Abstract
Introduction
There is a paucity of research investigating the effect of the experience of the operating surgeon on the long term function and survivorship of total hip replacements (THR). With the advent of individualised surgeon data being available to patients via the National Joint Registry, the desire to avoid complications and poor performance grows. This potentially reduces the availability of operative opportunities for trainees as consultants seek to ensure good results.
Method & Results
A multicentre retrospective study of 879 THR was undertaken to investigate any differences in outcome between trainee surgeons and consultants. The effect of trainee supervision on the surgical outcome was also assessed. The primary outcome measures were survivorship and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Rates of deep infection and dislocation were also recorded. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years post-operatively. Surgical outcome was compared between junior trainees, senior trainees and consultants. The effect of supervision on final outcome was determined by comparing supervised and unsupervised trainees.
66.4% of patients were operated by consultants, 15.7% by junior trainees (ST3–5 equivalent) and 16.8% by senior trainees (ST6–8 equivalent). 10 year implant survival rates were; consultants 96.4 %, senior trainees 98.0 % and junior trainees 97.1%. There was no significant difference in post-operative HHS among consultants, senior and junior trainees at 1 year (p=0.122), 3 year (p=0.282), 5 year (p=0.063), 7 year (p=0.875), or at 10 years (p=0.924). There was no significant difference in HHS between supervised and unsupervised trainees at 1 year (p=0.220), 3 year (p=0.0.542), 5 year (p=0.880), 7 year (p=0.953) and 10-years (p=0.787). Comparison of surgical outcome between the supervised and unsupervised trainees also shows no significant difference in implant survival years (p=0.257).
Conclusion
This study provides evidence that when trainees are appropriately supervised there is no negative effect on patient outcomes.
