Abstract
Introduction
The mobile-bearings were introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve the knee performance by simulating more closely ‘normal’ knee kinematics, and to increase the longevity of TKA by reducing the polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis. However, the superiority between posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs still remains controversial. The objective of the present study was to compare the mid-term results of Scorpio + Single Axis system (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, Allendale, New Jersey) for the mobile-bearing knees and Duracon system (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, Allendale, New Jersey) for the fixed bearing design with regard to clinical and roentgenographic outcome with special reference to any complications and survivorship.
Methods
Prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled study was carried out on 56 patients undergoing primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, who were divided into two groups. Group I received mobile-bearing knee prosthesis (29 patients) and Group 2 received fixed-bearing prosthesis (27 patients). The patients were assessed by a physical examination and knee scoring systems preoperatively, at a follow-up of three months, six months, and one year after surgery by independent researcher who was not part of the operating team, and was blinded as to the type of implant inserted. We used the Oxford knee score (OKS) and Knee society score (KSS), with Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS) being the subsets. The questionnaire for OKS was printed in our national language, and handed over to the patient at each visit.
Results
The Knee Society knee scores, pain scores, functional scores and Oxford knee scores were not statistically different (P > 0.05) between the two groups. Mean postoperative range-of-motion of mobile-bearing knees was significantly greater than that of fixed-bearing knees (127º versus 111º, P = 0.011). 72% of patients could sit cross legged, 48% could sit on the floor, and 17% could squat. Kaplan–Meier survival rate was 100%. No spin-out of mobile bearing was observed. The radiological analysis showed no osteolysis or implant loosening.
Conclusion
Mobile-bearing, and fixed-bearing knees demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the Oxford knee score, Knee society score, and radiological outcome with 100% survivorship, at 4 to 6.5 years (mean: 5.5 years) follow up. However, the post-operative range-of-motion of mobile-bearing knees was significantly higher than the fixed-bearing designs (mean, 127° versus 111°; range, 95° to 145° versus 80° to 125°).
