Titanium is a popular orthopaedic implant material, but it requires surface modification techniques to improve osseointegration and long term functionality. This project compares a new method of modifying surface topography (nano-patterning) with an existing clinical technology (grit-blasting and acid-etching (GAE)).

Titanium discs were blasted with aluminium oxide and etched in sulphuric and acetic acid. Injection moulded discs (with two different nano-patterns) were coated in titanium by evaporation. The topography and chemistry of the discs was assessed using atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), water contact angle measurements, and X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy (XPS). Two discs were plated bilaterally onto a flattened area of the tibiae of 12 rabbits. Tibiae were removed after 4 and 8 weeks for histological assessment of the bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio.

AFM and SEM demonstrated a difference in pattern between the square array of nano-pits (SQ) and the randomly positioned nano-pits (RAND). The GAE implants exhibited increased surface roughness (Ra = 570nm) compared to the titanium coated SQ and RAND implants (Ra = 12nm). Water contact angle measurements showed the surface had comparable wettability and XPS demonstrated similar chemical compositions, except GAE surfaces contained 6.8% aluminium.

Histological samples analysed at 4 weeks showed a BIC ratio of 36% for GAE, 56% for SQ, and 48% for RAND. At 8 weeks, the BIC ratio was 52% for GAE, 80% for SQ, and 72% for RAND implants. This increase in BIC at 8 weeks for both SQ and RAND implants compared to GAE was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

This project demonstrated there was an increase in interfacial bone to implant contact when using a nano-scale topography incorporating nano-pits compared to conventional grit-blasted acid-etched micro-scale topographies. This enhancement of BIC may reduce long term loosening of orthopaedic implants due to mechanical and biological attrition at the interface.

The surgical treatment options for patients who have sustained an intra-capsular hip fracture can vary depending on a number of patient and fracture related factors. Currently most national guidelines support the use of cemented prostheses for patient undergoing hemi-arthroplasty surgery. Uncemented prostheses are commonly used for a variety of indications including those patients who have significant medical co-morbidities.

To determine whether cemented hemi-arthroplasty is associated with a higher post operative mortality when compared to uncemented procedures. Data was extracted from the Scottish SMR01 database from 01/04/1997 from all patients who were admitted to hospital after sustaining a hip fracture. We investigated mortality at day 1, 2, 4, 7, 30, 120 and 1 year from surgery vs. that on day 0. In order to control for the effects of confounding variables between patients cohorts, 12 case-mix variable were used to construct a multivariable logistic regression analysis model to determine the independent effect of prosthesis fixation method.

There were 64,979 patients were included in the study. Mortality for osteosynthesis of extra-capsular fractures was consistently lower when compared to that for surgical procedures for intra-capsular fractures. At day 0, uncemented hemi-arthroplasty operations had a lower associated mortality (p<0.001) when compared to cemented implant designs. Unadjusted figures showed an increased mortality equal to 1 extra death per 424 procedures. By day 1 this had become 1 extra death per 338 procedures. By day 7 cumulative mortality was less for cemented than for uncemented procedures though this did not reach significance until day 120.

When compared to uncemented fixation techniques, cemented hemiarthroplasty is associated with a higher mortality in the immediate postoperative period. However, by day 120 and beyond the trend is reversed.

We noted, in the immature ankle, a discrepancy between the alignment of the distal tibial physis, the distal tibial articular surface and the talar dome in the coronal plane. This led to variability in the orientation of wires and half pins used for limb reconstruction depending on which landmark was used. We aimed to investigate the variability in normal ankle joints to determine which is the most reliable landmark to use for correct wire or pin insertion.

Radiographs of the ankle of 98 children were analysed. A variety of angular measurements were made with respect to the axis of the tibia and classified according to methods described by Shapiro & Mulhotra.

We investigated the inter- and intra-observer variation in these measurements and classifications. Using the Bland-Altman method we found that the talar plafond angle (TPA) showed less variation than the lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) with narrower limits of agreement and coefficients of repeatability. This was the same across the age and gender groups studied.

The Shapiro classification of distal tibial epiphyseal shape did not appear to correlate with age or gender, but showed more inter- and intra-rater variation using weighted Kappa analysis.

This study suggests that when measuring the orientation of the ankle joint from plain radiographs that the TPA is a more reliable measurement than the LDTA and this should be taken into consideration during decision making and pre-operative planning of lower limb deformity correction.

The number of primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) procedures carried out in England and Wales is increasing annually. The British Orthopaedic Association guidelines for follow up currently differ for patients with TKA and THA. In THA the BOA recommends that Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) 10A rated implants should be followed up in the first year, once at seven years and three yearly thereafter. The BOA guidelines for TKA minimum requirement is radiographs at 5 years and each five years thereafter. Few studies have investigated if early follow up affects patient management following total hip and knee arthroplasty

We carried out a retrospective review of all revision procedures carried out in our institution between April 2010 to April 2013. The medical notes and radiographs for each patient were examined to determine the operative indications and patients symptoms. 92 knee revisions and 143 hip revisions were identified. Additionally we retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 300 one year routine arthroplasty follow up appointments.

The mean time of hip revision was 8.5years (range 0 to 27years) and 5.6years (range 0 to 20years) for knee revisions. The commonest cause for revision was aseptic loosening associated with pain in 49 (53%) of knee revision patients and 89 (63%) of hip revisions. Infection accounted for 26 (28%) knee revisions and 16 (12%) hip revisions. Only 1% of hip and knee revisions was carried out in asymptomatic patients with aseptic loosening.

We did not identify any cases were a patients management was altered at the routine arthroplasty review clinic and none were referred on for further surgical treatment. The findings of our study suggest there is no evidence for a routine one year arthroplasty review and revisions were carried out in asymptomatic patients in 1% of patients.

When performing total hip replacements in patients with hip dysplasia, acetabular augmentation may be required to prevent early component failure. Preoperative radiographic templating may help estimate acetabularcomponent coverage but has not previously been shown to predict the need for augmentation.

We developed a simple method to estimate the percentage of acetabular component coverage from pre-operative radiographs (True: False cup ratio). We aimed to evaluate whether this couldpredict the need foracetabular augmentation at primary total hip replacement for patients with dysplastic hips.

We reviewed all patients with hip dysplasia who underwent a primary total hip replacement from 2005–2012. Classification of hip dysplasia (Crowe), centre edge angle (CEA), Sharp and Tonnis angles were determined on pre-operative radiographs for each patient. Templating was performed on anteroposteriorand lateral view hip radiographs to determine the likely percentage of acetabular component coverage using the True: False cup ratio. Patients requiring acetabular augmentation at time of primary total hip arthroplasty were noted.

128 cases were reviewed, 31 (24%) required acetabularaugmentation. Comparison between augmented and non-augmented cases revealed no difference in the mean CEA (p = 0.19), Sharp angles (p = 0.76) or Tonnis angles (p = 0.32). A lower True Cup: False Cup ratio was observed in the augmented groupcompared to the non-augmented group(median = 0.68 vs 0.88, p < 0.01).

Preoperative templating can help predict which dysplastic hips are likely to require acetabular augmentation at primary total hip replacement.

Three distal femoral axes have been described to aid in alignment of the femoral component; the Trans Epicondylar Axis (TEA), the Posterior Condylar Axis (PCA) and the Antero Posterior (AP) axis. Our aim was to identify if there was a reproducible relationship between the axes. Hopefully this will aid the surgeon to more accurately judge the rotation of the femoral cutting block by using the axes with the least variation. This is the first study compare all three distal femoral axes with each other using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a Caucasian population awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

We identified the relationship between these axes by performing MRI scans on 89 patients awaiting TKA with patient-specific instrumentation. Measurements were taken by two observers.

Patients had a mean age of 62.5 years (range 32–91). 51 patients were female. The mean angle between the TEA and AP axis was 92.78°, standard deviation (SD) 2.51° (range 88°–99°). The mean angle between the AP axis and PCA was 95.43°, SD 2.75° (range 85°–105°). The mean angle between the TEA and PCA was 2.78°, SD 1.91° (range 0°–10°).

We conclude that while there is a reproducible relationship between the differing femoral axes, there is a significant range in the relationship between the femoral axes. This range may lead to greater inaccuracy than has previously been appreciated when defining the rotation of the femoral component. There is most variation between the PCA and the AP axis. Most systems have a cutting block with 3° of external rotation from the PCA and this would be parallel to the TEA in the majority, but not all, cases in this series. This data suggests that if the surgeon is to pick two axes to reference from, one should include the TEA.

When performing total knee replacement (TKR), surgeons must select a size of tibial component tray that most closely matches the anatomy of the proximal tibia. As implants are available in a limited range of sizes, it may be necessary to slightly under or oversize the component. There are concerns overhang could lead to pain from irritation of soft tissues, and underhang could lead to subsidence and failure.

154 TKRs at 1- or 5-year follow up were reviewed prospectively. Oxford Knee Score (OKS), WOMAC and SF-12 was recorded along with pain scores. Scaled radiographs were reviewed and grouped into perfect sizing (78 TKRs, 50.6%), underhang in isolation (48 TKRs, 31.1%), minor overhang 1–3 mm (10 TKRs, 6.49%) or major overhang >3 mm (18 TKRs, 11.7%).

There was no significant difference in the SF-12 (p=0.356), post-operative OKS (p=0.401) or WOMAC (p=0.466) score. For the OKS, there was no difference for the scores collected at 1 year (p=0.176) or at 5 years (p=0.883).

Pre-operative OKS was well matched between the groups (p=0.152). There was no significant difference in the improvement in OKS from pre-operative scores (p=0.662). There was no significant difference in either the OKS or WOMAC pain scores (p=0.237 and 0.542 respectively).

There was no significant association of medial overhang with?medial knee pain (p=1.000) or lateral overhang with lateral knee pain (p=0.569) when compared to the group of patients with a well sized tibial component.

Our results suggest that tibial component overhang or underhang has no detrimental affect on outcome or pain scores. Surgeons should continue to select the tibial component that most closely fits the rim of the proximal tibia while accepting slight overhang if necessary due to the potential longer-term complications of subsidence and premature failure with an undersized tibial tray.

Carpal tunnel decompression is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic operations. Last year 160 patients attended our department for surgery. There have been reports in the literature of good results and improved patient satisfaction for wound closure with Vicryl Rapide following Dupuytren's surgery.

We looked at 200 consecutive patients who underwent carpal tunnel decompression. Wounds were closed using either non-absorbable monofilament sutures (first 97 patients) or interrupted Vicryl Rapide (next 103 patients). We compared the incidence of wound problems in the early post operative period, scar sensitivity and the number of patients requiring a further outpatient appointment because of ongoing problems associated with these issues.

There was a higher incidence of early wound problems (p=0.0359) in patients whose wounds were closed with nylon. There was no difference in the rates of scar tenderness (p=1) or in the number of patients requiring further clinic appointments (p=0.356). There are also potential cost savings in using absorbable sutures as they require fewer sundry items at the dressings clinic.

In conclusion there were fewer problems associated with wound closure with interrupted Vicryl Rapide sutures than with nylon in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression.

The management of displaced forearm diaphyseal fractures in adults is predominantly operative. Anatomical reduction is necessary to infer optimal motion and strength. The authors have observed an intraoperative technique where passive pronosupination is examined to assess quality of reduction as a surrogate marker for active movement.

We aimed to assess the value of this technique, but intentionally malreducing a simulated diaphyseal fracture of a radius in a cadaveric model, and measuring the effect on pronosupination.

A single cadaveric arm was prepared and pronation/supination was examined according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidance. A Henry approach was then performed and a transverse osteotomy achieved in the radial diaphysis. A volar locking plate was used to hold the radius in progressive amounts of translation and rotation, with pronosupaintion measured with a goniometer.

The radius could be grossly malreduced with no effect on pronation and supination until the extremes of deformity. The forearm showed more tolerance with rotational malreduction than translation. Passive pronation was more sensitive for malreduction than supination.

The use of passive pronosupination to assess quality of reduction is misleading.

Current Department of Health guidelines state that medical personnel should be ‘bare below the elbows’. Critics of this policy have raised concerns over the impact of these dress regulations on the portrayed image and professionalism of doctors. However, the importance of the doctor's appearance in relation to other professional attributes is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinion of patients and their relatives on the importance of appearance and the style of clothing worn by orthopaedic doctors. The secondary aim was to establish how patients would prefer orthopaedic doctors to be dressed.

The study consisted of the administration of a survey questionnaire to 427 subjects attending the orthopaedic outpatient clinics in four hospitals across Scotland. Subjects were asked about the importance or otherwise of various aspects of the doctors’ appearance and responded using a modified Likert 5-point scale. Subjects’ rank preferences for four different styles of doctors’ clothing were also determined. The study was appropriately powered to identify a 0.5 difference in mean rank values with 0.90 power at a = 0.05.

The majority of respondents felt doctors’ appearance was important but not as important as compassion, politeness and knowledge. Only 50% felt that the style of doctors clothing mattered; what proved more important was an impression of cleanliness and good personal hygiene. In terms of how patients would prefer doctors to dress in clinic, the most popular choice proved to be the smart casual style of dress, which conforms with the ‘bare below the elbows’ dress code policy. Indeed, the smart casual clothing style was the highest ranked choice irrespective of patient age, gender, regional or socioeconomic background.

In our department, currently there is variation in the number of xrays that patients receive following ORIF of distal radius fractures.

This audit investigated the use of xrays following ORIF of distal radius fractures. Patients were identified from daily trauma lists. Patients who had a primary ORIF or ORIF following failed conservative management were included in the study. PACS was used to identify the number of post-operative xrays performed. These were correlated with clinic letters to see if there was any change in management following xray review.

Between July and November 2013, 102 patients were admitted with distal radius fracture. Of these, 35 (mean age:51 years) had an ORIF. Four were not followed-up in Scotland. Of the remaining 31 patients, eleven had one post-operative xray, seventeen had two and three had three xrays. Of the patients who had one xray, seven had the xray in the first three weeks, the rest at six weeks. Patients who had two xrays had an xray at two and 6 weeks. Of the three patients who had three xrays, two had comminuted fractures that required further CT investigation, one for a suspicion of an intra-articular screw, the other for possibility of non-union. The third patient had no apparent reason for requiring three xrays. Thus of the 31 patients in the study, 29 did not require any further investigations.

The results show a variation in the frequency of post-operative xrays after fixation of distal radius fractures. In most cases the management plan was unchanged after plain xrays were undertaken. This suggests that a protocol driven approach to follow-up after fixation of distal radius fractures could reduce the burden on fracture clinic and radiology departments.

We propose that unless indicated by intra-operative findings or post-operative concerns, patients should have xrays at the two week review appointment.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is the result of abnormal contact/impingement of the femoral head-neck junction and acetabulum during motion. This can be corrected by surgical dislocation (using Ganz's trochanteric osteotomy) and femoral osteochondroplasty +/− acetabular rim resection. Our study aimed to assess the improvement in hip scores following open osteochondroplasty to predict outcomes based on patient characteristics.

This was a retrospective case note analysis of a single surgeon case series over a 4 year period. Inclusion criteria were open osteochondroplasty, complete pre- and post-op hip scores available), Tonnis osteoarthritis grade 0 or 1, with 1 year followup. Data was extracted from electronic and paper case notes for pre- and post-op Modified Harris Hip Scores (MHHS), Non-arthritis Hip Scores (NAHS) and SF-12 general satisfaction scores, as well as baseline patient demographics. Two independent observers used the PACS radiology system to examine x-rays and MRI. SPSS version 19 was used for statistical analysis.

42 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was an overall improvement in hip scores after the procedure. Mean pre-op scores were MHHS 52.5, NAHS 44.0, SF-12 32.1. Mean post-op scores were MHHS 66.1, NAHS 58.7, SF-12 36.4. Therefore mean improvements were seen in MHHS (13.6), NAHS (14.7) and SF-12 (4.3), all significant at p<0.005 when paired t-test was used for analysis. Pearson correlation for subgroup analysis showed no significant correlation of scores with age, centre-edge angle or alpha angles. Furthermore, no significant difference was seen between males and females (independent t test).

Open osteochondroplasty improves symptoms and function based on patient reported outcome measures. Although the mean scores improved, some patients’ scores deteriorated. We have not identified any statistically significant predictors of outcome, and therefore patient selection remains unclear.

Primary bony tumours of the elbow account for approximately 1% of all osseous tumours. The delayed diagnosis is commonly reported in the literature as a result of lack of clinician familiarity. We present the largest series of primary bone tumours of the elbow in the English literature.

We sought to identify characteristics specific to primary elbow tumours and compare these to the current literature. We discuss cases of misdiagnosis and reasons for any delay in diagnosis. The authors also recommend a collaborative protocol for the diagnosis and management of these rare tumours.

A prospectively collected national database of all bone tumours is maintained by an independent clerk. The registry and case notes were retrospectively reviewed from January 1954 until June 2013. Eighty cases of primary osseous elbow tumours were studied. Tumours were classified as benign or malignant and then graded according to the Enneking spectrum.

There were no benign latent cases in this series. All cases in this series required surgical intervention. These cases presented with persistent rest pain, with or without swelling. The distal humerus was responsible for the majority and most aggressive of cases. The multidisciplinary approach at a specialist centre is integral to management. Misdiagnosis was evident in 12.5 % of all cases. Malignant tumours carried a 5-year mortality of 61%. Benign tumours exhibited a 19% recurrence rate and in particular, giant cell tumour was very aggressive. The evolution in treatment modalities has clearly benefited patients.

Clinicians should be aware that elbow tumours can be initially misdiagnosed as soft tissue injuries or cysts. The suspicion of a tumour should be raised in the patient with unremitting, unexplained non-mechanical bony elbow pain. We suggest an investigatory and treatment protocol to avoid a delay to diagnosis. With high rates of local recurrence, we recommend regular postoperative reviews.

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical course of patients with Down's syndrome (DS) and congentital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) treated with the Ponseti regimen.

The members of the United Kingdom Ponseti Users Group were contacted to provide details of patients with DS and CTEV, whom they had treated using the Ponseti regimen. Nine patients (13 feet: 7 right, 6 left) were identified, and the case notes were reviewed. Six patients were male, 3 female. In all but one case, the DS was diagnosed postnatally. Co-morbidites included atrioventricular septal defect, hearing deficiencies and plagiocephaly. The initial mean Pirani score was 4.5 (range 3.0 to 6.0). Casting was commenced at a mean of 25 days (range 12–84 days). The mean number of casts required was 7 (range 3 to 12), taking a mean of 6.5 weeks (range 3–12) to achieve correction. 6 of the 13 feet (46%) required a tendoachilles tenotomy, and 2 of 13 (15%) required re-casting. No patients have required a tibialis anterior transfer, soft tissue releases or bony procedures, at a mean follow up of 44 months (9–65 months).

The results of the Ponseti regimen have not been described in patients with DS. From this small series, we can conclude that all patients responded to the regime. A tendoachilles tenotomy was required in just under half, and further casting was required in only 15% of the treated feet. No patient has required further surgery. The tenotomy rate is lower than in most series, but otherwise, the results are comparable to those for idiopathic CTEV for which the Ponseti regimen has become the gold standard. Parents of children with DS can be reassured that in the short term their feet will respond well to Ponseti treatment