conclusion. Assisted by the preliminary external fixation, MIPO may achieve successful outcomes for humeral shaft fractures

The primary aim was to assess the reliability of ultrasound in the assessment of humeral shaft fracture healing. The secondary aim was to estimate the accuracy of ultrasound assessment in predicting humeral shaft nonunion.

Twelve patients (mean age 54yrs [20–81], 58% [n=7/12] female) with a non-operatively managed humeral diaphyseal fracture were prospectively recruited and underwent ultrasound scanning at six and 12wks post-injury. Scans were reviewed by seven blinded observers to evaluate the presence of sonographic callus. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were determined using the weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Accuracy of ultrasound assessment in nonunion prediction was estimated by comparing scans for patients that united (n=10/12) with those that developed a nonunion (n=2/12).

At both six and 12wks, sonographic callus was present in 11 patients (10 united, one developed a nonunion) and sonographic bridging callus (SBC) was present in seven patients (all united). Ultrasound assessment demonstrated substantial intra- (6wk kappa 0.75, 95% CI 0.47-1.03; 12wk kappa 0.75, 95% CI 0.46-1.04) and inter-observer reliability (6wk ICC 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.83; 12wk ICC 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.91). Absence of sonographic callus demonstrated a sensitivity of 50%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) 91% in nonunion prediction (accuracy 92%). Absence of SBC demonstrated a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 70%, PPV 40% and NPV 100% (accuracy 75%). Of three patients at risk of nonunion based on reduced radiographic callus formation (Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures <8), one had SBC on 6wk ultrasound (and united) and the other two had non-bridging or absent sonographic callus (both developed a nonunion).

Ultrasound assessment of humeral shaft fracture healing was reliable and predictive of nonunion, and may be a useful tool in defining the risk of nonunion among patients with reduced radiographic callus formation.

Purpose: In a prospective randomized clinical trial, we have previously reported the “limb-specific” results comparing operative (plate fixation) versus non-operative (sling) treatment for completely displaced fractures of the shaft of the clavicle. We also sought to determine the effect that a fracture of the shaft of the clavicle had on general health status, as measured by the SF-36 General Health Status instrument. We then evaluated the effects of different treatment methods (operative versus non-operative), on general health scores. Method: We performed a multi-center, randomized clinical trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of completely displaced clavicular shaft fractures in 111 patients. In addition to radiographic, surgeon-based, and limb-specific data we prospectively gathered SF-36 questionnaires at baseline, and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-injury. Results: Results: Both groups had SF-36 scores equivalent to or slightly superior to population norms at baseline. A clavicular shaft fracture had a significant negative effect on SF-36 scores (especially the physical components) in both groups at 6 weeks (p< 0.01) and 3 months (p< 0.01). There was a statistically greater decrease in Physical Component Scores (PCS) in the non-operative group compared to the operative group (P< 0.05). At 6 months, scores had returned to pre-operative levels in the operative group, but remained significantly decreased in the non-operative group (p=0.04). This difference persisted at the one and two year points. Conclusion: A displaced fracture of the clavicular shaft has a clinically significant negative effect on general health status scores. This effect can be mitigated by primary operative fixation, which restores scores to normal levels by six months post-injury. Patients treated non-operatively for a displaced fracture of the shaft of the clavicle demonstrated lower PCS scores at two years post-injury. This information is useful in counseling patients with regards to treatment options following displaced fractures of the clavicle shaft

Purpose: In a prospective randomized clinical trial, we have previously reported the “limb-specific” results comparing operative (plate fixation) versus non-operative (sling) treatment for completely displaced fractures of the shaft of the clavicle. We also sought to determine the effect that a fracture of the shaft of the clavicle had on general health status, as measured by the SF-36 General Health Status instrument. We then evaluated the effects of different treatment methods (operative versus non-operative), on general health scores. Materials: We performed a multi-center, randomized clinical trial of operative versus non-operative treatment of completely displaced clavicular shaft fractures in 111 patients. In addition to radiographic, surgeon-based, and limb-specific data we prospectively gathered SF-36 questionnaires at baseline, and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-injury. Results: Both groups had SF-36 scores equivalent to or slightly superior to population norms at baseline. A clavicular shaft fracture had a significant negative effect on SF-36 scores (especially the physical components) in both groups at 6 weeks (p< 0.01) and 3 months (p> < 0.01). There was a statistically greater decrease in Physical Component Scores (PCS) in the non-operative group compared to the operative group (P> < 0.05). At 6 months, scores had returned to pre-operative levels in the operative group, but remained significantly decreased in the non-operative group (p=0.04). This difference persisted at the one and two year points. Conclusions: A displaced fracture of the clavicular shaft has a clinically significant negative effect on general health status scores. This effect can be mitigated by primary operative fixation, which restores scores to normal levels by six months post-injury. Patients treated non-operatively for a displaced fracture of the shaft of the clavicle demonstrated lower PCS scores at two years post-injury

Hypothesis: In severely the injured, there has been a move away from early total care to staged physiological and anatomic reconstruction, damage control orthopaedics (DCO). This seeks to limit the magnitude of the second hit insult resulting from operative treatment after trauma, deferring complex reconstructive work until a later stage. For femoral shaft fracture, this entails initial external fixation, to provide early skeletal stabilisation, and subsequent conversion to an intramedullary nail (IMN). Materials and Methods: Patients with femoral shaft fracture, who underwent primary IMN or DCO between 1996 and 2002 were identified from our database. Those with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) < 20 were excluded. The systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) and Marshall multi-organ failure scores (MMOFS) were calculated every 12h for 4 days. These systems have been previously correlated with outcome and complications in critical care. Results: 174 patients were included. The mean SIRS score was higher at each time period post operatively in the IMN group (p < 0.01). The MMOFS was slightly higher at each point in the DCO group, (only sig. at 48h). There was a higher incidence of pneumonia and mortality (significant p < 0.02), ARDS and MOF (both n.s.) in the DCO group, this being attributable to the higher incidence of head and thoracic injury (AIS severity 2 or more). The mean peak post-operative SIRS score was significantly higher in the IMN group than in the DCO group, both at primary procedure and conversion, as was the time with SIRS score above 1. The pre-op and peak post-op SIRS score correlated with the peak post op MMOFS score (p 0.0002). The conversion pre-op SIRS score correlated with post-operative peak SIRS score and MMOFS score (p 0.0001). On average, a significant rise in the MMOFS score did not occur following the conversion procedure. Conclusion: It would appear that despite having significantly more severe injuries, patients in the DCO group had a smaller, shorter postoperative systemic inflammatory response and suffered only slightly more pronounced organ failure than the IMN group. They did suffer more complications, but this was only significant for pneumonia. DCO patients undergoing conversion whilst their SIRS score was raised suffered the most pronounced subsequent inflammatory response and rise in organ failure score