Introduction: The Charnley Elite femoral component was first introduced in 1992 as a new design variant of the original Charnley femoral component (De Puy, Leeds, UK) with modified neck and stem geometry. The original component had undergone few changes in nearly forty years and has excellent long-term results.

Early migration of the new stem design was determined by Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA). Rapid early migration of a component relative to the bone, measured by RSA, is predictive of subsequent aseptic loosening for a number of femoral stems. As there was rapid early migration and rotation of the Charnley Elite stem, we predicted that the long-term results would be poor. An outcome assessment is required as stems of this type are still being implanted.

Materials and method: One hundred Charnley Elite stems, implanted in our centre between 1994 and 1997 were included in a prospective, cross-sectional follow-up study. Outcome measures include validated clinical scores (Charnley hip score, Harris hip score and Oxford hip score) and radiological scores (Gruen classification) as well as revision rates over the past 10 years.

Results: The preliminary analysis results are given. The mean time to follow-up was 8.28 years. 20 patients have died due to causes unrelated to their operations. 10 patients had stem revisions: 9 for aseptic loosening and 1 for a peri-prosthetic fracture. This indicates a significant 10% failure rate of the prosthesis in less than 10 years.

Preliminary clinical scores in the patients who had not undergone any subsequent surgery were adequate (Oxford Hip Score mean average of 23.9).

Thirteen percent of radiographs analysed had evidence of loosening, giving an overall loosening rate of 14% at 8 years.

Discussion and conclusion: The clinical follow-up supports the RSA predictions of early failure of the Charnley Elite femoral stem.

Introduction: Total knee replacement (TKR) is a common treatment for end stage osteoarthritis of knee. The best knee replacement is one in which the kinematics of the normal knee are reproduced. Amongst several factors affecting kinematics, variation in surface geometry and the retention/ sacrifice of the PCL are considered especially important. It is not known which of these two factors is most influential for establishing optimum joint kinematics after TKR.

Method: Four groups of patients who had undergone TKR at least one year previously were recruited. Two groups of patients had undergone replacement with a single axis design (Scorpio, Stryker Howmedica) in both PCL retaining (Scorpio CR, n=15) and PCL sacrificing (Scorpio CS, n=15) variants. The other two groups had undergone replacement with the traditional polyradial design prosthesis (Sigma, Depuy, Johnson & Johnson), again with both PCL retaining (Sigma CR, n=14) and PCL sacrificing (Sigma CS, n=13) variants. An in-vivo fluoroscopic analysis was carried out on all patients. Patients were asked to perform closed chain step up and open chain extension and flexion against gravity. The kinematic profile of each knee was obtained by measuring patella tendon angle (PTA) at specific angles of knee flexion (KFA) using an established fluoroscopic method. The data was also compared with the kinematic profile of normal knees. American Knee Society, Oxford and Patella Scores were recorded for all patients.

Results: All groups were comparable in terms of age and gender. In addition, no significant difference was found between groups in clinical outcome. PTA results for a step-up exercise are shown in the figure. A one way ANOVA between groups revealed that knee kinematics after total knee replacement is different to that for normal knees. No differences were found between groups when the data was analysed using CR/CS as the independent variable. The only differences between groups were found when surface geometry was used as the independent variable. It was shown that the kinematic profile of the single axis Scorpio design (in both CR & CS ) was closer to normal, especially near extension, than the traditional polyradial design (Sigma CR & CS).

Conclusions: Kinematics after a total knee replacement differ from that for a normal knee. Differences in surface design between knee replacements appear to have greater influence on kinematics than the presence or absence of the PCL.

Introduction and Aims: Since existing data relating to the kinematics of ACL-deficient knee joints relates mainly to walking, the kinematics during more dynamic activities remains unknown; therefore, the aim of this unique study was to describe in vivo ACL-deficient knee kinematics and muscle activity during running and cutting.

Method: Fifteen subjects with proven unilateral ACL rupture were measured performing running and cutting tasks prior to surgical reconstruction. Gait analysis was used to determine inter-limb differences in displacements at the knee joint during stance phase. Simultaneous EMG analysis was performed to give temporal measures of lower limb muscle activity.

Results: No significant inter-limb difference was seen for tibio-femoral translation in the sagittal or coronal planes during any part of stance phase. The ACLD limb showed a significantly reduced maximum knee flexion angle (40.4 vs. 44.0 degrees) compared to the ACL-intact (ACLI) limb (p=0.04). Internal tibial rotation was significantly greater (7.3 vs. 0.7 degrees) in the ACLD limb at toe-off (p=0.03). The quadriceps muscle group was found to be active for a significantly greater percentage of stance phase in the ACLD limb compared to the ACLI limb (p=0.001).

Conclusion: The ACL-deficient gait involves consistently greater knee extensor activity than ACL-intact gait during running, and as a consequence maximum knee flexion angle is reduced. These findings contrast with the description of ‘quadriceps-avoidance’ gait often described for ACL-deficient subjects. ACL-deficient gait also demonstrates increased rotational instability during terminal stance phase.

Introduction and Aims: Single compartmental replacement procedures are increasingly preferred over total knee replacement (TKR) for single compartment osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Theoretically, reduced disruption of the native joint should produce more normal kinematics. This study aimed to describe and compare the sagittal plane kinematics of four different, commonly used devices.

Method: Four groups of patients who had undergone successful single compartment replacement at least two years previously were recruited. Fifteen following Oxford medial UKA, 12 following medial St Georg Sled UKA, five following Oxford lateral UKA, and 12 following Avon PFJ replacement. Patients performed flexion/extension against gravity, and a step-up during video fluoroscopy. The Patellar Tendon Angle (PTA), the angle between the long axis of the tibia and the patella tendon, was obtained as a function of knee flexion. This relationship provides indication of sagittal movement between femur and tibia through range and has been validated as a reliable measure of joint kinematics.

Results: The kinematic profile for each group was compared to that of the profile for 12 normal and 30 TKR (AGC) knees. All three tibiofemoral devices produced knee kinematics similar to the normal knee. The PTA was found to have a linear relationship to flexion angle, decreasing with increasing knee flexion angle. No such linear relationship exists for the TKR joint, which display abnormal kinematics. The PF device also reflected similar trends to that for normal knees except that the PTA was moderately increased throughout the entire range of flexion (three degrees).

Conclusion: In contrast to TKR, all single compartmental knee replacements provided kinematics similar to the normal joint. The kinematic pattern of the PFJ replacement may be of most interest as the observed increase in PTA through range could influence patello-femoral contact forces

Introduction and Aims: Uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is appropriate for one in three osteoarthritic knees requiring replacement. An accelerated protocol enables patients undergoing UKA to be discharged within 24 hours of surgery. Before such an approach is universally accepted it must be safe, effective and economically viable. A study was performed to compare the new accelerated protocol with current standard care in a state healthcare system.

Method: A single blind RCT design was used. Patients eligible for UKA were screened for NSAID tolerance, social circumstances and geographical location before allocation to either an accelerated recovery group (Group A) or a standard non-accelerated group (Group S). The accelerated protocol included dedicated pain management and discharge support. Primary outcome was the Oxford Knee Assessment at six months post-operation, compared using independent t tests. Pain, range of movement and incidence of complications were also recorded by assessors blind to group allocation. Cost effectiveness was calculated in quality life adjusted years (QLAY) using the Euroqual instrument. The study power was sufficient to avoid type 2 errors. The study was supported by a NHS Regional R& D grant.

Results: Forty-one patients (21 group A, 20 group S) were included. Groups had comparable age and patient profiles. Average discharge time was 37 hours (1.5 days) for group A and 114 hours (4.3 days) for group S. Pain on hospital discharge was similar for both groups. No significant difference was found between groups for pain or range of movement at any time, although patients in group S regained pre-operative flexion faster than group A. One major complication occurred in each group; one infection (group S) and one manipulation for poor movement (group A). The cost per QLAY for the new protocol was 59% of the standard care.

Conclusion: The new protocol allows for safe accelerated discharge from hospital after UKA. The approach is cost-effective and should help to increase the throughput of patients who require knee replacement.

Introduction and Aims: The purpose of this study was to analyse the results of a new intramedullary retrograde humeral nail used for fixation of difficult fractures of humerus.

Method: In Airedale NHS Trust and Calderdale hospitals, 282 patients were treated for displaced humeral fractures. The new nail called Halder Humeral Nail (HHN) was inserted from the olecranon roof proximally towards the head of humerus. It had a specialised locking system by opening of a trio wire at the proximal head of humerus and distally near the elbow the nail was locked with the help of a screw on a plate. Patients were mobilised immediately after surgery in a polysling.

Results: At six weeks, 95% of patients were pain free and could perform daily activities comfortably. Average post-operative Constance score was 74.7. Complications included proximal migration of the nail and the trio wire in seven cases; six patients had non-union and one patient had infection. Breakage of trio wire was seen in five cases. This resulted in modification of the nail by introducing an additional screw to lock at proximal humerus around the trio wires.

Conclusion: We concluded that stable internal fixation and a good fracture union could be achieved by this new HHN, especially in a displaced humeral fracture, even in poor quality bone with fracture at different level. Pain-free movements, and early recovery was possible without damaging the rotator cuff and risking the axillary nerve.

Introduction and Aims Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is appropriate for one in three osteoarthritic knees requiring replacement. An accelerated protocol enables patients undergoing UKA to be discharged within 24 hours of surgery. Before such an approach is universally accepted it must be safe, effective and economically viable. A study was performed to compare the new accelerated protocol with current standard care in a state healthcare system.

Method A single blind RCT design was used. Patients eligible for UKA were screened for NSAID tolerance, social circumstances and geographical location before allocation to either an accelerated recovery group (Group A) or a standard non accelerated group (Group S). The accelerated protocol included dedicated pain management and discharge support. Primary outcome was the Oxford Knee Assessment at 6 months post operation, compared using independent t tests. Pain, range of movement and incidence of complications were also recorded by assessors blind to group allocation. Cost effectiveness was calculated in quality life adjusted years (QLAY) using the Euroqual instrument. The study power was sufficient to avoid type 2 errors. The study was supported by a NHS Regional R& D grant.

Results Forty one patients (21 group A, 20 group S) were included. Groups had comparable age and patient profiles. Average discharge time was 37 hours (1.5 days) for group A and 114 hours (4.3 days) for group S. Pain on hospital discharge was similar for both groups. No significant difference was found between groups for pain or range of movement at any time, although patients in group S regained pre-operative flexion faster than group A. One major complication occurred in each group; one infection (group S) and one manipulation for poor movement (group A). The cost per QLAY for the new protocol was 59% of the standard care.

Conclusion The new protocol allows for safe accelerated discharge from hospital after UKA. The approach is cost effective and should help to increase the throughput of patients who require knee replacement.

Purpose of the study Function is strongly infl uenced by proprioceptive ability, this prospective longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the change in proprioceptive performance after knee replacement; comparing total to unicompartment replacement.

Methods and Results Two groups of patients with OA as diagnosed clinically and by X-ray were recruited. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients (mean age 65.8yrs range 57-72yrs, 10 females & 5 males) listed for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with the AGC (Biomet, UK). Group 2 consisted of 19 patients (mean age 65.5yrs range 52–75yrs; 9 females & 10 males) listed for Oxford Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty (OUKA) for medial compartment OA. The ACL and PCL were present and preserved in all patients in Group 2, while only the PCL was preserved for Group 1 patients.

Joint Position Sense (JPS) & sway were used as measures of proprioception performance. Both groups were assessed pre- and 6 months post-op. JPS was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (KinCom, Chatanooga Ltd) as the error in actively and passively reproducing fi ve randomly ordered knee fl exion angles (30°, 40°, 50°, 60° and 70°). Sway (area, path and velocity) was measured during single leg stance using a Balance Performance Monitor (SMS Medical) for 30-second interval. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Pre-operatively, no differences in JPS or sway were found between limbs in either group. No differences existed between the two groups.

Post-operatively, both groups had signifi cant improvement of JPS in the operated limb only (Mean ± standard deviation for UKA 4.64±1.44° and for TKA 5.18±1.35°). No changes in JPS were seen in the control side. Group 2 patients showed signifi cant improvement in both sway area and path (p< .0001) for both limbs post-operatively. No signifi cant post-operative changes in sway occurred in either limb of Group 1 patients.

The OKS improved post-operatively in both groups, rising from 21.4 to 35.5 for Group 1 patients and from 23.9 to 38 for Group 2 patients.

Conclusion Interestingly, joint position sense improved for both groups but did not seem to show any difference between UKA and TKA. Postural sway was infl uenced by joint replacement type. Ligament retention may contribute to improved global postural control seen after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and may explain the higher level of function seen in these patients.

Introduction: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an increasingly popular procedure for young osteoarthritic patients whose age and activity levels preclude the use of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, successful reconstruction using an unconstrained mobile bearing implant requires an intact and functioning ACL. Patients with isolated medial compartment OA and an absent ACL therefore provide a management dilemma for the treating surgeon. One option is to perform a combined ACL reconstruction and mobile bearing UKA. This paper presents early results of this new procedure using an Oxford UKA and ACL reconstruction using an autograft.

Materials and Methods: Eleven patients who underwent one or two-staged ACL reconstruction and Oxford UKA for treatment of symptomatic medial compartment OA were reviewed at one year after surgery. The combined procedure required specific precautions and considerations; care had to be taken to place the tibial tunnel as far laterally as possible to avoid impingement of the graft by the tibial implant. Also, the presence of a posteromedial, rather than an anteromedial cartilage defect has the potential to reduce accuracy for placement of the initial tibial cut.

Results: All patients were male with an average age of 49 years (range: 36 – 52) and mean follow up of 1.3 years. One patient needed revision to TKA due to infection. The objective and functional knee society scores improved pre to post operatively from 55 to 98, and 85 to 100, respectively.

Conclusions: ACL reconstruction and simultaneous or staged UKA is a viable treatment option for patients with symptomatic medial compartment arthritis in whom the ACL is absent. Early results of this technically demanding procedure are encouraging but longer follow-up is required.

Introduction and Aims A randomised controlled trial (RCT) and a multi-centre unilateral cohort study were performed as part of the stepwise introduction of a new mobile bearing knee. The aim was to ensure that outcome for the new device was at least as good as that for an established fixed bearing device. This paper presents three year follow up of the published one year results. Instability and prevalence of “clicking” from the joint were examined in detail.

Method 1. A multi-centre RCT of patients undergoing bilateral knee replacement compared functional outcome between two different prostheses, the new mobile bearing device (TMK) and an established fixed bearing device (AGC). 2. A separate multi-centre cohort of 166 patients who had undergone a unilateral mobile bearing procedure at least six months previously was used to assess complication rate and corroborate any findings from the bilateral trial. Outcome measures included Oxford Knee Scores, American Knee Society ratings and complication rate.

Results The bilateral trial revealed no significant differences in outcome between the two devices. Revision rate for all (199) mobile bearing knees was less than 2%. The mean Oxford Knee Score for outcome for all mobile bearing knees was 37.1 ± 10.1. About 7% of patients reported instability. Clicking was more common in the TMK (48%) than in the AGC (30%) and was reported as a problem in 16% of TMK’s in the cohort study. However, clicking was unrelated to outcome score in both studies.

Conclusion At three years, the mobile bearing device was as good as the fixed bearing device. There was a relatively high prevalence of “clicking” in the TMK but the cause remains unclear. Furthermore, the symptom was not associated with poor functional outcome. The bilateral RCT and cohort study allows assessment of function and potential problems. It provides rigourous scientific justification for the introduction and early assessment of new implants.

There has been a rapid uptake in the use of Resurfacing Hip Replacement (RHR) in the United Kingdom, and its use is likely to accelerate both in Europe and the USA. The current level of use of RHR is not accurately known.

It was decided to audit the use of RHR amongst Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeons in the United Kingdom, and to identify the number of operations performed in the last twelve month period, and the specific training undertaken before offering this procedure.

A questionnaire was sent to 1600 Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeons with 894 responding.

19% had performed RHR in the previous year.

Excluding surgeons that do not perform Total Hip Replacement, 23.5% of surgeons had performed RHR.

29.5% of all orthopaedic surgeons had observed RHR surgery and 23% had been on an RHR course. 65% of all consultants who had attended a course were offering RHR surgery.

7.8% of those performing RHR had neither been on a course nor observed surgery.

There was no relationship between years in practice and RHR surgery.

There was a weak association with British Hip Society membership and with a previous fellowship in Hip Surgery.

Of those performing RHR, 72% perform less than 20 cases per year. The majority of surgeons perform 6-10 RHRs per year.

Although interest in RHR is increasing, it is currently performed by the minority of consultants. Given the steep learning curve, the lack of knowledge of long-term survival, and concerns regarding metal on metal bearing surfaces, RHR should be used by surgeons with a specialist interest in hip arthroplasty. We believe RHR should be used in accordance with the guidance given by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

Aim: To compare the kinematic profile of two types of TKRs – a single-axis design Vs a polyradial design, with that of the normal knee.

Methodology: An in-vivo fluoroscopic analysis was carried out as part of a four-armed prospective randomised trial comparing the clinical outcome of two commonly used types of TKRs each with posterior cruciate retaining -CR and sacrificing –CS models. The kinematic profile was obtained by measuring patella tendon angle at specific angles of knee flexion using an established fluoroscopic method whilst the patients performed close and open chain exercises. The data was compared with the kinematic profile of the normal knee.

Results: Fifty-five patients who had undergone TKR at least one year prior, were invited to take part in this ethically approved study. They were matched for age and gender and had a similar clinical outcome.

The kinematic profile of single axis design TKR was closer to normal especially near extension. During mid-flexion, abnormal anterior femoral translation was noticed with the polyradial design. No significant difference was noted between CR and CS designs.

Conclusions: Kinematics after a TKR differed from that of a normal knee. Reproducible differences were found between the two designs, which may predict mode of failure and longevity.

Introduction: Oxford Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is now performed using a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique. Although early results are encouraging, the studies assessing outcome could be criticised for the restricted number of patients and centres involved. A multi-centre follow-up of patients is required to confirm the preliminary findings.

Aim: To examine early clinical outcome in patients with minimally invasive Oxford medial UKA using a multi-centre, multi-surgeon design.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out in three centres with involvement of six surgeons. All patients undergoing cemented Oxford UKA for medial OA using MIS were included. 231 consecutive UKAs with a minimum follow up of 2 years (mean: 2.84) were assessed using objective and functional Knee Society Score (KSS).

Results: There were 108 females and 102 males (21-bilateral) with average age of 66.8 years (42 – 86). No significant difference was noted between various age groups or between different surgeons. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for unexplained pain and one for bearing dislocation. Cumulative survival rate at 2 years was 98.6% with 93% patients having good or excellent KSS rating.

Conclusions: This multi-centre study has confirmed preliminary findings that Oxford UKA using a minimally invasive approach is safe and effective.

Aim: To study the sagittal plane kinematics of the Avon patello-femoral replacement (Stryker-Howmedica), PTA.

Introduction: Replacement of the patello-femoral joint for end stage osteoarthritis has previously been associated with inconsistent results. Retention of the cruciate ligaments is likely to be important in maintaining normal kinematics and hence improved functional outcome.

Methodology: Twelve patients who had undergone Avon PFR least two years previously were recruited following ethical approval. American Knee Society, Bristol and Oxford knee scores were obtained. Patients performed open chain flexion and extension against gravity, in addition to closed chain step up. Video fluoroscopy of these activities was used to obtain the Patellar Tendon Angle (PTA), which is the angle between the long axis of the tibia and the patella tendon, at specific angles of knee flexion. This is a previously validated method of assessing the kinematic profile of a knee joint. These measurements were used to determine the kinematic profile of each knee and they were then compared to a group of twelve normal knees.

Results: A one way ANOVA revealed no significant differences between the kinematic profile following Avon PFR and that of the normal knee. All patients had good or excellent knee scores.

Conclusion: The kinematic profile after Avon PFR is similar to that of the normal knee. In contrast all TKRs we have studied have abnormal kinematics, which are associated with abnormal patello-femoral joint loading. This suggests that isolated PFR should have a functional advantage over TKR.

Introduction: Lateral uni-compartmental knee replacement (UKR) is seldom indicated and remains controversial. It has been considered a technically challenging operation with variable success. Aim: The aim of this paper is to assess the results of unicompartmental knee replacement using a þxed noncongruous prosthesis. Methods: Eighty-eight knees in 79 patients with lateral unicompartmental osteoarthritis treated with a þxed bearing, non-congruous, fully unconstrained prosthesis. (St Georg Sled UKR) over a period of 21 years by different consultants and there trainees. Surgical approach and rehabilitation protocol varied over this period but there was no change in the surgical indications. Results: At a mean follow up of 9 years (range 2 to 21 years). Fifteen knees had revision surgery (9 for progression of arthritis and 6 for component loosening, 4 for implant breakage and 4 for more than one reason). Six patients complained of moderate or severe pain at þnal follow up. Only þve knees were lost to follow up in the 21-year period. Survivorship analysis was performed on the group using revision for any cause as the end point. At ten years the cumulative survival rate was 83% and at 15 years, when ten knees were still at risk, the cumulative survival rate was 74%. Conclusion: Based on our clinical results and survival rate the St Georg Sled UKR can be considered a suitable treatment for isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis.

When the Oxford unicompartmental meniscal bearing arthroplasty (UCA) is used in the lateral compartment of the knee 10% of the bearings dislocate. An in-vitro cadaveric study was performed to investigate if the anatomy and joint geometry of the lateral compartment was a contributory factor in bearing dislocation. More specifically, the study investigated if the soft tissue tension of the lateral compartment, as determined by the length of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), was related to bearing dislocation. A change in length of greater than 2 mm is sufficient to allow the bearing to dislocate.

The Vicon Motion Analysis System (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) was used to assess length changes in the LCL of seven cadaveric knees. Measurements were made of the LCL length through knee flexion and of the change in LCL length when a varus force was applied at a fixed flexion angle. Measurements were made in the normal knee and with the knee implanted with the Oxford prosthesis.

In the intact knee the mean LCL change was 5.5mm (8%) over the flexion range. After implantation with the Oxford UCA the mean change in length was only 1 mm (1%). There was a significant difference in the LCL length at 90° (p=0.03) and 135° (p=0.01) of knee flexion compared to the intact knee. When a varus force was applied the LCL length change of the intact knee (5.4 mm) was significantly different (p=0.02) to that of the knee with the prosthesis implanted (2.7 mm)

This study used a new method to dynamically measure LCL length. It found that after implantation of the Oxford lateral UCA the LCL remains isometric over the flexion range and does not slacken in flexion as it in the normal knee. This would suggest that the soft tissue tension was adequate to contain the bearing within the joint.

However, when a varus force was applied the LCL did not sufficiently resist a displacing force producing an LCL length change greater than 2 mm.

The evidence provided by this study is contradictory. The “lack of change in LCL length through flexion” suggests that the ligament remains tight through range and is unlikely to allow dislocation. However, the amount of distraction possible when an adducting moment is applied is sufficient to allow bearing dislocation. The length tension properties of the lateral structures are therefore implicated in the mechanism of dislocation.

The indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can be contentious. Concerns exist about implanting a UKA in younger individuals. It has been reported that it is contra-indicated in patients under the age of 60. The suggestion is that younger patients may compromise their outcome after surgery by their increased activity levels. However, the number of publications with data on UKA in young patients is minimal and the age/activity related criteria for UKA remains unknown.

The aim of the study was 1) to confirm that younger UKA patients have higher activity levels than older patients, and 2) to test the hypothesis that younger, more active patients have inferior outcome when compared to older less active patients.

Fifty consecutive patients undergoing UKA who were under 60 years (Group Y) and 50 patients over 60 years (Group O) were recruited. Indications were anteromedial arthritis with full thickness lateral compartment cartilage, a functioning ACL and a correctible varus. All patients underwent Oxford UKA using the minimally invasive technique. This device employs an unconstrained fully congruous meniscal bearing. Outcome was evaluated using Knee Society Scores. Activity level was documented using Tegner Activity Score.

Average age of patients for group Y and O was 55 and 68 years respectively. Minimum follw-up was 2 years. pre-op. knee scores were comparable for each group. (y: 38.8, O: 35.8) and patients in both groups siginificantly improved after surgery. A significant difference in Tegner score was found between the two groups after surgery (y:4.1, O:2.6). More than 50% of younger patients regularly participated in high demand activities like skiing, tennis and manual labour. No statistically significant differences in any other post op. knee scores or complication rate were found despite adequate study power.

Younger patients have increased activity levels after UKA when compared to an older age group. There is no evidence that the outcome of UKA in younger more active patients will be inferior to those who are older and more sedentary.

There are numerous ankle and hindfoot scores in existence, which have been devised and used to assess surgical interventions. All have in common that there has been little or no work done to demonstrate their validity, reliability or sensitivity to change. Which score one chooses to use for the assessment of outcome will at present depend largely on personal preference.

We have undertaken a study to assess four of the most commonly used scores, those of Mazur (1978), Takakura (1990), AOFAS (1994) and Kofoed (1995) as well as a little used but well designed score, The Foot Function Index (1991).

A cohort of twenty patients who had undergone a unilateral total ankle replacement (STAR) for rheumatoid or osteoarthritis were assessed by a single observer. The time following operation ranged from six to 48 months. All completed the above scores as well as a SF36 questionnaire. Using the SF36 as a “Gold standard” the scores were compared, both in terms of their overall results and also more specifically in terms of subsections such as pain and function.

Our results, though not to be interpreted as validation, do give some rational basis for the choice of score to use in assessing total ankle replacements.

Injury to the dorsomedial cutaneous nerve has been identified as a potentially frequent occurrence after hallux valgus surgery. The existence of pre-operative pressure neuropathy is also described but remains largely unexplored. This study was performed to investigate the incidence of pre-operative sensory deficit in the hallux valgus toe, and to examine to what extent any deficit was related to the degree of joint angulation.

A cohort of 43 patients (61 hallux toes) presenting for consideration of surgical correction had their sensation tested in pre-designated sensory zones using a five-filament set of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. These allowed good inter-observer reliability with an ICC (intra-class correlation coefficient) of 0.84 overall.

Whilst sensory symptoms were self reported in only 21% of the feet, a measurable reduction in sensation by one monofilament grade or more was found in an additional 44% of the feet. No relationship was found between the degree of sensory loss and degree of angulation.

Patients with symptomatic hallux valgus may have sensory loss of the toe despite not being aware of the deficit. Normal subjective sensation does not reliably predict normal sensory function. Given the potentially high rates of intra-operative nerve damage in hallux surgery we recommend objective sensory testing as part of routine pre-operative assessment.

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of polyethylene wear in a fixed bearing knee replacement in order to establish a norm against which mobile bearing implants can be judged.

Method: Eighteen all polyethylene tibial components were retrieved when a St Georg Sled unicompartmental replacement was being revised. This prosthesis has a biconvex femoral component and a totally flat tibia; thus point loading occurs on at implantation. The implants had been in situ between 6 and 110 months, revision was predominantly for progression of the arthritic process.

Linear wear was measured using an electronic micrometer and volumetric wear by creating a mould of the defect using dental wax, and subsequently weighing the wax.

Results: All components developed dishing which varied in orientation but matched the alignment of the femoral component. A near congruous articulation was thus produced correctly aligned for that particular arthroplasty. The mean linear penetrative wear for the group was 0.33mm (0.09mm per year) and the volumetric wear 124mm³ (26mm³ per year). The rate of wear seemed greatest during the second year.

Conclusion: The wear rate for this totally non congruous implant was much less than anticipated. The linear penetrative wear is comparable to that reported for Charnley hip replacement though more than for a fully congruent mobile UKR. The volumetric wear is much lower than that thought to cause osteolysis. The surprisingly low wear rate suggests that the need for mobile bearing UKRs, with their greater technical demands, should be questioned.