Abstract
Introduction
Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the femoral head (SIF) often occurs in osteoporotic elderly patients. Patients usually suffer from acute hip pain without any obvious antecedent trauma. Radiologically, a subchondral fracture is seen mainly in the superolateral portion of the femoral head. The T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images show a low-intensity band in the subchondral area of the femoral head, which tends to be irregular, disconnected, and convex to the articular surface. This low-intensity band in SIF was histologically proven to correspond to the fracture line with associated repair tissue. Some cases of SIF resolve after conservative treatment, while others progress until collapse, thereby requiring surgical treatment. The prognosis of SIF remains unclear. This study investigated the risk factors that influence the prognosis of SIF based on the progression of the collapse.
Methods
Between June 2002 and June 2008, seventeen patients diagnosed as SIF were included in this study. Sequential radiographs were evaluated for the presence of progression of the collapse. The clinical profiles, including the age, body mass index (BMI), follow-up period and Singh index were examined. The morphological characteristics of the low intensity band on the T1-weighted magnetic resonance images were also examined, with regard to the band length, band thickness and band length ratio; which is defined as a proportion of the band length to the weight-bearing portion of the femoral head.
Results
Radiographically, a progression of the collapse was observed in 8 of 17 (47.1%) patients. The band length in patients with progression of the collapse (mean: 22.6 mm) was significantly larger than that in those without progression of the collapse (mean: 12.3 mm; P < 0.05). The band length ratio in patients with progression of the collapse (mean: 73.3 %) was also significantly higher than that in those without progression of the collapse (mean: 42.3 %; P < 0.01). No significant differences were seen in the other variables (the age, BMI, follow-up period, Singh index, and band thickness).
Conclusion
One of the important differential diagnoses in determining SIF may include osteonecrosis. The shape of the low signal intensity band on the T1-weighted MR images is one of the characteristic findings in SIF: namely, it is generally irregular, serpiginous, convex to the articular surface, and often discontinuous. This low-intensity band is generally surrounded by bone marrow edema. Histopathologically the band in SIF represents the fracture line with associated repair tissue. On the other hand, in osteonecrosis, since the low-intensity band represents repair tissue, it is generally smooth and circumscribes all of the necrotic segments. In this study, the prognosis of SIF varied even though all the patients received similar non-operative treatments. If the prognosis for SIF can be predicted at the early stage, it would allow the design of optimal treatments in each patient. In this preliminary investigation, both the band length and band length ratio were demonstrated to be useful when selecting the optimal treatment for SIF.
