Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Bone & Joint Research
Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings
View my account settingsVisit Bone & Joint Research at:
We performed A total of 12 cadaveric lower limbs were tested with a commercial
image-free navigation system using trackers secured by bone screws.
We then tested a non-invasive fabric-strap system. The lower limb
was secured at 10° intervals from 0° to 60° of knee flexion and
100 N of force was applied perpendicular to the tibia. Acceptable
coefficient of repeatability (CR) and limits of agreement (LOA)
of 3 mm were set based on diagnostic criteria for anterior cruciate
ligament (ACL) insufficiency.Objectives
Methods
Electronic forms of data collection have gained interest in recent
years. In orthopaedics, little is known about patient preference
regarding pen-and-paper or electronic questionnaires. We aimed to
determine whether patients undergoing total hip (THR) or total knee
replacement (TKR) prefer pen-and-paper or electronic questionnaires
and to identify variables that predict preference for electronic
questionnaires. We asked patients who participated in a multi-centre cohort study
investigating improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
after THR and TKR using pen-and-paper questionnaires, which mode
of questionnaire they preferred. Patient age, gender, highest completed
level of schooling, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, indication
for joint replacement and pre-operative HRQoL were compared between
the groups preferring different modes of questionnaire. We then
performed logistic regression analyses to investigate which variables
independently predicted preference of electronic questionnaires.Objectives
Methods
The peer review process for the evaluation of
manuscripts for publication needs to be better understood by the
orthopaedic community. Improving the degree of transparency surrounding
the review process and educating orthopaedic surgeons on how to
improve their manuscripts for submission will help improve both
the review procedure and resultant feedback, with an increase in
the quality of the subsequent publications. This article seeks to clarify
the peer review process and suggest simple ways in which the quality
of submissions can be improved to maximise publication success. Cite this article:
To investigate psychosocial and biomedical outcomes following
total hip replacement (THR) and to identify predictors of recovery
from THR. Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) on the waiting list for primary
THR in North West England were assessed pre-operatively and at six
and 12 months post-operatively to investigate psychosocial and biomedical
outcomes. Psychosocial outcomes were anxiety and depression, social
support and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Biomedical outcomes
were pain, physical function and stiffness. The primary outcome
was the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Total Physical Function.
Potential predictors of outcome were age, sex, body mass index,
previous joint replacement, involvement in the decision for THR,
any comorbidities, any complications, type of medication, and pre-operative
ENRICHD Social Support Instrument score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression
scores and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index
score.Objectives
Methods
