Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE RATES OF OSTEOLYSIS IN WELL-FUNCTIONING CONTEMPORARY TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN YOUNG PATIENTS. A COMPARISON OF FIXED-BEARING AND MOBILE-BEARING KNEES



Abstract

Background: Although many of the contemporary fixed- and mobile bearing total knee systems have been using extensively world wide, there is limited information available regarding the incidence of osteolysis of the well functioning total knee arthroplasties. We performed this study to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes, the incidence of osteolysis, the revision rates and implant survivorship of the fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties at ten to seventeen years follow-up.

Methods: We compared 488 patients (894 knees) who received a fixed-bearing total knee replacement and 445 patients (816 knees) who received a mobile-bearing total knee replacement. There were 187 men and 301 women (mean age, 58.6 years) in the fixed-bearing group and 167 men and 278 women (mean age, 55.7 years) in the mobile-bearing group. The mean follow-up was 12.6 years (range, ten to seventeen years) in the fixed-bearing group and 14.1 years (range, twelve to seventeen years) in the mobile-bearing group.

Results: The mean postoperative Knee Society knee and functional scores were 92.9 points and 83.5 points, respectively in the fixed-bearing group. The mean postoperative Knee Society knee and functional scores were 90.7 points and 83.8 points, respectively. Incidence of osteolysis was 1.6% (fourteen of 894 knees) in the fixed-bearing group and it was 2.2% (eighteen of 816 knees) in the mobile-bearing group at the final review. Revision rate was 3.7% (thirty-three of 894 knees) in the fixed-bearing group and it was 2.7% (twenty-two of 816 knees) in the mobile-bearing group. Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the fixed-bearing group was 96.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.0) at 13 years follow-up and it was 97% (95% confidence interval, 0.90–1.0) of the mobile-bearing group at 14 years follow-up.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that the clinical and radiographic outcomes, the incidence of osteolysis, the rate of revision and the implant survivorship were similar between the fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel: +41 44 448 44 00; Email: office@efort.org

Author: Young-Hoo Kim, Korea, Republic of

E-mail: younghookim@ewha.ac.kr