Introduction. Comparative studies examining Fixed-Bearing (FB) and Mobile-Bearing (MB) Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) designs have demonstrated similar results and successful long-term outcomes for both. To date there has been no study directly comparing FB and MB designs of the same prosthesis. We present the first prospective randomised trial comparing patient satisfaction, functional outcomes and radiographic results of the Salto Talaris Fixed-Bearing and the Salto Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Methods. A total of 108 adult patients with end-stage ankle arthritis were enrolled in the study between November 2014 and October 2021 with similar demographic comparison. Prospective patient-reported outcomes and standardised weightbearing ankle radiographs were performed preoperatively, at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-operatively, followed by yearly intervals. All surgeries were performed by a single non-design orthopaedic foot and ankle specialist with experience in over 200 Salto and Salto Talaris TAR prior to the study. Radiographs were examined independently by two clinicians. Complete patient data and radiographs were available for 103 patients with an average follow up of 2 years. Results. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement from preoperative evaluation to most recent follow up with no statistically significant difference between the two groups in all outcome measures. Radiographic incidence of subchondral cyst formation was 8.9% and 38.2% for FB and MB, respectively. Talar subsidence occurred in 2.2% and 5.5% of FB and MB, respectively. Discussion. Our study demonstrates a higher than previously reported rate of cyst formation in the MB TAR and comparatively higher talar subsidence in the MB TAR vs FB however this did not correlate with clinical outcome measures which were favourable for both groups. Conclusion. Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement demonstrate comparable favourable

Objectives. Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone strain, using an experimentally validated finite element model (FEM). Methods. A previously experimentally validated FEM of a composite tibia implanted with a cemented fixed-bearing UKA (MB and AP) was used. Standard alignment (medial proximal tibial angle 90°, 6° posterior slope), coronal malalignment (3°, 5°, 10° varus; 3°, 5° valgus), and sagittal malalignment (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°, 12°) were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the volume of compressively overstrained cancellous bone (VOCB) < -3000 µε. The secondary outcome measure was maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone (MSCB) over a medial region of interest. Results. Varus malalignment decreased VOCB but increased MSCB in both implants, more so in the AP implant. Varus malalignment of 10° reduced the VOCB by 10% and 3% in AP and MB implants but increased the MSCB by 14% and 13%, respectively. Valgus malalignment of 5° increased the VOCB by 8% and 4% in AP and MB implants, with reductions in MSCB of 7% and 10%, respectively. Sagittal malalignment displayed negligible effects. Well-aligned AP implants displayed greater VOCB than malaligned MB implants. Conclusion. All-polyethylene implants are more sensitive to coronal plane malalignments than MB implants are; varus malalignment reduced cancellous bone strain but increased anteromedial cortical bone stress. Sagittal plane malalignment has a negligible effect on bone strain. Cite this article: I. Danese, P. Pankaj, C. E. H. Scott. The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:55–64. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2

Objectives. Our study aimed to examine if a mobile-bearing total knee replacement (TKR) offered an advantage over fixed-bearing designs with respect to rates of secondary resurfacing of the patella in knees in which it was initially left unresurfaced. Methods. We examined the 11-year report of the New Zealand Joint Registry and identified all primary TKR designs that had been implanted in > 500 knees without primary resurfacing of the patella. We examined how many of these were mobile-bearing, fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining and fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised designs. We assessed the rates of secondary resurfacing of the patella for each group and constructed Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results. Our study showed a significantly higher rate of revision for secondary resurfacing of the patella in the fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised TKR designs compared with either fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining or mobile-bearing designs (p = 0.001 and p = 0.036, respectively). Conclusions. This New Zealand Registry study shows that during the last 11 years, revision procedures to resurface an unresurfaced patella in primary TKR occurred at a higher rate in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised designs

Abstract. Objectives. Hip instability following total hip arthroplasty in treatment of intracapsular neck of femur fractures is reported at 8–11%. Utilising the principle of a small articulation to minimize the problems of wear coupled with a large articulation, dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty prostheses stabilise the hip further than conventional fixed-bearing designs. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of dislocation and complication between standard fixed-bearing and dual-mobility prostheses for the treatment of intracapsular neck of femur fractures. Methods. A four-year retrospective review in a large district general hospital was completed. All cases of intracapsular neck of femur fractures treated with total hip arthroplasty were identified through the theatre logbooks. Patient's operative and clinical notes were retrospectively reviewed to collect data. Results. A total of 91 patients underwent total hip arthroplasty for intracapsular neck of femur fracture in the four-year period. 61.5% were dual-mobility design versus 28.5% had fixed-bearing implants. There were no statistical differences between patient group characteristics. Choice of implant was dependent on surgeon preference. There was a 0.0% dislocation rate in the dual-mobility group versus 8.6% in the fixed-bearing prosthesis group. All dislocations occurred in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty with 36.0mm fixed-bearing prosthesis via posterior surgical approach. There was no statistical difference in mortality between both groups. Conclusion. There was an increasing trend of towards the use of dual-mobility prosthesis for fractured neck of femur within this department with excellent outcomes. Dual-mobility designs provide reduced dislocation rates in total hip arthroplasty in intracapsular neck of femur fractures compared to standard fixed-bearing designs at this institution. The authors recommend that all orthopaedic staff consider the use of dual-mobility prostheses in suitable patients and ensure trainees are suitably trained in use of dual-mobility designs. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. The mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design was introduced with the aim of reducing polyethylene wear and component loosening seen in the fixed-bearing (FB) design. A recent joint registry study has revealed increased risk for all-cause revision, but not revision for infection, in MB-TKA. We used the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) to compare all-cause revision rates, and revision rates for aseptic loosening of MB-TKA compared with fixed bearing (FB) TKA. Methods. All patients who underwent a primary TKA registered in the NZJR between the 1st January 1999 to 31st December 2021 were identified. Analysis compared MB to FB designs, with sub analysis of implants from a single company. We identified 135,707 primary TKAs, with 104,074 (76.7%) FB-TKAs and 31,633 (23.3%) MB-TKAs recorded. We examined all-cause revision rates, reasons for revision and performed survival analyses. Results. For all-comers, MB-TKA had an all-cause revision rate of 0.43/100-component-years (OCY) compared with 0.42/OCY for FB-TKA (p=0.09). The all-cause revision rate was higher for those age < 65 years (MB TKA 0.60/OCY vs. FB-TKA 0.59/OCY) compared to those > 65 years at time of primary TKA (MB-TKA 0.29/OCY vs. FB-TKA 0.32/OCY), however there was no statistically significant difference between implant design in either age group (p=0.16 and p=0.64; respectively). Similarly, there was no difference in revision rates for aseptic loosening between implant designs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrates no statistically significant difference in revision-free survival of implants, with both MB-TKA and FB-TKA demonstrating ∼93% revision free survival at 23 years. Conclusions. Both FB- and MB-TKA demonstrated excellent survivorship, with no significant difference in all-cause revision rates or revision for aseptic loosening between implant designs

Background: Although many of the contemporary fixed- and mobile bearing total knee systems have been using extensively world wide, there is limited information available regarding the incidence of osteolysis of the well functioning total knee arthroplasties. We performed this study to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes, the incidence of osteolysis, the revision rates and implant survivorship of the fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties at ten to seventeen years follow-up. Methods: We compared 488 patients (894 knees) who received a fixed-bearing total knee replacement and 445 patients (816 knees) who received a mobile-bearing total knee replacement. There were 187 men and 301 women (mean age, 58.6 years) in the fixed-bearing group and 167 men and 278 women (mean age, 55.7 years) in the mobile-bearing group. The mean follow-up was 12.6 years (range, ten to seventeen years) in the fixed-bearing group and 14.1 years (range, twelve to seventeen years) in the mobile-bearing group. Results: The mean postoperative Knee Society knee and functional scores were 92.9 points and 83.5 points, respectively in the fixed-bearing group. The mean postoperative Knee Society knee and functional scores were 90.7 points and 83.8 points, respectively. Incidence of osteolysis was 1.6% (fourteen of 894 knees) in the fixed-bearing group and it was 2.2% (eighteen of 816 knees) in the mobile-bearing group at the final review. Revision rate was 3.7% (thirty-three of 894 knees) in the fixed-bearing group and it was 2.7% (twenty-two of 816 knees) in the mobile-bearing group. Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the fixed-bearing group was 96.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.0) at 13 years follow-up and it was 97% (95% confidence interval, 0.90–1.0) of the mobile-bearing group at 14 years follow-up. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that the clinical and radiographic outcomes, the incidence of osteolysis, the rate of revision and the implant survivorship were similar between the fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties

Background: Durable long-term independent results with the Low Contact Stress rotating-platform (mobile-bearing) and the Insall Burstein-II (fixed-bearing) total knee prostheses have been reported, but no studies describing either the mid-term or long-term results and comparing the two prostheses are available, to our knowledge. Methods: Thirty-two patients who had bilateral arthritis of the knee with similar deformity and preoperative range of motion on both sides and who agreed to have one knee replaced with a mobile-bearing total knee design and the other with a fixed-bearing design were prospectively evaluated. Comparative analysis of both designs was done at a mean follow-up period of six years, minimizing patient, surgeon, and observer-related bias. Clinical and radiographic outcome, survival, and complication rates were compared. Results: Patients with osteoarthritis had better function scores and range of motion compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, with the numbers available, no benefit of mobile-bearing over fixed-bearing designs could be demonstrated with respect to Knee Society scores, range of flexion, subject preference, or patellofemoral complication rates. Radiographs showed no difference in prosthetic alignment. Two knees with a mobile-bearing prosthesis required a reoperation: one had an early revision because of bearing dislocation and another required conversion to an arthrodesis to treat a deep infection. Conclusions: We found no advantage of the mobile-bearing arthroplasty over the fixed-bearing arthroplasty with regard to the clinical results at mid-term follow-up. The risk of bearing subluxation and dislocation in knees with the mobile-bearing prosthesis is a cause for concern and may necessitate early revision

Introduction. The mobile-bearings were introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve the knee performance by simulating more closely ‘normal’ knee kinematics, and to increase the longevity of TKA by reducing the polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis. However, the superiority between posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs still remains controversial. The objective of the present study was to compare the mid-term results of Scorpio + Single Axis system (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, Allendale, New Jersey) for the mobile-bearing knees and Duracon system (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, Allendale, New Jersey) for the fixed bearing design with regard to clinical and roentgenographic outcome with special reference to any complications and survivorship. Methods. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled study was carried out on 56 patients undergoing primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, who were divided into two groups. Group I received mobile-bearing knee prosthesis (29 patients) and Group 2 received fixed-bearing prosthesis (27 patients). The patients were assessed by a physical examination and knee scoring systems preoperatively, at a follow-up of three months, six months, and one year after surgery by independent researcher who was not part of the operating team, and was blinded as to the type of implant inserted. We used the Oxford knee score (OKS) and Knee society score (KSS), with Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS) being the subsets. The questionnaire for OKS was printed in our national language, and handed over to the patient at each visit. Results. The Knee Society knee scores, pain scores, functional scores and Oxford knee scores were not statistically different (P > 0.05) between the two groups. Mean postoperative range-of-motion of mobile-bearing knees was significantly greater than that of fixed-bearing knees (127º versus 111º, P = 0.011). 72% of patients could sit cross legged, 48% could sit on the floor, and 17% could squat. Kaplan–Meier survival rate was 100%. No spin-out of mobile bearing was observed. The radiological analysis showed no osteolysis or implant loosening. Conclusion. Mobile-bearing, and fixed-bearing knees demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the Oxford knee score, Knee society score, and radiological outcome with 100% survivorship, at 4 to 6.5 years (mean: 5.5 years) follow up. However, the post-operative range-of-motion of mobile-bearing knees was significantly higher than the fixed-bearing designs (mean, 127° versus 111°; range, 95° to 145° versus 80° to 125°)

Purpose. The mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty was designed to increase the contact area with the polyethylene bearing, through the functional range of motion, and subsequently decrease the wear rate previously seen in fixed-bearing implants. In the literature there is no clear clinical advantage between the different designs in the short to mid-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to compare the results between a cruciate retaining mobile-bearing design (SAL II, Sulzer) and two cruciate retaining fixed-bearing designs (AMK, Depuy, and the Genesis II, Smith and Nephew). Method. Ninety patients were randomised to receive either the mobile-bearing or one of the two fixed-bearing designs between 2000 and 2002. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the WOMAC and the SF-12, both of which are validated scores. One patient was withdrawn due to dementia before three months and eleven patients died. Two patients were revised due to infection (both had received the SAL II). One patient was revised for aseptic loosening and one patient was revised for pain (both had received the Genesis II). Of the 74 patients (77 knees) that remain, they were last seen on average 6.4 years (2–10) after their surgery. Their average age at the surgery was 69.2 years (52–81). Results. There was no statistically significant difference between the change scores (postoperative score minus preoperative score) for each of the outcome measures between the mobile-bearing and the two fixed-bearing designs. Conclusion. In conclusion, after mid-term follow-up there is no clinical difference between a cruciate retaining mobile-bearing design and two cruciate retaining fixed-bearing designs

Background. There are case series of debonding of the ATTUNE® tibial component introduced in 2013. We studied the early clinical results of this total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and compared it to other designs at one hospital. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 223 consecutive, non-randomized, cemented fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized ATTUNE® TKAs at one hospital by 5 surgeons from 2013 through 2017. We excluded 4 knees with early infection and 53 with follow-up less than 6 months. Of 166 TKAs reviewed, the mean patient age was 63.8 years, mean BMI 32, and mean follow-up 25 months. We compared this to a “control” cohort of 511 TKAs of other manufacturers performed at the same hospital. The endpoints were revision performed and revision pending. Results. Nineteen (11.5%) ATTUNE® knees have been revised and revision is pending in 12 (7%) knees, at a mean of 30 months. Tibial component loosening was seen in 17 (90%) revised knees. There was no difference between knees revised or revision pending and unrevised knees in patient demographics, cement used (p=0.84), or attending surgeon (p=0.55). In the “control” cohort, there were 13 (2.6%) knees revised (p<0.0001) and revision pending in 8 (1.5%) (p<0.0001), and only 2 had tibial loosening as the reason for revision. Conclusion. This cemented TKA design had an unexpected high early rate of revision. Debonding of the tibial component was the most common reason for failure. Additional longer-term follow-up studies of this component and techniques for implantation are warranted

Introduction: We compared the early results of mobile-bearing knee prosthesis with fixed-bearing knee prosthesis in 20 patients who had one-stage, sequential, bilateral replacements. Patients and Methods: In each patient, a Low Contact Stress (LCS, Depuy) rotating-platform prosthesis was inserted in one side, and an Anatomic Modular Knee (AMK, Depuy) posterior-stabilised prosthesis was inserted in the other side. The same surgical routines were adopted for both sides in each patient. The LCS and AMK knees were comparable in Knee Society knee scores, knee flexion and flexion contracture before surgery. Results: There were significant improvements in the Knee Society knee and functional scores after surgery (p < 0.001) for both LCS and AMK knees. Although the LCS knees had better Knee Society knee score, better knee flexion, and less residual flexion contracture at final follow-up, all these were not statistically significant when compared with the AMK knees. Discussion and Conclusion: The results of mobile-bearing knee replacements were as good as those that followed fixed-bearing knee replacements

Introduction. Forward solution joint models (FSMs) can be powerful tools, leading to fast and cost-efficient simulation revealing in vivo mechanics that can be used to predict implant longevity. Unlike most joint analysis methods, mathematical modeling allows for nearly instantaneous evaluations, yielding more rapid surgical technique and implant design iterations as well as earlier insight into the follow-up outcomes used to better assess potential success. The current knee FSM has been developed to analyze both the kinematics and kinetics of commercial TKA designs as well as novel implant designs. Objective. The objective of this study was to use the knee FSM to predict the condylar translations and axial rotation of both fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA designs during a deep knee bend activity and to compare these kinematics to known fluoroscopy evaluations. Methods. The knee joint is modeled mathematically using Kane's dynamics, incorporating muscle controllers to predict the muscle forces, contact detection algorithms to compute the knee joint forces, and nonlinear ligaments at the knee joint. The tibiofemoral kinematics data for 20 subjects implanted with fixed-bearing (FB) PS TKA and 20 subjects implanted with mobile-bearing (MB) PS TKA were collected using fluoroscopy data during a deep knee bend (DKB) activity from full extension to 120° of flexion. All subjects were implanted by the same surgeon. The same CAD models for these implanted were incorporated in the FSM to predict the tibiofemoral kinematics. The average component placement from fluoroscopy data were used as an initial condition for the placement of the component in the mathematical model. Results. Overall, fluoroscopy results showed patients experienced 6.8 mm and 6.4 mm posterior rollback of the lateral femoral condyle for FB and MB PS TKA groups, respectively. The FSM predicted 5.9 mm and 6.3 mm of lateral posterior rollback for FB and MB PS TKA models, respectively (Figure 1). On average, media condyle translated posteriorly −2.9 mm and −2.5 mm, for FB and MB subjects, respectively. The mathematical model prediction for FB and MB models was −1.4 mm and −2.4 mm, respectively (Figure 2). The overall axial rotation was 5.1° and 4.5°, for FB and MB subjects from fluoroscopy, respectively. The axial rotation prediction using the FSM was 6.0° and 4.2°, for FB and MB models, respectively (Figure 3). Conclusion. Overall, it is clear that the FSM can accurately predict both the patterns and magnitudes of fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA condylar translations and axial rotations, showing consistent rollback of the lateral condyle, less translation of the medial condyle, and consistent axial rotation throughout flexion, all of which were also observed in the fluoroscopy data. The correlation between the theoretically predicted and experimentally confirmed kinematic patterns demonstrates the viability of forward solution modeling as a valuable and accurate method to evaluate total joint replacement mechanics. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction

This is a multi-centre, prospective, observational study of 503 INFINITY fixed bearing total ankle arthroplasties. We report the minimum two-year results of this prosthesis which was introduced to the UK Market in 2014 and is now the most used ankle arthroplasty in the National Joint Registry of England and Wales.

We previously reported no clinical differences in short-term results in 26 patients that underwent fixed-bearing (FB) total knee arthroplasty in one knee followed by a rotating-platform (RP) version of the same implant in the contralateral knee at a later date. This study presents intermediate-term results in this unique cohort and uses optimised MRI for detection of particle disease in both knees. Patients from the original series were asked to complete questionnaires regarding both knees. In addition, both knees were evaluated with optimised MRI, which has been shown to be useful in evaluating early particle disease and osteolysis before its appearance on radiographs. Nine patients have been enrolled to date. At an average follow-up of 8.3 years for the FB side and 6.5 years for the RP side, no significant differences were found with respect to knee preference, pain, or overall satisfaction. Seven patients underwent MRI studies of both knees. Two FB knees demonstrated a massive intracapsular burden of particle disease (average 3066 mm3) with reactive synovitis, compared to no obvious particle disease in any RP knees. Osteolysis was seen around the femur in one FB knee and around the patella in two FB knees, compared to only around a single patella in the RP side. RP knees continue to demonstrate excellent patient satisfaction that is comparable to clinical results of the FB design; however, FB knees demonstrate higher rates of particle disease and early osteolysis on MRI. This is the first study to demonstrate in vivo advantages of RP over FB designs. It is unclear whether this is due to the slightly longer follow-up period for the FB knees or a decreased wear rate in the RP design; these differences may become apparent with longitudinal follow-up

Adequate fixation of implant components is an important goal for all arthroplasty procedures. Aseptic loosening is one of the leading causes of revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is an imaging technique to measure implant migration, with established migration thresholds for well-fixed, at risk, and unacceptably migrating components. The purpose of the present study was to examine the long-term fixation of a cemented titanium fixed bearing polished tibial baseplate.

Patients enrolled in a previous two-year prospective trial were recalled at ten years. All patients received a cemented, posterior-stabilised total knee replacement of the same design implanted by one of three surgeons. Of the original 35 patients, 16 were available for long-term follow-up, with one patient lost to follow-up, nine patients deceased, and a further nine patients unwilling to return to the clinic. Each patient underwent RSA imaging in a supine position using a conventional RSA protocol. Migration of the tibial component in all planes as well as maximum total point motion (MTPM) was compared between all time points (baseline, six weeks, three months, six months, one year, two years) up to the ten year follow-up visits. Outcome scores including the Knee Society Score (KSS), WOMAC, SF-12, and UCLA Activity Score were recorded.

At ten years, the mean migrations of the tibial component were less than 0.1 mm and 0.1 degree in all planes relative to the post-operative RSA exam. There was no significant difference in tibial component migration between time points. However, MTPM increased significantly over time (p = 0.002), from 0.23 ± 0.18 mm at six weeks to 0.42 ± 0.20 mm at ten years. At one year, 13 patients had an acceptable MTPM level, three patients had an ‘at risk’ level, and no patient had an ‘unacceptable’ level. No patients were revised at ten years. WOMAC and KSS were significantly improved (p < 0.0001) at the latest follow-up compared to pre-operatively, but there was no difference in SF-12. The median UCLA Activity Score at latest follow-up was six (range, two to eight).

The tibial baseplate demonstrated solid fixation at ten years. No patients had an unacceptable MTPM level at one year and no patients were revised at ten years, supporting the use of RSA to predict long-term loosening risk. The low level of tibial baseplate migration found in the present study correlates to the low rate of revision for this implant as reported in individual studies and in joint replacement registries.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results after total knee arthroplasty(TKA) with PCL sacrificing (PCS) Medial Pivot Knee (MPK) and PCL Substituting (PS) Nexgen® LPS.

There is renewed interest in unicondylar knee replacements (UKR) to meet the increasing demand for less invasive surgical procedures for knee arthroplasty. UKR survivorship exceeds 85% at 10 years, with unconstrained (round-on-flat) designs showing significantly better survivorship than conforming designs. However, round-on-flat articulations have the potential for poor wear performance and more conforming, mobile-bearing UKR designs have been advocated. This study evaluates the wear performance of unconstrained UKR polyethylene bearings retrieved at revision knee arthroplasty.

Forty-two UKR with fixed polyethylene tibial bearings were retrieved. Patient age and time in-situ averaged 73 (45–89) years and 7 (1–19) years, respectively. All knees had intact cruciate ligaments at index surgery. Revision reasons included loosening (45%), progressive arthritis (17%), polyethylene wear (17%), instability (5%), and other (17%). Retrospective radiographic review of radiolucent lines and component alignment was completed using Knee Society guidelines. Polyethylene articular damage size (% of articular surface area), location and damage mode incidence were measured using microscopy and digital image analysis.

Damage area was centrally located and averaged 65%+22%. The largest damage areas consisted of abrasion (19%) and scratching (17%). Revision for loosening or wear was significantly correlated with greater damage area (Spearman Correlation, p=0.049). The incidence of scratching, pitting and abrasion each exceeded 70%, including 29 inserts with peripheral abrasive damage consistent with impingement between the polyethylene and extra-articular cement or bone. Anterior damage location and abrasion were significantly correlated with component position (p< 0.001). Concave surface deformation due to femoral component contact was externally rotated (24 inserts), consistent with tibial external rotation relative to the femoral component, neutrally aligned (11 inserts), internally rotated (4 inserts), and indeterminate (3 inserts).

Despite initial tibiofemoral incongruity and concerns of high contact stress, round-on-flat UKR offers a durable knee arthroplasty. The relatively unconstrained tibiofemoral articulations allowed freedom of placement on the resected bone surfaces and a range of tibio-femoral rotation during activity, as demonstrated by the rotated concave surface deformations. Such deformation may reduce polyethylene contact stresses by increasing the tibio-femoral contact area. However, similar to retrieved mobile bearing UKR which show a 63% incidence of impingement, abrasive damage on these fixed bearing UKR has consequences for polyethylene debris generation and the transmission of shear forces to the bone-implant interface. Rigorous attention to conventional and minimally invasive surgical technique, including cement fixation and component position, is needed to reduce the incidence of abrasive polyethylene damage.

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to look at survivorship and patient satisfaction of a fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with an all-polyethylene tibial component.

Some mobile bearing knee replacement designs have shown truly excellent long-term clinical results. The higher laxity of a mobile bearing helps reduce the shear forces and torques transmitted to the prosthesis-bone interface, and this could only help reduce the risk of loosening. Some argue that self-alignment of a mobile bearing rotationally can produce more central patellar tracking. However, the most commonly assumed benefit of mobile bearings is the reduction in contact stress, which is typically expected to reduce fatigue and wear. In a rotating platform TKR for example, wear is also expected to be less because the rolling/sliding motion is separated from the transverse rotational motion onto two separate articulating surfaces, thus less cross-paths and less wear. Such expectations may have dominated the thinking and perhaps even clouded the expectations of TKR wear test engineers. Such wear reduction however has not really been categorically proven clinically.

This paper combines in-vitro wear results from two separate laboratories, one in Nebraska USA and one in Germany. These two (industrially unattached labs) possess between them a very large set of in-vitro wear testing results across the widest variety of fixed and mobile bearing TKR designs. Fortunately, the wear testing methodology using the force-control regime used in the two labs was largely similar, and was highly consistent within each lab. The fixed and the mobile bearings were subjected to the exact same force fields, allowing their Anterior-Posterior translation and internal-external rotation kinematics to vary based on the individual TKR design.

Tens of implant designs have been tested, both fixed and mobile, in total (bycondylar) form and unicompartmental, of various sizes. Some mobile bearings had rotating platforms and some were rotating-translating. Some of the tests specifically compared mobile to fixed bearing tibial components using identical femoral components. Between both labs, and across all tests, no statistically significant difference resulted in wear between fixed and mobile bearings. Yet, such differences did clearly feature with known superior bearing materials (for wear) and other favored design features. Also, generally, the force-control test methodology has proven highly discriminatory in its simulation and measurement of wear as a potential clinical failure mode.

The take home message to test engineers is to expect the wear of both mobile and fixed bearings to depend more on the detailed design and materials of the TKR than on the mobility of the bearing. The results of this study re-confirm the need for wear testing to be performed prior to any clinical use on all implant designs, despite seemingly similar predicates or success of some mobile bearings.

Purpose

The NexGen® legacy posterior stabilized (LPS)-Flex total knee system (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is designed to provide 150° of flexion following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). But, recent reports found a high incidence of loosening of the femoral component related to the deep flexion provided. We evaluated 9- to 12-year clinical and radiological follow-up results after NexGen® LPS-Flex TKA.