Background. Stemless prostheses are recognized to be an effective solution for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) while providing bone preservation and shortest operating time. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with stemless has not showed the same effectiveness, as clinical and biomechanical performances strongly depend on the design. The main concern is related to stability and bone response due to the changed biomechanical conditions; few studies have analyzed these effects in anatomic designs through Finite Element Analysis (FEA), however there is currently no study analyzing the reverse configuration. Additionally, most of the studies do not consider the effect of changing the neck-shaft angle (NSA) resection of the humerus nor the proper assignment of spatial bone properties to the bone models used in the simulations. The aim of this FEA study is to analyze bone response and primary stability of the SMR Stemless prosthesis in reverse with two different NSA cuts and two different reverse angled liners, in bone models with properties assigned using a quantitative computed tomography (QCT) methodology. Methods. Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaveric humeri were modelled using the QCT-based finite element methodology. The humeri were CT-scanned with a hydroxyapatite phantom to allow spatial bone properties assignment [Fig. 1]. Two implanted SMR stemless reverse configurations were considered for each humerus: a 150°-NSA cut with a 0° liner and a 135°-NSA cut with a 7° sloped liner [Fig. 2]. A 105° abduction loading condition was simulated on both the implanted reverse models and the intact (anatomic) humerus; load components were derived from previous dynamic biomechanical simulations on RSA implants for the implanted stemless models and from the OrthoLoad database for the intact humeri. The postoperative bone volume expected to resorb or remodel [Fig. 3a] in the implanted humeri were compared with their intact models in sixteen metaphyseal regions of interest (four 5-mm thick layers parallel to the resection and four anatomical quadrants) by means of a three-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction. In order to evaluate primary stability, micromotions at the bone-Trabecular Titanium interface [Fig. 3b] were compared between the two configurations using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. The significance level α was set to 0.05. Results. With the exception of the most proximal layer (0.0 – 5.0 mm), the 150°-NSA configuration showed overall a statistically significant lower bone volume expected to resorb (p = 0.011). In terms of bone remodelling, the 150°-NSA configuration had again a better response, but fewer statistically significant differences were found. Regarding micromotions, there was a median decrease (Mdn = 3.2 μm) for the 135°-NSA configuration (Mdn = 40.3 μm) with respect to the 150°-NSA configuration (Mdn = 43.5 μm) but this difference was non-significant (p = 0.464). Conclusions. For the analyzed SMR Stemless configurations, these results suggest a reduction in the risk of bone resorption when a 0° liner is implanted with the humerus cut at 150°. The used QCT-based methodology will allow further investigation, as this study was limited to one single design and load case. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

The reverse total shoulder replacement (rTSR) has excellent clinical outcomes and prosthesis longevity, and thus, the indications have expanded to a younger age group. The use of a stemless humeral implant has been established in the anatomic TSR; and it is postulated to be safe to use in rTSR, whilst saving humeral bone stock for younger patients. The Lima stemless rTSR is a relatively new implant, with only one paper published on its outcomes. This is a single-surgeon retrospective matched case control study to assess short term outcomes of primary stemless Lima SMR rTSR with 3D planning and Image Derived Instrumentation (IDI), in comparison to a matched case group with a primary stemmed Lima SMR rTSR with 3D planning and IDI. Outcomes assessed: ROM, satisfaction score, PROMs, pain scores; and plain radiographs for loosening, loss of position, notching. Complications will be collated. Patients with at least 1 year of follow-up will be assessed. With comparing the early radiographic and clinical outcomes of the stemless rTSR to a similar patient the standard rTSR, we can assess emerging trends or complications of this new device. 41 pairs of stemless and standard rTSRs have been matched, with 1- and 2-year follow up data. Data is currently being collated. Our hypothesis is that there is no clinical or radiographical difference between the Lima stemless rTSR and the traditional Lima stemmed rTSR

Over the last decade stemless shoulder arthroplasty has become increasingly popular. However, stability of metaphyseal loading humeral components remains a concern. This study aimed to assess the stability of the Affinis stemless humeral component using Radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Patients underwent total shoulder arthroplasty via a standardised technique with a press-fit stemless humeral component and a cemented pegged glenoid. Tantalum beads were inserted into the humerus at the time of operation. RSA of the relaxed shoulder was completed at weeks 1, 6, 13, 26, 52 and 104 post-operatively. Stressed RSA with 12 newtons of abduction force was completed from week 13 onwards. ABRSA 5.0 software (Downing Imaging Limited, Aberdeen) was used to calculate humeral component migration and induced movement. 15 patients were recruited. Precision was: 0.041, 0.034, 0.086 and 0.101 mm for Superior, Medial, Posterior and Total Point Motion (TPM) respectively. The mean TPM over 2 years was 0.24 (0.30) mm, (Mean (Standard deviation)). The mean rate of migration per 3 month time period decreased from 0.45 (0.31) to 0.02 (0.01) mm over 2 years. Mean inducible movement TPM peaked at 26 weeks at 0.1 (0.08) mm, which reduced to 0.07 (0.06) mm by 104 weeks when only 3 patients had measurable inducible motion. There was no clear trend in direction of induced movement. There were no adverse events or revisions required. We conclude migration of the humeral component was low with little inducible movement in the majority of patients implying initial and 2 year stability of the stemless humeral component

The advent of modern anatomic shoulder arthroplasty occurred in the 1990's with the revelation that the humeral head dimensions had a fixed ratio between the head diameter and height. As surgeons moved from the concept of balancing soft tissue tension by using variable neck lengths for a given humeral head diameter, a flawed concept based on lower extremity reconstruction, improvements in range of motion and function were immediately observed. Long term outcome has validated this guiding principle for anatomic shoulder replacement with improved longevity of implants, improved patient and surgeon expectations and satisfaction with results. Once the ideal humeral head prosthesis is identified, and its position prepared, the surgeon must use a method to fix the position of the head that is correct in three dimensions and has the security to withstand patient activities and provide maximal longevity. Based again on lower extremity concepts, long stems were the standard of care, initially with cement, and now, almost universally without cement for a primary shoulder replacement. The incredibly low revision rates for humeral stem aseptic loosening shifted much of the attempted innovation to the challenges on the glenoid side of the reconstruction. However, glenoid problems including revision surgery, infections, periprosthetic fractures, and other complications often required the removal of the humeral stem. And, in many cases, the overall results of the procedure and the patient's long-term outcome was affected by the difficulty in removing the stem, leading surgeons to compromise the revision procedure, avoid revision surgery, or add to the overall morbidity with humeral fractures and substantial bone loss. With improved technology, including bone ingrowth methods, better matching of the proximal stem geometry to the humerus, and an understanding that the center of rotation (torque) on the humeral component is at the level of the humeral osteotomy, shorter stems and stemless humeral components were developed, now more than 10 years ago, primarily in Europe. With more than a decade of experience, our European colleagues have shown us that stemless humeral component replacement with a device that has both cortical and cancellous fixation is as effective as a stemmed device, easier to implant as well as revise when needed. The short-term results of the cancellous fixation stemless devices are acceptable, but longer follow-up is needed. Currently, the most widely used humeral components in the USA are short stem components, although the recent FDA approval of numerous stemless devices has initiated a shift from short stems to stemless devices. The truth is, short stem devices have a firm position in the USA surgeons' armamentarium today due to regulatory restrictions. A decade ago, without a predicate on the market, it was not conceivable that a stemless device that was already gaining popularity in Europe would be able to get 510K approval, and therefore would require a lengthy and expensive FDA IDE process. However, shorter stems had already been approved in the USA, as long as the stem length was 7 centimeters, matching the market predicate. Now, in 2018, based on evidence and outcomes, stemless humeral components should be the first choice when treating primary osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. Short stem or longer stem devices should be reserved for those cases where stemless fixation is not possible, which is less than 10% of patients with primary OA of the shoulder

Abstract. Aim. Excessive glenoid retroversion and posterior wear leads to technical challenges when performing anatomic shoulder replacement. Various techniques have been described to correct glenoid version, including eccentric reaming, bone graft, posterior augmentation and custom prosthesis. Clinical outcomes and survivorship of a Stemless humeral component with cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid with eccentric reaming to partially correct retroversion are presented. Patients and Methods. Between 2010– 2019, 115 Mathys Affinis Stemless Shoulder Replacements were performed. 50 patients with significant posterior wear and retroversion (Walch type B1, B2, B3 and C) were identified. Measurement of Pre-operative glenoid retroversion and Glenoid component version on a post op axillary view was performed by method as described by Matsen FA. Relative correction was correlated with clinical and radiological outcome. Results. 4 were lost to follow up. 46 patients were therefore reviewed. The mean follow up was 4 years (2–8.9 years). Walch B1, Pre op Retroversion: 12 (8–20), post op retroversion :11.8 (−4 to 19), correction= 0.2. Walch B2, Pre op Retroversion :18.4 (10–32), post op retroversion: 13.2 (1 −22), correction= 5.2. Walch B3, Pre op Retroversion: 19.1 (13–32)post op retroversion : 16.1 (9–25), correction= 3.0. Walch C, Pre op Retroversion: 33.3 (28–42) post op retroversion: 16.0 (6–27), correction= 17.3. 3 patients required revision surgery for rotator cuff failure. Conclusion. Partial correction of glenoid retroversion with eccentric reaming and implantation of cemented pegged polyethylene component leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes at midterm follow up. No revisions for aseptic loosening of the glenoid were required

Introduction. The new era of shoulder arthroplasty is moving away from long stemmed, cemented humeral components to cementless, stemless and metaphyseal fixed implants and to humeral resurfacing. The early clinical results and functional outcome of stemless shoulder arthroplasty is presented. Methods. A retrospective single-surgeon series of stemless shoulder prostheses implanted from 2011 to 2013 at our institution was evaluated. Perioperative complications, Theatre time and length of hospital stay (LOS) were recorded. Postoperative radiographic and clinical evaluation including measurement of joint mobility, the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score by independent evaluators were made. Results. A total of 23 stemless shoulder arthroplasty were implanted in 22 patients. Mean age was 57.8 years. Mean follow up was 22 months (8–45). Symptomatic primary gleno-humeral osteoarthritis was the main indication for implantation (83%). None of the patients experienced periprosthetic fractures, glenoid notching, and implant loosening/migration. Mean OSS (44 ± 6.0) and mean DASH score (11 ± 6.5). Mean operative time was (88 ± 16.0 min) and mean length of hospital stay (1.1 ± 0.82 day). Active shoulder motion improved by (mean): 30° (95% CI 10–45) external rotation, 67° (95% CI 30- 100) forward elevation and 54° (95% CI 35- 90) Abduction. Conclusion. The implantation of stemless shoulder prosthesis in our institution offered good clinical results manifested by improved range of motion and favourable patient reported outcome measures. Although long term follow up is warranted, early results appear promising in young patients with symptomatic gleno-humeral osteoarthritis

In the past century several shoulder reconstruction systems with different types of prostheses and fixation methods have been developed to improve shoulder arthroplasty, especially to cover a wide range of pathologies and revision situations. The aim of this prospective trial was to report clinical and radiological mid-term results of a stemless humeral head replacement with metaphyseal hollow screw fixation. A consecutive series of 147 shoulders in 138 patients (84 female, 54 male; mean age of 67 years, range 40–84) undergoing stemless humeral head arthroplasty were considered for this single-centre trial. We prospectively followed 120 shoulders (40 hemi- and 80 total-arthroplasties) for an average of five years or until a reoperation. Patient's clinical and functional outcome was evaluated according to the Constant score and active range of motions (ROM) was measured. Patient's satisfaction with the treatment was evaluated. Additionally, operating times and complications were recorded. Radiological assessment for radiolucencies or implant migration was performed. The mean Constant score significantly increased from 35 points preoperatively to 62 points at the last follow-up (p<0.001). All subcomponents (pain, daily activity, ROM, strength) of the Constant score were significantly (p<0.001) higher at follow-up. Active flexion improved from 90° to 150° (p<0.001), active abduction from 78° to 120° (p<0.001), and active external rotation from 20° to 40° (p<0.001) between preoperative and last clinical assessment. Furthermore, 54% of the patients were very satisfied, 34% satisfied, and 12% unsatisfied. Operating times of the new stemless prosthesis were significantly shorter compared to a stemmed prosthesis. Over the follow-up period, all humeral head components were radiological centred, changing radiolucencies were detected; however no implant loosening occurred. Revision surgery for implant loosening only occurred in the metal-backed glenoid component with hollow screw fixation; otherwise no complication due to implant loosening was detected. The promising five-year results suggest that the concept of this stemless humeral head replacement might be an expedient alternative to existing shoulder replacements. Anatomical cutting of the humeral head and hollow screw fixation allow a familiar access to the glenoid combined with a shaft independent, less complex bone-sparing surgery along with shorter operating times and favourable revision situation

Stemless shoulder arthroplasty implants for the proximal humerus provide cementless metaphyseal prosthetic fixation. A near-perfect anatomic restoration of the proximal humeral articular surface is possible with this canal-sparing design—avoiding the risks associated with humeral stems and preserving bone for later revision. When compared with proximal humeral resurfacing, stemless arthroplasty avoids the potential technical errors that may lead to oversized implants, abnormal shift of the glenohumeral joint center of rotation, and excessive strain on the native rotator cuff. While canal-sparing stemless implants represent a new concept in shoulder arthroplasty without mid- and long-term results, the failures associated with resurfacing humeral arthroplasty have been documented in the literature. Unlike a stemless component, use of a resurfacing technique (and hence preservation of the humeral head) makes glenoid prosthetic implantation challenging and often impossible

Introduction. Stemless shoulder implants have recently gained increasing popularity. Advantages include an anatomic reconstruction of the humerus with preservation of bone stock for upcoming revisions. Several implant designs have been introduced over the last years. However, only few studies evaluated the impact of the varying designs on the load transfer and bone remodeling. The aim of this study was to compare the differences between two stemless shoulder implant designs using the micro finite element (µFE) method. Materials and Methods. Two cadaveric human humeri (low and high bone mineral density) were scanned with a resolution of 82µm by high resolution peripheral quantitative computer tomography (HR-pQCT). Images were processed to allow virtual implantation of two types of reverse-engineered stemless humeral implants (Implant 1: Eclipse, Arthrex, with fenestrated cage screw and Implant 2: Simpliciti, Tornier, with three fins). The resulting images were converted to µFE models consisting of up to 78 million hexahedral elements with isotropic elastic properties based on the literature. These models were subjected to two loading conditions (medial and along the central implant axis) and solved for internal stresses with a parallel solver (parFE, ETH Zurich) on a Linux Cluster. The bone tissue stresses were analysed according to four subregions (dividing plane: sagittal and frontal) at two depths starting from the bone-implant surface and the distal region ending distally from the tip of Implant 1 (proximal, distal). Results. Medial loads produced higher bone tissue stresses when loading was applied along the implant axis. This was more prominent in the lower density bone, causing more than 3 times higher stresses in the highest region for both implants. Bone tissue stresses were also shown to be higher in the low density specimen, especially in the distal zone. The maximum bone tissue stress ratio for low/high density bone reached 4.4 below Implant 1 and 2.2 below Implant 2, occurring both with a medially-directed load. For both implants, the highest bone tissue stresses were predicted in the distal region than in the proximal region, with larger distal-to-proximal stress ratios below Implant 1 than Implant 2 (3.8 and 1.7, respectively). Discussion. Our µFE analyses show that the implant anchorage design clearly influences load transfer to the periprosthetic bone. The long fenestrated cage screw of Implant 1 showed more direct distal stress transfer, which may lead to stress shielding in the proximal region, in a larger extent than Implant 2 which tends to distribute loads more evenly. Furthermore, periprosthetic bone quality appears to be an important factor for load transfer, causing dramatic changes due to different loading condition and implant geometry. These findings will help further improve anchorage design for stemless humeral heads in order to minimize bone remodeling and the long-term fixation of these implants

Humeral component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty has been rare with contemporary design systems. Are stemless implant designs superior to contemporary short-stem humeral component technologies? This presentation will provide information to address this question. Stemless technology became available in Europe and other parts of the world in 2004 and 2005 compared to only recently in the United States of America. Short-stem designs have developed with third generation implant systems. Advantages of short-stem implant designs include the following: the humeral canal facilitates proper head component position; modularity between the stem and head allows for modifications of version, inclination and offset to match the native anatomy and these designs are convertible for easier revision. This debate will demonstrate that short-stem implant designs provide the surgeon with more versatility to provide our patients with the best outcomes

The modern humeral head resurfacing was developed by Stephen Copeland, M.D. and introduced in 1986 as an alternative to stemmed humeral implants. At the time, first and second generation monoblock and modular stems with non-offset humeral heads posed many challenges to the surgeon to recreate the pre-morbid humeral head anatomy during anatomic TSA. The consequences of non-anatomic humeral head replacement were poor range of motion, increased native glenoid or glenoid component wear and premature rotator cuff failure. Additionally, the early generation humeral stems were very difficult to extract when revision was needed. The original stemless devices were cup resurfacing implants that were designed based on the early hip experience. The Copeland resurfacing device offered the ability to better match native humeral head anatomy and was considered less invasive and easier to revise. Glenoid exposure required more extensive dissection but TSA could be successfully completed. Clinical results for motion, function and outcome scores are similar to stemmed implants. The survivorship of the implants is also on par with other available implants and loosening has not been an issue. Stress shielding is not reported. Multiple manufacturers offered similar products all designed to try to predictably recreate the pre-morbid anatomy and to make insertion easier. Critical review of resurfacing arthroplasty radiographs has raised concern about the challenges of placing the implant with proper sizing and position. Most surgeons have implanted resurfacing implants as hemiarthroplasties. The development of anatomic TSA implants has allowed surgeons to better recreate the normal pre-morbid anatomy of the humerus. Newer stem designs are convertible or easily removable. This counters many of the original design benefits of resurfacing. The primary reason for revision of resurfacing implants is malposition followed by glenoid arthrosis and rotator cuff failure. Revision surgery after resurfacing has had mixed results. Stemless implants were introduced in Europe 13 years ago. Stemless devices share the benefits of resurfacing as minimally invasive and easier to revise. The added benefit of better glenoid access allows the surgeon to implant a glenoid. Most available implants have minimal follow-up. Mid-term follow-up of one design has demonstrated good fixation and loosening is uncommon. No studies are available that critically evaluate the surgeon's ability to recreate normal pre-morbid anatomy, whether revision arthroplasty is bone preserving and if results of revision will improve

Aims. The Mathys Affinis Short is the most frequently used stemless total shoulder prosthesis in the UK. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to report the survivorship, clinical, and radiological outcomes of the first independent series of the Affinis Short prosthesis. Methods. From January 2011 to January 2019, a total of 141 Affinis Short prostheses were implanted in 127 patients by a single surgeon. Mean age at time of surgery was 68 (44 to 89). Minimum one year and maximum eight year follow-up (mean 3.7 years) was analyzed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at latest follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with implant revision as the endpoint. Most recently performed radiographs were reviewed for component radiolucent lines (RLLs) and proximal humeral migration. Results. Five shoulders underwent revision surgery (3.5%); three for rotator cuff failure, one for infection, and one for component malposition. Survivorship of the implant was 95.4% (95% confidence interval 90.1% to 97.9%) at five and nine years. Mean OSS improved significantly compared to preoperative values from 19.0 (1 to 35) to 43.3 (7 to 48) (p < 0.001). Radiological analysis was undertaken for 99 shoulders. This revealed humeral RLLs in one case (1%), glenoid RLLs in 15 cases (15.2%), and radiological rotator cuff failure in 22 cases (22.2%). Conclusion. This prospective cohort study shows encouraging short- to mid-term survivorship and clinical and radiological results for the Mathys Affinis Short, Short Stem Total Shoulder Prosthesis. Level of Evidence: IV. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):58–65

Purpose. Traditional total knee arthoplasty techniques have involved implantation of diaphyseal stems to aid in fixation expecially when using constrained polyethylene inserts. While the debate over cemented vs uncemented stems continues, the actual use of stems is considered routine. The authors' experience with cemented stemmed knee revisions in older patients with osteoporotic bone has been favorable. Our younger patients with press-fit stems from varying manufacturers have been plagued with a relatively high incidence of component loosening and stem tip pain in the tibia and occasionally thigh. We report the early results of the first 20 total knee revisions using press-fit metaphyseal filling sleeved stemless implants with constrained bearings. Methods. Twenty three patients with failed primary or revision total knees were assigned to receive stemless sleeved revision knee designs using the DePuy MBT/TC3 system. Reasons for revision included loosening, implant fracture, stiffness, instability, and stem pain. Twenty patients (ages ranging from 42–73) were successfully reconstructed without stems. Six knees with significant uncontained cavitary defects were included. Three patients with unexpectedly osteoporotic metaphyseal bone were revised with cemented stemmed implants and excluded. All cases used cement for initial fixation on the cut bone surface and fully constrained mobile bearing inserts. Results. Follow up ranged from six months to three years. All patients had radiographic evidence of well fixed stable implants on most recent examination. All four cases of revision for “end of stem pain” had complete resolution of symptoms within two weeks of revision surgery. Long leg anterior posterior mechanical alignment x-rays measured within two degrees of neutral in all cases. Knee Society Scores improved an average of 34 points. Clinical results for revision for stiffness had the lowest final scores post operatively. Conclusion. Stemmed total knee arthroplasty revision implants with or without cement are considered the standard for most revision reconstructions. Recently, primary total hip replacements using newer short metaphyseal stems have shown promising early clinical results. This case series of twenty total knee revisions using stemless press-fit metaphyseal sleeves shows similarly favorable outcomes. The complications of stemmed implants such as stem tip pain and difficulty of cemented stem removal can be avoided successfully in non-osteporotic bone reconstructions. With stable bony ingrowth visible on early post-operatyive radiographs, long term stable fixation even with constrained bearings is expected. Longer follow up will be needed to validate this technique for routine use

Over the last two decades, design modifications in cementless total hip arthoplasty have led to longer lasting implants and an increased success rate. However, there remains limitations to the cementless femoral stem implant. Traditional cementless femoral components require large amounts of bone to be broached prior to stem insertion (. 1. ). This leads to a decrease in host bone stock, which can become problematic in a young patient who may eventually require a revision operation during his or her lifetime. Osteopenia, only second to distal stress shielding can lead to aseptic loosening of the implant and stem subsidence, which also accelerates the need for a revision operation (. 2. –. 4. ). Recent literature suggests that thigh pain due to distal canal fixation, micro-motion, uneven stress patterns or cortex impingement by the femoral stem is directly correlated to increased stem sizes and often very disabling to a patient (. 5. –. 8. ). In this study, we sought to determine whether reducing stem length in the femoral implant would produce more physiologic loading characteristics in the proximal femur and thus eliminate any remaining stress shielding that is present in the current design. We analyzed the surface strains in 13 femurs implanted with. no implants,. stemless,. ultra short and. short stem proximal fill implants in a test rig designed to assimilate muscle forces across the hip joints, including the ilio-tibial band and the hip abductors. Analysis of the resulting surface strains was performed using the photoelastic method. For each femur, intact and with the different stem length components in place, the fringe patterns were compared at the same applied loads. The highest fringe orders observed for all tests were located on the lateral proximal femur and medial proximal femur. The fringes decreased as they approached the neutral axis of bending (posterior and anterior). Distal fringe patterns were more prominent as the stem length increased. The results demonstrate that the stemless design most closely replicated normal strain patterns seen in a native femur during simulated gait. The presence of a stemless, ultra short and short stem reduced proximal strain and increased distal strain linearly, thereby increasing the potential for stress shielding. The stemless design most closely replicated normal strain patterns observed in a native femur and for this reason has the potential to address the shortcomings of the traditional cementless femoral implant

Humeral implant design in shoulder arthroplasty has evolved over the years. The third generation shoulder prostheses have an anatomic humeral stem that replicates the 3-dimensional parameters of the proximal humerus. The overall complication rate has decreased as a result of these changes in implant design. In contrast, the rate of periprosthetic humeral fractures has increased. To avoid stem-related complications while retaining the advantages of the third generation of shoulder implants, the stemless total evolutive shoulder system has been developed. The indications, the surgical technique, and the complications of this humeral implant in shoulder arthroplasty will be described

We compared the rate of revision of two classes of primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, stemmed (aTSA) and stemless (sTSA) undertaken with cemented all polyethylene glenoid components. A large national arthroplasty registry identified two cohort groups for comparison, aTSA and sTSA between 1. st. January 2011 and 31. st. December 2020. A sub-analysis from 1 January 2017 captured additional patient demographics. The cumulative percentage revision (CPR) was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age and gender. Of the 7,533 aTSA procedures, the CPR at 8 years was 5.3% and for 2,567 sTSA procedures was 4.0%. There was no difference in the risk of revision between study groups (p=0.128). There was an increased risk of revision for aTSA and sTSA undertaken with humeral head sizes <44mm (p=0.006 and p=0.002 respectively). Low mean surgeon volume (MSV) (<10 cases per annum) was a revision risk for aTSA (p=0.033) but not sTSA (p=0.926). For primary diagnosis osteoarthritis since 2017, low MSV was associated with an increased revision risk for aTSA vs sTSA in the first year (p=0.048). Conversely, low MSV was associated with a decreased revision risk for sTSA in the first 6 months (p<0.001). Predominantly aTSA was revised for loosening (28.8%) and sTSA for instability/dislocation (40.6%). Revision risk of aTSA and sTSA was associated with humeral head size and mean surgeon volume but not patient characteristics. Inexperienced shoulder arthroplasty surgeons experience lower early revision rates with sTSA in the setting of osteoarthritis. Revision of aTSA and sTSA occurred for differing reasons

Total hip arthroplasty is well established as a successful treatment modality for end stage arthritis, with a variety of components currently available. However, utilising traditional stemmed implants in patients with distorted proximal femoral geometry can be technically challenging with increased risk of complications. We present seven patients with distorted proximal femoral anatomy or failed hip arthroplasty in whom a technically challenging primary or revision operation was simplified by use of a Proxima stem. This is a short, stemless, metaphyseal loading implant with a pronounced lateral flare. At twelve months follow up there have been no complications with average improvement in Oxford and Harris scores of forty and forty-nine respectively. Radiological analysis shows all stems to be stable and well fixed. Designed primarily as a bone conserving implant for primary hip arthroplasty we propose that the Proxima prosthesis also be considered in cases where a conventional stemmed implant may not be suitable due to challenging proximal femoral anatomy. The use of the stemless Proxima implant provided a simple solution in seven difficult and potentially lengthy complex primary and revision hip arthroplasties with gratifying clinical and radiological outcomes

Introduction A wide range of stress-shielding phenomena following THA have been described in the past 20 years. Bone densitometry (DXA) stars as a golden standard in evaluating bone stock and bone density redistribution after total hip replacement. In this study, DXA scan was employed to evaluate and compare the behaviour of different femoral components including a recently developed stemless implant which features complete stress transfer over the proximal femur. Methodology A total of 120 patients, operated with six different femoral implants, were included in the present study. Five of these stems are widely commercially available (ABG, CFP, IPS, Mayo, Zweymueller) and present different patterns of stress distribution. The sixth is a custom made implant and features a pronounced lateral flare and complete femoral neck preservation. Rationale of this design is to obtain full load transfer on the proximal femur. Average interval between the operation and the DXA exam was 3 years, each group included 20 patients. Bone mineral density was measured by DXA in the seven Gruen femoral regions (ROI), using the software metal removal (Hologic QDR 4500 W, MA-USA). Results Differences in bone density were found in each group as well as between different groups. Significant differences (p< 0.001) were found between the stemless implant and the other five groups in zone I, IV and VII. CFP, IPS and ABG groups showed decreased bone density in ROI I, while Mayo, IPS, ABG and Zweym-ueller were osteopenic in ROI VII. An increased bone density in ROI IV was found in Zweymueller, Mayo, ABG and IPS groups. Conclusion Our data suggest that a conservative stemless implant with complete proximal load transfer, produces a homogeneous and more physiologic redistribution of bone density, allowing maintenance of proximal periprosthetic bone stock

Introduction: The Motus (Osteo) total knee replacement design is an uncemented, stemless, hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis designed as a low profile resurfacing implant. Aim: To review the results after five to eight years of the use of this prosthesis by one surgeon and to discuss the perceived advantages of its design. Methods: Between 1992 and 1996 the Motus (Osteo) prosthesis was used in 606 primary total knee replacements in 409 patients. The evaluation was undertaken using a clinical knee score based on the Knee Society Score and the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, which produces a maximum score of 200/200. Results: The mean age was 69 years (range: 31 to 88 years) with 53% of the patients being female. Osteoarthritis was the underlying pathology in the majority of the cases. The minimum time to follow up was 60 months (mean: 79, range: 60 to 104 months). The mean pre-operative knee score was 98/200 with a range of movement from six degrees to 122 degrees. After five years, the mean knee score was 180/200 with a range of movement from one degree to 113 degrees. To date only two patients have required a revision procedure, both for deep infection. Twenty-six patients have died and six have been lost to follow-up as they are overseas. Conclusion: At a minimum five-year review, the Motus (Osteo) total knee replacement prosthesis produced excellent functional and clinical results with a low rate of complications

Introduction

Revision TKA can be a difficult and complex procedure. Bone quality is commonly compromised and stem fixation is required in many cases to provide stability of the prosthetic construct. However, utilization of diaphyseal engaging stems adds complexity to the case and can present technical challenges to the surgeon. Press fit metaphyseal sleeves can provide stable fixation of the construct without the need for stems and allows for biologic ingrowth of the prosthesis. Metaphyseal sleeves simplify the revision procedure by avoiding the need to prepare the diaphysis for stems, alleviating the need for offset stems and decreasing the risk of intra-operative complications. The ability to obtain biologic fixation in the young patient is also appealing. This study reports on the author's mid-term experience with this novel technique.