RESEARCH ACTIVITY IN A SPECIALIST TRAINING SCHEME: THE TRAINEE’S PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

Research is regarded as an important part of higher surgical training, and forms an important component of in training assessment. Currently, there is little planning of research at a regional level. The aim of this study was, first, to evaluate the attitude of trainees towards research in order to highlight and understand difficulties. The second aim was to determine the level of support for a proposed research database to help organise regional research activity.

All trainees in a single region (39) were asked to complete a questionnaire handed out during two regional teaching days.

28 Questionnaires were returned. Nine percent of trainees have a higher degree with a further 35% on progress. Each trainee had an average of three (range 0–6) ongoing research projects. Over half the trainees had abandoned research projects. Most trainees stated an interest in research and felt that research was an important part of training and should be assessed in the RITA. Most trainees felt that research would dictate the quality of their consultant jobs. Almost every trainee stated that changing posts every eight months, as well as distance between hospital sites, made it difficult to complete projects. Every trainee felt that the ethical committee process causes significant delays in progress. Most felt that access to statistical advice was poor. Almost all trainees would welcome a regionally co-ordinated research database.

Trainees abandon research for various reasons. We propose that a research database would serve the primary function of linking trainees with consultants with quality research projects. Junior trainees would be encouraged to join the system and choose a project. The research section of the RITA could then focus on the progress of that project(s). Secondary aims would be coordinating access to advice on funding, statistics and ethics committee applications.