Aims. We aim to objectively assess the impact of COVID-19 on mean total operative cases for all indicative procedures (as outlined by the Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST)) experienced by orthopaedic trainees in the deanery of the Republic of Ireland. Subjective experiences were reported for each trainee using questionnaires. Methods. During the first four weeks of the nationwide lockdown due to COVID-19, the objective impact of the pandemic on each trainee’s surgical caseload exposure was assessed using data from individual trainee logbook profiles in the deanery of the Republic of Ireland. Independent predictor variables included the trainee grade (ST 3 to 8), the individual trainee, the unit that the logbook was reported from, and the year in which the logbook was recorded. We used the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test to assess for any statistically significant predictor variables. The subjective experience of each trainee was captured using an electronic questionnaire. Results. The mean number of total procedures per trainee over four weeks was 36.8 (7 to 99; standard deviation (SD) 19.67) in 2018, 40.6 (6 to 81; SD 17.90) in 2019, and 18.3 (3 to 65; SD 11.70) during the pandemic of 2020 (p = 0.043). Significant reductions were noted for all elective indicative procedures, including arthroplasty (p = 0.019), osteotomy (p = 0.045), nerve decompression (p = 0.024) and arthroscopy (p = 0.024). In contrast, none of the nine indicative procedures for trauma were reduced. There was a significant inter-unit difference in the mean number of total cases (p = 0.029) and indicative cases (p = 0.0005) per trainee. We noted that 7.69% (n = 3) of trainees contracted COVID-19. Conclusion. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean number of operative cases per trainee has been significantly reduced for four of the 13 indicative procedures, as outlined by the JCST. Reassignment of trainees to high-volume institutions in the future may be a plausible approach to mitigate significant training deficits in those trainees worst impacted by the reduction in operative exposure

Aims. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the provision of orthopaedic care across the UK. During the pandemic orthopaedic specialist registrars were redeployed to “frontline” specialties occupying non-surgical roles. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic training in the UK is unknown. This paper sought to examine the role of orthopaedic trainees during the COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on postgraduate orthopaedic education. Methods. A 42-point questionnaire was designed, validated, and disseminated via e-mail and an instant-messaging platform. Results. A total of 101 orthopaedic trainees, representing the four nations (Wales, England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland), completed the questionnaire. Overall, 23.1% (23/101) of trainees were redeployed to non-surgical roles. Of these, 73% (17/23) were redeployed to intensive treatment units (ITUs), 13% (3/23) to A/E, and 13%(3/23%) to general medicine. Of the trainees redeployed to ITU 100%, (17/17) received formal induction. Non-deployed or returning trainees had a significant reduction in sessions. In total, 42.9% (42/101) % of trainees were not timetabled into fracture clinic, 53% (53/101) of trainees had one allocated theatre list per week, and 63.8%(64/101) of trainees did not feel they obtained enough experience in the attached subspecialty and preferred repeating this. Overall, 93% (93/101) of respondents attended at least one weekly online webinar, with 79% (79/101) of trainees rating these as useful or very useful, while 95% (95/101) trainees attended online deanery teaching which was rated as more useful than online webinars (p = 0.005). Conclusion. Orthopaedic specialist trainees occupied an important role during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 has had a significant impact on orthopaedic training. It is imperative this is properly understood to ensure orthopaedic specialist trainees achieve competencies set out in the training curriculum. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:676–682

Introduction. Procedure Based Assessments (PBAs) were recently introduced for orthopaedic trainees and play an increasing role in assessment. The study aims to describe the attitudes of trainees to the educational benefit of PBAs and the factors which underlie these attitudes. Methodology. A link to an online questionnaire was sent via the eLogbook email system to all orthopaedic trainees in the UK with a National Training Number (NTN). The questions were attitude statements with Likert-type scaled responses, free text responses and closed questions. Results. Of 668 responses, 616 trainees with NTNs were included, with a good spread of seniority and geographical location. Trainees found PBAs useful for delivery of feedback (53%). The role of PBAs as evidence of competence in the annual review of progression was more controversial, with 31.8% agreeing. 61% of respondents found there were barriers to the successful use of PBAs. Trainee and trainer behaviours have been identified that significantly increase the chance of trainees improving their practice, such as completing the PBA at the time of the procedure (p< 0.001) and the trainer delivering quality feedback when using PBAs (p< 0.001), but completing higher numbers of PBAs does not have this effect (p=0.26). Training Programme Directors (TPDs) were perceived to be supportive of the use of PBAs (67.3%), and trainees with strongly supportive TPDs were more likely to improve their practice using PBAs (p=0.014). There were wide variations between Training Programmes in use of and satisfaction with PBAs. Conclusion. This is the first nationwide study in the UK investigating the attitudes of trainees to PBAs. Trainees found PBAs can be educationally beneficial, but that this benefit is contingent on a variety of factors highlighted in this study. These findings may inform the debate as to how to improve the effective use of PBAs in orthopaedic training

Aims. Ankle fracture fixation is commonly performed by junior trainees. Simulation training using cadavers may shorten the learning curve and result in a technically superior surgical performance. Methods. We undertook a preliminary, pragmatic, single-blinded, multicentre, randomized controlled trial of cadaveric simulation versus standard training. Primary outcome was fracture reduction on postoperative radiographs. Results. Overall, 139 ankle fractures were fixed by 28 postgraduate year three to five trainee surgeons (mean age 29.4 years; 71% males) during ten months' follow-up. Under the intention-to-treat principle, a technically superior fixation was performed by the cadaveric-trained group compared to the standard-trained group, as measured on the first postoperative radiograph against predefined acceptability thresholds. The cadaveric-trained group used a lower intraoperative dose of radiation than the standard-trained group (mean difference 0.011 Gym. 2. , 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.019; p = 0.009). There was no difference in procedure time. Conclusion. Trainees randomized to cadaveric training performed better ankle fracture fixations and irradiated patients less during surgery compared to standard-trained trainees. This effect, which was previously unknown, is likely to be a consequence of the intervention. Further study is required. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):594–601

Aims. To evaluate if, for orthopaedic trainees, additional cadaveric simulation training or standard training alone yields superior radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. Methods. This was a preliminary, pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled trial in nine secondary and tertiary NHS hospitals in England. Researchers were blinded to group allocation. Overall, 40 trainees in the West Midlands were eligible: 33 agreed to take part and were randomized, five withdrew after randomization, 13 were allocated cadaveric training, and 15 were allocated standard training. The intervention was an additional two-day cadaveric simulation course. The control group received standard on-the-job training. Primary outcome was implant position on the postoperative radiograph: tip-apex distance (mm) (DHS) and leg length discrepancy (mm) (hemiarthroplasty). Secondary clinical outcomes were procedure time, length of hospital stay, acute postoperative complication rate, and 12-month mortality. Procedure-specific secondary outcomes were intraoperative radiation dose (for DHS) and postoperative blood transfusion requirement (hemiarthroplasty). Results. Eight female (29%) and 20 male trainees (71%), mean age 29.4 years, performed 317 DHS operations and 243 hemiarthroplasties during ten months of follow-up. Primary analysis was a random effect model with surgeon-level fixed effects of patient condition, patient age, and surgeon experience, with a random intercept for surgeon. Under the intention-to-treat principle, for hemiarthroplasty there was better implant position in favour of cadaveric training, measured by leg length discrepancy ≤ 10 mm (odds ratio (OR) 4.08 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 14.22); p = 0.027). There were significantly fewer postoperative blood transfusions required in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty by cadaveric-trained compared to standard-trained surgeons (OR 6.00 (95% CI 1.83 to 19.69); p = 0.003). For DHS, there was no significant between-group difference in implant position as measured by tip-apex distance ≤ 25 mm (OR 6.47 (95% CI 0.97 to 43.05); p = 0.053). No between-group differences were observed for any secondary clinical outcomes. Conclusion. Trainees randomized to additional cadaveric training performed hip fracture fixation with better implant positioning and fewer postoperative blood transfusions in hemiarthroplasty. This effect, which was previously unknown, may be a consequence of the intervention. Further study is required. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):602–611

Aims. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been used due to its financial advantages, overall resource usage, and convenience for the patient. The training model where a trainee performs the first TKA, followed by the trainer surgeon performing the second TKA, is a unique model to our institution. This study aims to analyze the functional and clinical outcomes of bilateral simultaneous TKA when performed by a trainee or a supervising surgeon, and also to assess these outcomes based on which side was done by the trainee or by the surgeon. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of all simultaneous bilateral TKAs performed by a single surgeon in an academic institution between May 2003 and November 2017. Exclusion criteria were the use of partial knee arthroplasty procedures, staged bilateral procedures, and procedures not performed by the senior author on one side and the trainee on another. Primary clinical outcomes of interest included revision and re-revision. Primary functional outcomes included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and patient satisfaction scores. Results. In total, 315 patients (630 knees) were included for analysis. Of these, functional scores were available for 189 patients (378 knees). There was a 1.9% (n = 12) all-cause revision rate for all knees. Overall, 12 knees in ten patients were revised, and both right and left knees were revised in two patients. The OKS and patient satisfaction scores were comparable for trainees and supervising surgeons. A majority of patients (88%, n = 166) were either highly likely (67%, n = 127) or likely (21%, n = 39) to recommend bilateral TKAs to a friend. Conclusion. Simultaneous bilateral TKA can be used as an effective teaching model for trainees without any significant impact on patient clinical or functional outcomes. Excellent functional and clinical outcomes in both knees, regardless of whether the performing surgeon is a trainee or supervising surgeon, can be achieved with simultaneous bilateral TKA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):29–34

Abstract. Background. Recruitment of patients to participate in Randomised control trials (RCTs) is a challenging task, especially for trauma trials in which the identification and recruitment are time-limited. Multiple strategies have been tried to improve the participation of doctors and recruitment of patients. Aim. To study the effect of a trainee advocate (trainee Principal investigator-tPI) on influencing junior doctors to take part in trials and its effect on recruitment for a multicenter prospective hip fracture RCT. Methods. A retrospective study comparing the number of junior doctors participating in trials and patients recruited before and after the introduction of informal tPI role at UHW Cardiff. Results. The target recruitment set by the central trial unit was 9/month. Excluding the research team, there were 6 trainees actively recruiting in the before period (Feb’19-July’19) in comparison with 12 in the after period (Sept’19-Feb’20). TPI had a direct influence on 9 of the 11 trainees to get involved in the trials by guidance and nudging. There were 105 eligible patients of which 62 were recruited (59% of eligible pts, 115% of target) in the before period in comparison with 102 recruited (76% of eligible pts, 189% of target) out of the 135 eligible patients in the after period. The proportion of recruitment done by the research team to that of trainees was 79%:21% in the before period in comparison with 30%:70% in the after period further improving to 15%:85% in the last 3 months. Conclusion. TPI can work alongside the PI and research team to be a valuable link person coordinating and engaging local trainees to take part in trials. This may be particularly beneficial in hospitals where there is no dedicated research team. TPI role could be formalized for many trials and can be used as a leadership & management potential building experience for trainees. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The process of obtaining informed consent is an important and complex pursuit, especially within a paediatric setting. Medical governing bodies have stated that the role of the trainee surgeon must be explained to patients and their families during the consent process. Despite this, attitudes and practices of surgeons and their trainees regarding disclosure of the trainee's participation during the consent process has not been reported in the paediatric setting. Nineteen face-to-face interviews were conducted with surgical trainees and staff surgeons at a tertiary level paediatric hospital in Toronto, Canada. These were transcribed and subsequently thematically coded by three reviewers. Five main themes were identified from the interviews. 1) Surgeons do not consistently disclose the role of surgical trainees to parents. 2) Surgical trainees are purposefully vague in disclosing their role during the consent discussion without being misleading. 3) Surgeons and surgical trainees believe parents do not fully understand the specific role of surgical trainees. 4) Graduated responsibility is an important aspect of training surgeons. 5) Surgeons feel a responsibility towards both their patients and their trainees. Surgeons don't explicitly inform patients about the involvement of trainees, believing there is a lack of understanding of the training process. Trainee perspectives reflect this, with the view that families are aware of their participation but likely underestimate their role, and suggest that information is kept purposely vague to reduce anxiety. The majority of surgeons and surgical trainees do not voluntarily disclose the degree of trainee participation in surgery during the informed consent discussion with parents. An open and honest discussion should occur, allowing for parents to make an informed decision regarding their child's care. Further patient education regarding trainees' roles would help develop a more thorough and patient centred informed consent process

Training time in Trauma & Orthopaedics is pressured. In this action research project, we develop a feedback/self-reflection model for trainers and trainees, emphasising the contribution both groups make to training, to maximise cohesion and efficacy. Starting in 2013, trainees completed anonymous feedback forms after each 6-month post. The 18-point quantitative questionnaire covers four training domains: WBA engagement, teaching/feedback, research/audit, operative training. Consultant trainers completed a once-off corresponding 18-point self-reflection questionnaire. Additionally, trainers were asked for their expectations of and advice for trainees. Individual trainer profiles were generated from trainee feedback questionnaires, allowing comparison between trainer-group-average, trainer-specific and trainer-self-reflection scores across 18 fields. Trainer profiles were uploaded to ISCP and used for recognition of trainer status for SOAR. This data provided basis for local service provision review with amendments to maximise training efficacy. Results of thematic analysis of trainer feedback was shared with the trainee group. This and subsequent group self-reflection formed the basis of our ‘Trainee Charter’. Trainee feedback illustrates high levels of satisfaction with local training (average global score 4.2/5). Strengths included ‘feedback’ and ‘operative teaching’; relative weaknesses included ‘research time’ and ‘OPD teaching’. The ‘Trainee Charter’ details specific desirable behaviours that embody eight trainee-qualities consistently identified by trainers as important, including ‘honesty’ and ‘being organised’. The charter emphasises trainee contribution to training. For the first time, trainers have the benefit of serial and individualised feedback. Trainees are better informed and empowered in relation to maximising their own training. Most importantly, both halves of the training-team are explicitly acknowledged

Introduction. There is a paucity of research investigating the effect of the experience of the operating surgeon on the long term function and survivorship of total hip replacements (THR). With the advent of individualised surgeon data being available to patients via the National Joint Registry, the desire to avoid complications and poor performance grows. This potentially reduces the availability of operative opportunities for trainees as consultants seek to ensure good results. Method & Results. A multicentre retrospective study of 879 THR was undertaken to investigate any differences in outcome between trainee surgeons and consultants. The effect of trainee supervision on the surgical outcome was also assessed. The primary outcome measures were survivorship and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Rates of deep infection and dislocation were also recorded. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years post-operatively. Surgical outcome was compared between junior trainees, senior trainees and consultants. The effect of supervision on final outcome was determined by comparing supervised and unsupervised trainees. 66.4% of patients were operated by consultants, 15.7% by junior trainees (ST3–5 equivalent) and 16.8% by senior trainees (ST6–8 equivalent). 10 year implant survival rates were; consultants 96.4 %, senior trainees 98.0 % and junior trainees 97.1%. There was no significant difference in post-operative HHS among consultants, senior and junior trainees at 1 year (p=0.122), 3 year (p=0.282), 5 year (p=0.063), 7 year (p=0.875), or at 10 years (p=0.924). There was no significant difference in HHS between supervised and unsupervised trainees at 1 year (p=0.220), 3 year (p=0.0.542), 5 year (p=0.880), 7 year (p=0.953) and 10-years (p=0.787). Comparison of surgical outcome between the supervised and unsupervised trainees also shows no significant difference in implant survival years (p=0.257). Conclusion. This study provides evidence that when trainees are appropriately supervised there is no negative effect on patient outcomes

Aims. This study was conducted to investigate the influence of surgical experience on the outcomes and component positioning of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared the outcomes and component positioning of simultaneous bilateral TKAs performed by supervisors and trainee surgeons. Patients and Methods. A total of 20 patients (40 knees) who underwent simultaneous bilateral primary TKA using the same cruciate-retaining TKA system between 2011 and 2015 were included. The mean patient age was 76 years (range: 64 to 86 years). There were 2 males and 18 females. The first phase of the operation was performed on the knee that was more severely degenerated by one supervisor who had performed over 1000 TKAs. The other knee was operated on next by trainee surgeons who had performed less than 20 TKAs. The knees were categorized into two groups: those operated on by supervisors (group S) and those operated on by trainee surgeons (group T). Outcome measures included range of motion (ROM), Knee Score (KS), and Function Score (FS). We also evaluated operative time, alignment of the leg, and the orientation of components, which was determined on post-operative long-leg coronal films. Results. The mean pre-operative maximal flexion was 119.8° in group T and 114.8° in group S (p=0.548). The mean pre-operative KS was 47.5 in group T and 35.6 in group S (p<0.01). The mean operative time was 124.5 min in group T and 91.8 min in group S (p<0.01). The mean post-operative maximal flexion was 114.0° in group T and 113.0° in group S (p=0.967). The mean post-operative KS was 93.9 in group T and 92.9 in group S (p=0.978). There were no significant differences in the ROM and KS when comparing supervisor and trainee surgeons. The overall mean FS increased to 70 from 42. The varus angle of the mean coronal tibial component was −1.12° in group T and 1.12° in group S (p<0.01). The varus angle of the mean coronal femoral component was 0.24° in group T and 1.82° in group S (p=0.0447). The mean FTA was 172.7° in group T and 176.4° in group S (p<0.01). The mean HKA was 179.2° in group T and 182.9° in group S (p<0.01). Conclusions. Operative time was significantly longer for TKAs performed by trainee surgeons compared to those performed by supervisors. However, alignment for knees in the supervisor group were significantly more likely to be varus compared with those in the trainee group. This study showed no significant difference in ROM and KS between supervisors and trainee surgeons

A multicentre retrospective study of 879 total hip replacements (THR) was undertaken to investigate any differences in outcome between trainee surgeons and consultants. The effect of trainee supervision was also assessed. The primary outcome measures were survivorship and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Length of stay was a secondary outcome. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years post-operatively. Surgical outcome was compared between junior trainees, senior trainees and consultants. The effect of supervision was determined by comparing supervised and unsupervised trainees. There was no significant difference in post-operative HHS among consultants, senior and junior trainees at 1 year (p=0.122), at 3 years (p=0.282), at 5 years (p=0.063), at 7 years (p=0.875), or at 10 years (p=0.924) follow up. Additionally there was no significant difference in HHS between supervised and unsupervised trainees at 1 year (p=0.220), 3 years (p=0.0.542), 5 years (p=0.880), 7 years (p=0.953) and 10-year (p=0.787) follow-up. Comparison of surgical outcome between the supervised and unsupervised trainees also shows no significant difference in hospital stay (p=0.989), or implant survival years (p=0.257). This study provides evidence that when trainees are appropriately supervised, they can obtain equally good results compared with consultants when performing THR

Introduction. Entry into orthopaedic higher surgical training remains extremely competitive, however little evidence exists regarding the validity of short-listing and interviewing for selection. This paper assesses the relative correlations of short-listing and interview scores in predicting subsequent performance as an orthopaedic trainee. Methods. We compared data from the selection process (short-listing and interview scores) to subsequent performance during training (academic output and an annual assessment score by Programme Director). Data was prospectively collected from 115 trainees on the South West Thames region of the U.K. during 2000–2010. Results. We found that trainees achieving an interview score within the top third subsequently produced a higher academic output and had a higher annual assessment score than their peers (MANOVA, p>0.05) see Figure 1. [Academic output vs interview score rank (thirds)]. The short-listing scores did not correlate with subsequent academic output or annual assessment score see Figure 2. [Academic output vs shortlist score rank (thirds)]. We found no statistical correlation between the short-listing and interview scores (r. 2. < 0.1). Discussion. This study provides an evidence base to support the value of interviews by senior surgeons in the selection of trainees. We support the following selection process for orthopaedic trainees: long listing followed by a competitive interview(s) of all remaining candidates

Purpose. To highlight the cardiovascular responses of a trainee and supervising consultant while performing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and to demonstrate the impact that supervision has on both their responses. Methods. A third year orthopaedic trainee and his consultant underwent non-invasive, continuous cardiac monitoring while performing three primary TKAs. The consultant performed one TKA with the trainee assisting. The trainee then performed two TKAs as primary surgeon. The consultant supervised one TKA scrubbed and the other un-scrubbed. A third person noted the timing of each distinct intra-operative step. A significant peak was defined as an increase in heart rate (HR) of >10%. Results. Trainee. Significant peaks were only observed when acting as primary surgeon. Peaks occurred during patient positioning, approach, femoral cut, tibial cut, component trial, soft tissue balancing and cementation. Maximum HR was observed during cementation. Scrubbed supervision reduced the magnitude of these peaks and of the maximum HR. Consultant. Significant peaks were only observed when supervising the trainee. Timing of these peaks and the maximum HR coincided with those of the trainee. Both were of the higher magnitude when supervising un-scrubbed. Conclusion. Significant peaks in HR illustrate the cardiovascular impact of performing TKA. This impact is greatest during the seven definitive steps of the procedure that we have highlighted. This cardiovascular impact of performing TKA reduces as the experience of the surgeon increases. Supervision of a less experienced/trainee surgeon performing a TKA also has a cardiovascular impact on the supervising consultant. To reduce this impact on both trainee and consultant we suggest that supervision, when required, is best provided scrubbed rather than un-scrubbed

Trainees experience significant stress in the operating room, with potentially adverse effects on performance and learning. Psychological resilience explains why some individuals excel despite significant stress, meeting challenges with optimism and flexibility. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between trainee resilience, intraoperative stress, and desire to leave residency training. Qualitative focus groups and a literature review were used to develop a new instrument to assess Surgical TRainee Experiences of StresS in the Operating Room (STRESSOR). STRESSOR was used in a survey of Canadian surgical residents to assess trainee stress. Resiliency was measured using the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resiliency Scale (CD-RISC-10). The survey was distributed nationally and 171 responses were collected for a 36% response rate. The greatest sources of intraoperative stress were time pressure, attending temperament, and being interrupted by a pager. The STRESSOR instrument had strong reliability (Cronbach's α=0.92) and demonstrated good construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis. The mean CD-RISC-10 score was 28.8, which is similar to that of Canadian medical students. Resilience was protective against intraoperative stress (R2=0.16, p<0.001). Residents with higher stress or lower resilience were more likely to have seriously considered leaving their training program (Spearman's rho = 0.42, p<0.001). Screening for resilience may assist in selecting trainees who are better able to manage stress during surgery and reduce resident attrition. Resiliency training may help learners manage the high stress environment of the operating room, potentially improving surgical performance and learning in the next generation of surgeons

Research is regarded as an important part of higher surgical training, and forms an important component of in training assessment. Currently, there is little planning of research at a regional level. The aim of this study was, first, to evaluate the attitude of trainees towards research in order to highlight and understand difficulties. The second aim was to determine the level of support for a proposed research database to help organise regional research activity. All trainees in a single region (39) were asked to complete a questionnaire handed out during two regional teaching days. 28 Questionnaires were returned. Nine percent of trainees have a higher degree with a further 35% on progress. Each trainee had an average of three (range 0–6) ongoing research projects. Over half the trainees had abandoned research projects. Most trainees stated an interest in research and felt that research was an important part of training and should be assessed in the RITA. Most trainees felt that research would dictate the quality of their consultant jobs. Almost every trainee stated that changing posts every eight months, as well as distance between hospital sites, made it difficult to complete projects. Every trainee felt that the ethical committee process causes significant delays in progress. Most felt that access to statistical advice was poor. Almost all trainees would welcome a regionally co-ordinated research database. Trainees abandon research for various reasons. We propose that a research database would serve the primary function of linking trainees with consultants with quality research projects. Junior trainees would be encouraged to join the system and choose a project. The research section of the RITA could then focus on the progress of that project(s). Secondary aims would be coordinating access to advice on funding, statistics and ethics committee applications

Computer-assisted surgical techniques in knee replacement procedures have been shown to increase the accuracy of implant positioning and reduce the incidence of alignment and soft-tissue balancing “outliers”. The use of this technology as a training tool is less widely reported. However, the recent implementation of the EWTD 48-hour working week for junior doctors has focussed attention on the issues of surgical training and experience. Recent evidence from trainee logbooks has shown a significant downward trend in operative exposure and this is forcing changes in the principles of how training should be delivered. Trainees are actively required to demonstrate operative competence in order to progress but are increasingly faced with limited opportunities to acquire these skills. On the other hand, trainers also face difficulties with the prospect of supervising less accomplished trainees which raises ethical issues of patient protection. We present a trainee’s perspective of experience gained in a unit routinely using computer-assisted technology and highlight the potential to enhance the learning process. Navigation systems provide constant visual and numerical feedback via a computer simulated interpretation. Initially this displays relevant functional anatomy, helps in the identification of anatomical landmarks and demonstrates sagittal and coronal plane deformities which can be difficult to accurately assess “by eye”. Computer-assisted systems have the benefit of displaying only bony anatomy which improves visualisation. This can then be compared to the palpable, clinical deformity on the table. The geometry of the native knee is also made clear with the navigation system leading to a better understand of the objectives of TKR. There are some aspects of the biomechanics of the knee which are difficult to appreciate, such as the changes in varus-valgus alignment during flexion and extension. This may be very subtle and difficult to pick up manually but can look quite dramatic on the computer. The position of cutting jigs which are held to the bone by pins can be altered by inadvertently lifting or hanging on them with the saw, when making the bone cuts. Additionally the cut can be altered by advancing the cutting block closer to the bone, for example if cutting the tibia with a posterior slope. Both these effects can be quantified by using the navigation tools to confirm the cut that has been made. Trainers can have the benefit of seeing the alignment and confirming the cuts made by a trainee without having to get closely involved with the operation. Cementation technique is also open to scrutiny with the ability to compare pre and post cementation alignment. The positive feedback obtained from computer assisted surgery is educational to the trainee, by giving an undisputable computer generated graphic of what they are doing during the different stages of total knee arthroplasty. It also shows what has been achieved at the end of the procedure. This can give both the trainer and trainee more confidence in the procedure and ensures patient safety

Aims. The aim of this to study was to compare the previously unreported long-term survival outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed by trainee surgeons and consultants. . Patients and Methods. We therefore identified a previously unreported cohort of 1084 knees in 947 patients who had a UKA inserted for anteromedial knee arthritis by consultants and surgeons in training, at a tertiary arthroplasty centre and performed survival analysis on the group with revision as the endpoint. Results. The ten-year cumulative survival rate for revision or exchange of any part of the prosthetic components was 93.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.1 to 100, number at risk 45). Consultant surgeons had a nine-year cumulative survival rate of 93.9% (95% CI 90.2 to 97.6, number at risk 16). Trainee surgeons had a cumulative nine-year survival rate of 93.0% (95% CI 90.3 to 95.7, number at risk 35). Although there was no differences in implant survival between consultants and trainees (p = 0.30), there was a difference in failure pattern whereby all re-operations performed for bearing dislocation (n = 7), occurred in the trainee group. This accounted for 0.6% of the entire cohort and 15% of the re-operations. . Conclusion. This is the largest single series of the Oxford UKA ever reported and demonstrates that good results can be achieved by a heterogeneous group of surgeons, including trainees, if performed within a high-volume centre with considerable experience with the procedure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;(10 Suppl B):22–7

Introduction: There is little published on the outcome of orthopaedic surgery performed by surgeons in training. The individual results of orthopaedic units and consultants are coming under increasing scrutiny. There may be concerns that trainee performed THR will negatively impact on these figures. This study compares the outcome of THR’s performed by consultants and supervised trainees. Methods: Data was prospectively collected on 139 THR’s carried out by supervised specialist registrars (years 1 to 4) and 397 THR’s carried out by consultants. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used as the primary outcome measure and scores were taken at 7days pre-operatively, 6 and 18 months post-operatively. In addition data on co-morbidity, blood loss, transfusion requirements, re-operation, dislocation and death were recorded. Radiographs of 110 trainee and 110 consultant performed THR’s were compared at 6 months. Acetabular anteversion and abduction and femoral orientation were assessed on lateral and AP films. Cementation was judged using methods described by Hodgkinson and Barrack. Results: Blood loss, transfusion requirement, dislocation, revision, deep infection and the HHS at 6 and 18 months showed no statistically significant difference between trainee and consultant (all p< 0.05). Component orientation and cementation quality again showed no significant difference (p< 0.05). Discussion: This paper reveals no difference in the short term results of THR performed by consultants and supervised trainees. Our results show that quality can be maintained whilst training juniors to operate

Cervical spine disorders represent a good proportion of the daily practice of many neurosurgeons. The rapidly increasing knowledge base on spinal conditions and the progressive complexity of surgical interventions appear to be generating a renewed interest in this evolving subspecialty among neurosurgical trainees. In order to assess the current level of spinal surgery training and conveyed competence in dealing with spinal disorders, a self assessment questionnaire was devised and distributed to the neurosurgical trainees attending the EANS (European Association of Neurosurgical Society) training courses. 126 questionnaires were returned with a return rate of 32%. The majority of trainees responding to the questionnaire were in their final (6th) year of training or had completed their training (60,3% of total) representing 25 European nations. A separate analysis of the data pertaining to cervical spine disorders revealed 80% of the trainees completing their training in University hospitals with cervical spine injuries predominantly managed by neurosurgeons (75%). In their practical skill assessment, 78% of the senior trainees were competent in the treatment of cervical disc herniation and cervical spinal stenosis in their anterior microsurgical techniques. In emergency management of cervical spinal trauma, 45% of the senior trainees were competent in being able to perform procedures without direct supervision. Regarding skills in anterior and posterior cervical stabilisation techniques, 33% and 15% respectively were competent in performing as well as dealing with complications & difficulties that may arise. Spinal surgery training in European residency programs has clear strength in the traditional areas of microsurgical decompression for spinal stenosis and disc herniation. Deficits are revealed in the management of spinal trauma and spinal conditions requiring the use of implants, with the exception of anterior cervical stabilisation. In order to achieve a high level of competency, EANS trainees advocate the development of a post-residency spine sub-specialty training program