header advert
You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to through either of these
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Get Access locked padlock

Knee

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

SINGLE- VERSUS DOUBLE-BUNDLE MULTISTRANDED HAMSTRING TENDONS



Download PDF

Abstract

A total of 108 patients with unilateral instability of the knee, associated with rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament, was prospectively randomised for arthroscopic single- or double-bundle reconstruction of the ligament using hamstring tendons. The same postoperative rehabilitation protocol was used for all. The patients were followed up for a mean of 32 months (24 to 36). We measured the anterior laxity and joint position sense at different angles of flexion of the knee to determine whether both bundles in the double-bundle reconstruction contributed to the stability of the joint and proprioception.

No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to anterior laxity measured by the KT-2000 arthrometer with the knee at 20° or 70° flexion nor with regard to proprioception. A notchplasty was required less often in the double- compared with the single-bundle reconstruction.

We did not find any advantage in a double-bundle as opposed to a single-bundle reconstruction in terms of stability or proprioception.


Correspondence should be sent to Dr N. Adachi.

For access options please click here